Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of an Intravenous Solution of JNJ-39588146 or Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (NCT NCT01120210)
NCT ID: NCT01120210
Last Updated: 2013-07-19
Results Overview
The effect of JNJ-39588146 on cardiac index (CI), a hemodynamic parameter that relates heart performance to the size of the individual measured in liters per minute per square metre (l/min/m2) was evaluated in patients with heart failure (HF). The primary analysis of this study focused on the differences between the treatment groups in terms of Least Squares (LS) mean change from Baseline at each time point; thus, the results provided below consist of the JNJ-39588146 minus placebo differences in LS means (and associated confidence intervals) for change from Baseline in CI at each time point as well as treatment group LS means and Standard Errors.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
62 participants
Baseline up through 3 hours post infusion initiation
2013-07-19
Participant Flow
This study was conducted in 5 countries: Belgium (3 sites), Germany (3 sites), Italy (5 sites), Poland (3 sites), and Romania (3 sites). A total of 62 subjects (16 subjects in the placebo group and 46 subjects in the JNJ-39588146 group) were randomized and treated with the study drug.
Patients had an option to participate in an 18 hour extended infusion sub-study following the initial 3-hour infusion main study with the highest dose. A total of 10 patients (7 patients in the JNJ-39588146 group and 3 patients in the placebo group) participated in the sub-study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo identical in appearance to JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours. Patients had an option to participate in an 18-hour extended infusion sub-study following the initial 3-hour infusion main study with the highest dose.
|
JNJ-39588146
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours. Patients had an option to participate in an 18-hour extended infusion sub-study following the initial 3-hour infusion main study with the highest dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
MAIN INFUSION
STARTED
|
16
|
46
|
|
MAIN INFUSION
COMPLETED
|
15
|
45
|
|
MAIN INFUSION
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
1
|
|
18-HOUR EXTENDED INFUSION SUBSTUDY
STARTED
|
3
|
7
|
|
18-HOUR EXTENDED INFUSION SUBSTUDY
COMPLETED
|
3
|
7
|
|
18-HOUR EXTENDED INFUSION SUBSTUDY
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo identical in appearance to JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours. Patients had an option to participate in an 18-hour extended infusion sub-study following the initial 3-hour infusion main study with the highest dose.
|
JNJ-39588146
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours. Patients had an option to participate in an 18-hour extended infusion sub-study following the initial 3-hour infusion main study with the highest dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
MAIN INFUSION
Adverse Event
|
1
|
0
|
|
MAIN INFUSION
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of an Intravenous Solution of JNJ-39588146 or Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo identical in appearance to JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours. Patients had an option to participate in an 18-hour extended infusion sub-study following the initial 3-hour infusion main study with the highest dose.
|
JNJ-39588146
n=46 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours. Patients had an option to participate in an 18-hour extended infusion sub-study following the initial 3-hour infusion main study with the highest dose.
|
Total
n=62 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
57.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.46 • n=5 Participants
|
56.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.91 • n=7 Participants
|
56.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.25 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Italy
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Poland
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Romania
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
AgeCategorical
<=10 years
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
AgeCategorical
11 - 20 years
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
AgeCategorical
21 - 50 years
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
AgeCategorical
50 - 64 years
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
23 participants
n=7 Participants
|
30 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
AgeCategorical
>=65 years
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up through 3 hours post infusion initiationPopulation: The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population included all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had baseline measurement and at least 1 post-baseline measurement value of at least 1 of the primary endpoints. The efficacy analysis was to be performed using the MITT analysis set.
The effect of JNJ-39588146 on cardiac index (CI), a hemodynamic parameter that relates heart performance to the size of the individual measured in liters per minute per square metre (l/min/m2) was evaluated in patients with heart failure (HF). The primary analysis of this study focused on the differences between the treatment groups in terms of Least Squares (LS) mean change from Baseline at each time point; thus, the results provided below consist of the JNJ-39588146 minus placebo differences in LS means (and associated confidence intervals) for change from Baseline in CI at each time point as well as treatment group LS means and Standard Errors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo identical in appearance to JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours.
|
JNJ-39588146
n=46 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours. Planned doses were 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/min.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Cardiac Index (CI)
2 hour infusion (15 ng/kg/min)
|
-0.15 L/min/m2
Standard Error 0.17
|
0.18 L/min/m2
Standard Error 0.13
|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Cardiac Index (CI)
1 hour infusion (5 ng/kg/min)
|
-0.03 L/min/m2
Standard Error 0.19
|
0.24 L/min/m2
Standard Error 0.14
|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Cardiac Index (CI)
3 hour infusion (30 ng/kg/min)
|
-0.05 L/min/m2
Standard Error 0.23
|
0.52 L/min/m2
Standard Error 0.17
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up through 3 hours post infusion initiationPopulation: The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population included all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had baseline measurement and at least 1 post-baseline measurement value of at least 1 of the primary endpoints. The efficacy analysis was to be performed using the MITT analysis set.
The effect of JNJ-39588146 on pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) was evaluated by administering multiple ascending doses of JNJ-39588146 or placebo over a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion period to patients with heart failure. The primary analysis of this study focused on the differences between the treatment groups in terms of Least Squares (LS) mean change from Baseline at each time point; thus, the results provided below consist of the JNJ-39588146 minus placebo differences in LS means (and associated confidence intervals) for change from baseline in PCWP at each time point as well as treatment group LS means and Standard Errors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo identical in appearance to JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours.
|
JNJ-39588146
n=46 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours. Planned doses were 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/min.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure (PCWP)
1 hour infusion (5 ng/kg/min)
|
-0.75 mmHg
Standard Error 1.43 • Interval -2.312 to 2.131
|
-0.84 mmHg
Standard Error 1.03
|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure (PCWP)
2 hour infusion (15 ng/kg/min)
|
0.15 mmHg
Standard Error 1.81 • Interval -4.164 to 1.464
|
-1.20 mmHg
Standard Error 1.31
|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure (PCWP)
3 hour infusion (30 ng/kg/min)
|
0.05 mmHg
Standard Error 1.97 • Interval -5.639 to 0.483
|
-2.53 mmHg
Standard Error 1.42
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At 1-hour, 2 hours and 3 hours post infusion initiationPopulation: The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population included all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had baseline measurement and at least 1 post-baseline measurement value of at least 1 of the primary endpoints. The efficacy analysis was to be performed using the MITT analysis set.
The primary analysis of this study focused on the differences between the treatment groups in terms of Least Squares (LS) mean change from Baseline at each time point; thus, the results provided below consist of the JNJ-39588146 minus placebo differences in LS means (and associated confidence intervals) for change from Baseline in heart rate (HR) at each time point as well as treatment group LS means and Standard Errors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo identical in appearance to JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours.
|
JNJ-39588146
n=44 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours. Planned doses were 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/min.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Heart Rate (HR)
2 hour infusion (15 ng/kg/min)
|
3.72 beats per minute (bpm)
Standard Error 1.69 • Interval -1.764 to 4.235
|
4.96 beats per minute (bpm)
Standard Error 1.24
|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Heart Rate (HR)
3 hour infusion (30 ng/kg/min)
|
3.07 beats per minute (bpm)
Standard Error 1.81 • Interval -1.046 to 5.372
|
5.23 beats per minute (bpm)
Standard Error 1.32
|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Heart Rate (HR)
1 hour infusion (5 ng/kg/min)
|
3.02 beats per minute (bpm)
Standard Error 1.24 • Interval -2.527 to 1.879
|
2.69 beats per minute (bpm)
Standard Error 0.91
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up through 3 hours post infusion initiationPopulation: The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population included all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had baseline measurement and at least 1 post-baseline measurement value of at least 1 of the primary endpoints. The efficacy analysis was to be performed using the MITT analysis set.
The primary analysis of this study focused on the differences between the treatment groups in terms of Least Squares (LS) mean change from Baseline at each time point; thus, the results provided below consist of the JNJ-39588146 minus placebo differences in LS means (and associated confidence intervals) for change from Baseline in systolic blood pressure (SBP) at each time point as well as treatment group LS means and Standard Errors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo identical in appearance to JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours.
|
JNJ-39588146
n=46 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours. Planned doses were 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/min.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
1 hour infusion (5 ng/kg/min)
|
0.15 mmHg
Standard Error 2.95 • Interval -6.06 to 4.718
|
-0.53 mmHg
Standard Error 2.12
|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
2 hour infusion (15 ng/kg/min)
|
6.94 mmHg
Standard Error 3.17 • Interval -7.781 to 3.801
|
4.94 mmHg
Standard Error 2.28
|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
3 hour infusion (30 ng/kg/min)
|
6.32 mmHg
Standard Error 4.09 • Interval -11.251 to 3.708
|
2.55 mmHg
Standard Error 2.94
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up through 3 hours post infusion initiationPopulation: The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population included all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had baseline measurement and at least 1 post-baseline measurement value of at least 1 of the primary endpoints. The efficacy analysis was to be performed using the MITT analysis set.
The primary analysis of this study focused on the differences between the treatment groups in terms of LS mean change from Baseline at each time point; thus, the results provided below consist of the JNJ-39588146 minus placebo differences in Least Square (LS) means (and associated confidence intervals) for change from Baseline in diastolic blood pressure(DBP) at each time point as well as treatment group LS means and Standard Errors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo identical in appearance to JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours.
|
JNJ-39588146
n=46 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours. Planned doses were 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/min.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
1 hour infusion (5 ng/kg/min)
|
-0.43 mmHg
Standard Error 2.57 • Interval -8.047 to 1.331
|
-3.78 mmHg
Standard Error 1.83
|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
2 hour infusion (15 ng/kg/min)
|
1.83 mmHg
Standard Error 2.70 • Interval -10.482 to -0.622
|
-3.72 mmHg
Standard Error 1.93
|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
3 hour infusion (30 ng/kg/min)
|
3.05 mmHg
Standard Error 2.60 • Interval -11.818 to -2.332
|
-4.03 mmHg
Standard Error 1.86
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up through 3 hours post infusion initiationPopulation: The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population included all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had baseline measurement and at least 1 post-baseline measurement value of at least 1 of the primary endpoints. The efficacy analysis was to be performed using the MITT analysis set.
The primary analysis of this study focused on the differences between the treatment groups in terms of Least Squares (LS) mean change from Baseline at each time point; thus, the results provided below consist of the JNJ-39588146 minus placebo differences in LS means (and associated confidence intervals) for change from Baseline in left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) at the end of the 30 ng/kg/min infusion as well as treatment group LS means and Standard Errors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo identical in appearance to JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours.
|
JNJ-39588146
n=36 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours. Planned doses were 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/min.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of the 30 ng/kg/Min Infusion]) in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
|
-15.51 mL
Standard Error 8.93 • Interval -16.347 to 16.823
|
-15.28 mL
Standard Error 6.36
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up through 3 hours post infusion initiationPopulation: The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population included all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had baseline measurement and at least 1 post-baseline measurement value of at least 1 of the primary endpoints. The efficacy analysis was to be performed using the MITT analysis set.
The primary analysis of this study focused on the differences between the treatment groups in terms of Least Squares (LS) mean change from Baseline at each time point; thus, the results provided below consist of the JNJ-39588146 minus placebo differences in LS means (and associated confidence intervals) for change from Baseline in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) at the end of the 30 ng/kg/min infusion as well as treatment group LS means and Standard Errors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo identical in appearance to JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours.
|
JNJ-39588146
n=36 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours. Planned doses were 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/min.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 30 ng/kg/Min Infusion]) in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
|
-13.91 mL
Standard Error 10.05 • Interval -16.592 to 20.551
|
-11.93 mL
Standard Error 7.11
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up through 3 hours post infusion initiationPopulation: The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population included all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had baseline measurement and at least 1 post-baseline measurement value of at least 1 of the primary endpoints. The efficacy analysis was to be performed using the MITT analysis set.
The primary analysis of this study focused on the differences between the treatment groups in terms of Least Squares (LS) mean change from Baseline at each time point; thus, the results provided below consist of the JNJ-39588146 minus placebo differences in LS means (and associated confidence intervals) for change from Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) at the end of the 30 ng/kg/min infusion as well as treatment group LS means and Standard Errors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo identical in appearance to JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours.
|
JNJ-39588146
n=36 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours. Planned doses were 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/min.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of the 30 ng/kg/Min Infusion]) in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
|
3.61 percentage
Standard Error 1.93 • Interval -3.352 to 3.968
|
3.92 percentage
Standard Error 1.38
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up through 3 hours post infusion initiationPopulation: The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population included all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had baseline measurement and at least 1 post-baseline measurement value of at least 1 of the primary endpoints. The efficacy analysis was to be performed using the MITT analysis set.
The primary analysis of this study focused on the differences between the treatment groups in terms of Least Squares (LS) mean change from Baseline at each time point; thus, the results provided below consist of the JNJ-39588146 minus placebo differences in LS means (and associated confidence intervals) for change from Baseline in Fractional Shortening (FS) at the end of the 30 ng/kg/min infusion as well as treatment group LS means and Standard Errors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=13 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo identical in appearance to JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours.
|
JNJ-39588146
n=33 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours. Planned doses were 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/min.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of the 30 ng/kg/Min Infusion]) in Fractional Shortening (FS)
|
0.22 percentage
Standard Error 1.54 • Interval -1.204 to 3.102
|
1.17 percentage
Standard Error 1.14
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up through 3 hours post infusion initiationPopulation: The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population included all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had baseline measurement and at least 1 post-baseline measurement value of at least 1 of the primary endpoints. The efficacy analysis was to be performed using the MITT analysis set.
The primary analysis of this study focused on the differences between the treatment groups in terms of Least Squares (LS) mean change from Baseline at each time point; thus, the results provided below consist of the JNJ-39588146 minus placebo differences in LS means (and associated confidence intervals) for change from Baseline in Stroke Volume (SV) at the end of the 30 ng/kg/min infusion as well as treatment group LS means and Standard Errors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo identical in appearance to JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours.
|
JNJ-39588146
n=44 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours. Planned doses were 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/min.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Stroke Volume (SV)
3 hour infusion (30 ng/kg/min)
|
-0.62 mL/beat
Standard Error 6.7 • Interval 2.557 to 25.771
|
13.54 mL/beat
Standard Error 4.98
|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Stroke Volume (SV)
1 hour infusion (5 ng/kg/min)
|
-1.34 mL/beat
Standard Error 6.51 • Interval -4.198 to 18.359
|
5.75 mL/beat
Standard Error 4.84
|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Stroke Volume (SV)
2 hour infusion (15 ng/kg/min)
|
-4.33 mL/beat
Standard Error 6.23 • Interval -2.016 to 19.575
|
4.45 mL/beat
Standard Error 4.63
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up through 3 hours post infusion initiationPopulation: The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population included all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had baseline measurement and at least 1 post-baseline measurement value of at least 1 of the primary endpoints. The efficacy analysis was to be performed using the MITT analysis set.
The primary analysis of this study focused on the differences between the treatment groups in terms of Least Squares (LS) mean change from Baseline at each time point; thus, the results provided below consist of the JNJ-39588146 minus placebo differences in LS means (and associated confidence intervals) for change from Baseline in Pulmonary Arterial Systolic Pressure (PASP) at the end of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/min Infusions as well as treatment group LS means and Standard Errors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo identical in appearance to JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours.
|
JNJ-39588146
n=46 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours. Planned doses were 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/min.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Pulmonary Arterial Systolic Pressure (PASP)
1 hour infusion (5 ng/kg/min)
|
2.69 mmHg
Standard Error 2.10 • Interval -5.308 to 2.554
|
1.32 mmHg
Standard Error 1.55
|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Pulmonary Arterial Systolic Pressure (PASP)
2 hour infusion (15 ng/kg/min)
|
0.51 mmHg
Standard Error 2.45 • Interval -5.567 to 3.594
|
-0.48 mmHg
Standard Error 1.80
|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Pulmonary Arterial Systolic Pressure (PASP)
3 hour infusion (30 ng/kg/min)
|
-0.79 mmHg
Standard Error 2.74 • Interval -4.107 to 6.148
|
0.24 mmHg
Standard Error 2.02
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up through 3 hours post infusion initiationPopulation: The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population included all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had baseline measurement and at least 1 post-baseline measurement value of at least 1 of the primary endpoints. The efficacy analysis was to be performed using the MITT analysis set.
The primary analysis of this study focused on the differences between the treatment groups in terms of Least Square (LS) mean change from Baseline at each time point; thus, the results provided below consist of the JNJ-39588146 minus placebo differences in LS means (and associated confidence intervals) for change from Baseline in Pulmonary Arterial Diastolic Pressure (PADP) at the end of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/min Infusions as well as treatment group LS means and Standard Errors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo identical in appearance to JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours.
|
JNJ-39588146
n=46 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours. Planned doses were 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/min.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Pulmonary Arterial Diastolic Pressure (PADP)
1 hour infusion (5 ng/kg/min)
|
-0.99 mmHg
Standard Error 1.57 • Interval -2.197 to 3.558
|
-0.29 mmHg
Standard Error 1.12
|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Pulmonary Arterial Diastolic Pressure (PADP)
2 hour infusion (15 ng/kg/min)
|
-0.83 mmHg
Standard Error 1.91 • Interval -3.851 to 3.153
|
-1.17 mmHg
Standard Error 1.36
|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Pulmonary Arterial Diastolic Pressure (PADP)
3 hour infusion (30 ng/kg/min)
|
-0.72 mmHg
Standard Error 1.85 • Interval -4.138 to 2.669
|
-1.46 mmHg
Standard Error 1.32
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up through 3 hours post infusion initiationPopulation: The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population included all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had baseline measurement and at least 1 post-baseline measurement value of at least 1 of the primary endpoints. The efficacy analysis was to be performed using the MITT analysis set.
