Trial of a Medical and Mental Health Unit for Older People
NCT ID: NCT01136148
Last Updated: 2015-12-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
600 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-07-31
2012-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators will count the total days spent at home and measure patient participants' health status after 3 months, and use of resources over six months. Carer strain and quality of life will be measured at baseline and follow up.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. To evaluate whether a specialist multidisciplinary MMHU for older people with 'confusion', admitted to a general hospital as an emergency, is associated with better outcomes than standard care.
2. To study the quality of care on the MMHU compared with standard care
3. To perform a health economic analysis, from the perspective of health and social care.
The principal hypotheses being tested are:
* That care on the MMHU is associated with more days spent at home (in the 3 months after recruitment) than care on standard wards
* That care on the MMHU is associated with better health status measured at 3 months, in terms of quality of life, behavioural disturbance, cognitive function, disability, participation, mortality and care home residence.
* That care on the MMHU is associated with better psychological well being amongst carers and reduced carer strain compared with standard care.
* That the quality of care and patient experience for patients on the MMHU is superior to that on standard care wards.
* That care on the MMHU is cost-effective compared with that on standard care wards.
The setting for the study is a large NHS acute teaching hospital organisation with 2 campuses (Queens Medical Centre and City Hospital), comprising 1800 beds, serving a population of 700 000 for general hospital services.
Sample size is determined by available resources. 240 patients randomised to the MMHU unit over 24 months, and an equal number of controls, should be sufficient to measure, with 80% power, a 3 to 6-day reduction in length of stay, and 15% increase in the proportion of participants discharged home (e.g. 50% to 65%). Power will be greater for scaled outcomes, and the 'days at home' outcome.
The main study will run for up to 24 months from July 2010. Follow up will be 3 months after randomisation.
Prior to trial commencement we will run 1 or 2 short pilot studies, during which we will test the recruitment and ward allocation processes.
The study is designed to be robust, despite being constrained by the operational needs of the clinical service, and both service and research capacity.
The NHS Trust clinical service has agreed that, for the duration of the study, allocation to the MMHU will be by randomisation. This is not part of the research, but represents clinical service support for it. Potential participants will be identified by the Acute Medical Unit, on simple criteria (''confused', over 65'). The MMHU will confirm clinical eligibility and complete a screening log. If there is a bed available on MMHU the patient will be randomised using an internet based randomisation system (with stratification on care home residence), and the patient assigned to MMHU or a standard care ward. Non-randomised patients can be referred, and, if appropriate, randomised, later in their hospital stay.
Research eligible patients and carers will be invited to participate in research, once on their allocated ward. Consent and participation will be for data collection, observation of care, and follow up only. Excluded patients will continue on their allocated ward outside the trial.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A Medical and Mental Health Unit
A specialist unit for cognitively impaired older patients admitted as a medical emergency to the acute hospital.
A medical and mental health unit
A specialist medical and mental health unit with both physician and psychiatric medical and nursing staff, and mental health experienced therapists. Emphasis will be on early and accurate diagnosis, multidisciplinary management, rigorous communication and goal setting, discharge planning and interface with community services.
Standard care wards
The standard care provided by the acute hospital for cognitively impaired older patients admitted as a medical emergency.
A medical and mental health unit
A specialist medical and mental health unit with both physician and psychiatric medical and nursing staff, and mental health experienced therapists. Emphasis will be on early and accurate diagnosis, multidisciplinary management, rigorous communication and goal setting, discharge planning and interface with community services.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
A medical and mental health unit
A specialist medical and mental health unit with both physician and psychiatric medical and nursing staff, and mental health experienced therapists. Emphasis will be on early and accurate diagnosis, multidisciplinary management, rigorous communication and goal setting, discharge planning and interface with community services.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Carer participants will be a family member or carer, in regular contact with the patient participant, to serve both as an informant, and, and to study carer health and outcomes.
* Confusion will be loosely defined, including working diagnoses of:
* Delirium
* Dementia
* Dementia with a suspicion of super-added delirium
Exclusion Criteria
* Those with intoxication to illicit drugs or alcohol, or the immediate care of patients with overdose
* Those with a primary psychiatric problem in the absence of suspected significant physical or functional co-morbidity.
* Those who are severely medically ill, requiring intensive monitoring or therapy (critical care), or sub-specialist medical intervention (e.g. severe acute GI bleeding, respiratory support).
* Those with an overriding clinical need for management in another service e.g. stroke, orthogeriatric, renal, oncology.
* Those with personality disorder, depression or anxiety as the primary psychiatric diagnosis.
* Those who are registered with a non - Nottingham Primary Care Trust General Practitioner.
* Those who do not speak English and have no family translator.
65 Years
120 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom
OTHER_GOV
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
OTHER
University of Nottingham
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John R Gladman
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Nottingham
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tanajewski L, Franklin M, Gkountouras G, Berdunov V, Harwood RH, Goldberg SE, Bradshaw LE, Gladman JR, Elliott RA. Economic Evaluation of a General Hospital Unit for Older People with Delirium and Dementia (TEAM Randomised Controlled Trial). PLoS One. 2015 Dec 18;10(12):e0140662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140662. eCollection 2015.
Goldberg SE, Whittamore KH, Pollock K, Harwood RH, Gladman JR. Caring for cognitively impaired older patients in the general hospital: a qualitative analysis of similarities and differences between a specialist Medical and Mental Health Unit and standard care wards. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Oct;51(10):1332-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.02.002. Epub 2014 Feb 15.
Goldberg SE, Bradshaw LE, Kearney FC, Russell C, Whittamore KH, Foster PE, Mamza J, Gladman JR, Jones RG, Lewis SA, Porock D, Harwood RH; Medical Crises in Older People Study Group. Care in specialist medical and mental health unit compared with standard care for older people with cognitive impairment admitted to general hospital: randomised controlled trial (NIHR TEAM trial). BMJ. 2013 Jul 2;347:f4132. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f4132.
Harwood RH, Goldberg SE, Whittamore KH, Russell C, Gladman JR, Jones RG, Porock D, Lewis SA, Bradshaw LE, Elliot RA; Medical Crises in Older People Study Group (MCOP). Evaluation of a Medical and Mental Health Unit compared with standard care for older people whose emergency admission to an acute general hospital is complicated by concurrent 'confusion': a controlled clinical trial. Acronym: TEAM: Trial of an Elderly Acute care Medical and mental health unit. Trials. 2011 May 13;12:123. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-123.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RP-PG-0407-10147
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
10004
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id