Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Efficacy of Lansoprazole in Patients With Reflux Disease (NCT NCT01135368)
NCT ID: NCT01135368
Last Updated: 2012-09-03
Results Overview
Heartburn symptoms were assessed by the Investigator at Baseline and the Week 8 visit. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in symptom intensity (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Week 8 (depicted in the rows) for all patients.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
506 participants
Baseline and Week 8
2012-09-03
Participant Flow
Participants took part in the study at 38 investigative sites in Germany from 18 June 2002 to 24 September 2008.
Participants with a historical diagnosis of Gastro Esophageal Reflux disease (GERD) received treatment with Lansoprazole at the usual dosage.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Lansoprazole
Lansoprazole 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
Depending on response, dosage could then be decreased to 15 mg, once daily, or increased to 30 mg, twice daily for up to 4 years and 10 months.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
506
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
255
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
251
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Safety and Efficacy of Lansoprazole in Patients With Reflux Disease
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Lansoprazole
n=506 Participants
Lansoprazole 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
Depending on response, dosage could then be decreased to 15 mg, once daily, or increased to 30 mg, twice daily for up to 4 years and 10 months.
|
|---|---|
|
Age Continuous
|
53.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
218 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
288 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
|
502 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Oriental
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Height
|
171.1 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
82.2 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
28.09 kg/cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.15 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Diagnosis of Reflux Disease
First diagnosis
|
150 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Diagnosis of Reflux Disease
Recurrence
|
356 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8Population: Intent to treat population, including all patients who received at least one dose of study medication and had a subsequent rating of the primary efficacy variable.
Heartburn symptoms were assessed by the Investigator at Baseline and the Week 8 visit. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in symptom intensity (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Week 8 (depicted in the rows) for all patients.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=69 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=156 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
n=257 Participants
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Heartburn
Week 8 Symptoms: None
|
—
|
59 participants
|
117 participants
|
186 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Heartburn
Week 8 Symptoms: Mild
|
—
|
7 participants
|
27 participants
|
43 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Heartburn
Week 8 Symptoms: Moderate
|
—
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
12 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Heartburn
Week 8 Symptoms: Severe
|
—
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Heartburn
Week 8 Missing data
|
—
|
3 participants
|
8 participants
|
14 participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8Population: Intent to treat population, including all patients who received at least one dose of study medication and had a subsequent rating of the primary efficacy variable.
Acid regurgitation symptoms were assessed by the Investigator at Baseline and the Week 8 visit. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in symptom intensity (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Week 8 (depicted in the rows) for all patients.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=66 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=136 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=166 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
n=114 Participants
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid Regurgitation
Week 8 Symptoms: None
|
58 participants
|
113 participants
|
125 participants
|
81 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid Regurgitation
Week 8 Symptoms: Mild
|
4 participants
|
19 participants
|
28 participants
|
22 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid Regurgitation
Week 8 Symptoms: Moderate
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
3 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid Regurgitation
Week 8 Symptoms: Severe
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid Regurgitation
Week 8 Missing data
|
3 participants
|
4 participants
|
10 participants
|
8 participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8Population: Intent to treat population, including all patients who received at least one dose of study medication and had a subsequent rating of the primary efficacy variable.
Difficulty swallowing symptoms were assessed by the Investigator at Baseline and the Week 8 visit. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in symptom intensity (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Week 8 (depicted in the rows) for all patients.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=316 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=102 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=45 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
n=19 Participants
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty Swallowing
Week 8 Symptoms: None
|
293 participants
|
89 participants
|
33 participants
|
13 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty Swallowing
Week 8 Symptoms: Mild
|
7 participants
|
9 participants
|
5 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty Swallowing
Week 8 Symptoms: Moderate
|
3 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty Swallowing
Week 8 Symptoms: Severe
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty Swallowing
Week 8 Missing data
|
13 participants
|
4 participants
|
5 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8Population: Intent to treat population, including all patients who received at least one dose of study medication and had a subsequent rating of the primary efficacy variable.
Pain in the upper abdomen symptoms were assessed by the Investigator at Baseline and the Week 8 visit. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in symptom intensity (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Week 8 (depicted in the rows) for all patients.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=139 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=155 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=120 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
n=68 Participants
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper Abdomen
Week 8 Symptoms: None
|
124 participants
|
125 participants
|
86 participants
|
44 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper Abdomen
Week 8 Symptoms: Mild
|
9 participants
|
19 participants
|
21 participants
|
10 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper Abdomen
Week 8 Symptoms: Moderate
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
2 participants
|
8 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper Abdomen
Week 8 Symptoms: Severe
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
3 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper Abdomen
Week 8 Missing data
|
6 participants
|
7 participants
|
10 participants
|
3 participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8Population: Intent to treat population, including all patients who received at least one dose of study medication and had a subsequent rating of the primary efficacy variable.
Nausea and vomiting symptoms were assessed by the Investigator at Baseline and the Week 8 visit. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in symptom intensity (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Week 8 (depicted in the rows) for all patients.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=330 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=98 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=36 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
n=18 Participants
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & Vomiting
Week 8 Symptoms: None
|
303 participants
|
78 participants
|
25 participants
|
13 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & Vomiting
Week 8 Symptoms: Mild
|
10 participants
|
9 participants
|
9 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & Vomiting
Week 8 Symptoms: Moderate
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & Vomiting
Week 8 Symptoms: Severe
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & Vomiting
Week 8 Missing data
|
15 participants
|
10 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8Population: Intent to treat population, including all patients who received at least one dose of study medication and had a subsequent rating of the primary efficacy variable.
Cough and sore throat symptoms were assessed by the Investigator at Baseline and the Week 8 visit. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in symptom intensity (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Week 8 (depicted in the rows) for all patients.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=343 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=81 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=35 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
n=23 Participants
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore Throat
Week 8 Symptoms: None
|
305 participants
|
71 participants
|
24 participants
|
14 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore Throat
Week 8 Symptoms: Mild
|
16 participants
|
4 participants
|
7 participants
|
6 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore Throat
Week 8 Symptoms: Moderate
|
3 participants
|
3 participants
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore Throat
Week 8 Symptoms: Severe
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore Throat
Week 8 Missing data
|
19 participants
|
3 participants
|
4 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8Population: Intent to treat population, including all patients who received at least one dose of study medication and had a subsequent rating of the primary efficacy variable.
Los Angeles Classification is used to grade the extension of changes in the oesophagus induced by reflux disease (Grade 0: normal aspect of mucosa; Grade A: ≥1 mucosal breaks no longer than 5 mm; Grade B: ≥1 mucosal breaks \>5 mm long; Grade C: mucosal breaks extending between tops of two or more mucosal folds but are \<75% of the circumference; Grade D: mucosal breaks ≥75% of the circumference). Healed defined as anything less than Grade A criteria. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in Los Angeles classification between Baseline (table columns) and Week 8 (table rows).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=168 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=149 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=118 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
n=39 Participants
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
n=8 Participants
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by Endoscopy
Week 8: Grade B
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
3 participants
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by Endoscopy
Week 8: Grade 0
|
38 participants
|
97 participants
|
79 participants
|
17 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by Endoscopy
Week 8: Grade A
|
0 participants
|
17 participants
|
19 participants
|
6 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by Endoscopy
Week 8: Grade C
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by Endoscopy
Week 8: No data
|
130 participants
|
35 participants
|
17 participants
|
14 participants
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, including all participants who received any study medication. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
Enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells were evaluated and classified by histopathological examinations as Normal, Simple (diffuse) hyperplasia, or Linear, chain producing hyperplasia. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in ECL-cell classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows) for all patients.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=446 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=13 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=1 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
n=46 Participants
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Enterochromaffin-like Cell Hyperplasia
Year 5: Linear hyperplasia
|
13 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Enterochromaffin-like Cell Hyperplasia
Year 5: No data
|
108 participants
|
3 participants
|
0 participants
|
14 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Enterochromaffin-like Cell Hyperplasia
Year 5: Normal
|
315 participants
|
8 participants
|
1 participants
|
26 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Enterochromaffin-like Cell Hyperplasia
Year 5: Simple hyperplasia
|
10 participants
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, including all participants who received any study medication. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
Atrophy was assessed by histopathological examination of cells biopsied from the antrum and classified according to the Sydney classification as mild, moderate, severe or none. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in atrophy classification (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=408 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=57 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=7 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
n=1 Participants
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
n=33 Participants
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Antrum Atrophy
Year 5: Mild atrophy
|
7 participants
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline in Antrum Atrophy
Year 5: Moderate atrophy
|
4 participants
|
5 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline in Antrum Atrophy
Year 5: Severe atrophy
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline in Antrum Atrophy
Year 5: No data
|
91 participants
|
28 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
7 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline in Antrum Atrophy
Year 5: No atrophy
|
306 participants
|
23 participants
|
4 participants
|
1 participants
|
23 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, including all participants who received any study medication. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
Atrophy was assessed by histopathological examination of cells biopsied from the corpus and classified according to the Sydney classification as mild, moderate, severe or none. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in atrophy classification (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=451 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=23 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=2 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
n=30 Participants
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Corpus Atrophy
Year 5: No atrophy
|
330 participants
|
12 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
17 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corpus Atrophy
Year 5: Mild atrophy
|
9 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corpus Atrophy
Year 5: Moderate atrophy
|
7 participants
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corpus Atrophy
Year 5: Severe atrophy
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corpus Atrophy
Year 5: No data
|
105 participants
|
8 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
11 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, including all participants who received any study medication. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
Chronic inflammation of the antrum was assessed by histopathology and graded according to the Sydney classification: 0 = None; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = Severe
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=506 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Antrum Chronic Inflammation Score
Baseline (n=473)
|
0.8 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Antrum Chronic Inflammation Score
Change from Baseline (n=353)
|
-0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, including all participants who received any study medication. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
Chronic inflammation of the corpus was assessed by histopathology and graded according to the Sydney classification: 0 = None; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = Severe.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=506 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Corpus Chronic Inflammation Score
Baseline (n=476)
|
0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corpus Chronic Inflammation Score
Change from Baseline (n=363)
|
-0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, including all participants who received any study medication. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
Intestinal metaplasia was assessed by biopsy and histopathological examination of the antrum and classified according to the Sydney classification as mild, moderate, severe or none. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in intestinal metaplasia classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=438 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=28 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=7 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
n=33 Participants
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal Metaplasia
Year 5: None
|
319 participants
|
13 participants
|
4 participants
|
—
|
23 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal Metaplasia
Year 5: Mild
|
6 participants
|
2 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
2 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal Metaplasia
Year 5: Moderate
|
5 participants
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal Metaplasia
Year 5: Severe
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal Metaplasia
Year 5: No data
|
108 participants
|
12 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
7 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, including all participants who received any study medication. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
Intestinal metaplasia was assessed by biopsy and histopathological examination of the corpus and classified according to the Sydney classification as mild, moderate, severe or none. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in intestinal metaplasia classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=472 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=4 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
n=30 Participants
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Corpus Intestinal Metaplasia
Year 5: None
|
359 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
18 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corpus Intestinal Metaplasia
Year 5: Mild
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corpus Intestinal Metaplasia
Year 5: Moderate
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corpus Intestinal Metaplasia
Year 5: Severe
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corpus Intestinal Metaplasia
Year 5: No data
|
112 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
11 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, including all male participants who received any study medication. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The change between testosterone measured at year 5 in males including final visit and Testosterone measured at baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=285 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Analysis - Testosterone
Change from Baseline (n=214)
|
0.16 µg/L
Standard Deviation 1.275
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Analysis - Testosterone
Baseline (n=285)
|
4.57 µg/L
Standard Deviation 1.566
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, including all male participants who received any study medication. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The change between luteinizing hormone measured at year 5 in males including final visit and luteinizing hormone measured at baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=286 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Analysis - Luteinizing Hormone
Baseline (n=286)
|
4.73 IU/L
Standard Deviation 3.183
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Analysis - Luteinizing Hormone
Change from Baseline (n=214)
|
0.71 IU/L
Standard Deviation 3.101
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5.Population: Safety analysis set, including all male participants who received any study medication. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The change between follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) measured at year 5 in males including final visit and follicle stimulating hormone measured at baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=286 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Analysis - Follicle Stimulating Hormone
Baseline (n=286)
|
7.62 IU/L
Standard Deviation 7.864
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Analysis - Follicle Stimulating Hormone
Change from Baseline (n=214)
|
0.39 IU/L
Standard Deviation 4.714
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
Visual Acuity was measured using the Snellen eye chart at a distance of 6 meters. Acuity is expressed as a ratio of the test distance (6 M) / the distance the average eye can see the letters on a certain line of the eye chart. Visual acuity of 1 is normal; an individual with acuity of 0.5 could only recognize an object at half the distance compared to an individual with normal acuity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=506 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ophthalmologic Examination - Visual Acuity
Right Eye: Acuity at Baseline (n=443)
|
0.927 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.174
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Ophthalmologic Examination - Visual Acuity
Right Eye: Acuity at Year 5 (n=376)
|
0.904 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.186
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Ophthalmologic Examination - Visual Acuity
Left Eye: Acuity at Baseline (n=447)
|
0.919 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.181
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Ophthalmologic Examination - Visual Acuity
Left Eye: Acuity at Year 5 (n=379)
|
0.894 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.205
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
Adaptation is the ability of the eye to adjust to various levels of darkness and light. Normal and pathological status of adaptation without glare was defined as follows: * Normal status: Contrast between 1:0.05 and 1:23.5. * Pathological status: Contrast = 0 or contrast \> 1:23.5. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in the classification of adaptation without glare between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=93 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=7 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=30 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
n=376 Participants
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation Without Glare
Year 5: Missing data
|
62 participants
|
1 participants
|
4 participants
|
73 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation Without Glare
Year 5: Decreased due to age
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation Without Glare
Year 5: Pathological
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
10 participants
|
14 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation Without Glare
Year 5: Normal
|
30 participants
|
2 participants
|
16 participants
|
288 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
Adaptation is the ability of the eye to adjust to various levels of darkness and light. Normal and pathological status of adaptation with glare was defined as follows: * Normal status: Contrast between 1:0.05 and 1:23.5. * Pathological status: Contrast = 0 or contrast \> 1:23.5. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in the classification of adaptation with glare between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=118 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=8 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=52 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
n=328 Participants
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation With Glare
Year 5: Missing data
|
75 participants
|
2 participants
|
12 participants
|
58 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation With Glare
Year 5: Decreased due to age
|
2 participants
|
4 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation With Glare
Year 5: Pathological
|
8 participants
|
0 participants
|
16 participants
|
18 participants
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation With Glare
Year 5: Normal
|
33 participants
|
2 participants
|
24 participants
|
251 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
Accommodation is the adjustment of the focal length of the eye lens to keep an object in focus on the retina as its distance from the eye varies, and is measured in diopters: Diopters = 1/(focal length).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=506 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Accommodation
Right Eye: Baseline (n=424)
|
2.877 diopters
Standard Deviation 2.884
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Accommodation
Right Eye: Change from Baseline (n=348)
|
-0.090 diopters
Standard Deviation 2.634
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Accommodation
Left Eye: Baseline (n=426)
|
2.835 diopters
Standard Deviation 2.831
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Accommodation
Left Eye: Change from Baseline (n=349)
|
-0.073 diopters
Standard Deviation 2.585
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
Color vision was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and classified as normal or pathological. Pathological findings include abnormal color vision tests, color blindness and anomalous quotient. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in color vision classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=58 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=406 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=42 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Color Vision
Year 5: No data
|
46 participants
|
76 participants
|
5 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Color Vision
Year 5: Normal
|
12 participants
|
320 participants
|
10 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Color Vision
Year 5: Pathological
|
0 participants
|
10 participants
|
27 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The cornea of the right eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as cataracts, corneal degeneration, opacity, scars or deposits. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in corneal classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=57 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=425 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=24 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Right Eye
Year 5: No data
|
46 participants
|
78 participants
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Right Eye
Year 5: Normal
|
11 participants
|
343 participants
|
5 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Right Eye
Year 5: Pathological
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
16 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The cornea of the left eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as cataracts, corneal degeneration, opacity, scars or deposits. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in corneal classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=57 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=429 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=20 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Left Eye
Year 5: No data
|
46 participants
|
77 participants
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Left Eye
Year 5: Normal
|
11 participants
|
348 participants
|
5 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Left Eye
Year 5: Pathological
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
11 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The lens of the right eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as cataracts, lenticular opacities, vacuoles or pseudophakia. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in lens classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=57 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=293 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=156 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Right Eye
Year 5: No data
|
46 participants
|
56 participants
|
25 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Right Eye
Year 5: Normal
|
8 participants
|
193 participants
|
7 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Right Eye
Year 5: Pathological
|
3 participants
|
44 participants
|
124 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The lens of the left eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as cataracts, lenticular opacities, vacuoles or pseudophakia. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in lens classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=57 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=292 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=157 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Left Eye
Year 5: No data
|
46 participants
|
56 participants
|
25 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Left Eye
Year 5: Normal
|
6 participants
|
193 participants
|
8 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Left Eye
Year 5: Pathological
|
5 participants
|
43 participants
|
124 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The vitreous body of the right eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as myodesopsia, vitreous opacities, degeneration, detachment or prolapse. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in vitreous body classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=57 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=422 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=27 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Right Eye
Year 5: No data
|
46 participants
|
73 participants
|
8 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Right Eye
Year 5: Normal
|
11 participants
|
338 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Right Eye
Year 5: Pathological
|
0 participants
|
11 participants
|
17 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The vitreous body of the left eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as myodesopsia, vitreous opacities, degeneration, detachment or prolapse. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in vitreous body classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=59 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=421 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=26 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Left Eye
Year 5: No data
|
47 participants
|
73 participants
|
7 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Left Eye
Year 5: Normal
|
12 participants
|
341 participants
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Left Eye
Year 5: Pathological
|
0 participants
|
7 participants
|
16 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The retinal aspect of the right eye (such as color anomalies) was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as deep red ocular fundus, fundus myopicus, retinal disorders, exudates or pigmentation. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in retinal aspect classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=59 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=438 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=9 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Right Eye
Year 5: No data
|
48 participants
|
80 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Right Eye
Year 5: Normal
|
11 participants
|
356 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Right Eye
Year 5: Pathological
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
8 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The retinal aspect of the left eye (such as color anomalies) was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as deep red ocular fundus, fundus myopicus, retinal disorders, exudates or pigmentation. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in retinal aspect classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=57 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=442 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=7 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Left Eye
Year 5: No data
|
46 participants
|
80 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Left Eye
Year 5: Normal
|
11 participants
|
361 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Left Eye
Year 5: Pathological
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
5 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The optic nerve and papilla of the right eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as optic nerve cupping, optic nerve cup/disc ratio, or glaucomatous optic disc atrophy. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in optic nerve/papilla classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=59 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=422 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=25 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Right Eye
Year 5: No data
|
48 participants
|
76 participants
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Right Eye
Year 5: Normal
|
11 participants
|
337 participants
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Right Eye
Year 5: Pathological
|
0 participants
|
9 participants
|
17 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The optic nerve and papilla of the left eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as optic nerve cupping, optic nerve cup/disc ratio, or glaucomatous optic disc atrophy. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in optic nerve/papilla classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=57 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=422 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=27 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Left Eye
Year 5: No data
|
46 participants
|
75 participants
|
6 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Left Eye
Year 5: Normal
|
11 participants
|
339 participants
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Left Eye
Year 5: Pathological
|
0 participants
|
8 participants
|
17 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The retinal blood vessels of the right eye were assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as retinal vascular disorder, retinopathy, and retinal hemorrhage. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in retinal blood vessel classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=59 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=369 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=78 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Right Eye
Year 5: No data
|
48 participants
|
68 participants
|
12 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Right Eye
Year 5: Normal
|
7 participants
|
279 participants
|
6 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Right Eye
Year 5: Pathological
|
4 participants
|
22 participants
|
60 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The retinal blood vessels of the left eye were assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as retinal vascular disorder, retinopathy, and retinal hemorrhage. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in retinal blood vessel classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=57 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=369 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=80 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Left Eye
Year 5: Pathological
|
4 participants
|
23 participants
|
60 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Left Eye
Year 5: No data
|
46 participants
|
68 participants
|
13 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Left Eye
Year 5: Normal
|
7 participants
|
278 participants
|
7 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The macula lutea of the right eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as maculopathy, retinal pigmentation, macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, retinal hemorrhage or aneurysm. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in macula lutea classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=60 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=412 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=34 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Right Eye
Year 5: No data
|
49 participants
|
75 participants
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Right Eye
Year 5: Normal
|
10 participants
|
317 participants
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Right Eye
Year 5: Pathological
|
1 participants
|
20 participants
|
27 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Year 5Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The macula lutea of the left eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as maculopathy, retinal pigmentation, macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, retinal hemorrhage or aneurysm. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in macula lutea classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
None
n=57 Participants
Participants with no symptoms at Baseline.
|
Mild
n=418 Participants
Participants with mild symptoms at Baseline.
|
Moderate
n=31 Participants
Participants with moderate symptoms at Baseline.
|
Severe
Participants with severe symptoms at Baseline.
|
Grade D
Participants with Grade D (mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the oesophageal circumference) at Baseline.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Left Eye
Year 5: No data
|
46 participants
|
77 participants
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Left Eye
Year 5: Normal
|
10 participants
|
323 participants
|
5 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Left Eye
Year 5: Pathological
|
1 participants
|
18 participants
|
22 participants
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Lansoprazole
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Lansoprazole
n=506 participants at risk
Lansoprazole 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
Depending on response, dosage could then be decreased to 15 mg, once daily, or increased to 30 mg, twice daily for up to 4 years and 10 months.
|
|---|---|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Subclavian artery stenosis
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombosis
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Vascular pseudoaneurysm
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Biliary colic
|
0.40%
2/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Jaundice cholestatic
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchopneumonia
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Neuroborreliosis
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Papilloma viral infection
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Oesophageal carcinoma
|
0.40%
2/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Rectal cancer
|
0.40%
2/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Uterine leiomyoma
|
0.40%
2/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Astrocytoma
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bladder cancer recurrent
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer female
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Gastrointestinal stromal tumour
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Hepatic neoplasm
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Hypopharyngeal cancer
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastatic bronchial carcinoma
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Nasopharyngeal cancer
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Ovarian cancer
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Renal oncocytoma
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Seminoma
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Uterine cancer
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.79%
4/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carpal tunnel syndrome
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Restless leg syndrome
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Brain stem infarction
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carotid sinus syndrome
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebellar infarction
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral haemorrhage
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paresis cranial nerve
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
0.79%
4/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.59%
3/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Aortic valve stenosis
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrioventricular block complete
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pleuropericarditis
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colonic polyp
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Crohn's disease
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematochezia
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal haemorrhage
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectocele
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament rupture
|
0.40%
2/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Concussion
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Excoriation
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Facial bones fracture
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hand fracture
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Humerus fracture
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lower limb fracture
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Meniscus lesion
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural haematoma
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radius fracture
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.59%
3/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
|
0.40%
2/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Lumbar spinal stenosis
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.79%
4/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety disorder
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Completed suicide
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Generalised anxiety disorder
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Panic attack
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Panic disorder
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Varicose vein
|
0.40%
2/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Vulval abscess
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.40%
2/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Haemoptysis
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hyperventilation
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Sudden hearing loss
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo positional
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Impaired healing
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Sudden death
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Benign prostatic hyperplasia
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Menorrhagia
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Prostatitis
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Incontinence
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal colic
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Eye disorders
Diplopia
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Toe operation
|
0.20%
1/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Lansoprazole
n=506 participants at risk
Lansoprazole 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
Depending on response, dosage could then be decreased to 15 mg, once daily, or increased to 30 mg, twice daily for up to 4 years and 10 months.
|
|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
9.1%
46/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
5.9%
30/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
5.7%
29/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
5.5%
28/506 • Starting with the first administration of study medication for up to 14 days after last dose of study medication.
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
Additional Information
Sr. VP, Clinical Science
Takeda Global Research and Development Center, Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The first study related publication will be a multi-center publication submitted within 24 months after conclusion or termination of a study at all sites. After such multi site publication, all proposed site publications and presentations will be submitted to sponsor for review 60 days in advance of publication. Site will remove Sponsor confidential information unrelated to study results. Sponsor can delay a proposed publication for another 60 days to preserve intellectual property.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER