Study of the Effect of Iodized Oil Supplementation During Infancy

NCT ID: NCT01126125

Last Updated: 2012-11-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

241 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-05-31

Study Completion Date

2012-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In iodine-deficient countries or regions that have inadequate iodized salt distribution, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends choosing one of two methods to improve iodine intakes in breastfeeding infants: 1) iodine supplement (400 mg as iodized oil; 1/year) to the breastfeeding mother, or 2) iodine supplement (100 mg as iodized oil; 1/year) directly to the infant. However, the relative efficacy of these two methods of providing iodine to the newborn has never been directly compared. Whether the first method of iodine supplementation to the breast feeding mother can significantly improve iodine supply and maintain normal thyroid function in her infant remains unclear. This study will directly compare these two strategies. The hypothesis is that the two strategies will be equally effective in providing iodine to the newborn.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In iodine-deficient countries or regions that have inadequate iodized salt distribution, WHO recommends choosing one of two methods to improve iodine intakes in breastfeeding infants:

Method 1) iodine supplement (400 mg as iodized oil; 1/year) to the breastfeeding mother Method 2) iodine supplement (100 mg as iodized oil; 1/year) directly to the infant

However, the relative efficacy of these two methods of providing iodine to the newborn has never been directly compared. Whether the first method of iodine supplementation to the breast feeding mother can significantly improve iodine supply and maintain normal thyroid function in her infant remains unclear.

The mountains of southern Morocco are areas of iodine deficiency. Although the government has been promoting iodization of salt, there are hundreds of small salt producers in the mountains who do not have the funding or infrastructure to iodize their salt, and thus many rural populations still are consuming non-iodized locally-produced salt. At the study site, a 2009 pilot survey of urinary iodine has found that the population in this region is moderately iodine sufficient.

Thus, according to WHO, breastfeeding women and/or their infants should be provided with oral iodine supplementation. But which of the above supplementation methods is preferable? Controlled studies clearly demonstrate that iodine repletion in moderate-to severely iodine deficient school-age children increases insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-3 concentrations and improves somatic growth (height and weight). But whether supplying adequate iodine to iodine deficient infants improves their somatic growth has not been tested.

Therefore, the study hypotheses are: In Moroccan infants who are breastfeeding, method 2 will be more efficacious than method 1 in:

1. increasing urinary iodine (UI) concentrations
2. improving thyroid function (TSH, TT4)
3. increasing IGF-1, IGFBP-3
4. improving somatic growth (length, weight, head circumference)

The study design will be a double-blind, randomized controlled intervention trial in southern Morocco lasting 1 year. Healthy mother-infant pairs (n=240) who are breastfeeding will be recruited while the infant is \>1 mo of age. They will be divided into two groups as follows:

1\) method 1: mother receives 400 mg of iodine as oral iodized oil + infant receives placebo capsule; or 2) method 2: mother receives placebo capsule + infant receives 100 mg oral iodized oil.

The outcomes will be:

1. length, weight, head circumference
2. IGF-1, IGFBP-3, thyroid functions (TSH, total T4) from a dried blood spot taken from a finger prick in the mothers/heel prick in the infants
3. urinary and breast milk iodine concentrations These samples (blood spot, urine, breastmilk, anthropometry) will be collected during the first year visits of the infant to the local health clinic for routine pediatric vaccinations (at 1, 12, 20 and 40-52 wks).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Iodine Deficiency

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

iodine infant breastfeeding deficiency

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Iodized oil to mother

400 mg iodine as iodized oil to breastfeeding mother

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Iodized oil

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

400 mg of iodine vs 100 mg of iodine as iodized oil

Iodized oil to infant

100 mg of iodine as iodized oil to infant

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Iodized oil

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

400 mg of iodine vs 100 mg of iodine as iodized oil

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Iodized oil

400 mg of iodine vs 100 mg of iodine as iodized oil

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* breastfeeding term infant

Exclusion Criteria

* not breastfeeding
* major medical illnesses
Minimum Eligible Age

4 Weeks

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Swiss Federal Institute of Technology

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prof. Michael B. Zimmermann

Prof

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael B Zimmermann, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Semilila Faculty of Sciences

Marrakesh, Marrakech, Morocco

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Morocco

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bouhouch RR, Bouhouch S, Cherkaoui M, Aboussad A, Stinca S, Haldimann M, Andersson M, Zimmermann MB. Direct iodine supplementation of infants versus supplementation of their breastfeeding mothers: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014 Mar;2(3):197-209. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70155-4. Epub 2013 Nov 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24622750 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SwissFIT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id