Trial Outcomes & Findings for Initial Experience With Storz C-MAC Video Intubation System (NCT NCT01104090)

NCT ID: NCT01104090

Last Updated: 2021-11-01

Results Overview

Time taken for successful placement of endotracheal tube (that is, intubation).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

50 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

at the time of intubation (about 10 seconds)

Results posted on

2021-11-01

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
C-MAC Direct Laryngoscopy, Then C-MAC Indirect Laryngoscopy
Each patient received both direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy, and the order of receipt was randomized. Patients were intubated once, and intubation occurred after the second laryngoscopy.
C-MAC Indirect Laryngoscopy, Then C-MAC Direct Laryngoscopy
Each patient received both direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy, and the order of receipt was randomized. Patients were intubated once, and intubation occurred after the second laryngoscopy.
Overall Study
STARTED
25
25
Overall Study
COMPLETED
25
25
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Initial Experience With Storz C-MAC Video Intubation System

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
C-MAC Direct Laryngoscopy, Then C-MAC Indirect Laryngoscopy
n=25 Participants
Each patient received both direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy, and the order of receipt was randomized. Patients were intubated once, and intubation occurred after the second laryngoscopy.
C-MAC Indirect Laryngoscopy, Then C-MAC Direct Laryngoscopy
n=25 Participants
Each patient received both direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy, and the order of receipt was randomized. Patients were intubated once, and intubation occurred after the second laryngoscopy.
Total
n=50 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
46.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2 • n=5 Participants
49.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.2 • n=7 Participants
47.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
50 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: at the time of intubation (about 10 seconds)

Time taken for successful placement of endotracheal tube (that is, intubation).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
C-MAC Direct Laryngoscopy, Then C-MAC Indirect Laryngoscopy
n=25 Participants
Each patient received both direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy, and the order of receipt was randomized. Patients were intubated once, and intubation occurred after the second laryngoscopy.
C-MAC Indirect Laryngoscopy, Then C-MAC Direct Laryngoscopy
n=25 Participants
Each patient received both direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy, and the order of receipt was randomized. Patients were intubated once, and intubation occurred after the second laryngoscopy.
Time for Intubation
12.3 seconds
Standard Deviation 11.1
9.8 seconds
Standard Deviation 7.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at the time of laryngoscopy (about 10 seconds)

Laryngoscopy time is defined as the time between advancing the laryngoscopy and obtaining the optimal view of the airway.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
C-MAC Direct Laryngoscopy, Then C-MAC Indirect Laryngoscopy
n=25 Participants
Each patient received both direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy, and the order of receipt was randomized. Patients were intubated once, and intubation occurred after the second laryngoscopy.
C-MAC Indirect Laryngoscopy, Then C-MAC Direct Laryngoscopy
n=25 Participants
Each patient received both direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy, and the order of receipt was randomized. Patients were intubated once, and intubation occurred after the second laryngoscopy.
Laryngoscopy Time
first laryngoscopy
8.7 seconds
Standard Deviation 4.7
14.1 seconds
Standard Deviation 12.1
Laryngoscopy Time
second laryngoscopy
9.1 seconds
Standard Deviation 6.1
12.2 seconds
Standard Deviation 7.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at the time of laryngoscopy (about 10 seconds)

Modified Cormack-Lehane classification: 1. Full view of glottis 2. a Partial view of glottis 2b Only posterior extremity of glottis seen or only arytenoid cartilages 3 Only epiglottis seen, none of glottis seen 4 Neither glottis nor epiglottis seen

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
C-MAC Direct Laryngoscopy, Then C-MAC Indirect Laryngoscopy
n=25 Participants
Each patient received both direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy, and the order of receipt was randomized. Patients were intubated once, and intubation occurred after the second laryngoscopy.
C-MAC Indirect Laryngoscopy, Then C-MAC Direct Laryngoscopy
n=25 Participants
Each patient received both direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy, and the order of receipt was randomized. Patients were intubated once, and intubation occurred after the second laryngoscopy.
Airway View at the Time of Laryngoscopy as Categorized by the Modified Cormack-Lehane Classification (Before External Manipulation)
second laryngoscopy · 2b
1 Participants
5 Participants
Airway View at the Time of Laryngoscopy as Categorized by the Modified Cormack-Lehane Classification (Before External Manipulation)
second laryngoscopy · 3
0 Participants
3 Participants
Airway View at the Time of Laryngoscopy as Categorized by the Modified Cormack-Lehane Classification (Before External Manipulation)
first laryngoscopy · 1
12 Participants
19 Participants
Airway View at the Time of Laryngoscopy as Categorized by the Modified Cormack-Lehane Classification (Before External Manipulation)
first laryngoscopy · 2a
7 Participants
3 Participants
Airway View at the Time of Laryngoscopy as Categorized by the Modified Cormack-Lehane Classification (Before External Manipulation)
first laryngoscopy · 2b
6 Participants
1 Participants
Airway View at the Time of Laryngoscopy as Categorized by the Modified Cormack-Lehane Classification (Before External Manipulation)
first laryngoscopy · 3
0 Participants
2 Participants
Airway View at the Time of Laryngoscopy as Categorized by the Modified Cormack-Lehane Classification (Before External Manipulation)
first laryngoscopy · 4
0 Participants
0 Participants
Airway View at the Time of Laryngoscopy as Categorized by the Modified Cormack-Lehane Classification (Before External Manipulation)
second laryngoscopy · 1
20 Participants
11 Participants
Airway View at the Time of Laryngoscopy as Categorized by the Modified Cormack-Lehane Classification (Before External Manipulation)
second laryngoscopy · 2a
4 Participants
6 Participants
Airway View at the Time of Laryngoscopy as Categorized by the Modified Cormack-Lehane Classification (Before External Manipulation)
second laryngoscopy · 4
0 Participants
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at the time of laryngoscopy (about 10 seconds)

Modified Cormack-Lehane classification: 1. Full view of glottis 2. a Partial view of glottis 2b Only posterior extremity of glottis seen or only arytenoid cartilages 3 Only epiglottis seen, none of glottis seen 4 Neither glottis nor epiglottis seen

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
C-MAC Direct Laryngoscopy, Then C-MAC Indirect Laryngoscopy
n=25 Participants
Each patient received both direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy, and the order of receipt was randomized. Patients were intubated once, and intubation occurred after the second laryngoscopy.
C-MAC Indirect Laryngoscopy, Then C-MAC Direct Laryngoscopy
n=25 Participants
Each patient received both direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy, and the order of receipt was randomized. Patients were intubated once, and intubation occurred after the second laryngoscopy.
Airway View at the Time of Laryngoscopy as Categorized by the Modified Cormack-Lehane Classification (After External Manipulation)
first laryngoscopy · 1
15 Participants
20 Participants
Airway View at the Time of Laryngoscopy as Categorized by the Modified Cormack-Lehane Classification (After External Manipulation)
first laryngoscopy · 2a
10 Participants
4 Participants
Airway View at the Time of Laryngoscopy as Categorized by the Modified Cormack-Lehane Classification (After External Manipulation)
first laryngoscopy · 2b
0 Participants
1 Participants
Airway View at the Time of Laryngoscopy as Categorized by the Modified Cormack-Lehane Classification (After External Manipulation)
first laryngoscopy · 3
0 Participants
0 Participants
Airway View at the Time of Laryngoscopy as Categorized by the Modified Cormack-Lehane Classification (After External Manipulation)
first laryngoscopy · 4
0 Participants
0 Participants
Airway View at the Time of Laryngoscopy as Categorized by the Modified Cormack-Lehane Classification (After External Manipulation)
second laryngoscopy · 1
22 Participants
12 Participants
Airway View at the Time of Laryngoscopy as Categorized by the Modified Cormack-Lehane Classification (After External Manipulation)
second laryngoscopy · 2a
3 Participants
11 Participants
Airway View at the Time of Laryngoscopy as Categorized by the Modified Cormack-Lehane Classification (After External Manipulation)
second laryngoscopy · 2b
0 Participants
2 Participants
Airway View at the Time of Laryngoscopy as Categorized by the Modified Cormack-Lehane Classification (After External Manipulation)
second laryngoscopy · 3
0 Participants
0 Participants
Airway View at the Time of Laryngoscopy as Categorized by the Modified Cormack-Lehane Classification (After External Manipulation)
second laryngoscopy · 4
0 Participants
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at the time of intubation (about 10 seconds)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
C-MAC Direct Laryngoscopy, Then C-MAC Indirect Laryngoscopy
n=25 Participants
Each patient received both direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy, and the order of receipt was randomized. Patients were intubated once, and intubation occurred after the second laryngoscopy.
C-MAC Indirect Laryngoscopy, Then C-MAC Direct Laryngoscopy
n=25 Participants
Each patient received both direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy, and the order of receipt was randomized. Patients were intubated once, and intubation occurred after the second laryngoscopy.
Number of Participants With Successful Intubation
25 Participants
25 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at the time of intubation (about 10 seconds)

Ease of intubation as assessed by a rating scale, which ranged from 1 (very easy) to 5 (very difficult).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
C-MAC Direct Laryngoscopy, Then C-MAC Indirect Laryngoscopy
n=25 Participants
Each patient received both direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy, and the order of receipt was randomized. Patients were intubated once, and intubation occurred after the second laryngoscopy.
C-MAC Indirect Laryngoscopy, Then C-MAC Direct Laryngoscopy
n=25 Participants
Each patient received both direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy, and the order of receipt was randomized. Patients were intubated once, and intubation occurred after the second laryngoscopy.
Ease of Intubation as Assessed by a Rating Scale
1
14 Participants
16 Participants
Ease of Intubation as Assessed by a Rating Scale
2
6 Participants
4 Participants
Ease of Intubation as Assessed by a Rating Scale
3
4 Participants
4 Participants
Ease of Intubation as Assessed by a Rating Scale
4
1 Participants
1 Participants
Ease of Intubation as Assessed by a Rating Scale
5
0 Participants
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at the time of laryngoscopy (about 10 seconds)

Ease of laryngoscopy as assessed by a rating scale, which ranged from 1 (very easy) to 5 (very difficult).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
C-MAC Direct Laryngoscopy, Then C-MAC Indirect Laryngoscopy
n=25 Participants
Each patient received both direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy, and the order of receipt was randomized. Patients were intubated once, and intubation occurred after the second laryngoscopy.
C-MAC Indirect Laryngoscopy, Then C-MAC Direct Laryngoscopy
n=25 Participants
Each patient received both direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy, and the order of receipt was randomized. Patients were intubated once, and intubation occurred after the second laryngoscopy.
Ease of Laryngoscopy as Assessed by a Rating Scale
3
4 Participants
5 Participants
Ease of Laryngoscopy as Assessed by a Rating Scale
1
15 Participants
13 Participants
Ease of Laryngoscopy as Assessed by a Rating Scale
2
5 Participants
4 Participants
Ease of Laryngoscopy as Assessed by a Rating Scale
4
1 Participants
3 Participants
Ease of Laryngoscopy as Assessed by a Rating Scale
5
0 Participants
0 Participants

Adverse Events

C-MAC Direct Laryngoscopy, Then C-MAC Indirect Laryngoscopy

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

C-MAC Indirect Laryngoscopy, Then C-MAC Direct Laryngoscopy

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Davide Cattano, MD, PhD

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Phone: (713) 500-6200

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place