Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Efficacy of SPD489 on Executive Function Behaviors in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) (NCT NCT01101022)
NCT ID: NCT01101022
Last Updated: 2021-06-09
Results Overview
BRIEF-A Global Executive Composite assesses behavioral aspects of executive function. Items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
161 participants
Baseline and up to 10 weeks
2021-06-09
Participant Flow
161 subjects were enrolled and randomized, but 2 never received any investigational product, and therefore were not included in subject disposition going forward (n = 159).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
SPD489
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM at either 30, 50 or 70 mg for 10 weeks (a 4-week dose optimization period followed by a 6-week dose maintenance period at an optimal dose).
|
Placebo
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM for 10 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
79
|
80
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
62
|
53
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
17
|
27
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
SPD489
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM at either 30, 50 or 70 mg for 10 weeks (a 4-week dose optimization period followed by a 6-week dose maintenance period at an optimal dose).
|
Placebo
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM for 10 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
6
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
4
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
Sponsor decision
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Non-compliance
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Work schedule
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Vacation
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Safety and Efficacy of SPD489 on Executive Function Behaviors in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
SPD489
n=79 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM at either 30, 50 or 70 mg for 10 weeks (a 4-week dose optimization period followed by a 6-week dose maintenance period at an optimal dose).
|
Placebo
n=80 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM for 10 weeks.
|
Total
n=159 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
34.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.58 • n=5 Participants
|
34.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.02 • n=7 Participants
|
34.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.77 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
<18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
18 to 55 years
|
79 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
80 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
159 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>55 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
76 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
83 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
79 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
80 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
159 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 10 weeksPopulation: Full Analysis Set (FAS) defined as all subjects who took 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase and had 1 primary efficacy assessment.
BRIEF-A Global Executive Composite assesses behavioral aspects of executive function. Items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SPD489
n=79 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM at either 30, 50 or 70 mg for 10 weeks (a 4-week dose optimization period followed by a 6-week dose maintenance period at an optimal dose).
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM for 10 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version Global Executive Composite T-score (BRIEF-A GEC T) at up to 10 Weeks
|
-22.3 T-scores
Standard Error 1.67
|
-11.1 T-scores
Standard Error 1.72
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 10 weeksPopulation: FAS
The AIM-A was developed to assess impact of core ADHD symptoms on daily functioning and quality of life. For multi-item scales, subjects respond to items using a Likert scale with responses ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). Scores were computed by deriving the mean of the item sets and transforming the scale score on a continuum from 0 to 100 using a standard formula. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SPD489
n=79 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM at either 30, 50 or 70 mg for 10 weeks (a 4-week dose optimization period followed by a 6-week dose maintenance period at an optimal dose).
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM for 10 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Adult ADHD Impact Module (AIM-A) Multi-Item Scales Total Score at up to 10 Weeks
Performance and Daily Functioning
|
38.8 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.84
|
17.2 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.91
|
|
Change From Baseline in Adult ADHD Impact Module (AIM-A) Multi-Item Scales Total Score at up to 10 Weeks
Impact of symptoms: Daily Interference
|
30.6 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.52
|
15.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.58
|
|
Change From Baseline in Adult ADHD Impact Module (AIM-A) Multi-Item Scales Total Score at up to 10 Weeks
Impact of symptoms: Bother/Concern
|
29.3 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.53
|
15.8 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.60
|
|
Change From Baseline in Adult ADHD Impact Module (AIM-A) Multi-Item Scales Total Score at up to 10 Weeks
Relationships/Communication
|
21.2 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.49
|
13.4 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.56
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and up to10 weeksPopulation: FAS
BRIEF-A is a validated 75-item questionnaire composed of three indexes (Global Executive Composite, Behavioral Recognition Index, and Metacognition Index). Items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SPD489
n=71 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM at either 30, 50 or 70 mg for 10 weeks (a 4-week dose optimization period followed by a 6-week dose maintenance period at an optimal dose).
|
Placebo
n=71 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM for 10 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Informant-reported BRIEF-A T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Global Executive Composite
|
-10.2 T-scores
Standard Error 1.06
|
-5.3 T-scores
Standard Error 1.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Informant-reported BRIEF-A T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Behavioral Regulation Index
|
-8.6 T-scores
Standard Error 1.04
|
-5.5 T-scores
Standard Error 1.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Informant-reported BRIEF-A T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Metacognition Index
|
-10.3 T-scores
Standard Error 1.07
|
-4.6 T-scores
Standard Error 1.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 10 weeksPopulation: FAS
BRIEF-A is a validated 75-item questionnaire composed of three indexes (Global Executive Composite, Behavioral Recognition Index, and Metacognition Index). Global Executive Composite was reported as the Primary Outcome. Items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SPD489
n=79 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM at either 30, 50 or 70 mg for 10 weeks (a 4-week dose optimization period followed by a 6-week dose maintenance period at an optimal dose).
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM for 10 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject-reported BRIEF-A T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Behavioral Regulation Index
|
-17.5 T-scores
Standard Error 1.54
|
-9.2 T-scores
Standard Error 1.58
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject-reported BRIEF-A T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Metacognition Index
|
-22.8 T-scores
Standard Error 1.63
|
-11.2 T-scores
Standard Error 1.67
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 10 weeksPopulation: FAS
BRIEF-A clinical subscales items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SPD489
n=79 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM at either 30, 50 or 70 mg for 10 weeks (a 4-week dose optimization period followed by a 6-week dose maintenance period at an optimal dose).
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM for 10 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject-reported BRIEF-A Clinical Subscales T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Inhibit
|
-17.8 T-scores
Standard Error 1.50
|
-9.5 T-scores
Standard Error 1.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject-reported BRIEF-A Clinical Subscales T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Shift
|
-14.5 T-scores
Standard Error 1.46
|
-7.8 T-scores
Standard Error 1.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject-reported BRIEF-A Clinical Subscales T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Emotional control
|
-10.9 T-scores
Standard Error 1.28
|
-5.7 T-scores
Standard Error 1.31
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject-reported BRIEF-A Clinical Subscales T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Self-monitor
|
-16.6 T-scores
Standard Error 1.44
|
-8.4 T-scores
Standard Error 1.48
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject-reported BRIEF-A Clinical Subscales T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Initiate
|
-17.9 T-scores
Standard Error 1.38
|
-8.6 T-scores
Standard Error 1.41
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject-reported BRIEF-A Clinical Subscales T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Working memory
|
-23.2 T-scores
Standard Error 1.67
|
-11.9 T-scores
Standard Error 1.71
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject-reported BRIEF-A Clinical Subscales T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Plan/Organize
|
-20.8 T-scores
Standard Error 1.58
|
-9.9 T-scores
Standard Error 1.62
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject-reported BRIEF-A Clinical Subscales T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Task monitor
|
-20.1 T-scores
Standard Error 1.64
|
-10.8 T-scores
Standard Error 1.68
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subject-reported BRIEF-A Clinical Subscales T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Organization of materials
|
-16.5 T-scores
Standard Error 1.26
|
-7.6 T-scores
Standard Error 1.30
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 10 weeksPopulation: FAS
BRIEF-A clinical subscales items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SPD489
n=71 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM at either 30, 50 or 70 mg for 10 weeks (a 4-week dose optimization period followed by a 6-week dose maintenance period at an optimal dose).
|
Placebo
n=71 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM for 10 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Informant-reported BRIEF-A Clinical Subscales T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Inhibit
|
-10.2 T-scores
Standard Error 1.08
|
-5.8 T-scores
Standard Error 1.08
|
|
Change From Baseline in Informant-reported BRIEF-A Clinical Subscales T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Shift
|
-9.1 T-scores
Standard Error 1.17
|
-4.3 T-scores
Standard Error 1.17
|
|
Change From Baseline in Informant-reported BRIEF-A Clinical Subscales T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Emotional control
|
-5.9 T-scores
Standard Error 0.99
|
-4.6 T-scores
Standard Error 0.99
|
|
Change From Baseline in Informant-reported BRIEF-A Clinical Subscales T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Self-monitor
|
-6.8 T-scores
Standard Error 1.04
|
-4.6 T-scores
Standard Error 1.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Informant-reported BRIEF-A Clinical Subscales T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Initiate
|
-8.6 T-scores
Standard Error 1.00
|
-3.2 T-scores
Standard Error 1.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Informant-reported BRIEF-A Clinical Subscales T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Working memory
|
-12.0 T-scores
Standard Error 1.22
|
-5.7 T-scores
Standard Error 1.22
|
|
Change From Baseline in Informant-reported BRIEF-A Clinical Subscales T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Plan/Organize
|
-9.9 T-scores
Standard Error 1.07
|
-5.0 T-scores
Standard Error 1.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Informant-reported BRIEF-A Clinical Subscales T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Task monitor
|
-9.7 T-scores
Standard Error 1.21
|
-3.4 T-scores
Standard Error 1.21
|
|
Change From Baseline in Informant-reported BRIEF-A Clinical Subscales T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Organization of materials
|
-6.2 T-scores
Standard Error 0.97
|
-3.0 T-scores
Standard Error 0.97
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 10 weeksPopulation: FAS
The ADHD-RS consists of 18 items scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with total score ranging from 0 to 54. Lower scores indicate reduction in symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SPD489
n=79 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM at either 30, 50 or 70 mg for 10 weeks (a 4-week dose optimization period followed by a 6-week dose maintenance period at an optimal dose).
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM for 10 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) With Adult Prompts Total Score at up to 10 Weeks
|
-21.4 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.35
|
-10.3 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.38
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: FAS
CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SPD489
n=79 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM at either 30, 50 or 70 mg for 10 weeks (a 4-week dose optimization period followed by a 6-week dose maintenance period at an optimal dose).
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM for 10 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Baseline
Normal, not at all ill
|
0 Percent of participants
|
0 Percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Baseline
Borderline mentally ill
|
0 Percent of participants
|
0 Percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Baseline
Mildly ill
|
0 Percent of participants
|
0 Percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Baseline
Moderately ill
|
48.1 Percent of participants
|
42.7 Percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Baseline
Markedly ill
|
38.0 Percent of participants
|
49.3 Percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Baseline
Severely ill
|
13.9 Percent of participants
|
8.0 Percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Baseline
Among the most extremely ill
|
0 Percent of participants
|
0 Percent of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 10 weeks post-dosePopulation: FAS
CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SPD489
n=79 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM at either 30, 50 or 70 mg for 10 weeks (a 4-week dose optimization period followed by a 6-week dose maintenance period at an optimal dose).
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM for 10 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at up to 10 Weeks
Normal, not at all ill
|
13.9 Percent of participants
|
6.7 Percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at up to 10 Weeks
Borderline mentally ill
|
38.0 Percent of participants
|
16.0 Percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at up to 10 Weeks
Mildly ill
|
21.5 Percent of participants
|
10.7 Percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at up to 10 Weeks
Moderately ill
|
15.2 Percent of participants
|
37.3 Percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at up to 10 Weeks
Markedly ill
|
8.9 Percent of participants
|
25.3 Percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at up to 10 Weeks
Severely ill
|
2.5 Percent of participants
|
4.0 Percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at up to 10 Weeks
Among the most extremely ill
|
0 Percent of participants
|
0 Percent of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 10 weeks post-dosePopulation: FAS
Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SPD489
n=79 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM at either 30, 50 or 70 mg for 10 weeks (a 4-week dose optimization period followed by a 6-week dose maintenance period at an optimal dose).
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM for 10 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I) at up to 10 Weeks
|
78.5 Percent of participants
|
34.7 Percent of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 10 weeksPopulation: FAS
The AIM-A was developed to assess impact of core ADHD symptoms on daily functioning and quality of life. For multi-item scales, subjects respond to items using a Likert scale with responses ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). Scores were computed by deriving the mean of the item sets and transforming the scale score on a continuum from 0 to 100 using a standard formula. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SPD489
n=79 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM at either 30, 50 or 70 mg for 10 weeks (a 4-week dose optimization period followed by a 6-week dose maintenance period at an optimal dose).
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM for 10 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in AIM-A Multi-Item Scales of Living With ADHD and General Well-being Score at up to 10 Weeks
Living with ADHD
|
14.0 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.30
|
4.9 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.33
|
|
Change From Baseline in AIM-A Multi-Item Scales of Living With ADHD and General Well-being Score at up to 10 Weeks
General Well-being
|
19.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.69
|
9.0 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.73
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 10 weeksPopulation: FAS
Question 1: 'On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the overall quality of life right now?' It is rated on a scale of 1 (worst) to 10 (best). Higher scores representing a more positive rating. Question 4: 'How much do you agree with this statement: Over the past few weeks, I've had more good days than bad days?' This is rated on a scale of 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). Lower scores represent better quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SPD489
n=79 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM at either 30, 50 or 70 mg for 10 weeks (a 4-week dose optimization period followed by a 6-week dose maintenance period at an optimal dose).
|
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM for 10 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in AIM-A Quality of Life Questions 1 and 4 Scores at up to 10 Weeks
Question 1
|
1.6 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
1.0 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
|
Change From Baseline in AIM-A Quality of Life Questions 1 and 4 Scores at up to 10 Weeks
Question 4
|
-1.0 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-0.4 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 10 weeksPopulation: FAS
The CAARS-O:S is an assessment tool with prompts provided to an observer who describes ADHD-related symptoms in an adult subject. The 26-item scale is scored on a 4-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much, very frequently). There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SPD489
n=71 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM at either 30, 50 or 70 mg for 10 weeks (a 4-week dose optimization period followed by a 6-week dose maintenance period at an optimal dose).
