Evaluating the Relative Effectiveness of Two Feeding Interventions for the Treatment of Moderate Acute Malnutrition
NCT ID: NCT01097889
Last Updated: 2021-04-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
2600 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-04-30
2010-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objectives: To investigate the relative effectiveness of two non-identical therapeutic foods in children with moderate malnutrition by comparing differences in performance indicators (i.e. recovery rates), recovery times, and change in weight-for-height z-scores in each group.
This proposed research project will evaluate the relative effectiveness of two non-identical treatment foods for the treatment of moderate acute malnutrition in children
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ready to Use Supplementary Food in Moderate Childhood Malnutrition
NCT01147198
Effectiveness Comparison of Three Supplementary Foods in the Treatment of Moderate Acute Malnutrition
NCT00998517
Effectiveness of an Alternative Protocol in the Management of Acute Malnutrition
NCT06792370
Modified Dosage for Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MODAM-MAM)
NCT06056089
Effectiveness of Nutritional Products to Treat Moderate Acute Malnutrition
NCT01898871
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment Group 1
Fortified blended foods, Corn Soya Bean Flour (CSB) with oil.
A daily ration equivalent of 300g CSB and 32g vegetable oil Bi-weekly distribution of premix of 4.2kg CSB with 0.5L vegetable oil. Estimated 1413 kcal, 47g protein
Treatment Group 2
RUSF (ready-to-use supplementary foods) Supplementary Plumpy®
Peanut-based fortified supplement
One 92g sachet eaten throughout the day Bi-weekly distributions of 14 sachets 500 kcal and 13g protein
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fortified blended foods, Corn Soya Bean Flour (CSB) with oil.
A daily ration equivalent of 300g CSB and 32g vegetable oil Bi-weekly distribution of premix of 4.2kg CSB with 0.5L vegetable oil. Estimated 1413 kcal, 47g protein
RUSF (ready-to-use supplementary foods) Supplementary Plumpy®
Peanut-based fortified supplement
One 92g sachet eaten throughout the day Bi-weekly distributions of 14 sachets 500 kcal and 13g protein
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Children with any illness or clinical condition that prevents them from safely ingesting either supplementary foods. A child is medically assessed upon admission for any complicated clinical condition (oedema, malaria, vomiting, chronic diarrhea, infections, appetite, etc) that would require medical care and those children will be referred to the therapeutic feeding programme.
* All children transferred from the therapeutic feeding programme directly into the supplementary feeding programme - however they will not be included in the research study.
* Children with WFH \> 80% but MUAC 110 to 120 mm- they will be admitted to SFP however will not be included in the research study.
6 Months
60 Months
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Hospital for Sick Children
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Stanley Zlotkin
Chief, Global Child Health
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stanley Zlotkin, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Hospital for Sick Children
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Regional Health Board - Health Posts in South Nations and Nationalities Peoples Region (SNNPR
Sidama Zone, Southern Ethiopia, Ethiopia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Karakochuk C, van den Briel T, Stephens D, Zlotkin S. Treatment of moderate acute malnutrition with ready-to-use supplementary food results in higher overall recovery rates compared with a corn-soya blend in children in southern Ethiopia: an operations research trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Oct;96(4):911-6. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.029744. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1000013545
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.