Comparison of Harmonic Scalpel to Conventional Diathermy in Perforator Flap Elevation for Head and Neck Reconstruction

NCT ID: NCT01092468

Last Updated: 2011-10-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-31

Study Completion Date

2011-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is to compare the efficacy of Harmonic Scalpel with conventional diathermy technique in terms of reducing elevation time and perioperative complications of perforator flaps for head and neck reconstruction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Diathermy

Perforator flap elevation using conventional diathermy technique

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Diathermy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

flap dissection with conventional diathermy

Harmonic Scalpel

Perforator flap elevation using Harmonic Scalpel

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Harmonic Scalpel

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

flap dissection using harmonic scalpel (FOCUS)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Diathermy

flap dissection with conventional diathermy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Harmonic Scalpel

flap dissection using harmonic scalpel (FOCUS)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* head and neck reconstruction with perforator flap
* informed consent from the patient

Exclusion Criteria

* coagulation problem
* refused to participate
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Samsung Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Man Ki Chung

Assistant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Samsung medical center

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2009-08-063

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id