The primary analysis of this study focused on the differences between the treatment groups in terms of Least Squares (LS) mean change from Baseline at each time point; thus, the results provided below consist of the JNJ-39588146 minus placebo differences in LS means (and associated confidence intervals) for change from Baseline in Calculated Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR) at the end of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/min Infusions as well as treatment group LS means and Standard Errors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo identical in appearance to JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours.
|
JNJ-39588146
n=45 Participants
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours. Planned doses were 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/min.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Calculated Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR)
1 hour infusion (5 ng/kg/min)
|
67.41 dyn.s.cm-5
Standard Error 147.97 • Interval -529.875 to 1.147
|
-196.95 dyn.s.cm-5
Standard Error 105.33
|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Calculated Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR)
2 hour infusion (15 ng/kg/min)
|
321.97 dyn.s.cm-5
Standard Error 116.73 • Interval -592.781 to -173.867
|
-61.36 dyn.s.cm-5
Standard Error 83.09
|
|
Post-baseline Changes Compared to Placebo (at 1-, 2-, and 3-hours Post Infusion Initiation [ie, at the End of 5, 15 and 30 ng/kg/Min Infusions]) in Calculated Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR)
3 hour infusion (30 ng/kg/min)
|
281.79 dyn.s.cm-5
Standard Error 131.69 • Interval -764.07 to -291.478
|
-245.98 dyn.s.cm-5
Standard Error 93.74
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
JNJ-39588146
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=16 participants at risk
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo identical in appearance to JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours. Patients had an option to participate in an 18-hour extended infusion sub-study following the initial 3-hour infusion main study with the highest dose.
|
JNJ-39588146
n=46 participants at risk
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours. Patients had an option to participate in an 18-hour extended infusion sub-study following the initial 3-hour infusion main study with the highest dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac Failure
|
6.2%
1/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
4.3%
2/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac Arrest
|
0.00%
0/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
2.2%
1/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular Tachycardia
|
6.2%
1/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
0.00%
0/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
2.2%
1/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
|
General disorders
Chest Pain
|
0.00%
0/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
2.2%
1/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
|
General disorders
Device Malfunction
|
6.2%
1/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
0.00%
0/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypovolaemia
|
0.00%
0/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
2.2%
1/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal Impairment
|
0.00%
0/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
2.2%
1/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
2.2%
1/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=16 participants at risk
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo identical in appearance to JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours. Patients had an option to participate in an 18-hour extended infusion sub-study following the initial 3-hour infusion main study with the highest dose.
|
JNJ-39588146
n=46 participants at risk
Patients received 3 consecutive escalating intravenous (IV) infusions of JNJ-39588146. Each dose was planned to be infused over 1 hour for a total planned infusion time in the main study of 3 hours. Patients had an option to participate in an 18-hour extended infusion sub-study following the initial 3-hour infusion main study with the highest dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular Tachycardia
|
6.2%
1/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
4.3%
2/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac Failure
|
6.2%
1/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
2.2%
1/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular Arrhythmia
|
6.2%
1/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
2.2%
1/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular Extrasystoles
|
12.5%
2/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
0.00%
0/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
|
General disorders
Feeling Hot
|
0.00%
0/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
6.5%
3/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
6.2%
1/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
0.00%
0/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
6.2%
1/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
6.5%
3/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
0.00%
0/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
6.5%
3/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
6.2%
1/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
4.3%
2/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Tooth Disorder
|
6.2%
1/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
0.00%
0/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
6.2%
1/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
2.2%
1/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
6.2%
1/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
0.00%
0/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
6.2%
1/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
2.2%
1/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Flushing
|
12.5%
2/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
2.2%
1/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone Pain
|
6.2%
1/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
0.00%
0/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck Pain
|
6.2%
1/16 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
0.00%
0/46 • The number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) and other adverse events reported from the time of the first dose of study drug through the last examination/follow-up visit or 4 weeks after dosing are provided in the table below.
One SAE of Cardiac Failure in the JNJ-39588146 group classified as non-treatment emergent was verified as "treatment-emergent" after database lock. Thus, 3(7%) patients in the JNJ-39588146 group experienced a treatment-emergent SAE of Cardiac Failure and the total number of patients with treatment-emergent SAEs in the JNJ-39588146 group was 6(13%).
|
Additional Information
Senior Director Translational Medicine
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee If an Investigator wishes to publish information from the study, a copy of the manuscript must be provided to the Sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication or presentation. Expedited reviews will be arranged for abstracts, poster presentations, or other materials. If requested by the Sponsor in writing, the Investigator will withhold such publication for up to an additional 60 days to allow for filing of a patent application.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER