A Pilot Study of NSICU Assessment of Seizure Prophylaxis With Lacosamide
NCT ID: NCT01110187
Last Updated: 2014-04-28
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
11 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-05-31
2012-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intravenous Lacosamide Compared With Fosphenytoin in the Treatment of Patients With Frequent Nonconvulsive Seizures
NCT01458522
Seizure Prevention in Traumatic Brain Injury With Levetiracetam and Lacosamide
NCT06866691
The Safety of Intravenous Lacosamide
NCT00832884
IV Lacosamide: The Safety of Intravenous Lacosamide
NCT01981447
Cognitive and Behavioral Effects of Lacosamide
NCT01175954
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. The short- and long-term incidence of adverse events related to the anticonvulsant medication
2. The frequency of clinically-evident and sub-clinical seizures, as demonstrated by continuous EEG monitoring for the first three days and by clinical assessment for up to 6 months after initial admission.
3. Intermediate and long-term outcomes as measured by standard outcome measures including Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale, Disability Rating Scale, and Resource Utilization Questionnaire
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
IV LCM (lacosamide)
Patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) or subarachanoid hemorrhage (SAH) randomized to seizure prophylaxis with either lacosamide.
lacosamide
200 mg IV over 60 minutes; these patients will then be started on a maintenance dose 100 mg, IV BID as prophylaxis administered as per pharmacy protocol consistent with acceptable standards of care for 7 days. The Lacosamide dose can be adjusted as needed if seizures occur for therapeutic effect up to 200 mg bid (400 mg/d) as a maximum dose.
IV fPHT (fos-phenytoin)
Patients with TBI or SAH randomized to seizure prophylaxis with fos-phenytoin
Fosphenytoin
20 mgPE/kg IV over 60 minutes and then will be started on a maintenance dose (5 mgPE/kg/day, rounded to nearest dose of 150 mgPE IV, BID administered as per pharmacy protocol consistent with acceptable standards of care for 7 days
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
lacosamide
200 mg IV over 60 minutes; these patients will then be started on a maintenance dose 100 mg, IV BID as prophylaxis administered as per pharmacy protocol consistent with acceptable standards of care for 7 days. The Lacosamide dose can be adjusted as needed if seizures occur for therapeutic effect up to 200 mg bid (400 mg/d) as a maximum dose.
Fosphenytoin
20 mgPE/kg IV over 60 minutes and then will be started on a maintenance dose (5 mgPE/kg/day, rounded to nearest dose of 150 mgPE IV, BID administered as per pharmacy protocol consistent with acceptable standards of care for 7 days
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* GCS score 3-8 (inclusive) or GCS motor score of 5 or less and abnormal admission CT scan showing intracranial pathology
* Hemodynamically stable with a systolic BP \> 90 mmHg
* At least one reactive pupil
* Age at least 18 years
* Signed informed consent and HIPAA authorization for research form
* Patients will not be excluded because of race, gender, educational status or occupation
Exclusion Criteria
* Spinal cord injury
* History of or CT confirmation of previous brain injury such as brain tumor, cerebral infarct, or spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage
* Hemodynamically unstable
* Suspected anoxic events
* Other peripheral trauma likely to result in liver failure
* Age less than 18 years of age
* Known hypersensitivity to any anticonvulsant
* Any treatment, condition, or injury that contraindicates treatment with Lacosamide (LCM) or fos-phenytoin (fPHT)
* Inability to obtain signed informed consent or HIPAA authorization for research
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
UCB Pharma
INDUSTRY
University of Alabama at Birmingham
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jerzy P Szaflarski
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jerzy P Szaflarski, M.D., PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Univeristy of Cincinnati
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UC Health University Pointe
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
UC Health Medical Arts Building
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
University Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Szaflarski JP, Sangha KS, Lindsell CJ, Shutter LA. Prospective, randomized, single-blinded comparative trial of intravenous levetiracetam versus phenytoin for seizure prophylaxis. Neurocrit Care. 2010 Apr;12(2):165-72. doi: 10.1007/s12028-009-9304-y.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
JPS-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.