A Pilot Study of NSICU Assessment of Seizure Prophylaxis With Lacosamide

NCT ID: NCT01110187

Last Updated: 2014-04-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

11 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-05-31

Study Completion Date

2012-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Trial to determine if seizure prophylaxis with IV LCM in NSICU patients experiencing mental status changes due to severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) will result in improved short- and long-term outcomes and better immediate adverse effects when compared to the current standard of care anticonvulsant (IV fPHT) and will be at least as effective as IV fPHT in preventing clinical and sub-clinical seizure activity.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The goals are to compare IV LCM and IV fPHT for seizure prophylaxis in the neuro-critical care setting in terms of the following outcome measures:

1. The short- and long-term incidence of adverse events related to the anticonvulsant medication
2. The frequency of clinically-evident and sub-clinical seizures, as demonstrated by continuous EEG monitoring for the first three days and by clinical assessment for up to 6 months after initial admission.
3. Intermediate and long-term outcomes as measured by standard outcome measures including Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale, Disability Rating Scale, and Resource Utilization Questionnaire

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Traumatic Brain Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

IV LCM (lacosamide)

Patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) or subarachanoid hemorrhage (SAH) randomized to seizure prophylaxis with either lacosamide.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

lacosamide

Intervention Type DRUG

200 mg IV over 60 minutes; these patients will then be started on a maintenance dose 100 mg, IV BID as prophylaxis administered as per pharmacy protocol consistent with acceptable standards of care for 7 days. The Lacosamide dose can be adjusted as needed if seizures occur for therapeutic effect up to 200 mg bid (400 mg/d) as a maximum dose.

IV fPHT (fos-phenytoin)

Patients with TBI or SAH randomized to seizure prophylaxis with fos-phenytoin

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fosphenytoin

Intervention Type DRUG

20 mgPE/kg IV over 60 minutes and then will be started on a maintenance dose (5 mgPE/kg/day, rounded to nearest dose of 150 mgPE IV, BID administered as per pharmacy protocol consistent with acceptable standards of care for 7 days

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

lacosamide

200 mg IV over 60 minutes; these patients will then be started on a maintenance dose 100 mg, IV BID as prophylaxis administered as per pharmacy protocol consistent with acceptable standards of care for 7 days. The Lacosamide dose can be adjusted as needed if seizures occur for therapeutic effect up to 200 mg bid (400 mg/d) as a maximum dose.

Intervention Type DRUG

Fosphenytoin

20 mgPE/kg IV over 60 minutes and then will be started on a maintenance dose (5 mgPE/kg/day, rounded to nearest dose of 150 mgPE IV, BID administered as per pharmacy protocol consistent with acceptable standards of care for 7 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Vimpat Dilantin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject with traumatic brain injury admitted to the hospital less than 24 hours prior to randomization
* GCS score 3-8 (inclusive) or GCS motor score of 5 or less and abnormal admission CT scan showing intracranial pathology
* Hemodynamically stable with a systolic BP \> 90 mmHg
* At least one reactive pupil
* Age at least 18 years
* Signed informed consent and HIPAA authorization for research form
* Patients will not be excluded because of race, gender, educational status or occupation

Exclusion Criteria

* No venous access
* Spinal cord injury
* History of or CT confirmation of previous brain injury such as brain tumor, cerebral infarct, or spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage
* Hemodynamically unstable
* Suspected anoxic events
* Other peripheral trauma likely to result in liver failure
* Age less than 18 years of age
* Known hypersensitivity to any anticonvulsant
* Any treatment, condition, or injury that contraindicates treatment with Lacosamide (LCM) or fos-phenytoin (fPHT)
* Inability to obtain signed informed consent or HIPAA authorization for research
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

UCB Pharma

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Alabama at Birmingham

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jerzy P Szaflarski

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jerzy P Szaflarski, M.D., PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Univeristy of Cincinnati

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UC Health University Pointe

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

UC Health Medical Arts Building

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

University Hospital

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Szaflarski JP, Sangha KS, Lindsell CJ, Shutter LA. Prospective, randomized, single-blinded comparative trial of intravenous levetiracetam versus phenytoin for seizure prophylaxis. Neurocrit Care. 2010 Apr;12(2):165-72. doi: 10.1007/s12028-009-9304-y.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19898966 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

JPS-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Lacosamide IV and EEG/EKG (LIVE) Study
NCT01724918 TERMINATED PHASE2