Trial Outcomes & Findings for Somatostatin Analogue SOM230 (Pasireotide) in Healthy Male Volunteers (NCT NCT01128192)
NCT ID: NCT01128192
Last Updated: 2014-12-25
Results Overview
Change from Day 2 and Day 9 of insulin basal levels (2-step hyperglycemic clamp test with arginine stimulation)
COMPLETED
PHASE2
45 participants
-30 min and -15 min on Day 2 and Day 9
2014-12-25
Participant Flow
Participants were healthy men aged 18-50 years with a body mass index (BMI) ≤25 kg/m2 who came to the VA San Diego Healthcare System Metabolic Research medical clinic. Recruitment occurred between August of 2009 until March 2010.
Participants were excluded if they had a family history of diabetes or a baseline diagnosis of impaired glucose tolerance.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Pasireotide 600 μg sc Bid
19 healthy male volunteers were randomized to receive Pasireotide 600 μg (n=19). All participants completed the study.
|
Pasireotide 900 μg sc Bid
19 healthy male volunteers were randomized to receive Pasireotide 900 μg (n=19). All participants completed the study.
|
Pasireotide 1200 μg sc Bid
7 healthy male volunteers were randomized to receive Pasireotide 1200 μg (n=7). This arm was used in safety analysis only.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
19
|
19
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
19
|
19
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Somatostatin Analogue SOM230 (Pasireotide) in Healthy Male Volunteers
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Pasireotide 600 μg sc Bid
n=19 Participants
Pasireotide 600 μg sc bid n=19
|
Pasireotide 900 μg sc Bid
n=19 Participants
Pasireotide 900 μg sc bid n=19
|
Total
n=38 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
24.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6 • n=5 Participants
|
24.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1 • n=7 Participants
|
24.45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index BMI (kg/m2)
|
23.30 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.61 • n=5 Participants
|
23.68 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.04 • n=7 Participants
|
23.49 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.85 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Weight (kg)
|
75.67 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.11 • n=5 Participants
|
74.49 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.41 • n=7 Participants
|
75.08 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.26 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: -30 min and -15 min on Day 2 and Day 9Change from Day 2 and Day 9 of insulin basal levels (2-step hyperglycemic clamp test with arginine stimulation)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pasireotide 600 µg sc Bid
n=19 Participants
Pasireotide 600 µg was injected subcutaneously twice daily from Day 3-10. Baseline OGTT was conducted on Day 1 (pre-treatment) and a post-treatment OGTT was conducted on Day 8.
|
Pasireotide 900 µg sc Bid
n=19 Participants
Pasireotide 900 µg was injected subcutaneously twice daily from Day 3-10. Baseline OGTT was conducted on Day 1 (pre-treatment) and a post-treatment OGTT was conducted on Day 8.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Insulin Basal Level
|
-24.37 pmol/L
Standard Deviation 10.42
|
-29.60 pmol/L
Standard Deviation 16.05
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-10 mins, 10-180 mins, 0-180 mins (Day 2 and Day 9)Blood samples were taken at -30 min, -15 min, 0 min, 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 60 min, 75 min, 90 min, 105 min, 120 min, 135 min, 150 min, 165 min, 180 min to assess the plasma insulin levels during Hyperglycemic Clamp (2-step hyperglycemic clamp test with arginine stimulation). The mean change in plasma insulin levels from Day 2 to Day 9 were calculated as Values on Day 9 - Values on Day 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pasireotide 600 µg sc Bid
n=19 Participants
Pasireotide 600 µg was injected subcutaneously twice daily from Day 3-10. Baseline OGTT was conducted on Day 1 (pre-treatment) and a post-treatment OGTT was conducted on Day 8.
|
Pasireotide 900 µg sc Bid
n=19 Participants
Pasireotide 900 µg was injected subcutaneously twice daily from Day 3-10. Baseline OGTT was conducted on Day 1 (pre-treatment) and a post-treatment OGTT was conducted on Day 8.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Plasma Insulin Level 0-10mins, 10-180mins, 0-180mins During Hyperglycemic Clamp
AUC 0-10 min
|
-28.07 h*pmol/L
Standard Deviation 19.15
|
-27.95 h*pmol/L
Standard Deviation 18.56
|
|
Change in Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Plasma Insulin Level 0-10mins, 10-180mins, 0-180mins During Hyperglycemic Clamp
AUC 10-180 min
|
-1450.59 h*pmol/L
Standard Deviation 1237.44
|
-1474.65 h*pmol/L
Standard Deviation 1009.00
|
|
Change in Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Plasma Insulin Level 0-10mins, 10-180mins, 0-180mins During Hyperglycemic Clamp
AUC 0-180 min
|
-1478.65 h*pmol/L
Standard Deviation 1254.66
|
-1502.60 h*pmol/L
Standard Deviation 1022.33
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 3 and Day 10Change from Day 3 and Day 10 of Basal EGP (Hyperinsulinemic-Euglycemic Clamp)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pasireotide 600 µg sc Bid
n=19 Participants
Pasireotide 600 µg was injected subcutaneously twice daily from Day 3-10. Baseline OGTT was conducted on Day 1 (pre-treatment) and a post-treatment OGTT was conducted on Day 8.
|
Pasireotide 900 µg sc Bid
n=19 Participants
Pasireotide 900 µg was injected subcutaneously twice daily from Day 3-10. Baseline OGTT was conducted on Day 1 (pre-treatment) and a post-treatment OGTT was conducted on Day 8.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Basal Endogenous Glucose Production (EGP)
|
-0.041 mg/kg/min
Standard Deviation 0.342
|
0.112 mg/kg/min
Standard Deviation 0.308
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 3 and Day 10Change from Day 3 and Day 10 of low dose % EGP Inhibition (Hyperinsulinemic-Euglycemic Clamp)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pasireotide 600 µg sc Bid
n=19 Participants
Pasireotide 600 µg was injected subcutaneously twice daily from Day 3-10. Baseline OGTT was conducted on Day 1 (pre-treatment) and a post-treatment OGTT was conducted on Day 8.
|
Pasireotide 900 µg sc Bid
n=19 Participants
Pasireotide 900 µg was injected subcutaneously twice daily from Day 3-10. Baseline OGTT was conducted on Day 1 (pre-treatment) and a post-treatment OGTT was conducted on Day 8.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Low Dose % Endogenous Glucose Production (EGP) Inhibition
|
-7.54 percentage of EGP Inhibition
Standard Deviation 23.47
|
-6.28 percentage of EGP Inhibition
Standard Deviation 16.31
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 3 and Day 10Change from Day 3 and Day 10 of high dose % EGP Inhibition (Hyperinsulinemic-Euglycemic Clamp)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pasireotide 600 µg sc Bid
n=19 Participants
Pasireotide 600 µg was injected subcutaneously twice daily from Day 3-10. Baseline OGTT was conducted on Day 1 (pre-treatment) and a post-treatment OGTT was conducted on Day 8.
|
Pasireotide 900 µg sc Bid
n=19 Participants
Pasireotide 900 µg was injected subcutaneously twice daily from Day 3-10. Baseline OGTT was conducted on Day 1 (pre-treatment) and a post-treatment OGTT was conducted on Day 8.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in High Dose % Endogenous Glucose Production (EGP) Inhibition
|
-2.06 percentage of EGP inhibition
Standard Deviation 15.65
|
0.00 percentage of EGP inhibition
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 3 and Day 10Change from Day 3 and Day 10 in Low-Dose Glucose Disposal Rate (GDR) during Hyperinsulinemic-Euglycemic Clamp.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pasireotide 600 µg sc Bid
n=19 Participants
Pasireotide 600 µg was injected subcutaneously twice daily from Day 3-10. Baseline OGTT was conducted on Day 1 (pre-treatment) and a post-treatment OGTT was conducted on Day 8.
|
Pasireotide 900 µg sc Bid
n=19 Participants
Pasireotide 900 µg was injected subcutaneously twice daily from Day 3-10. Baseline OGTT was conducted on Day 1 (pre-treatment) and a post-treatment OGTT was conducted on Day 8.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Low-Dose Glucose Disposal Rate (GDR)
|
-0.029 mg/kg/min
Standard Deviation 2.230
|
0.791 mg/kg/min
Standard Deviation 2.144
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 3 and Day 10Change from Day 3 and Day 10 in High-Dose Glucose Disposal Rate (GDR) during Hyperinsulinemic-Euglycemic Clamp.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pasireotide 600 µg sc Bid
n=19 Participants
Pasireotide 600 µg was injected subcutaneously twice daily from Day 3-10. Baseline OGTT was conducted on Day 1 (pre-treatment) and a post-treatment OGTT was conducted on Day 8.
|
Pasireotide 900 µg sc Bid
n=19 Participants
Pasireotide 900 µg was injected subcutaneously twice daily from Day 3-10. Baseline OGTT was conducted on Day 1 (pre-treatment) and a post-treatment OGTT was conducted on Day 8.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in High-Dose Glucose Disposal Rate (GDR)
|
0.004 mg/kg/min
Standard Deviation 2.051
|
-0.027 mg/kg/min
Standard Deviation 2.099
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: -30 minutes on Day 1 and -30 minutes on Day 8An Oral Glucose Tolerance Test was performed at Day 1 (baseline) and Day 8 (post-treatment). Samples were taken at -30 min to assess the fasting plasma glucose level. The mean change in fasting plasma glucose level from Day 1 to Day 8 was assessed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pasireotide 600 µg sc Bid
n=19 Participants
Pasireotide 600 µg was injected subcutaneously twice daily from Day 3-10. Baseline OGTT was conducted on Day 1 (pre-treatment) and a post-treatment OGTT was conducted on Day 8.
|
Pasireotide 900 µg sc Bid
n=18 Participants
Pasireotide 900 µg was injected subcutaneously twice daily from Day 3-10. Baseline OGTT was conducted on Day 1 (pre-treatment) and a post-treatment OGTT was conducted on Day 8.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose Level
|
-0.10 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.36
|
0.12 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-30 mins, 30-180 mins, 0-180 mins (Day 1 and Day 8)Blood samples were taken at -30 min, 0 min, 30 min, 60 min, 90 min, 120 min, 150 min, 180 min to assess the plasma glucose level. The mean change in plasma glucose level from Day 1 to Day 8 were calculated as Values on Day 8 - Values on Day 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pasireotide 600 µg sc Bid
n=19 Participants
Pasireotide 600 µg was injected subcutaneously twice daily from Day 3-10. Baseline OGTT was conducted on Day 1 (pre-treatment) and a post-treatment OGTT was conducted on Day 8.
|
Pasireotide 900 µg sc Bid
n=18 Participants
Pasireotide 900 µg was injected subcutaneously twice daily from Day 3-10. Baseline OGTT was conducted on Day 1 (pre-treatment) and a post-treatment OGTT was conducted on Day 8.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Plasma Glucose 0-30mins, 30-180mins, 0-180mins During Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)
AUC 0-30 min
|
-0.43 h*mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
-0.86 h*mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.45
|
|
Change in Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Plasma Glucose 0-30mins, 30-180mins, 0-180mins During Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)
AUC 30-180 min
|
14.72 h*mmol/L
Standard Deviation 4.23
|
12.35 h*mmol/L
Standard Deviation 4.25
|
|
Change in Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Plasma Glucose 0-30mins, 30-180mins, 0-180mins During Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)
AUC 0-180 min
|
14.29 h*mmol/L
Standard Deviation 4.02
|
11.49 h*mmol/L
Standard Deviation 4.49
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: -30 minutes on Day 1 and -30 minutes on Day 8An Oral Glucose Tolerance Test was performed at Day 1 (baseline) and Day 8 (post-treatment). Samples were taken at -30 min to assess the fasting plasma insulin level. The mean change in fasting plasma insulin level from Day 1 to Day 8 was assessed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pasireotide 600 µg sc Bid
n=19 Participants
Pasireotide 600 µg was injected subcutaneously twice daily from Day 3-10. Baseline OGTT was conducted on Day 1 (pre-treatment) and a post-treatment OGTT was conducted on Day 8.
|
Pasireotide 900 µg sc Bid
n=18 Participants
Pasireotide 900 µg was injected subcutaneously twice daily from Day 3-10. Baseline OGTT was conducted on Day 1 (pre-treatment) and a post-treatment OGTT was conducted on Day 8.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change Fasting Plasma Insulin Level
|
-6.62 pmol/L
Standard Deviation 11.17
|
-11.69 pmol/L
Standard Deviation 10.96
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-30 mins, 30-180 mins, 0-180 mins (Day 1 and Day 8)Blood samples were taken at -30 min, 0 min, 30 min, 60 min, 90 min, 120 min, 150 min, 180 min to assess the plasma insulin level. The mean change in plasma insulin level from Day 1 to Day 8 were calculated as Values on Day 8 - Values on Day 1
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pasireotide 600 µg sc Bid
n=19 Participants
Pasireotide 600 µg was injected subcutaneously twice daily from Day 3-10. Baseline OGTT was conducted on Day 1 (pre-treatment) and a post-treatment OGTT was conducted on Day 8.
