Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
16720 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-01-31
2010-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of a Educational Intervention to Improve the Resolution Capacity of Primary Health Care Teams.
NCT00140283
Nurse vs General Practitioner Care for Patients Requesting Same Day Consultations in Primary Care
NCT00461201
Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Virtual Community of Practice
NCT06046326
Advance Care Planning in Primary Care: a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT04867005
Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of a VCoP to Empowerment of Patients With Ischaemic Heart Disease in PHC: Cluster-RCT
NCT03959631
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It is a before after quasi-experimental multi-centre study with no control group. Agreed voluntarily to participate 13 primary care centres, 20 primary care physicians, 17 nurses them having 16.720 reference adult patients. We designed a website where participants can access the internet and consult their doctor/nurse, who will answer within 48 hours at maximum. The intervention will last 6 months.
We believe that the site can be useful by both patient and professional. For some types of patient, the use of the site may increase its accessibility, reduce face to face consultations and improve satisfaction, while the professional makes a more efficient practice.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
eConsulta
Those patients who are offered to use the eConsulta, a web where they can virtually consult with their primary care doctor or nurse.
eConsulta
It is a web specifically designed for the project where elected patients can consult virtually with their primary care physician and within 48 hours have an answer.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
eConsulta
It is a web specifically designed for the project where elected patients can consult virtually with their primary care physician and within 48 hours have an answer.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* having a primary care centre assigned
* to have both physician and nurse participating in the project
* to use the same electronic clinical recording software
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Institut Catala de Salut
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Institut Català de la Salut
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Josep Casajuana
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Institut Català de la Salut
Maria A Casas
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Institut Català de la Salut
Rosa Chumillas
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Institut Català de la Salut
Mireia Fàbregas
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Institut Català de la Salut
Ana I Garaikoetxea
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Institut Català de la Salut
Maria I Garrido
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Institut Català de la Salut
Yolanda Lejardi
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Institut Català de la Salut
María J Martínez
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Institut Català de la Salut
Maria C Piorno
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Institut Català de la Salut
Joan Camús
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Institut Català de la Salut
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
EAP Gòtic
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
EAP Ramón Turró
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
EAP El Clot
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
EAP Sant Martí
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
EAP La Sagrera
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
EAP Montnegre
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
EAP Sant Andreu
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
EAP El Carmel
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
EAP Horta
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
EAP Pare Claret
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
EAP Dr. Carles Ribas
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
EAP Congrés
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
EAP Guinardó Baix
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Spielberg AR. On call and online: sociohistorical, legal, and ethical implications of e-mail for the patient-physician relationship. JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1353-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.15.1353.
Weiss N. E-mail consultation: clinical, financial, legal, and ethical implications. Surg Neurol. 2004 May;61(5):455-9; discussion 459. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2003.09.029.
Leong SL, Gingrich D, Lewis PR, Mauger DT, George JH. Enhancing doctor-patient communication using email: a pilot study. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2005 May-Jun;18(3):180-8. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.18.3.180.
Messikomer CM. "Our options have changed. .. we will not call you back". Communicating with my primary care physician. Perspect Biol Med. 2007 Summer;50(3):435-43. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2007.0035.
Roter DL, Larson S, Sands DZ, Ford DE, Houston T. Can e-mail messages between patients and physicians be patient-centered? Health Commun. 2008;23(1):80-6. doi: 10.1080/10410230701807295.
Kjaer NK, Jepsen KL, Ruwald S, Jepsen NP, Nielsen HH. [E-mail communication in general practice]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2005 Nov 21;167(47):4461-5. Danish.
Kuszler PC. A question of duty: common law legal issues resulting from physician response to unsolicited patient email inquiries. J Med Internet Res. 2000 Jul-Sep;2(3):E17. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2.3.e17. No abstract available.
Bovi AM; Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the American Medical Association. Ethical guidelines for use of electronic mail between patients and physicians. Am J Bioeth. 2003 Summer;3(3):W-IF2. doi: 10.1162/152651603322874771.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
eConsulta
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.