Trial Outcomes & Findings for Trial of Otelixizumab for Adolescents and Adults With Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (Autoimmune): DEFEND-2 (NCT NCT01123083)
NCT ID: NCT01123083
Last Updated: 2017-09-15
Results Overview
C-peptide is a protein that shows how much insulin the body is producing. For 3 days before the mixed meal tolerance test participants were asked to eat a balanced diet. The test was performed only when the finger-stick blood glucose level was above 70 mg per deciliter (mg/dL) and no higher than 200 mg/dL. Mixed meal-stimulated C-peptide AUC was the area under the C-peptide/time curve from time 0 to 120-minutes, calculated using the trapezoidal rule. This AUC was normalized for time interval by dividing it by 120-minutes (the number of minutes over which it was determined), and was adjusted by inclusion of Baseline C-peptide AUC as a covariate in the analysis. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the value at Month 12 from the Baseline value.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
179 participants
Baseline (Day 1) and Month 12
2017-09-15
Participant Flow
This study was conducted across 73 centers in 10 countries (Belgium, Canada, Germany, Denmark, Spain, Finland, United Kingdom, Italy, Sweden, and United States of America) from 17 May 2010 to 09 March 2012.
A total of 179 participants (125 adults and 54 adolescents) were randomized in this study and included in safety and intent-to-treat (ITT) population.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Eligible participants received Placebo matching otelixizumab 3.1 milligrams (mg) as intravenous (IV) infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
Otelixizumab
Eligible participants received otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
61
|
118
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
50
|
103
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
11
|
15
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Eligible participants received Placebo matching otelixizumab 3.1 milligrams (mg) as intravenous (IV) infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
Otelixizumab
Eligible participants received otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Investigator recommendation
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Administrative reasons
|
0
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrew for another reason not covered
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Participant/legal representative request
|
7
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
Trial of Otelixizumab for Adolescents and Adults With Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (Autoimmune): DEFEND-2
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=61 Participants
Eligible participants received Placebo matching otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
Otelixizumab
n=118 Participants
Eligible participants received otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
Total
n=179 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
22.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.22 • n=5 Participants
|
23.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.34 • n=7 Participants
|
23.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.29 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
74 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
68 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
105 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
54 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
111 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
165 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Month 12Population: ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
C-peptide is a protein that shows how much insulin the body is producing. For 3 days before the mixed meal tolerance test participants were asked to eat a balanced diet. The test was performed only when the finger-stick blood glucose level was above 70 mg per deciliter (mg/dL) and no higher than 200 mg/dL. Mixed meal-stimulated C-peptide AUC was the area under the C-peptide/time curve from time 0 to 120-minutes, calculated using the trapezoidal rule. This AUC was normalized for time interval by dividing it by 120-minutes (the number of minutes over which it was determined), and was adjusted by inclusion of Baseline C-peptide AUC as a covariate in the analysis. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the value at Month 12 from the Baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=45 Participants
Eligible participants received Placebo matching otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
Otelixizumab
n=96 Participants
Eligible participants received otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 2 Hour Mixed Meal-stimulated C-peptide Area Under Curve (AUC) (Normalized for 120-minute Time Interval) at Month 12
|
-0.14 nanomoles per liter
Standard Error 0.036
|
-0.23 nanomoles per liter
Standard Error 0.026
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12, Month 6Population: ITT population. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
C-peptide is a protein that shows how much insulin the body is producing. For 3 days before the mixed meal tolerance test participants were asked to eat a balanced diet. The test was performed only when the finger-stick blood glucose level was above 70 mg/dL and no higher than 200 mg/dL. Mixed meal-stimulated C-peptide AUC was the area under the C-peptide/time curve from time 0 to 120-minutes, calculated using the trapezoidal rule. This AUC was normalized for time interval by dividing it by 120-minutes (the number of minutes over which it was determined), and was adjusted by inclusion of Baseline C-peptide AUC as a covariate in the analysis. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post Baseline value from the Baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=61 Participants
Eligible participants received Placebo matching otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
Otelixizumab
n=118 Participants
Eligible participants received otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 2 Hour Mixed Meal-stimulated C-peptide AUC (Normalized for 120-minute Time Interval) at Week 12 and 6 Months
Week 12
|
0.05 nanomoles per liter
Standard Error 0.031
|
-0.05 nanomoles per liter
Standard Error 0.023
|
|
Change From Baseline in 2 Hour Mixed Meal-stimulated C-peptide AUC (Normalized for 120-minute Time Interval) at Week 12 and 6 Months
Month 6
|
-0.04 nanomoles per liter
Standard Error 0.037
|
-0.10 nanomoles per liter
Standard Error 0.027
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12, Month 6, 12, 18Population: ITT population. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
C-peptide is a protein that shows how much insulin the body is producing. For 3 days before the mixed meal tolerance test participants were asked to eat a balanced diet. The test was performed only when the finger-stick blood glucose level was above 70 mg/dL and no higher than 200 mg/dL. Mixed meal-stimulated C-peptide AUC was the area under the C-peptide/time curve from time 0 to 120-minutes, calculated using the trapezoidal rule. This AUC was normalized for time interval by dividing it by 120-minutes (the number of minutes over which it was determined), and was adjusted by inclusion of Baseline C-peptide AUC as a covariate in the analysis. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post Baseline value from the Baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=61 Participants
Eligible participants received Placebo matching otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
Otelixizumab
n=118 Participants
Eligible participants received otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Stimulated C-Peptide Mean AUC at Week 12, Month 6, 12 and 18
Week 12
|
0.0519 nanomoles per liter
Standard Deviation 0.24430
|
-0.0472 nanomoles per liter
Standard Deviation 0.23394
|
|
Change From Baseline in Stimulated C-Peptide Mean AUC at Week 12, Month 6, 12 and 18
Month 6
|
-0.0455 nanomoles per liter
Standard Deviation 0.23802
|
-0.0945 nanomoles per liter
Standard Deviation 0.29151
|
|
Change From Baseline in Stimulated C-Peptide Mean AUC at Week 12, Month 6, 12 and 18
Month 12
|
-0.1236 nanomoles per liter
Standard Deviation 0.24362
|
-0.2331 nanomoles per liter
Standard Deviation 0.30537
|
|
Change From Baseline in Stimulated C-Peptide Mean AUC at Week 12, Month 6, 12 and 18
Month 18
|
-0.4125 nanomoles per liter
Standard Deviation 0.17059
|
0.0502 nanomoles per liter
Standard Deviation 0.25597
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3, 6 and 12Population: ITT population. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
A participant was considered a responder when, at the given time point, the participant had: glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) less than or equal to 6.5 percent and mean daily insulin use less than 0.5 international unit per kilogram per day (IU/kg/day) over 7 consecutive days during the 2 weeks preceding the visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=61 Participants
Eligible participants received Placebo matching otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
Otelixizumab
n=118 Participants
Eligible participants received otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Responder Status
Week 12
|
19 Participants
|
42 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Responder Status
Month 6
|
11 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Responder Status
Month 12
|
10 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Month 3, 6, 12Population: ITT population. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
Mean daily insulin use over 7 consecutive days during the 2 weeks preceding each key visit was calculated as the mean of the values of amount of insulin used per day on each of the 7 consecutive days. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post Baseline value from the Baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=61 Participants
Eligible participants received Placebo matching otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
Otelixizumab
n=118 Participants
Eligible participants received otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Insulin Use Over 7 Consecutive Days During the 2 Weeks Prior to the Assessment
Week 12
|
-0.04 International unit per kilogram (IU/kg)
Standard Error 0.020
|
-0.08 International unit per kilogram (IU/kg)
Standard Error 0.016
|
|
Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Insulin Use Over 7 Consecutive Days During the 2 Weeks Prior to the Assessment
Month 6
|
0.01 International unit per kilogram (IU/kg)
Standard Error 0.027
|
-0.04 International unit per kilogram (IU/kg)
Standard Error 0.021
|
|
Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Insulin Use Over 7 Consecutive Days During the 2 Weeks Prior to the Assessment
Month 12
|
0.01 International unit per kilogram (IU/kg)
Standard Error 0.036
|
0.05 International unit per kilogram (IU/kg)
Standard Error 0.028
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Month 3, 6, 12Population: ITT population. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
HbA1c level was recorded at Baseline, Month 3, 6 and 12. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post Baseline value from the Baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=61 Participants
Eligible participants received Placebo matching otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
Otelixizumab
n=118 Participants
Eligible participants received otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in HbA1c Levels Over 7 Consecutive Days During the 2 Weeks Prior to the Assessment
Month 12
|
-0.61 Percentage of HbA1c
Standard Error 0.188
|
-0.47 Percentage of HbA1c
Standard Error 0.133
|
|
Change From Baseline in HbA1c Levels Over 7 Consecutive Days During the 2 Weeks Prior to the Assessment
Week 12
|
-0.82 Percentage of HbA1c
Standard Error 0.140
|
-1.01 Percentage of HbA1c
Standard Error 0.101
|
|
Change From Baseline in HbA1c Levels Over 7 Consecutive Days During the 2 Weeks Prior to the Assessment
Month 6
|
-0.65 Percentage of HbA1c
Standard Error 0.185
|
-0.65 Percentage of HbA1c
Standard Error 0.134
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Month 12Population: ITT population.
Severe hypoglycemia was considered as an event that required assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. These episodes may be associated with sufficient neuroglycopenia to induce seizure or coma. Plasma glucose measurements may not be available during such an event, but neurological recovery attributable to the restoration of plasma glucose to normal is considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration. Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was considered as an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia are accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration less than or equal to 70 mg/dL and it was collected in (1) eCRF using two forms - for single event and for mutiple events, and (2) the IVRS system. The numbers of participant-reported hypoglycemic events per participant of severe hypoglycemia and documented symptomatic hypoglycemia have been reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=61 Participants
Eligible participants received Placebo matching otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
Otelixizumab
n=118 Participants
Eligible participants received otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Average Number of Severe Hypoglycemic Events and Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemic Events From Baseline to Month 12
Severe hypoglycemia
|
33 Events
|
11 Events
|
|
Average Number of Severe Hypoglycemic Events and Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemic Events From Baseline to Month 12
Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia from IVRS
|
429 Events
|
690 Events
|
|
Average Number of Severe Hypoglycemic Events and Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemic Events From Baseline to Month 12
Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia from eCRF
|
822 Events
|
1300 Events
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Month 12Population: ITT population.
Severe hypoglycemia was considered as an event that required assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. These episodes may be associated with sufficient neuroglycopenia to induce seizure or coma. Plasma glucose measurements may not be available during such an event, but neurological recovery attributable to the restoration of plasma glucose to normal is considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration. Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was considered as an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia are accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration less than or equal to 70 mg/dL and it was collected in (1) eCRF using two forms - for single event and for mutiple events, and (2) the IVRS system. The percentage of participant with incidence of severe hypoglycemia and documented symptomatic hypoglycemia have been reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=61 Participants
Eligible participants received Placebo matching otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
Otelixizumab
n=118 Participants
Eligible participants received otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Severe Hypoglycemic Events and Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemic Events at Month 12
Severe hypoglycemia
|
11.5 Percentage of participants
|
5.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Severe Hypoglycemic Events and Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemic Events at Month 12
Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia from IVRS
|
36.1 Percentage of participants
|
28.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Severe Hypoglycemic Events and Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemic Events at Month 12
Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia from eCRF
|
45.9 Percentage of participants
|
43.2 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 6 and 12Population: ITT population. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
O'Brien mean rank analyses was performed on a two-part composite of the Baseline-adjusted HbA1c level and the Baseline-adjusted mean total daily insulin use per kg body weight in the otelixizumab group compared with the placebo group at Months 6 and 12. Baseline adjustment was used to reduce the potential impact of imbalances in Baseline levels between treatment groups on the treatment comparisons at later time points. For the O'Brien mean rank analysis at a particular time point, adjusted HbA1c values (for both treatment groups together) and adjusted mean daily insulin use values was ranked from smallest to largest. For each participant, the HbA1c and insulin use ranks were added together, producing a composite rank. A treatment comparison test was then performed on the composite ranks. If otelixizumab treatment was effective on this composite endpoint, then the mean of the ranks sum in the otelixizumab group was smaller than the mean of the ranks sum in the placebo group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=61 Participants
Eligible participants received Placebo matching otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
Otelixizumab
n=118 Participants
Eligible participants received otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Composite Rank Sum: HbA1c and Exogenous Insulin Use at 6 and 12 Months
Month 12
|
96 Rank
Standard Deviation 51.2
|
110 Rank
Standard Deviation 55.3
|
|
Composite Rank Sum: HbA1c and Exogenous Insulin Use at 6 and 12 Months
Month 6
|
119 Rank
Standard Deviation 48.4
|
110 Rank
Standard Deviation 49.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 6 and 12Population: ITT population. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
O'Brien analyses was performed on a three-part composite of HbA1c level, C-peptide AUC, and mean daily insulin use in the otelixizumab group compared with the placebo group at Months 6 and 12. The three variables was adjusted for Baseline values. Baseline adjustment was used to reduce the potential impact of imbalances in Baseline levels between treatment groups on the treatment comparisons at later time points. HbA1c and insulin use was ranked from smallest to largest, and C-peptide AUC was ranked from largest to smallest. If otelixizumab treatment was effective on the composite endpoint, then the mean of the ranks sum in the otelixizumab group was smaller than the mean of the ranks sum in the placebo group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=61 Participants
Eligible participants received Placebo matching otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
Otelixizumab
n=118 Participants
Eligible participants received otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Composite Rank Sum: C-Peptide AUC, HbA1c and Exogenous Insulin Use at 6 and 12 Months
Month 6
|
206 Rank
Standard Deviation 48.6
|
186 Rank
Standard Deviation 41.6
|
|
Composite Rank Sum: C-Peptide AUC, HbA1c and Exogenous Insulin Use at 6 and 12 Months
Month 12
|
180 Rank
Standard Deviation 42.5
|
170 Rank
Standard Deviation 46.0
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
Otelixizumab
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=61 participants at risk
Eligible participants received Placebo matching otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
Otelixizumab
n=118 participants at risk
Eligible participants received otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
0.85%
1/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetic ketoacidosis
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
0.85%
1/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
0.85%
1/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
0.85%
1/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
0.85%
1/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Loss of consciousness
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
0.85%
1/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Cytokine release syndrome
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
1.7%
2/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant melanoma in situ
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
0.85%
1/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Thyroid cancer
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
0.85%
1/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Atrial septal defect
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
0.85%
1/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
0.85%
1/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Overdose
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Scoliosis
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
0.85%
1/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Pregnancy induced hypertension
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
0.85%
1/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Major depression
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
0.85%
1/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
0.85%
1/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal ideation
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=61 participants at risk
Eligible participants received Placebo matching otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
Otelixizumab
n=118 participants at risk
Eligible participants received otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
55.7%
34/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
78.0%
92/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
6.6%
4/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
10.2%
12/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
24.6%
15/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
31.4%
37/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
26.2%
16/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
7.6%
9/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
11.5%
7/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
2.5%
3/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
7.6%
9/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis streptococcal
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
5.1%
6/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
5.1%
6/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
26.2%
16/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
32.2%
38/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
3.3%
2/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
16.1%
19/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
8.2%
5/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
9.3%
11/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
9.3%
11/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
5.1%
6/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
18.0%
11/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
23.7%
28/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
3.3%
2/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
17.8%
21/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
4.9%
3/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
13.6%
16/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
6.6%
4/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
3.4%
4/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Infusion site erythema
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
5.1%
6/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
6.6%
4/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
9.3%
11/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
10.2%
12/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
3.3%
2/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
5.9%
7/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
3.3%
2/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
5.9%
7/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
5.1%
6/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
5.1%
6/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
11.5%
7/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
13.6%
16/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
6.6%
4/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
7.6%
9/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
5.9%
7/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
9.8%
6/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
10.2%
12/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathy
|
14.8%
9/61 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
6.8%
8/118 • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
|
Additional Information
GSK Response Center
GlaxoSmithKline
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER