Study of Usefulness of Genotyping to Predict Docetaxel Exposure and Adverse Events
NCT ID: NCT01110291
Last Updated: 2010-04-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
20 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2003-04-30
2009-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Primary Object:
The primary object of this study is to define, if it is possible to predict the clearance and/ or toxicity of docetaxel by assessing
* activity of CYP3A4 by midazolam test (CYP3A4 phenotype)
* CYP3A5 genotype
* MDR1 genotype
Secondary object:
The secondary object of this study is to define whether the treatment with docetaxel alters the activity of CYP3A4 enzyme in previously untreated breast cancer patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of ABCB1,SLC22A16 Drug Transporter Genes and Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Toxicity in Brest Cancer Patient
NCT04654195
Genetic Expression and Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Docetaxel or Doxorubicin in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
NCT00123929
This Study Investigates the Impact of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Genes Involved in the Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity of Doxorubicin (DOX) in Egyptian Female Patients with Breast Cancer. It Also Aims to Explore the Association of Pretreatment Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio to PCR
NCT06595758
Docetaxel Followed by CEF (Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin and 5-Fluorouracil) Compared to Docetaxel and Capecitabine Followed by CEX (Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin and Capecitabine) as Adjuvant Treatment for Breast Cancer
NCT00114816
Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel-Gemcitabine in Breast Cancer
NCT00191243
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Breast cancer
Twenty patients with verified high risk breast cancer will be included in the study.
docetaxel + CEF
Docetaxel 80 mg/m² of body surface area (BSA) will be given as an i.v. infusion during 60 minutes on day 0 in a 20-day schedule. The cycle is repeated three times.
Three weeks after the last docetaxel regimen, all patients will receive the CEF-combination treatment. In CEF-combination cyclophosphamide will be given 600 mg/m²of BSA as an i.v. infusion during 15 - 30 minutes on day 0 in a 20-day schedule. This is followed by fluorouracil given 600 mg/m² of BSA as an i.v. infusion during 15 - 30 minutes . Epirubicin will be given 60 mg/m² of BSA as an i.v. infusion during 15 - 30 minutes. This combination therapy will be repeated three times.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
docetaxel + CEF
Docetaxel 80 mg/m² of body surface area (BSA) will be given as an i.v. infusion during 60 minutes on day 0 in a 20-day schedule. The cycle is repeated three times.
Three weeks after the last docetaxel regimen, all patients will receive the CEF-combination treatment. In CEF-combination cyclophosphamide will be given 600 mg/m²of BSA as an i.v. infusion during 15 - 30 minutes on day 0 in a 20-day schedule. This is followed by fluorouracil given 600 mg/m² of BSA as an i.v. infusion during 15 - 30 minutes . Epirubicin will be given 60 mg/m² of BSA as an i.v. infusion during 15 - 30 minutes. This combination therapy will be repeated three times.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. The patient has received information on the purpose of the study and the meaning of the treatment, and has given verbal and written consent to participate in the study. The patient is accessible for treatment and follow-up.
2. Histologically verified diagnosis of breast cancer
3. High risk for recurrence ( node positive or node negative if T2 with histological grade 2 or 3, or Pgr negative)
4. No metastases
5. Females, age =\<60
6. No concomitant regular medication which is either substrate, inducer or inhibitor of CYP3A4
Exclusion Criteria
1. Poor performance status,\>=2 according to WHO
2. Inadequate bone marrow reserve defined as:
* hemoglobin \< 100 g/L
* leukocytes \< 3.0 x 10E9/L or neutrophiles \< 1.5 x 10E9/L
* plateless \< 120 x 10E9/L
3. Inadequate liver function defined as:
* ALAT is \> 1.5 x units of normal level
* elevated bilirubin (unless verified Gilbert´s syndrome)
* alkaline phosphatase is \> 2.5 x units of normal level
4. History of concomitant serious physical or psychiatric disease, which makes a regular cytotoxic treatment impossible
5. cardiac insufficience; severe arrhythmia; severe hypertension; cardiac infarction within one year or other active cardiac disease
6. pregnant or lactating patients
7. abuse of alcohol or any narcotic substances
18 Years
60 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sanofi
INDUSTRY
Turku University Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland
OTHER
medbase Oy Ltd
UNKNOWN
University of Turku
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Department of Pharmacology, Drug Development and Therapeutics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Johanna Hilli, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Pharmacology, Drug Development and Therapeutics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
Liisa Sailas, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Department of Oncology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland
Sirkku Jyrkkiö, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
Seppo Pyrhönen, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
Kari Laine, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
medbase Oy Ltd, Turku, Finland
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Turku University Hospital
Turku, , Finland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hilli J, Sailas L, Jyrkkio S, Pyrhonen S, Laine K. NCT01110291: induction of CYP3A activity and lowered exposure to docetaxel in patients with primary breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011 Jun;67(6):1353-62. doi: 10.1007/s00280-010-1426-6. Epub 2010 Aug 27.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
XRP 6976A/6022
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.