|
Placebo
n=71 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM for 10 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Conner's Adult ADHD Rating Scale-Observer: Short Version (CAARS-O:S) ADHD Index T-score at up to 10 Weeks
|
-11.3 T-scores
Standard Error 1.24
|
-5.8 T-scores
Standard Error 1.24
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 10 weeksPopulation: FAS
The CAARS-O:S is an assessment tool with prompts provided to an observer who describes ADHD-related symptoms in an adult subject. The 26-item scale is scored on a 4-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much, very frequently). There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SPD489
n=71 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM at either 30, 50 or 70 mg for 10 weeks (a 4-week dose optimization period followed by a 6-week dose maintenance period at an optimal dose).
|
Placebo
n=71 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM for 10 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in CAARS-O:S Factor-derived Subscale T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Inattention/Memory Problems
|
-10.0 T-scores
Standard Error 1.12
|
-4.9 T-scores
Standard Error 1.12
|
|
Change From Baseline in CAARS-O:S Factor-derived Subscale T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Hyperactivity/Restlessness
|
-9.1 T-scores
Standard Error 1.20
|
-5.0 T-scores
Standard Error 1.20
|
|
Change From Baseline in CAARS-O:S Factor-derived Subscale T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Impulsivity/Emotional Liability
|
-8.0 T-scores
Standard Error 1.01
|
-4.0 T-scores
Standard Error 1.01
|
|
Change From Baseline in CAARS-O:S Factor-derived Subscale T-scores at up to 10 Weeks
Problems with Self-concept
|
-7.7 T-scores
Standard Error 1.10
|
-3.3 T-scores
Standard Error 1.10
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 10 weeksPopulation: FAS
AAQoL is a validated 29-item scale consisting of 4 subscales. The AAQoL yields a total score and 4 subscale scores. Subjects rate each item on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all/never) to 5 (extremely/very often). These scores are then transformed to a 0-100 point scale with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SPD489
n=28 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM at either 30, 50 or 70 mg for 10 weeks (a 4-week dose optimization period followed by a 6-week dose maintenance period at an optimal dose).
|
Placebo
n=26 Participants
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM for 10 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Adult ADHD Quality of Life (AAQoL) Scale Total Score at up to 10 Weeks
Life Productivity
|
38.0 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 4.34
|
17.0 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 4.51
|
|
Change From Baseline in Adult ADHD Quality of Life (AAQoL) Scale Total Score at up to 10 Weeks
Psychological Health
|
19.3 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 3.61
|
7.2 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 3.74
|
|
Change From Baseline in Adult ADHD Quality of Life (AAQoL) Scale Total Score at up to 10 Weeks
Life Outlook
|
18.5 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.85
|
6.0 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.96
|
|
Change From Baseline in Adult ADHD Quality of Life (AAQoL) Scale Total Score at up to 10 Weeks
Relationships
|
17.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 3.69
|
9.8 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 3.83
|
|
Change From Baseline in Adult ADHD Quality of Life (AAQoL) Scale Total Score at up to 10 Weeks
Total Score
|
25.9 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 3.04
|
11.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 3.16
|
Adverse Events
SPD489
Placebo
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
SPD489
n=79 participants at risk
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM at either 30, 50 or 70 mg for 10 weeks (a 4-week dose optimization period followed by a 6-week dose maintenance period at an optimal dose).
|
Placebo
n=80 participants at risk
Dosed orally once a day at approximately 7:00 AM for 10 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
7.6%
6/79
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
2.5%
2/80
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry Mouth
|
31.6%
25/79
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
7.5%
6/80
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
2.5%
2/79
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
6.2%
5/80
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
7.6%
6/79
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
3.8%
3/80
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
|
General disorders
Feeling Jittery
|
12.7%
10/79
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
0.00%
0/80
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
|
General disorders
Irritability
|
10.1%
8/79
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
3.8%
3/80
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
5.1%
4/79
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
5.0%
4/80
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
6.3%
5/79
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
1.2%
1/80
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
|
Investigations
Heart Rate Increased
|
5.1%
4/79
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
2.5%
2/80
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
|
Investigations
Weight Decreased
|
10.1%
8/79
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
0.00%
0/80
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Anorexia
|
5.1%
4/79
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
0.00%
0/80
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased Apetite
|
32.9%
26/79
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
6.2%
5/80
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
25.3%
20/79
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
2.5%
2/80
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Initial Insomnia
|
10.1%
8/79
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
6.2%
5/80
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
12.7%
10/79
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
3.8%
3/80
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Libido Decreased
|
5.1%
4/79
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
0.00%
0/80
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
|
6.3%
5/79
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
0.00%
0/80
Safety Population defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product in the double-blind evaluation phase.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee If a multicenter publication is not submitted within twelve (12) months after conclusion, abandonment or termination of the Study at all sites, or after Sponsor confirms there shall be no multicenter Study publication, the Institution and/or such Principal Investigator may publish the results from the Institution site individually.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER