Cardiovascular Safety of Febuxostat and Allopurinol in Participants With Gout and Cardiovascular Comorbidities (CARES)

NCT ID: NCT01101035

Last Updated: 2018-06-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

6198 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-04-23

Study Completion Date

2017-07-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to see whether subjects with gout who receive febuxostat or allopurinol for up to 9 years have a higher rate of serious heart and blood vessel complications (major cardiovascular events).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The drug tested in this study was called Febuxostat (TMX-67). Febuxostat compared with allopurinol was evaluated for the cardiovascular (CV) safety in people with gout and significant CV comorbidities.

The study enrolled 6198 patients. Participants with a diagnosis of gout were enrolled in a 1:1 ratio to receive either:

* Febuxostat
* Allopurinol

Participants received febuxostat 40 mg or 80 mg for the study depending on their serum uric acid levels were either \<6.0 mg/dL or ≥6.0 mg/dL during specified visits. Allopurinol 200 mg to 400 mg (for moderate renal impairment),or 300 mg to 600 mg (for normal and mild renal impairment), increased in 100 mg increments each month until serum uric acid was \<6.0 mg/dL was received.

This multi-center trial was conducted in Canada, Mexico and United States. The overall time to participate in this study was approximately 7 years (84 months). Participants made multiple visits to the clinic and were also contacted through the telephone.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiovascular Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Febuxostat

Febuxostat 40 mg (or 80 mg beginning on week 4 if serum uric acid level was ≥6.0 mg/dL), tablets, orally, once daily for up to approximately 82 months.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Febuxostat

Intervention Type DRUG

Febuxostat tablets

Allopurinol

Allopurinol 300 mg to 600 mg (increased in 100 mg increments each month until serum uric acid was \<6.0 mg/dL), tablets, orally, once daily for up to approximately 83 months to participants with mildly impaired renal function or normal renal function (estimated creatinine clearance \[eCLcr\] ≥60 mL/min) or allopurinol 200 mg to 400 mg (increased in 100 mg increments each month until serum uric acid was \<6.0 mg/dL), tablets, orally, once daily for up to approximately 83 months to participants with moderately impaired renal function (eCLcr ≥30 but \<60 mL/min).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Allopurinol

Intervention Type DRUG

Allopurinol tablets

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Febuxostat

Febuxostat tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Allopurinol

Allopurinol tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Uloric TMX-67 Zyloprim Allohexal Allosig Milurit Alloril Progout Zyloric Puricos Zyrik 300 Aluron

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. The participant or the participant's legally acceptable representative signs and dates a written, informed consent form/Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Authorization prior to the initiation of any study procedures.
2. The participant is male ≥50 years of age or female ≥55 years of age and at least 2-years post-menopausal.
3. The participant has a history of major CV or cerebrovascular disease including at least one of the following:

* Myocardial infarction (MI).
* Hospitalized unstable angina.
* Cardiac or cerebrovascular revascularization procedure.
* Stroke.
* Hospitalized transient ischemic attack (TIA).
* Peripheral vascular disease (ankle brachial index ≤0.6, revascularization and/or well-documented history of claudication).
* History of diabetes mellitus with evidence of micro- or macrovascular disease (retinopathy, neuropathy, nephropathy, small vessel vascular diseases).
4. The participant has a history or presence of gout defined as having one or more of the American Rheumatism Association criteria for the diagnosis of gout:

* A tophus proven to contain urate crystals by chemical or polarized light microscopic means, and/or
* Characteristic urate crystals in the joint fluid, and/or
* History of at least 6 of the following clinical, laboratory, and X-ray phenomena:

* More than 1 attack of acute arthritis.
* Maximum inflammation developed within 1 day.
* Monoarticular arthritis.
* Redness observed over joints.
* First metatarsophalangeal joint painful or swollen.
* Unilateral first metatarsophalangeal joint attack.
* Unilateral tarsal joint attack.
* Tophus (proven or suspected).
* Hyperuricemia.
* Asymmetric swelling within a joint on x-ray.
* Subcortical cysts without erosions on x-ray.
* Joint fluid culture negative for organisms during attack.
5. The participants must have either:

* a serum urate or serum uric acid (sUA) level ≥7.0 mg/dL (≥416 μmol/L) at the Day -7 Visit OR
* a sUA level ≥6.0 mg/dL (≥354 μmol/L) at the Day -7 Visit AND inadequately controlled gout (≥1 flare in the 12 months prior to screening and/or the presence of tophi).
6. The participant is capable of understanding and complying with protocol requirements

Exclusion Criteria

Participants who meet any of the following criteria will not qualify for entry into this study:

1. The participant has secondary hyperuricemia (eg, due to myeloproliferative disorder, or organ transplant).
2. The participant has a history of xanthinuria.
3. The participant has received urate-lowering therapy (i.e., febuxostat, allopurinol, probenecid, etc.) or excluded medication during the screening period (beginning with Day -7).
4. The participant has a known hypersensitivity to febuxostat or allopurinol or any components of their formulation.
5. The participant has active peptic ulcer disease.
6. The participant has a history of cancer (other than basal cell carcinoma of the skin) within 5 years prior to the first dose of study medication.
7. The participant had MI or stroke within 60 days prior to the Screening Visit.
8. The participant has alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) values greater than 2 times the upper limit of normal (×ULN) during the Screening period.
9. The participant has a significant medical condition and/or conditions that would interfere with the treatment, safety, or compliance with the protocol.
10. The participant has a history of drug abuse (defined as any illicit drug use) or a history of alcohol abuse within 5 years prior to the Screening Visit or the participant consumes \>14 alcoholic beverages per week.
11. The participant has received any investigational medicinal product within the 30 days prior to the Screening Visit and throughout the study.
12. The participant's estimated creatinine clearance (CLcr) is \<30 mL/min, where CLcr is calculated using the Cockcroft and Gault formula based on ideal body weight (IBW),
13. The participant is an immediate family member, study site employee, or is in a dependant relationship with a study site employee who is involved in conduct of this study (eg, spouse, parent, child, sibling) or may consent under duress.
14. The participant is required to take excluded medications
15. The participant has a known history of infection with hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or human immunodeficiency virus.
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Verona, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Waukesha, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Weston, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Jalisco, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Dunwoody, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Norcross, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Roswell, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Suwanee, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Waycross, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Nampa, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Addison, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Arlington Heights, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Evanston, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Evergreen Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Flossmoor, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Melrose Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Morton, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Naperville, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Quincy, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Rockford, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Bloomington, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Brownsburg, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Lafayette, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Valparaiso, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Lenexa, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Topeka, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Elizabethtown, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Owensboro, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Paducah, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Mer Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Monroe, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Biddeford, Maine, United States

Site Status

Rockport, Maine, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Cumberland, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Hagerstown, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Lutherville, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Wheaton, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Brockton, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Fall River, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Hyannis, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Bingham Farms, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Chelsea, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Flint, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Chaska, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Duluth, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Edina, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Olive Branch, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Port Gibson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Clarkson Valley, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Hazelwood, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Saint Charles, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Washington, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Billings, Montana, United States

Site Status

Butte, Montana, United States

Site Status

Bellevue, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Grand Island, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Henderson, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Reno, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Brick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Edison, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Oradell, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Endwell, New York, United States

Site Status

Freeport, New York, United States

Site Status

Glens Falls, New York, United States

Site Status

Mineola, New York, United States

Site Status

New Windsor, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

West Seneca, New York, United States

Site Status

Westfield, New York, United States

Site Status

Asheboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cary, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Columbia, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Huntersville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Lenoir, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Monroe, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Shelby, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Akron, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Centerville, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Delaware, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Franklin, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Kettering, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Lyndhurst, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Marion, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Mentor, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Willoughby Hills, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Ashland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Bend, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Bensalem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Downingtown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Ephrata, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Harleysville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Lansdale, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

McMurray, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Quakertown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Cumberland, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

East Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Anderson, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenwood, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greer, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Pelzer, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Simpsonville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Athens, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Clarksville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Collierville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Fayetteville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

New Tazewell, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Bellaire, Texas, United States

Site Status

Carrollton, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

El Paso, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Grapevine, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Irving, Texas, United States

Site Status

McKinney, Texas, United States

Site Status

New Braunfels, Texas, United States

Site Status

Odessa, Texas, United States

Site Status

Pearland, Texas, United States

Site Status

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

Richardson, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Southlake, Texas, United States

Site Status

Sugar Land, Texas, United States

Site Status

Tomball, Texas, United States

Site Status

Waco, Texas, United States

Site Status

Bountiful, Utah, United States

Site Status

Draper, Utah, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

West Jordan, Utah, United States

Site Status

Alexandria, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Arlington, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Burke, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Danville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

McLean, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Salem, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Port Orchard, Washington, United States

Site Status

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Clarksburg, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Green Bay, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

New Berlin, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Oregon, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Mexico

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

White WB, Chohan S, Dabholkar A, Hunt B, Jackson R. Cardiovascular safety of febuxostat and allopurinol in patients with gout and cardiovascular comorbidities. Am Heart J. 2012 Jul;164(1):14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.04.011. Epub 2012 Jun 13.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22795277 (View on PubMed)

White WB, Saag KG, Becker MA, Borer JS, Gorelick PB, Whelton A, Hunt B, Castillo M, Gunawardhana L; CARES Investigators. Cardiovascular Safety of Febuxostat or Allopurinol in Patients with Gout. N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 29;378(13):1200-1210. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1710895. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29527974 (View on PubMed)

Saag KG, Becker MA, White WB, Whelton A, Borer JS, Gorelick PB, Hunt B, Castillo M, Gunawardhana L; CARES Investigators. Evaluation of the Relationship Between Serum Urate Levels, Clinical Manifestations of Gout, and Death From Cardiovascular Causes in Patients Receiving Febuxostat or Allopurinol in an Outcomes Trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022 Sep;74(9):1593-1601. doi: 10.1002/art.42160. Epub 2022 Aug 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35536764 (View on PubMed)

Fravel MA, Ernst ME. Management of gout in the older adult. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2011 Oct;9(5):271-85. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Aug 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21849262 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U1111-1114-4194

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

TMX-67_301

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Allopurinol Combination Study
NCT01001338 COMPLETED PHASE2