Trial Outcomes & Findings for Oral LBH589 in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) (NCT NCT01090973)

NCT ID: NCT01090973

Last Updated: 2013-12-16

Results Overview

Investigators intended to assess the rate of overall and complete response by World Health Organization (WHO) classification in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). WHO Performance Scale Measures levels of patient capability: 0 Normal activity; 1 Symptoms, but nearly fully ambulatory; 2 Some bed time, but needs to be in bed \<50% of normal daytime; 3 Needs to be in bed \>50% of normal daytime; 4 Unable to get out of bed.

Recruitment status

TERMINATED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

1 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

8 weeks (2 cycles) unless treatment continues due to partial or complete response

Results posted on

2013-12-16

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Oral Drug Treatment
LBH589 was to be given orally (by mouth), 40 mg once-a-day, 3 times weekly every week on days 1, 3 \& 5, then 8, 10 \&12, then 15, 17 \& 19, then 22, 24 \& 26.
Overall Study
STARTED
1
Overall Study
COMPLETED
0
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Oral Drug Treatment
LBH589 was to be given orally (by mouth), 40 mg once-a-day, 3 times weekly every week on days 1, 3 \& 5, then 8, 10 \&12, then 15, 17 \& 19, then 22, 24 \& 26.
Overall Study
Disease progression
1

Baseline Characteristics

Oral LBH589 in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL)

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Oral Drug Treatment
n=1 Participants
LBH589 was to be given orally (by mouth), 40 mg once-a-day, 3 times weekly every week on days 1, 3 \& 5, then 8, 10 \&12, then 15, 17 \& 19, then 22, 24 \& 26.
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
1 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 8 weeks (2 cycles) unless treatment continues due to partial or complete response

Population: The study was abandoned after only one patient due to low accrual and the sponsor losing interest in the single-agent. The one patient had disease progression requiring more aggressive treatment and did not complete the study.

Investigators intended to assess the rate of overall and complete response by World Health Organization (WHO) classification in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). WHO Performance Scale Measures levels of patient capability: 0 Normal activity; 1 Symptoms, but nearly fully ambulatory; 2 Some bed time, but needs to be in bed \<50% of normal daytime; 3 Needs to be in bed \>50% of normal daytime; 4 Unable to get out of bed.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 8 weeks (2 cycles) unless treatment continues due to partial or complete response

Population: The study was abandoned after only one patient due to low accrual and the sponsor losing interest in the single-agent. The one patient had disease progression requiring more aggressive treatment and did not complete the study.

Investigators intended to determine the complete and partial responses. Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): Using the NCI criteria - - See definitions in the Detailed Description section for a Complete hematologic Remission, and Partial Response. Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): Based on the International Workshop to Standardize Response Criteria to NHL (Cheson, JCO 1999) - See definitions in the Detailed Description section for a Complete hematologic Remission, and Partial Response.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 8 weeks (2 cycles) unless treatment continues due to partial or complete response

Population: The study was abandoned after only one patient due to low accrual and the sponsor losing interest in the single-agent. The one patient had disease progression requiring more aggressive treatment and did not complete the study.

Investigators intended to determine the duration of responses.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 8 weeks (2 cycles) unless treatment continues due to partial or complete response

Population: The study was abandoned after only one patient due to low accrual and the sponsor losing interest in the single-agent. The one patient had disease progression requiring more aggressive treatment and did not complete the study.

Investigators intended to estimate the progression free survival time

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 8 weeks (2 cycles) unless treatment continues due to partial or complete response

Investigators intended to monitor the QTc interval in patients receiving oral LBH589

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 8 weeks (2 cycles) unless treatment continues due to partial or complete response

Population: The study was abandoned after only one patient due to low accrual and the sponsor losing interest in the single-agent. The one patient had disease progression requiring more aggressive treatment and did not complete the study.

Investigators intended to evaluate histone acetylation, cytotoxic mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) activity, cytokine profiles, and immunologic synapse alterations through peripheral blood correlative studies

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 8 weeks (2 cycles) unless treatment continues due to partial or complete response

Population: The study was abandoned after only one patient due to low accrual and the sponsor losing interest in the single-agent. The one patient had disease progression requiring more aggressive treatment and did not complete the study.

Investigators intended to evaluate the safety and tolerability profile of LBH589. Assessments would consist of monitoring and recording all adverse events and serious adverse events, the regular monitoring of hematology, blood chemistry and urine values, vital signs, ECOG performance status, and the regular physical examinations and ECG assessments. Adverse events will be assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0. CTCAE v3.0 can be accessed on the National Institute of Health (NIH)/NCI website at http://ctep.cancer.gov/forms/CTCAEv3.pdf.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Oral Drug Treatment
n=1 Participants
LBH589 was to be given orally (by mouth), 40 mg once-a-day, 3 times weekly every week on days 1, 3 \& 5, then 8, 10 \&12, then 15, 17 \& 19, then 22, 24 \& 26.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
1 participants

Adverse Events

Oral Drug Treatment

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Oral Drug Treatment
n=1 participants at risk
LBH589 was to be given orally (by mouth), 40 mg once-a-day, 3 times weekly every week on days 1, 3 \& 5, then 8, 10 \&12, then 15, 17 \& 19, then 22, 24 \& 26.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Death not associated with CTCAE term - Disease progression NOS
100.0%
1/1 • Number of events 1 • 46 days

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Oral Drug Treatment
n=1 participants at risk
LBH589 was to be given orally (by mouth), 40 mg once-a-day, 3 times weekly every week on days 1, 3 \& 5, then 8, 10 \&12, then 15, 17 \& 19, then 22, 24 \& 26.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hemorrhage, GI - Upper GI NOS
100.0%
1/1 • Number of events 1 • 46 days

Additional Information

Celeste Bello, M.D.

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute

Phone: 813-745-8623

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place