Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparison of Colesevelam Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Powder For Oral Suspension Versus Generic Cholestyramine Through Use of the Bile Acid Sequestrant Acceptability (BASA) Scale (NCT NCT01122108)
NCT ID: NCT01122108
Last Updated: 2010-10-07
Results Overview
The bile acid sequestrant acceptability (BASA) scale has 4 scoring categories: taste, texture, appearance, and mixability. Participants rank each category separately. The best possible score for each category is 5, and the worst possible score for each category is 1.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
42 participants
1 Day
2010-10-07
Participant Flow
Recruitment started in April 2010 and ended in May 2010. Enrollment officially closed on May 24th, 2010. All patient screening and study visits were conducted at L-MARC Research Center's clinic.
Enrolled subjects were required to meet all of the inclusion and none of the exlusion criteria prior to being randomized to a group assignment. Subjects were also required to undergo vital sign obtainment, a brief physical exam, and a medical history review to ensure they were generally healthy.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Colesevelam HCl 3.75g First, Then Cholestyramine 12g
Colesevelam HCl 3.75g once orally in the first intervention and Cholestyramine 12g once orally in the second intervention. Both interventions were given on the same day, 30 minutes apart.
|
Cholestyramine 12g First, Then Colesevelam HCl 3.75
Cholestyramine 12g once orally in the first intervention and Colesevelam 3.75g once orally in the second intervention. Both interventions were given on the same day, 30 minutes apart.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
21
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
21
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Comparison of Colesevelam Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Powder For Oral Suspension Versus Generic Cholestyramine Through Use of the Bile Acid Sequestrant Acceptability (BASA) Scale
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Colesevelam HCl (3.75g) vs Cholestyramine (12g)
n=42 Participants
Although 2 different arms are used in this study, there is only one study group. All subjects received both treatment arms on the same day, just in varying orders. Thus, the participant flow and baseline characteristics are the same for both arms.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
49.98 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.61 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
42 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 DayThe bile acid sequestrant acceptability (BASA) scale has 4 scoring categories: taste, texture, appearance, and mixability. Participants rank each category separately. The best possible score for each category is 5, and the worst possible score for each category is 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Colesevelam HCl (3.75g)
n=42 Participants
Although 2 different arms are used in this study, there is only one study group. All subjects received both treatment arms on the same day, just in varying orders. Thus, the participant flow and baseline characteristics are the same for both arms.
|
Cholestyramine (12g)
n=42 Participants
Although 2 different arms are used in this study, there is only one study group. All subjects received both treatment arms on the same day, just in varying orders. Thus, the participant flow and baseline characteristics are the same for both arms.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Acceptability of Colesevelam HCl Powder for Oral Suspension vs. Generic Cholestyramine Via the Bile Acid Sequestrant Acceptability (BASA) Scale, Based Upon an Anticipated Equivalent Cholesterol Lowering Doses of Each Comparator Drug.
Taste Score
|
3.26 Units on BASA Scale
Standard Deviation .17
|
2.67 Units on BASA Scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
|
Patient Acceptability of Colesevelam HCl Powder for Oral Suspension vs. Generic Cholestyramine Via the Bile Acid Sequestrant Acceptability (BASA) Scale, Based Upon an Anticipated Equivalent Cholesterol Lowering Doses of Each Comparator Drug.
Texture Score
|
2.62 Units on BASA Scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
2.36 Units on BASA Scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
|
Patient Acceptability of Colesevelam HCl Powder for Oral Suspension vs. Generic Cholestyramine Via the Bile Acid Sequestrant Acceptability (BASA) Scale, Based Upon an Anticipated Equivalent Cholesterol Lowering Doses of Each Comparator Drug.
Appearance Score
|
2.69 Units on BASA Scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
3.48 Units on BASA Scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
|
Patient Acceptability of Colesevelam HCl Powder for Oral Suspension vs. Generic Cholestyramine Via the Bile Acid Sequestrant Acceptability (BASA) Scale, Based Upon an Anticipated Equivalent Cholesterol Lowering Doses of Each Comparator Drug.
Mixability Score
|
2.74 Units on BASA Scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
2.6 Units on BASA Scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 1 DayAggregate scores were calculated for both the unweighted and weighted BASA scale scores for both Colesevlam HCL (3.75G) and Cholestyramine (12g). The best possible total BASA score is 20 and the worst possible total BASA score is 4. For the weighted version of the scale, the best possible total score is 60 and the worst possible total score is 4.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Colesevelam HCl (3.75g)
n=42 Participants
Although 2 different arms are used in this study, there is only one study group. All subjects received both treatment arms on the same day, just in varying orders. Thus, the participant flow and baseline characteristics are the same for both arms.
|
Cholestyramine (12g)
n=42 Participants
Although 2 different arms are used in this study, there is only one study group. All subjects received both treatment arms on the same day, just in varying orders. Thus, the participant flow and baseline characteristics are the same for both arms.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Weighted vs. Unweighted Composite BASA Scale Scores
Total BASA Score
|
11.31 Units on a BASA Scale
Standard Deviation 0.40
|
11.10 Units on a BASA Scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
|
Weighted vs. Unweighted Composite BASA Scale Scores
Total Weighted BASA Score
|
27.29 Units on a BASA Scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
26.05 Units on a BASA Scale
Standard Deviation 1.34
|
Adverse Events
Cholestyramine (12g)
Colesevelam HCl (3.75 Grams)
More Than 30 Minutes After Last Beverage
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Cholestyramine (12g)
n=42 participants at risk
Although 2 different arms are used in this study, there is only one study group. All subjects received both treatment arms on the same day, just in varying orders. Thus, the participant flow and baseline characteristics are the same for both arms.
|
Colesevelam HCl (3.75 Grams)
n=42 participants at risk
|
More Than 30 Minutes After Last Beverage
n=42 participants at risk
This group summarizes the adverse events that occurred more than 30 mintures after the last beverage administered, and thus cannot be attributed to one specific bile acid sequestrant.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Belching
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
4.8%
2/42 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Burping
|
2.4%
1/42 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
|
General disorders
Dry Throat
|
2.4%
1/42 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
0.00%
0/32 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
|
General disorders
Headache
|
2.4%
1/42 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mild Indigestion
|
2.4%
1/42 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
4.8%
2/42 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mild Nausea
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Cramps
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
4.8%
2/42 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gas
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
4.8%
2/42 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Increased Urination
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intermittent R Back Thigh Pain
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Moderate Indigestion
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Severe Indigestion
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Moderate Nausea
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomitting
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Bloating
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
0.00%
0/42 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
2.4%
1/42 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent to up to 7 days after the study visit.
Adverse events were assessed in clinic during the study visit and through a follow-up phone call 1-7 days after the study visit.
|
Additional Information
Harold E. Bays, MD
Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center (L-MARC)
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place