Neural Mechanisms of the Contextual Interference Effect: A fNIRs and EEG Study
NCT ID: NCT01134978
Last Updated: 2011-11-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-11-30
2011-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Practice Schedules
Subjects are randomly assigned to either a blocked or random practice schedule when learning three 3-D computer mazes. A blocked practice schedule is created when the tasks to be learned are presented in a predictable order, while a random practice schedule has tasks presented in a nonsequential, unpredictable order. Neural activity and behavioral measures will differ for the two practice schedules. For memory and transfer, it is predicted that random practice will be better than blocked practice.
Practice Order
Blocked order - predictable
Random order - unpredictable
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Practice Order
Blocked order - predictable
Random order - unpredictable
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* vision correctable to 20/20
* right-handed
* English is first language or learned English before age of 5 years
Exclusion Criteria
* pregnant
* have latex or tape adhesives allergies
* self-exclude if:
* had a history of seizures, head injury or neurological dysfunction
* history or diagnosis of depression, schizophrenia or social phobia
* previous admission to alcohol/drug treatment program or diagnosis of alcohol/drug abuse
* take medications know to affect neurological function.
18 Years
55 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pennsylvania Department of Health
OTHER_GOV
Drexel University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Drexel University
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Patricia A Shewokis, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Drexel University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cognitive Motor Movement Neuroscience Lab (CoMMoNS) - rm 3612 NCB, Drexel University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ayaz H, Shewokis PA, Curtin A, Izzetoglu M, Izzetoglu K, Onaral B. Using MazeSuite and functional near infrared spectroscopy to study learning in spatial navigation. J Vis Exp. 2011 Oct 8;(56):3443. doi: 10.3791/3443.
Shewokis PA, Ayaz H, Izzetoglu M, Bunce S, Gentili RJ, Sela I, Izzetoglu K, Onaral B. Brain in the Loop: Assessing Learning using fNIR in cognitive and motor tasks. D.D. Schmorrow and C.M. Fidopiastis (Eds.).Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 6780: 240-249. 2011. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011.
Shewokis PA, Ayaz H, Izzetoglu K, Izzetoglu M, Bunce SC, Schultheis MT, Pourrezaei K. Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activity during the learning of computer tasks in a contextual interference paradigm using fNIRs: a case series. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology 30: S130. 2008.
Shewokis PA, Ayaz H, Izzetoglu M, Getchell N, Izzetoglu K. the acquisition and learning of computer tasks in a contextual interference paradigm: Using functional near infrared spectroscopy to examine prefrontal cortex activity. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 32: S127-S128. 2010.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
16758
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id