Trial Outcomes & Findings for Satellite™ PEEK Nucleus Replacement Retrospective Analysis (NCT NCT01110967)
NCT ID: NCT01110967
Last Updated: 2016-01-28
Results Overview
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a tool widely used to measure pain. It is a 10 cm scale, 0cm means 'no pain' and 10cm means 'worst possible pain'. The patients mark the location corresponding to the amount of back pain they experienced on the 10cm line.
COMPLETED
40 participants
Up to 12 months follow up visit
2016-01-28
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Patients Implanted With a Satellite Device
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
40
|
|
Overall Study
Surgery
|
40
|
|
Overall Study
1 Month Follow up
|
26
|
|
Overall Study
3 Months Follow up
|
28
|
|
Overall Study
6 Months Follow up
|
24
|
|
Overall Study
12 Months Follow up
|
31
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
31
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
9
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Satellite™ PEEK Nucleus Replacement Retrospective Analysis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Patients Implanted With a Satellite Device
n=40 Participants
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Slovakia
|
8 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Venezuela
|
30 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 12 months follow up visitThe Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a tool widely used to measure pain. It is a 10 cm scale, 0cm means 'no pain' and 10cm means 'worst possible pain'. The patients mark the location corresponding to the amount of back pain they experienced on the 10cm line.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Patients Implanted With a Satellite Device
n=32 Participants
|
|---|---|
|
Health-related Quality of Life Using the Visual Analogue Scale for Back Pain
Back pain pre-operative (n = 32)
|
5.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
|
Health-related Quality of Life Using the Visual Analogue Scale for Back Pain
Back pain at 1 month Follow up (n = 25)
|
2.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
|
Health-related Quality of Life Using the Visual Analogue Scale for Back Pain
Back pain at 3 months Follow up (n = 25)
|
2.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
|
Health-related Quality of Life Using the Visual Analogue Scale for Back Pain
Back pain at 6 months Follow up (n = 18)
|
1.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
|
Health-related Quality of Life Using the Visual Analogue Scale for Back Pain
Back pain at 12 months Follow up (n = 26)
|
1.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 12 months follow up visitThe Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a tool widely used to measure pain. It is a 10 cm scale, 0cm means 'no pain' and 10cm means 'worst possible pain'. The patients mark the location corresponding to the amount of back pain they experienced on the 10cm line.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Patients Implanted With a Satellite Device
n=30 Participants
|
|---|---|
|
Health-related Quality of Life Using the Visual Analogue Scale for Leg Pain
Leg pain pre-operative (n = 30)
|
7.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
|
Health-related Quality of Life Using the Visual Analogue Scale for Leg Pain
Leg pain at 1 month Follow up (n = 25)
|
1.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
|
Health-related Quality of Life Using the Visual Analogue Scale for Leg Pain
Leg pain at 3 months Follow up (n = 25)
|
1.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
|
Health-related Quality of Life Using the Visual Analogue Scale for Leg Pain
Leg pain at 6 months Follow up (n = 18)
|
0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
|
Health-related Quality of Life Using the Visual Analogue Scale for Leg Pain
Leg pain at 12 months Follow up (n = 26)
|
0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 12 months follow up visitThe Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) derives from the Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire, it is used to measure disability for low back pain. The index is scored from 0 to 50; 0 meaning 'no disability' and 50 meaning 'maximum disability'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Patients Implanted With a Satellite Device
n=38 Participants
|
|---|---|
|
Physical Functioning Using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
ODI pre-operative (n = 38)
|
48.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.6
|
|
Physical Functioning Using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
ODI at 1 month Follow up (n = 26)
|
23.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.0
|
|
Physical Functioning Using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
ODI at 3 months Follow up (n = 30)
|
18.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.4
|
|
Physical Functioning Using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
ODI at 6 months Follow up (n = 23)
|
17.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.0
|
|
Physical Functioning Using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
ODI at 12 months Follow up (n = 29)
|
11.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.2
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Patients were followed up according to the local practice, up to 1 yearOutcome measures
| Measure |
Patients Implanted With a Satellite Device
n=40 Participants
|
|---|---|
|
Safety by Evaluating the Number of Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADEs), Adverse Device Effects (ADEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
|
7 events
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 12 months follow up visitThe range of motion (ROM) was calculated as the angle of the segment on the flexion radiograph minus the angle of the segment on the extension radiograph, expressed in degrees (absolute value).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Patients Implanted With a Satellite Device
n=22 Participants
|
|---|---|
|
Range of Motion (ROM) at Implanted Level
ROM pre-operative (n = 22)
|
10.0 degrees
Standard Deviation 7.9
|
|
Range of Motion (ROM) at Implanted Level
ROM at 3 month Follow up (n = 20)
|
14.3 degrees
Standard Deviation 5.8
|
|
Range of Motion (ROM) at Implanted Level
ROM at 6 month Follow up (n = 16)
|
12.1 degrees
Standard Deviation 9.8
|
|
Range of Motion (ROM) at Implanted Level
ROM at 12 month Follow up (n = 16)
|
14.9 degrees
Standard Deviation 6.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 12 months follow up visitThe Intervertebral Disc Space (IVD) was measured as average disc height, calculated as \[(A+B)/2\]/H, where A is the posterior intervertebral disc height, B is the anterior intervertebral disc height and H is the anterior height of upper vertebral body.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Patients Implanted With a Satellite Device
n=35 Participants
|
|---|---|
|
Intervertebral Disc Space (IVD) at Implanted Level
IVD pre-operative (n = 35)
|
0.30 mm
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
|
Intervertebral Disc Space (IVD) at Implanted Level
IVD post-operative (n = 29)
|
0.29 mm
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
|
Intervertebral Disc Space (IVD) at Implanted Level
IVD at 3 months Follow up (n = 21)
|
0.28 mm
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
|
Intervertebral Disc Space (IVD) at Implanted Level
IVD at 6 months Follow up (n = 18)
|
0.26 mm
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
|
Intervertebral Disc Space (IVD) at Implanted Level
IVD at 12 months Follow up (n = 19)
|
0.26 mm
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 12 months follow up visitInterbody Height Ratio (IBHR) is calculated as the total vertical height of the two vertebral bodies directly superior and inferior to the implant divided by the anteroposterior diameter of the superior vertebral body.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Patients Implanted With a Satellite Device
n=34 Participants
|
|---|---|
|
Device Subsidence Measured as Interbody Height Ratio (IBHR)
IBHR at surgery (n = 34)
|
1.9 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.2
|
|
Device Subsidence Measured as Interbody Height Ratio (IBHR)
IBHR at 3 months Follow up (n = 20)
|
1.9 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.2
|
|
Device Subsidence Measured as Interbody Height Ratio (IBHR)
IBHR at 6 months Follow up (n = 18)
|
1.7 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.2
|
|
Device Subsidence Measured as Interbody Height Ratio (IBHR)
IBHR at 12 months Follow up (n = 21)
|
2.0 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 12 months follow up visitOutcome measures
| Measure |
Patients Implanted With a Satellite Device
n=35 Participants
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in Device Placement
|
1 participant
|
Adverse Events
Patients Implanted With a Satellite Device
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Patients Implanted With a Satellite Device
n=40 participants at risk
|
|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Residual Radiculopathy
|
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • Patients were followed up according to the local practice, up to 1 year
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Patients Implanted With a Satellite Device
n=40 participants at risk
|
|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Residual Radiculopathy
|
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • Patients were followed up according to the local practice, up to 1 year
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain and Sciatica
|
7.5%
3/40 • Number of events 3 • Patients were followed up according to the local practice, up to 1 year
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Low back pain
|
5.0%
2/40 • Number of events 2 • Patients were followed up according to the local practice, up to 1 year
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Confidential Information shall not be disclosed and shall be sole property of sponsor during the term of the agreement and for 3 years after agreement termination. Results might be published or presented, however sponsor should receive publication for review at least 7 days prior to submittal. Sponsor shall limit its review to a determination of whether Confidential Information is disclosed, to allow sponsor to protect its rights in copyrightable material, and to check for technical correctness.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER