The CANTATA-MP Trial (CANagliflozin Treatment and Trial Analysis - Metformin and Pioglitazone)

NCT ID: NCT01106690

Last Updated: 2013-07-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

344 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-06-30

Study Completion Date

2012-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 different doses of canagliflozin compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are receving treatment with metformin and pioglitazone and have inadequate glycemic (blood sugar) control.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Canagliflozin is a drug that is being tested to see if it may be useful in treating patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This is a randomized (study drug assigned by chance), double-blind (neither the patient or the study doctor will know the name of the assigned treatment), parallel-group, 3-arm (3 treatment groups) multicenter study to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of canagliflozin (100 mg and 300 mg) compared to placebo (a capsule that looks like all the other treatments but has no real medicine) in patients with T2DM who are not achieving an adequate response from current antihyperglycemic therapy with metformin and pioglitazone to control their diabetes. Approximately 360 patients with T2DM who are receiving combination therapy with metformin and pioglitazone will receive the addition of once-daily treatment with canagliflozin (100 mg or 300 mg) or placebo capsules for 26 weeks followed by a 26-week extension period where patients treated with canagliflozin (100 mg or 300 mg) will continue treatment for an additional 26 weeks and patients treated with placebo will be switched to active double-blind treatment with sitagliptin 100 mg, an antihyperglycemic agent administered once-daily for 26 weeks. In addition, all patients will take protocol specified stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone along with assigned study drug for the duration of the study. Patients will participate in the study for approximately 59 to 78 weeks. During the study, if a patient's fasting blood sugar remains high despite treatment with study drug, the patient will receive treatment with glimepiride (rescue therapy) in accordance with local prescribing information. During treatment, patients will be monitored for safety by review of adverse events, results from laboratory tests, 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs), vital signs measurements, body weight, physical examinations, and self-monitored blood glucose (SMGB) measurements. The primary outcome measure in the study is the effect of canagliflozin relative to placebo on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) after 26 weeks of treatment. Study drug will be taken orally (by mouth) once daily before the first meal each day unless otherwise specified. Patients will take single-blind placebo capsules for 2 weeks before randomization. After randomization, patients will take double-blind canagliflozin (100 mg or 300 mg) for 52 weeks OR placebo for 26 weeks switched to double-blind sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo/Sitagliptin

Each patient will receive matching placebo once daily for 26 weeks with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone. At Week 26, patients will be switched from placebo to 100 mg of sitagliptin once daily with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone until Week 52.

Group Type OTHER

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

One matching placebo capsule orally (by mouth) once daily for 26 weeks with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone.

Sitagliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

One 100 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally once daily beginning at Week 26 until Week 52 with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone.

Metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

The patient's stable dose of metformin background therapy should be continued throughout the study.

Pioglitazone

Intervention Type DRUG

The patient's stable dose of pioglitazone background therapy should be continued throughout the study.

Canagliflozin 100 mg

Each patient will receive 100 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 52 weeks with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Canagliflozin

Intervention Type DRUG

One 100 mg or 300 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally once daily for 52 weeks with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone.

Metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

The patient's stable dose of metformin background therapy should be continued throughout the study.

Pioglitazone

Intervention Type DRUG

The patient's stable dose of pioglitazone background therapy should be continued throughout the study.

Canagliflozin 300 mg

Each patient will receive 300 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 52 weeks with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Canagliflozin

Intervention Type DRUG

One 100 mg or 300 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally once daily for 52 weeks with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone.

Metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

The patient's stable dose of metformin background therapy should be continued throughout the study.

Pioglitazone

Intervention Type DRUG

The patient's stable dose of pioglitazone background therapy should be continued throughout the study.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Placebo

One matching placebo capsule orally (by mouth) once daily for 26 weeks with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone.

Intervention Type DRUG

Canagliflozin

One 100 mg or 300 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally once daily for 52 weeks with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone.

Intervention Type DRUG

Sitagliptin

One 100 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally once daily beginning at Week 26 until Week 52 with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone.

Intervention Type DRUG

Metformin

The patient's stable dose of metformin background therapy should be continued throughout the study.

Intervention Type DRUG

Pioglitazone

The patient's stable dose of pioglitazone background therapy should be continued throughout the study.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients must have a diagnosis of T2DM and be currently treated with PPAR gamma agent ((pioglitazone or rosiglitazone) and another anti-diabetes agent (metformin)
* Patients in the study must have a HbA1c between \>=7 and \<=10.5% and a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) \<270 mg/dL (15 mmol/L)

Exclusion Criteria

* History of diabetic ketoacidosis, type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), pancreas or beta cell transplantation, or diabetes secondary to pancreatitis or pancreatectomy
* or a severe hypoglycemic episode within 6 months before screening
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC C. Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Anniston, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Burlingame, California, United States

Site Status

Encinitas, California, United States

Site Status

Fullerton, California, United States

Site Status

Roseville, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Ana, California, United States

Site Status

Wes Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Bartow, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Chaska, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Picayune, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Billings, Montana, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Dublin, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Perrysburg, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Yukon, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Bensalem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Bristol, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Arlington, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Grand Prairie, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

New Braunfels, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Falls Church, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Federal Way, Washington, United States

Site Status

Selah, Washington, United States

Site Status

Bathurst, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Grand Falls-Windsor, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Brampton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Smiths Falls, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Thornhill, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Drummondville, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Calgary, , Canada

Site Status

Mount Pearl, , Canada

Site Status

Truro, , Canada

Site Status

Kuopio, , Finland

Site Status

Oulu, , Finland

Site Status

Turku, , Finland

Site Status

Bondy, , France

Site Status

Le Creusot, , France

Site Status

Narbonne, , France

Site Status

Aschaffenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

Neuwied, , Germany

Site Status

Schkeuditz, , Germany

Site Status

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Thessalonikis, , Greece

Site Status

Ahmedabad, , India

Site Status

Belagavi, , India

Site Status

Chennai, , India

Site Status

Coimbatore, , India

Site Status

Jaipur, , India

Site Status

Nagpur, , India

Site Status

Chihuahua City, , Mexico

Site Status

Ciudad Juárez, , Mexico

Site Status

Durango, , Mexico

Site Status

México, , Mexico

Site Status

Almería, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Khon Kaen, , Thailand

Site Status

Antrim, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Belfast, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada Finland France Germany Greece India Mexico Spain Thailand United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Davies MJ, Merton K, Vijapurkar U, Yee J, Qiu R. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes based on history of cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors: a post hoc analysis of pooled data. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Mar 21;16(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0517-7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28327140 (View on PubMed)

Pfeifer M, Townsend RR, Davies MJ, Vijapurkar U, Ren J. Effects of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, on blood pressure and markers of arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a post hoc analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Feb 27;16(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0511-0.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28241822 (View on PubMed)

Gilbert RE, Mende C, Vijapurkar U, Sha S, Davies MJ, Desai M. Effects of Canagliflozin on Serum Magnesium in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Post Hoc Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Diabetes Ther. 2017 Apr;8(2):451-458. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0232-0. Epub 2017 Feb 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28197834 (View on PubMed)

Qiu R, Balis D, Xie J, Davies MJ, Desai M, Meininger G. Longer-term safety and tolerability of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pooled analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Mar;33(3):553-562. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1271780. Epub 2017 Jan 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27977934 (View on PubMed)

John M, Cerdas S, Violante R, Deerochanawong C, Hassanein M, Slee A, Canovatchel W, Hamilton G. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus living in hot climates. Int J Clin Pract. 2016 Sep;70(9):775-85. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12868.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27600862 (View on PubMed)

Watts NB, Bilezikian JP, Usiskin K, Edwards R, Desai M, Law G, Meininger G. Effects of Canagliflozin on Fracture Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jan;101(1):157-66. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-3167. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26580237 (View on PubMed)

Blonde L, Woo V, Mathieu C, Yee J, Vijapurkar U, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Achievement of treatment goals with canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Nov;31(11):1993-2000. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1082991. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26373629 (View on PubMed)

Gavin JR 3rd, Davies MJ, Davies M, Vijapurkar U, Alba M, Meininger G. The efficacy and safety of canagliflozin across racial groups in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015;31(9):1693-702. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1067192. Epub 2015 Sep 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26121561 (View on PubMed)

Cefalu WT, Stenlof K, Leiter LA, Wilding JP, Blonde L, Polidori D, Xie J, Sullivan D, Usiskin K, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and relationship to HbA1c and blood pressure changes in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2015 Jun;58(6):1183-7. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3547-2. Epub 2015 Mar 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25813214 (View on PubMed)

Weir MR, Januszewicz A, Gilbert RE, Vijapurkar U, Kline I, Fung A, Meininger G. Effect of canagliflozin on blood pressure and adverse events related to osmotic diuresis and reduced intravascular volume in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014 Dec;16(12):875-82. doi: 10.1111/jch.12425. Epub 2014 Oct 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25329038 (View on PubMed)

Usiskin K, Kline I, Fung A, Mayer C, Meininger G. Safety and tolerability of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: pooled analysis of phase 3 study results. Postgrad Med. 2014 May;126(3):16-34. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2014.05.2753.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24918789 (View on PubMed)

Weir MR, Kline I, Xie J, Edwards R, Usiskin K. Effect of canagliflozin on serum electrolytes in patients with type 2 diabetes in relation to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Sep;30(9):1759-68. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.919907. Epub 2014 May 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24786834 (View on PubMed)

Sinclair A, Bode B, Harris S, Vijapurkar U, Mayer C, Fung A, Shaw W, Usiskin K, Desai M, Meininger G. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin compared with placebo in older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pooled analysis of clinical studies. BMC Endocr Disord. 2014 Apr 18;14:37. doi: 10.1186/1472-6823-14-37.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24742013 (View on PubMed)

Nyirjesy P, Sobel JD, Fung A, Mayer C, Capuano G, Ways K, Usiskin K. Genital mycotic infections with canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pooled analysis of clinical studies. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Jun;30(6):1109-19. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.890925. Epub 2014 Feb 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24517339 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

28431754DIA3012

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR017032

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.