Trial Outcomes & Findings for Does Treximet Improve Productivity and Patient Satisfaction Due to Sustained Response and Consistency of Response? (NCT NCT01086358)
NCT ID: NCT01086358
Last Updated: 2018-05-01
Results Overview
The primary outcome measure was lost productivity (workplace productivity + non-workplace activity time) as measured by a variant of the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Scale (WPAI) at 6 months. The primary efficacy dataset included the 37 patients that completed both phases of the study and uses the last observed headache. The unit of analysis is hours lost. The higher the score the greater impact on productivity. The range depends on the length of the attack, but in the sample among all observed attacks, lost work productivity ranged from 0-10.5 hours, while lost non-workplace activity time ranged from 0 to 8.95 hours. The total lost productivity is the sum of lost work productivity and lost non-workplace activity time.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
60 participants
6 months
2018-05-01
Participant Flow
60 Subjects who are employed in a paying job, who have episodic migraine (\<15 days/month), who are using an acute care triptan monotherapy for their migraine (excluding combinations of any sort, such as acetaminophen \[APAP\] and non-steoridals \[NSAIDs\]) and who have no contraindications to triptan or NSAID use.
This study had no wash-out or run-in phase.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Usual Prescribed Triptan First
Subjects will be randomized to either of two arms at enrollment in this study. They may start with their usual prescribed triptan or Treximet, depending on the randomization schedule. To account for the correlation from patients acting as their own controls in this crossover design, a standard deviation of the difference equal to 2.5 is assumed. Under these assumptions, a total sample of 60, with 30 in each sequence, would power the study at 86%.
|
Treximet Arm First
Subjects will be randomized to either of two arms at enrollment in this study. They may start with their usual prescribed triptan or Treximet, depending on the randomization schedule.
Treximet for migraine treatment: Treximet is the combination of sumatriptan 85 mg plus naproxen sodium 500mg. To account for the correlation from patients acting as their own controls in this crossover design, a standard deviation of the difference equal to 2.5 is assumed. Under these assumptions, a total sample of 760, with 30 in each sequence, would power the study at 86%.
|
|---|---|---|
|
First Intervention
STARTED
|
30
|
29
|
|
First Intervention
COMPLETED
|
21
|
24
|
|
First Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
9
|
5
|
|
Second Intervention
STARTED
|
21
|
24
|
|
Second Intervention
COMPLETED
|
17
|
20
|
|
Second Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Usual Prescribed Triptan First
Subjects will be randomized to either of two arms at enrollment in this study. They may start with their usual prescribed triptan or Treximet, depending on the randomization schedule. To account for the correlation from patients acting as their own controls in this crossover design, a standard deviation of the difference equal to 2.5 is assumed. Under these assumptions, a total sample of 60, with 30 in each sequence, would power the study at 86%.
|
Treximet Arm First
Subjects will be randomized to either of two arms at enrollment in this study. They may start with their usual prescribed triptan or Treximet, depending on the randomization schedule.
Treximet for migraine treatment: Treximet is the combination of sumatriptan 85 mg plus naproxen sodium 500mg. To account for the correlation from patients acting as their own controls in this crossover design, a standard deviation of the difference equal to 2.5 is assumed. Under these assumptions, a total sample of 760, with 30 in each sequence, would power the study at 86%.
|
|---|---|---|
|
First Intervention
Lost to Follow-up
|
9
|
4
|
|
First Intervention
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
1
|
|
Second Intervention
Lost to Follow-up
|
4
|
4
|
Baseline Characteristics
Subjects were lost to follow-up or withdrew consent.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
All Completed Study Participants
n=37 Participants
Participants received their usual prescribed triptan or Treximet, depending on the randomization schedule.
Usual prescribed triptan: usual prescribed triptans may include:sumatriptan, rizatriptan, naratriptan, almotriptan, eletriptan, zolmitriptan
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
41.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 • n=5 Participants • Subjects were lost to follow-up or withdrew consent.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants • Not all subjects completed both study arms.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants • Not all subjects completed both study arms.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • 37 patients completed both phases of the study and make up the primary data set.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • 37 patients completed both phases of the study and make up the primary data set.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • 37 patients completed both phases of the study and make up the primary data set.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants • 37 patients completed both phases of the study and make up the primary data set.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants • 37 patients completed both phases of the study and make up the primary data set.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • 37 patients completed both phases of the study and make up the primary data set.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • 37 patients completed both phases of the study and make up the primary data set.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: This includes all patients that completed all study visits are included in this efficacy analysis
The primary outcome measure was lost productivity (workplace productivity + non-workplace activity time) as measured by a variant of the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Scale (WPAI) at 6 months. The primary efficacy dataset included the 37 patients that completed both phases of the study and uses the last observed headache. The unit of analysis is hours lost. The higher the score the greater impact on productivity. The range depends on the length of the attack, but in the sample among all observed attacks, lost work productivity ranged from 0-10.5 hours, while lost non-workplace activity time ranged from 0 to 8.95 hours. The total lost productivity is the sum of lost work productivity and lost non-workplace activity time.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1 - Triptan
n=37 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to either of two arms at enrollment in this study. They may start with their usual prescribed triptan or Treximet, depending on the randomization schedule.
