Effect of Lidocaine and Esmolol to Improve the Quality of Recovery

NCT ID: NCT01114997

Last Updated: 2016-11-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-04-30

Study Completion Date

2015-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled study is:

To assess the effectiveness of systemic administration of lidocaine and esmolol in combination (vs. either drug alone) will result in improved postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing abdominal surgery (e.g., less pain and postoperative constipation, nausea and vomiting, faster return of bowel function, resumption of normal activities of daily living), leading to a shorten length of hospital stay, maintaining hemodynamic stability during general anesthesia, when administered as intravenous adjuvants

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Finding the optimal combination of anesthetic adjuvant drugs for maintaining hemodynamic stability during surgery is a challenge (1-3). Traditionally, potent opioid analgesics like fentanyl and its newer analogs have been used for this purpose. However, use of opioid compounds is associated with well-known side effects (e.g., ventilatory depression, postoperative nausea and vomiting, constipation, ileus, bladder dysfunction, urinary retention, pruritus, drowsiness and sedation). All of these common side effects interfere with the early recovery process and contribute to a delayed resumption of normal activities (4, 5). Increasingly, non-opioid analgesics (e.g. β-blockers and local anesthetics) are being utilized as adjuvant drugs during surgery for treatment of acute hyperdynamic responses (increased catecholamine release) during surgery, as well as, facilitation of the recovery process after surgery because of their anesthetic and analgesic-sparing effects. The β-blocking drugs, esmolol and labetalol have been used as an alternative to short-acting opioid analgesics for controlling the transient, acute autonomic responses during surgery (5-8), They have been shown to reduce the anesthetic requirement during intravenous (propofol) or volatile-based anesthesia (6,7,10-13) and to decrease opioid consumption intraoperatively and in the PACU (8). They may also improve hemodynamic stability during induction and emergence from anesthesia in the perioperative and early postoperative period and facilitate the resumption of normal activities after major surgical procedures. The anesthetic and analgesic-sparing effects of β -blockers also lead to a faster emergence from anesthesia and reduce postoperative opioid side effects (e.g., PONV) (14-18). Perioperative intravenous esmolol has shown improvement in perioperative outcomes, decreases acute hemodynamic responses, reduces anesthetics and opioids use during anesthesia, facilitates a faster emergence from anesthesia, reduces intraoperative and postoperative opioid requirements, reduces side effects as such as pruritus, constipation, ileus, nausea and vomiting (PONV) and thereby shortens the hospital stay. (3, 7, 13, 18)

Local anesthetics like lidocaine possess analgesic, antihyperalgesic and anti-inflammatory properties. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine has shown improvement in perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing abdominal surgery to decrease intraoperative requirement of Inhalants/Intravenous agents, opioid consumption, postoperative pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting scores, maintain hemodynamic stability, facilitate a more rapid recovery of gastrointestinal function, improve postoperative recovery, fast resumption of normal activities of daily living and shorten length of hospital stay, when administered as an adjuvant during surgery.(19,23-29,33)

Theoretically, it would be extremely beneficial to administer an adjuvant (to patients undergoing abdominal surgery) that is capable of effectively controlling autonomic responses during surgery, while providing a faster recovery with fewer side effects. Preliminary data suggests that the perioperative effects of systemic administration of lidocaine and esmolol is most effective in facilitating bowel recovery, decreasing opioid consumption in the intra/postoperative period, and shorten length of hospital stay with early recovery. Therefore, we designed this prospective, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled study to test the hypothesis that systemic administration of lidocaine and esmolol in combination (vs. either drug alone) for maintenance of hemodynamic stability during surgery will result in improved postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing abdominal surgery (e.g., less pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting, and faster return of bowel function and resumption of normal activities of daily living); leading to a shorten length of hospital stay.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Constipation Nausea Vomiting

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Lidocaine Infusion Esmolol Infusion Anesthetic adjuvant Abdominal surgery Pain management Hemodynamic stability Perioperative outcomes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lidocaine

Pre-Induction: Lidocaine Loading: 1 mg/kg Post- Induction:Lidocaine Infusion: 12.5-25 mcg/kg/min 0.75-1.5 mg/kg/h)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lidocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Pre-Induction: Lidocaine Loading: 1 mg/kg After Induction:Lidocaine Infusion: 12.5-25 mcg/kg/min 0.75-1.5 mg/kg/h)

Esmolol

Pre-Induction: Loading dose 750 mcg/Kg (0.75 mg/kg) Post-Induction: Infusion dose 7.5 - 15 mcg /kg/min

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Esmolol

Intervention Type DRUG

Esmolol Pre-Induction: Loading dose 750 mcg/Kg (0.75 mg/kg) Esmolol Post Induction: Infusion dose 7.5 - 15 mcg /kg/min

Lidocaine + Esmolol (Combo)

Performed with the administration of both drugs.

Pre-induction:

Lidocaine Loading dose(1 mg/kg)+Esmolol Loading dose(750 mcg/Kg)

Post-induction:

Infusion rate: Lidocaine(12.5-25 mcg/kg/min) + Esmolol(7.5-15 mcg/kg/min)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lidocaine + Esmolol (Combo)

Intervention Type DRUG

Pre-induction: Lidocaine Loading dose(1 mg/kg) + Esmolol Loading dose(750 mcg/Kg)

Maintenance Infusion rate after Induction:

Lidocaine(12.5-25 mcg/kg/min) + Esmolol(7.5-15 mcg/kg/min)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lidocaine

Pre-Induction: Lidocaine Loading: 1 mg/kg After Induction:Lidocaine Infusion: 12.5-25 mcg/kg/min 0.75-1.5 mg/kg/h)

Intervention Type DRUG

Esmolol

Esmolol Pre-Induction: Loading dose 750 mcg/Kg (0.75 mg/kg) Esmolol Post Induction: Infusion dose 7.5 - 15 mcg /kg/min

Intervention Type DRUG

Lidocaine + Esmolol (Combo)

Pre-induction: Lidocaine Loading dose(1 mg/kg) + Esmolol Loading dose(750 mcg/Kg)

Maintenance Infusion rate after Induction:

Lidocaine(12.5-25 mcg/kg/min) + Esmolol(7.5-15 mcg/kg/min)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients scheduled to undergo abdominal surgical procedures
* Willingness and ability to sign an informed consent document
* No allergies to anesthetic or analgesic medications
* 18 - 80 years of age
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification: Class I - III adults of either sex
* Women of childbearing potential must be currently practicing an acceptable form of birth control, and have a negative urine or blood pregnancy test
* Patients with systolic blood pressure greater than 80 and less than 150 at baseline, diastolic blood pressure less than 100 at baseline.

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to comprehend the pain assessment tools.
* Patients with known allergy, hypersensitivity or contraindications to anesthetic or analgesic medications
* Patients with clinically-significant medical conditions, such as brain, heart, kidney, endocrine, or liver diseases,
* Peptic ulcer disease or bleeding disorders
* Patients with history of hepatic, renal, cardiac failure, organ transplant, or diabetes
* Patients with reactive airway disease (asthma)
* Patients with seizures
* Chronic use of ß-blocker or calcium channel blocker
* Morbid obesity (body mass index \>40)
* Pregnant or lactating women
* Subjects with a history of alcohol or drug abuse within the past 3 months
* Any other conditions or use of any medication which may interfere with the conduct of the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Roya Yumul, M.D.,PhD.

Residency program director, Department of anesthesiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Roya Yumul, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cedars Sinai Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro00020608

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id