|
Pasireotide 900 µg sc Bid
n=18 Participants
Pasireotide 900 µg was injected subcutaneously twice daily from Day 3-10. Baseline OGTT was conducted on Day 1 (pre-treatment) and a post-treatment OGTT was conducted on Day 8.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Plasma Insulin 0-30mins, 30-180mins, 0-180mins During Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)
AUC 0-30 min
|
-104.18 h*pmol/L
Standard Deviation 90.60
|
-100.90 h*pmol/L
Standard Deviation 68.99
|
|
Change in Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Plasma Insulin 0-30mins, 30-180mins, 0-180mins During Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)
AUC 30-180 min
|
-184.96 h*pmol/L
Standard Deviation 126.57
|
-262.15 h*pmol/L
Standard Deviation 158.58
|
|
Change in Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Plasma Insulin 0-30mins, 30-180mins, 0-180mins During Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)
AUC 0-180 min
|
-289.14 h*pmol/L
Standard Deviation 162.54
|
-363.06 h*pmol/L
Standard Deviation 191.58
|
Adverse Events
Pasireotide 600 μg sc Bid
Pasireotide 900 μg sc Bid
Pasireotide 1200 μg sc Bid
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Pasireotide 600 μg sc Bid
n=19 participants at risk
Forty-five healthy male volunteers were randomized to receive pasireotide 600 μg (n=19), 900 μg (n=19) or 1200 μg (n=7) sc bid. All participants completed the study. Due to an increased severity of gastrointestinal AEs in the 1200 μg bid arm, randomization to this dose was discontinued after seven participants had completed the 7 days of treatment. These participants were included in the safety analyses only.
|
Pasireotide 900 μg sc Bid
n=19 participants at risk
Forty-five healthy male volunteers were randomized to receive pasireotide 600 μg (n=19), 900 μg (n=19) or 1200 μg (n=7) sc bid. All participants completed the study. Due to an increased severity of gastrointestinal AEs in the 1200 μg bid arm, randomization to this dose was discontinued after seven participants had completed the 7 days of treatment. These participants were included in the safety analyses only.
|
Pasireotide 1200 μg sc Bid
n=7 participants at risk
Forty-five healthy male volunteers were randomized to receive pasireotide 600 μg (n=19), 900 μg (n=19) or 1200 μg (n=7) sc bid. All participants completed the study. Due to an increased severity of gastrointestinal AEs in the 1200 μg bid arm, randomization to this dose was discontinued after seven participants had completed the 7 days of treatment. These participants were included in the safety analyses only.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
52.6%
10/19 • Number of events 10 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
52.6%
10/19 • Number of events 10 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
71.4%
5/7 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Cramping
|
31.6%
6/19 • Number of events 6 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
47.4%
9/19 • Number of events 9 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
57.1%
4/7 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Loose Stools (soft stools)
|
26.3%
5/19 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
68.4%
13/19 • Number of events 13 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
28.6%
2/7 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Burning Sensation
|
21.1%
4/19 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
10.5%
2/19 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
15.8%
3/19 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
21.1%
4/19 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
15.8%
3/19 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting/emesis
|
10.5%
2/19 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
15.8%
3/19 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
42.9%
3/7 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gas (Flatulence)
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
21.1%
4/19 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Injection site redness
|
10.5%
2/19 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
10.5%
2/19 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Injection site stinging
|
10.5%
2/19 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
10.5%
2/19 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper respiratory infection (common cold)
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
15.8%
3/19 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Frequent Stools
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
General disorders
Impacted wisdom tooth
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Light colored stool
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pressure in gut
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomach ache
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomach cramps
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomach fullness
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Heartburn
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Injection site bruise
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
General disorders
Sleepiness
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
General disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
General disorders
Histamine-like reaction
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
General disorders
Sweating
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
General disorders
Vasovagal reaction while voiding
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
10.5%
2/19 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Infiltration, left ACFf
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events (AE) were collected in real time as reported by each study subject. The study Investigators' reviewed and evaluated each individually reported Adverse Event within one week of reporting (if not immediately upon report).
The investigator provided a listing of each subject's AEs. The individual AEs that occurred in each subject were then identified using the Investigator's term and AE frequency was summarized by dose group and adverse event.
|
Additional Information
Principal Investigator
Veterans Medical Research Foundation
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place