Arm 1 Triptan: Usual prescribed triptans may include:sumatriptan, rizatriptan, naratriptan, almotriptan, eletriptan, zolmitriptan
|
Arm 2 - Sumatriptan/Naproxen Sodium (Treximet) Arm
n=37 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to either of two arms at enrollment in this study. They may start with their usual prescribed triptan or Treximet, depending on the randomization schedule.
Arm 2 - Sumatriptan/naproxen sodium (Treximet): Treximet is the combination of sumatriptan 85 mg plus naproxen sodium 500mg
|
|---|---|---|
|
Workplace Productivity and Activity Impairment Scale (WPAI).
|
4.15 hours
Interval 2.93 to 5.36
|
2.44 hours
Interval 1.23 to 3.65
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: This includes all patients that completed all study visits are included in this efficacy analysis
This outcome measure was lost workplace productivity as measured by a variant of the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Scale (WPAI) at 6 months.The primary efficacy dataset included the 37 patients that completed both phases of the study and uses the last observed headache. The primary efficacy dataset included the 37 patients that completed both phases of the study and uses the last observed headache. The unit of analysis is hours lost. The higher the score the greater impact on productivity. The range depends on the length of the attack, but in the sample among all observed attacks, lost work productivity ranged from 0-10.5 hours, while lost non-workplace activity time ranged from 0 to 8.95 hours. The total lost productivity is the sum of lost work productivity and lost non-workplace activity time.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1 - Triptan
n=37 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to either of two arms at enrollment in this study. They may start with their usual prescribed triptan or Treximet, depending on the randomization schedule.
Arm 1 Triptan: Usual prescribed triptans may include:sumatriptan, rizatriptan, naratriptan, almotriptan, eletriptan, zolmitriptan
|
Arm 2 - Sumatriptan/Naproxen Sodium (Treximet) Arm
n=37 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to either of two arms at enrollment in this study. They may start with their usual prescribed triptan or Treximet, depending on the randomization schedule.
Arm 2 - Sumatriptan/naproxen sodium (Treximet): Treximet is the combination of sumatriptan 85 mg plus naproxen sodium 500mg
|
|---|---|---|
|
Lost Workplace Productivity
|
2.25 hours
Interval 1.6 to 2.9
|
1.23 hours
Interval 0.58 to 1.87
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 MonthsPopulation: This includes all patients that completed all study visits are included in this efficacy analysis
This outcome measure was lost activity time as measured by a variant of the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Scale (WPAI) at 6 months.The primary efficacy dataset included the 37 patients that completed both phases of the study and uses the last observed headache. The primary efficacy dataset included the 37 patients that completed both phases of the study and uses the last observed headache. The unit of analysis is hours lost. The higher the score the greater impact on productivity. The range depends on the length of the attack, but in the sample among all observed attacks, lost work productivity ranged from 0-10.5 hours, while lost non-workplace activity time ranged from 0 to 8.95 hours. The total lost productivity is the sum of lost work productivity and lost non-workplace activity time.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1 - Triptan
n=37 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to either of two arms at enrollment in this study. They may start with their usual prescribed triptan or Treximet, depending on the randomization schedule.
Arm 1 Triptan: Usual prescribed triptans may include:sumatriptan, rizatriptan, naratriptan, almotriptan, eletriptan, zolmitriptan
|
Arm 2 - Sumatriptan/Naproxen Sodium (Treximet) Arm
n=37 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to either of two arms at enrollment in this study. They may start with their usual prescribed triptan or Treximet, depending on the randomization schedule.
Arm 2 - Sumatriptan/naproxen sodium (Treximet): Treximet is the combination of sumatriptan 85 mg plus naproxen sodium 500mg
|
|---|---|---|
|
Lost Activity Time
|
1.89 hours
Interval 1.19 to 2.6
|
1.22 hours
Interval 0.51 to 1.92
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsThe Migraine-ACT is a 4-item scale with yes/no responses. A score of 3 or more is considered favorable. The primary efficacy dataset included the 37 patients that completed both phases of the study and uses the last observed headache. The Migraine-ACT is reported as a binary measure (3 or more positive responses). The outcome presented included the percentage with a score of 3 or more, and the Odds ratio comparing the two treatments.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1 - Triptan
n=37 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to either of two arms at enrollment in this study. They may start with their usual prescribed triptan or Treximet, depending on the randomization schedule.
Arm 1 Triptan: Usual prescribed triptans may include:sumatriptan, rizatriptan, naratriptan, almotriptan, eletriptan, zolmitriptan
|
Arm 2 - Sumatriptan/Naproxen Sodium (Treximet) Arm
n=37 Participants
Subjects will be randomized to either of two arms at enrollment in this study. They may start with their usual prescribed triptan or Treximet, depending on the randomization schedule.
Arm 2 - Sumatriptan/naproxen sodium (Treximet): Treximet is the combination of sumatriptan 85 mg plus naproxen sodium 500mg
|
|---|---|---|
|
Favorable Response on Migraine-ACT
|
46 percentage of favorable responses
Interval 30.0 to 63.0
|
71 percentage of favorable responses
Interval 54.0 to 84.0
|
Adverse Events
Usual Prescribed Triptan
Treximet Arm
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Usual Prescribed Triptan
n=45 participants at risk
Subjects will be randomized to either of two arms at enrollment in this study. They may start with their usual prescribed triptan or Treximet, depending on the randomization schedule. To account for the correlation from patients acting as their own controls in this crossover design, a standard deviation of the difference equal to 2.5 is assumed. Under these assumptions, a total sample of 760, with 30 in each sequence, would power the study at 86%.
|
Treximet Arm
n=45 participants at risk
Subjects will be randomized to either of two arms at enrollment in this study. They may start with their usual prescribed triptan or Treximet, depending on the randomization schedule.
Treximet for migraine treatment: Treximet is the combination of sumatriptan 85 mg plus naproxen sodium 500mg. To account for the correlation from patients acting as their own controls in this crossover design, a standard deviation of the difference equal to 2.5 is assumed. Under these assumptions, a total sample of 760, with 30 in each sequence, would power the study at 86%.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
17.8%
8/45 • Approximately 6 months
Adverse events were noted from the date of the first study visit until the end of study visit was completed, grouped by the treatment medication in use. There were no serious AEs. 45 patients entered the Triptan arm and 45 patients entered the Treximet arm. 12 patients failed to report AE status and were considered to be free from AEs in the calculations below.
|
8.9%
4/45 • Approximately 6 months
Adverse events were noted from the date of the first study visit until the end of study visit was completed, grouped by the treatment medication in use. There were no serious AEs. 45 patients entered the Triptan arm and 45 patients entered the Treximet arm. 12 patients failed to report AE status and were considered to be free from AEs in the calculations below.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
11.1%
5/45 • Approximately 6 months
Adverse events were noted from the date of the first study visit until the end of study visit was completed, grouped by the treatment medication in use. There were no serious AEs. 45 patients entered the Triptan arm and 45 patients entered the Treximet arm. 12 patients failed to report AE status and were considered to be free from AEs in the calculations below.
|
13.3%
6/45 • Approximately 6 months
Adverse events were noted from the date of the first study visit until the end of study visit was completed, grouped by the treatment medication in use. There were no serious AEs. 45 patients entered the Triptan arm and 45 patients entered the Treximet arm. 12 patients failed to report AE status and were considered to be free from AEs in the calculations below.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Lightheadedness
|
8.9%
4/45 • Approximately 6 months
Adverse events were noted from the date of the first study visit until the end of study visit was completed, grouped by the treatment medication in use. There were no serious AEs. 45 patients entered the Triptan arm and 45 patients entered the Treximet arm. 12 patients failed to report AE status and were considered to be free from AEs in the calculations below.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Approximately 6 months
Adverse events were noted from the date of the first study visit until the end of study visit was completed, grouped by the treatment medication in use. There were no serious AEs. 45 patients entered the Triptan arm and 45 patients entered the Treximet arm. 12 patients failed to report AE status and were considered to be free from AEs in the calculations below.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
8.9%
4/45 • Approximately 6 months
Adverse events were noted from the date of the first study visit until the end of study visit was completed, grouped by the treatment medication in use. There were no serious AEs. 45 patients entered the Triptan arm and 45 patients entered the Treximet arm. 12 patients failed to report AE status and were considered to be free from AEs in the calculations below.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Approximately 6 months
Adverse events were noted from the date of the first study visit until the end of study visit was completed, grouped by the treatment medication in use. There were no serious AEs. 45 patients entered the Triptan arm and 45 patients entered the Treximet arm. 12 patients failed to report AE status and were considered to be free from AEs in the calculations below.
|
|
General disorders
Chest Discomfort
|
2.2%
1/45 • Approximately 6 months
Adverse events were noted from the date of the first study visit until the end of study visit was completed, grouped by the treatment medication in use. There were no serious AEs. 45 patients entered the Triptan arm and 45 patients entered the Treximet arm. 12 patients failed to report AE status and were considered to be free from AEs in the calculations below.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Approximately 6 months
Adverse events were noted from the date of the first study visit until the end of study visit was completed, grouped by the treatment medication in use. There were no serious AEs. 45 patients entered the Triptan arm and 45 patients entered the Treximet arm. 12 patients failed to report AE status and were considered to be free from AEs in the calculations below.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Giddiness
|
2.2%
1/45 • Approximately 6 months
Adverse events were noted from the date of the first study visit until the end of study visit was completed, grouped by the treatment medication in use. There were no serious AEs. 45 patients entered the Triptan arm and 45 patients entered the Treximet arm. 12 patients failed to report AE status and were considered to be free from AEs in the calculations below.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Approximately 6 months
Adverse events were noted from the date of the first study visit until the end of study visit was completed, grouped by the treatment medication in use. There were no serious AEs. 45 patients entered the Triptan arm and 45 patients entered the Treximet arm. 12 patients failed to report AE status and were considered to be free from AEs in the calculations below.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Apraxia
|
2.2%
1/45 • Approximately 6 months
Adverse events were noted from the date of the first study visit until the end of study visit was completed, grouped by the treatment medication in use. There were no serious AEs. 45 patients entered the Triptan arm and 45 patients entered the Treximet arm. 12 patients failed to report AE status and were considered to be free from AEs in the calculations below.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Approximately 6 months
Adverse events were noted from the date of the first study visit until the end of study visit was completed, grouped by the treatment medication in use. There were no serious AEs. 45 patients entered the Triptan arm and 45 patients entered the Treximet arm. 12 patients failed to report AE status and were considered to be free from AEs in the calculations below.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Bladder pain
|
0.00%
0/45 • Approximately 6 months
Adverse events were noted from the date of the first study visit until the end of study visit was completed, grouped by the treatment medication in use. There were no serious AEs. 45 patients entered the Triptan arm and 45 patients entered the Treximet arm. 12 patients failed to report AE status and were considered to be free from AEs in the calculations below.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Approximately 6 months
Adverse events were noted from the date of the first study visit until the end of study visit was completed, grouped by the treatment medication in use. There were no serious AEs. 45 patients entered the Triptan arm and 45 patients entered the Treximet arm. 12 patients failed to report AE status and were considered to be free from AEs in the calculations below.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle weakness
|
2.2%
1/45 • Approximately 6 months
Adverse events were noted from the date of the first study visit until the end of study visit was completed, grouped by the treatment medication in use. There were no serious AEs. 45 patients entered the Triptan arm and 45 patients entered the Treximet arm. 12 patients failed to report AE status and were considered to be free from AEs in the calculations below.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Approximately 6 months
Adverse events were noted from the date of the first study visit until the end of study visit was completed, grouped by the treatment medication in use. There were no serious AEs. 45 patients entered the Triptan arm and 45 patients entered the Treximet arm. 12 patients failed to report AE status and were considered to be free from AEs in the calculations below.
|
|
General disorders
Irritability
|
2.2%
1/45 • Approximately 6 months
Adverse events were noted from the date of the first study visit until the end of study visit was completed, grouped by the treatment medication in use. There were no serious AEs. 45 patients entered the Triptan arm and 45 patients entered the Treximet arm. 12 patients failed to report AE status and were considered to be free from AEs in the calculations below.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Approximately 6 months
Adverse events were noted from the date of the first study visit until the end of study visit was completed, grouped by the treatment medication in use. There were no serious AEs. 45 patients entered the Triptan arm and 45 patients entered the Treximet arm. 12 patients failed to report AE status and were considered to be free from AEs in the calculations below.
|
|
General disorders
Xerostomia
|
4.4%
2/45 • Approximately 6 months
Adverse events were noted from the date of the first study visit until the end of study visit was completed, grouped by the treatment medication in use. There were no serious AEs. 45 patients entered the Triptan arm and 45 patients entered the Treximet arm. 12 patients failed to report AE status and were considered to be free from AEs in the calculations below.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Approximately 6 months
Adverse events were noted from the date of the first study visit until the end of study visit was completed, grouped by the treatment medication in use. There were no serious AEs. 45 patients entered the Triptan arm and 45 patients entered the Treximet arm. 12 patients failed to report AE status and were considered to be free from AEs in the calculations below.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paresthesia
|
2.2%
1/45 • Approximately 6 months
Adverse events were noted from the date of the first study visit until the end of study visit was completed, grouped by the treatment medication in use. There were no serious AEs. 45 patients entered the Triptan arm and 45 patients entered the Treximet arm. 12 patients failed to report AE status and were considered to be free from AEs in the calculations below.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Approximately 6 months
Adverse events were noted from the date of the first study visit until the end of study visit was completed, grouped by the treatment medication in use. There were no serious AEs. 45 patients entered the Triptan arm and 45 patients entered the Treximet arm. 12 patients failed to report AE status and were considered to be free from AEs in the calculations below.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place