Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy, With or Without Cetuximab, Followed by Surgery in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer That Can Be Removed by Surgery

NCT ID: NCT01107639

Last Updated: 2020-10-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

297 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-05-27

Study Completion Date

2018-12-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays and to kill tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as docetaxel and cisplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. It is not yet known whether giving radiation therapy together with chemotherapy is more effective with or without cetuximab in treating patients with esophageal cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying giving radiation therapy together with chemotherapy, with or without cetuximab, followed by surgery in treating patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer that can be removed by surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

* To determine the efficacy of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy comprising docetaxel, cisplatin, and radiotherapy in combination with cetuximab followed by surgery and adjuvant cetuximab versus neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy comprising docetaxel, cisplatin, and radiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma.

Secondary

* To compare the toxicity of the two therapy arms.
* To determine patterns of failure overall and with regard to histology.
* To evaluate economic aspects in a subproject and to perform a radiotherapy quality assurance program.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to center, histology (adenocarcinoma vs squamous cell carcinoma), primary tumor (T2 vs T3-4), and gender (male vs female). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

* Arm A:

* Induction chemotherapy (docetaxel and cisplatin) and concurrent cetuximab Patients receive docetaxel IV over 1 hour and cisplatin IV over 1 hour on day 1 and cetuximab IV over 1-2 hours on day 1, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 2 courses.
* Chemotherapy (docetaxel and cisplatin), cetuximab, and concurrent radiotherapy Beginning in week 7, patients receive cetuximab IV over 1 hour, docetaxel IV over 30 minutes, cisplatin IV over 1 hour on days 43, 50, 57, 64, and 71 and undergo radiotherapy 5 days a week for 5 weeks. Patients then undergo surgery 4-7 weeks after completion of radiotherapy.
* Adjuvant cetuximab Beginning 3-6 weeks after completion of surgery, patients receive cetuximab IV over 1-2 hours once every 2 weeks for a total of 6 doses.
* Arm B: Patients receive induction chemotherapy comprising docetaxel IV and cisplatin IV for 2 courses as in arm A. Beginning in week 7, patients receive docetaxel IV, cisplatin IV, and concurrent radiotherapy for 5 weeks as in arm A. Patients then undergo surgery 4-7 weeks after completion of radiotherapy.

After completion of study therapy, patients are followed up at 1 (arm B) or 6 (arm A) months, every 3 months for 3 years, and then every 6 months for 2 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Adenocarcinoma of the Gastroesophageal Junction Esophageal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Additional immunotherapy (cetuximab)

All patients in the experimental arm will be given additional immunotherapy (cetuximab) during cycles 1 and 2, during RT and after surgery.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

cetuximab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Loading dose 400 mg/m2 2h infusion Weekly: 250 mg/m2 1h infusion

cisplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

* Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 1h infusion d1, 22
* Cisplatin 25 mg/m2 1h infusion weekly x5

docetaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

* Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 1h infusion d1, 22
* Docetaxel 20 mg/m2 1/2h infusion weekly x5

adjuvant therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

During the adjuvant phase, all infusions, given every two weeks, will be at a dose of 500mg/m².

neoadjuvant therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

During the neoadjuvant phase, the first infusion of cetuximab should be at a dose of 400 mg/m² administered over a period of 2 hours and all subsequent infusions, given weekly, should be of 250 mg/m² over a period of 1 hour, unless any infusion related reaction was observed at a previous infusion. (The maximum infusion rate is 10 mg/min, corresponding to 2 mL/min ready-to-use solution.

Without additional immunotherapy

Standard therapy without immunotherapy (cetuximab).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

cisplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

* Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 1h infusion d1, 22
* Cisplatin 25 mg/m2 1h infusion weekly x5

docetaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

* Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 1h infusion d1, 22
* Docetaxel 20 mg/m2 1/2h infusion weekly x5

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

cetuximab

Loading dose 400 mg/m2 2h infusion Weekly: 250 mg/m2 1h infusion

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

cisplatin

* Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 1h infusion d1, 22
* Cisplatin 25 mg/m2 1h infusion weekly x5

Intervention Type DRUG

docetaxel

* Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 1h infusion d1, 22
* Docetaxel 20 mg/m2 1/2h infusion weekly x5

Intervention Type DRUG

adjuvant therapy

During the adjuvant phase, all infusions, given every two weeks, will be at a dose of 500mg/m².

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

neoadjuvant therapy

During the neoadjuvant phase, the first infusion of cetuximab should be at a dose of 400 mg/m² administered over a period of 2 hours and all subsequent infusions, given weekly, should be of 250 mg/m² over a period of 1 hour, unless any infusion related reaction was observed at a previous infusion. (The maximum infusion rate is 10 mg/min, corresponding to 2 mL/min ready-to-use solution.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Erbitux Taxotere or generic product

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* No cervical esophageal carcinoma and tumors involving the first 5 cm of the thoracic esophagus
* No airway infiltration in case of tumors at or above the tracheal bifurcation
* No peritoneal carcinomatosis in case of adenocarcinomas infiltrating the gastric cardia (i.e., esophagogastric junction carcinoma Siewert type I or II)

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

* WHO performance status 0-1
* Neutrophil count ≥ 1.5 x 10\^9/L
* Platelet count ≥ 100 x 10\^9/L
* Creatinine clearance \> 60 mL/min
* Bilirubin ≤ 1.0 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.5 times ULN
* AST ≤ 1.5 times ULN
* INR normal
* PTT ≤ 1.0 times ULN
* Not pregnant or nursing
* Negative pregnancy test
* Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for 12 months after completion of study therapy
* FEV\_1 ≥ 1.5 L OR ≥ 75% of the reference value
* Must be compliant and geographically proximal for staging and follow-up
* Considered operable (i.e., appropriate organ functions and ability to undergo general anesthesia)
* No other malignancies within the past 5 years except nonmelanomatous skin cancer or adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix
* No severe or uncontrolled cardiovascular disease, including any of the following:

* NYHA class III-IV congestive heart failure
* Unstable angina pectoris
* Myocardial infarction within the past 12 months
* Significant arrhythmias
* No psychiatric disorder precluding understanding of information on trial related topics, giving informed consent, and answering questionnaires
* No active uncontrolled infection
* No serious underlying medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could impair the ability of the patient to participate in the trial (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or active autoimmune disease)
* No preexisting peripheral neuropathy \> grade 1
* No definite contraindications for the use of corticosteroids and antihistamines as premedication
* No known hypersensitivity to trial drugs or hypersensitivity to any other component of the trial drugs

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

* No prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy to the chest
* At least 30 days since prior treatment in another clinical trial
* No concurrent drugs contraindicated for use with the trial drugs
* No other concurrent anticancer treatments
* No other concurrent experimental drugs or investigational treatments
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Swiss Cancer Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thomas Ruhstaller, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen

Michael Stahl, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Kliniken Essen-Mitte

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Landeskrankenhaus

Feldkirch, , Austria

Site Status

Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin I

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Krankenhaus Barmherzige Schwestern Linz

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

Krankenhaus der Elisabethinen Linz GmbH

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum der PMU Salzburg

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen GmbH

Wels, , Austria

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Général

Béziers, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Avicenne

Bobigny, , France

Site Status

Hôtel Dieu Estaing

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Centre Georges-François Leclerc

Dijon, , France

Site Status

CHU Le Bocage

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Centre Bourgogne

Lille, , France

Site Status

CHRU de Lille

Lille, , France

Site Status

Clinique François Chénieux

Limoges, , France

Site Status

CHU la TIMONE

Marseille, , France

Site Status

CH Régional de la Source

Orléans, , France

Site Status

CH Saint Jean

Perpignan, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Haut Leveque

Pessac, , France

Site Status

CHU

Rennes, , France

Site Status

CHU de Saint Etienne - Hôpital Nord

Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, , France

Site Status

Clinique Ste Anne

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Purpan

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Charite University Hospital - Campus Virchow Klinikum

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Universitaetsklinikum Duesseldorf

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status

Kliniken Essen - Mitte

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Universitaetsklinikum Freiburg

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn GmbH

Heilbronn, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Herford

Herford, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Ludwigsburg

Ludwigsburg, , Germany

Site Status

Universitaetsklinikum Giessen und Marburg GmbH

Marburg, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum der Universitaet Muenchen - Grosshadern Campus

Munich, , Germany

Site Status

Staedtisches Klinikum Solingen

Solingen, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Stuttgart - Katharinenhospital

Stuttgart, , Germany

Site Status

Universitaetsklinikum Tuebingen

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Szent Laszlo Korhaz

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Hirslanden Klinik Aarau

Aarau, , Switzerland

Site Status

Kantonsspital Aarau

Aarau, , Switzerland

Site Status

Kantonsspital Baden

Baden, , Switzerland

Site Status

St. Claraspital AG

Basel, , Switzerland

Site Status

Universitaetsspital-Basel

Basel, , Switzerland

Site Status

Inselspital Bern

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Kantonsspital Bruderholz

Bruderholz, , Switzerland

Site Status

Kantonsspital Graubuenden

Chur, , Switzerland

Site Status

Hopital Cantonal Universitaire de Geneve

Geneva, , Switzerland

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Lausanne, , Switzerland

Site Status

Kantonsspital Liestal

Liestal, , Switzerland

Site Status

Kantonsspital Olten

Olten, , Switzerland

Site Status

Kantonsspital - St. Gallen

Sankt Gallen, , Switzerland

Site Status

Hôpital du Valais (RSV)-CHCVs

Sion, , Switzerland

Site Status

Regionalspital

Thun, , Switzerland

Site Status

Ospedale Italiano

Viganello, , Switzerland

Site Status

Kantonsspital Winterthur

Winterthur, , Switzerland

Site Status

Onkozentrum Klinik im Park

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Klinik Hirslanden

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

City Hospital Triemli

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

UniversitaetsSpital Zuerich

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria France Germany Hungary Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ruhstaller T, Thuss-Patience P, Hayoz S, Schacher S, Knorrenschild JR, Schnider A, Plasswilm L, Budach W, Eisterer W, Hawle H, Mariette C, Hess V, Mingrone W, Montemurro M, Girschikofsky M, Schmidt SC, Bitzer M, Bedenne L, Brauchli P, Stahl M; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK); German Esophageal Cancer Study Group; Austrian 'Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentose Tumortherapie' (AGMT); Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive (FFCD)/Federation de Recherche en Chirurgie (FRENCH). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation and surgery with and without cetuximab in patients with resectable esophageal cancer: a randomized, open-label, phase III trial (SAKK 75/08). Ann Oncol. 2018 Jun 1;29(6):1386-1393. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy105.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29635438 (View on PubMed)

von Holzen U, Schmidt S, Hayoz S, Steffen T, Grieder F, Bartsch D, Schnider A, Knoefel WT, Piessen G, Kettelhack C, Marti WR, Schafer M, Fugger R, Koigsrainer A, Gloor B, Furrer M, Gerard MA, Hawle H, Walz MK, Alesina P, Ruhstaller T; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), the German Esophageal Cancer Study Group, the Austrian Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentose Tumortherapie (AGMT), the Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive (FFCD)/Federation de Recherche en Chirurgie (FRENCH). Surgical Outcomes After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Followed by Curative Surgery in Patients With Esophageal Cancer: An Intergroup Phase III Trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK 75/08). Ann Surg. 2022 Jun 1;275(6):1130-1136. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004334. Epub 2020 Aug 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33055589 (View on PubMed)

Fehr M, Hawle H, Hayoz S, Thuss-Patience P, Schacher S, Riera Knorrenschild J, Durr D, Knoefel WT, Rumpold H, Bitzer M, Zweifel M, Samaras P, Mey U, Kung M, Winterhalder R, Eisterer W, Hess V, Gerard MA, Templeton A, Stahl M, Ruhstaller T; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK); German Esophageal Cancer Study Group; Austrian Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentose Tumortherapie (AGMT); Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive (FFCD) / Federation de Recherche en Chirurgie (FRENCH). High thromboembolic event rate in patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer during neoadjuvant therapy. An exploratory analysis of the prospective, randomised intergroup phase III trial SAKK 75/08. BMC Cancer. 2020 Feb 28;20(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6623-z.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32111181 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2009-016584-10

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EU-21024

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000669249

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

SAKK 75/08

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.