Trial Outcomes & Findings for Trial to Optimize Mineral Outcomes in Dialysis Patients (NCT NCT01100723)
NCT ID: NCT01100723
Last Updated: 2017-01-02
Results Overview
Compare the percent of patients achieving an intact Parathyroid hormone (PTH) target of ≤ 300 pg/ml before and after the application of a computerized dosing protocol for management of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). If multiple values were obtained within a specified evaluation time frame the values were averaged and the average value was then evaluated as to whether it was within or outside the target range.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
92 participants
1 year
2017-01-02
Participant Flow
181 pts in dialysis center. 65 did not meet enrollment criteria. 23 declined participation and 1 had prior intolerance to cinacalcet. Therefore 92 subjects enrolled in study.
No washout. Once enrolled, mineral and bone disorder managed by computer algorithm.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Post Treatment
Patients had their mineral and bone disorders managed by the computer directed algorithm. Cinacalcet dose was increased starting at 30 mg/day as indicated by protocol along with active vitamin D based on values of serum calcium, phosphorus and parathyroid hormone.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
92
|
|
Overall Study
6 Month Analysis
|
85
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
78
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
14
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Trial to Optimize Mineral Outcomes in Dialysis Patients
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Post Treatment
n=92 Participants
Results analyzed at study evaluation time points.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Gender
Female
|
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Gender
Male
|
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearPopulation: Subjects who had at least one laboratory measurement during the assessment phase.
Compare the percent of patients achieving an intact Parathyroid hormone (PTH) target of ≤ 300 pg/ml before and after the application of a computerized dosing protocol for management of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). If multiple values were obtained within a specified evaluation time frame the values were averaged and the average value was then evaluated as to whether it was within or outside the target range.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Post Treatment
n=78 Participants
Results analyzed at study evaluation time points.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent of Patients Achieving Parathyroid Hormone Target ≤ 300
|
21 percentage of subjects meeting target
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearCompare the percent of patients achieving a phosphorus of ≤ 5.5 mg/dL before and after the application of a computerized dosing protocol for management of CKD-MBD. If multiple values were obtained within a specified evaluation time frame the values were averaged and the average value was then evaluated as to whether it was within or outside the target range.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Post Treatment
n=78 Participants
Results analyzed at study evaluation time points.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent of Patients Achieving Phosphorous Target ≤ 5.5
|
53 percent of participants in target
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearCompare the percent of patients achieving an intact PTH target of ≤ 450 pg/ml before and after the application of a computerized dosing protocol for management of CKD-MBD. If multiple values were obtained within a specified evaluation time frame the values were averaged and the average value was then evaluated as to whether it was within or outside the target range.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Post Treatment
n=78 Participants
Results analyzed at study evaluation time points.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent of Patients Achieving Parathyroid Hormone Target ≤ 450
|
33 percent of participants in target
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearCompare the percent of patients achieving a phosphorus of ≤ 4.5 mg/dL before and after the application of a computerized dosing protocol for management of CKD-MBD. If multiple values were obtained within a specified evaluation time frame the values were averaged and the average value was then evaluated as to whether it was within or outside the target range.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Post Treatment
n=78 Participants
Results analyzed at study evaluation time points.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent of Patients Achieving Phosphorous Target ≤ 4.5
|
29 percent of participants in target
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearPopulation: Subjects with at least one laboratory value during evaluation period.
Compare the percent of patients achieving a calcium ≤ 10.1 mg/dL before and after the application of a computerized dosing protocol for management of CKD-MBD. If multiple values were obtained within a specified evaluation time frame the values were averaged and the average value was then evaluated as to whether it was within or outside the target range.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Post Treatment
n=78 Participants
Results analyzed at study evaluation time points.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent of Patients Achieving Calcium Target ≤ 10.1
|
78 percentage of subjects in target
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months and 1 yearPopulation: Number of subjects with at least 1 laboratory analysis during the evaluation period.
Compare the percent of patients on cinacalcet and vitamin D analogues at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after the application of a computerized dosing protocol for management of CKD-MBD. If multiple values were obtained within a specified evaluation time frame the values were averaged and the average value was then evaluated as to whether it was within or outside the target range.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Post Treatment
n=78 Participants
Results analyzed at study evaluation time points.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent of Patients on Cinacalcet and Vitamin D Analogues
|
84 percentage of subjects receiving med
|
Adverse Events
Post Treatment
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place