Trial Outcomes & Findings for Use of PET Imaging to Distinguish Malignant From Benign IPMN (NCT NCT01104116)
NCT ID: NCT01104116
Last Updated: 2016-09-15
Results Overview
The primary outcome will be to determine the positive and negative predictive values of \[18F\]-FDG PET imaging for identifying malignant IPMN lesions in patients who are to undergo surgical resection. We will determine the mean SUV that would provide optimal positive predictive value for malignant IPMN. IPMN lesions will be classified categorically as benign (adenoma or borderline ) or malignant (in situ or invasive carcinoma) and PET imaging will be classified categorically as negative or positive, with focal FDG uptake corresponding to pancreatic lesion.
TERMINATED
NA
1 participants
1 month
2016-09-15
Participant Flow
The principal investigator has left the institution. Data will not be analyzed. Only the demographic information on 1 enrolled subject is available.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
PET/CT Imaging
Surgical patients will undergo \[18F\]-FDG PET/CT imaging
\[18F\]-FDG PET/CT imaging: Drug: F-18 Fluoro-2-Deoxyglucose (F-18 FDG)
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Use of PET Imaging to Distinguish Malignant From Benign IPMN
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
PET/CT Imaging
n=1 Participants
Surgical patients will undergo \[18F\]-FDG PET/CT imaging
\[18F\]-FDG PET/CT imaging: Drug: F-18 Fluoro-2-Deoxyglucose (F-18 FDG)
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 monthPopulation: The principal investigator has left the institution. Data will not be analyzed. Only the demographic information on 1 enrolled subject is available.
The primary outcome will be to determine the positive and negative predictive values of \[18F\]-FDG PET imaging for identifying malignant IPMN lesions in patients who are to undergo surgical resection. We will determine the mean SUV that would provide optimal positive predictive value for malignant IPMN. IPMN lesions will be classified categorically as benign (adenoma or borderline ) or malignant (in situ or invasive carcinoma) and PET imaging will be classified categorically as negative or positive, with focal FDG uptake corresponding to pancreatic lesion.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 monthPopulation: The principal investigator has left the institution. Data will not be analyzed. Only the demographic information on 1 enrolled subject is available.
The secondary outcome that we are interested in studying is the benefit of PET scan as compared to other imaging modalities, such as CT, MRI, and EUS. Thus, Patients will also have CT, MRI, and EUS imaging. We will look at how size, location, and branch of the IPMN lesion on PET compare to these other imaging modalities. The location, size, and pathology results of the actual surgical specimen will serve as the gold standard.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
PET/CT Imaging
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place