Trial Outcomes & Findings for Mastery Learning Inguinal Hernia Repair (NCT NCT01085500)
NCT ID: NCT01085500
Last Updated: 2016-10-28
Results Overview
Operative time was recorded with a standard stopwatch, began at the start of the operative case and ended when procedure was terminated. We realized that the operative time for poorly performing trainees could be faster than the time for more skilled trainees because the supervising surgeon would perform a greater proportion of the procedure. We calculated participation-corrected time as raw total time + the time of staff involvement: time\_corrected = time\_raw + (1-participation) x time\_raw.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
at first TEP procedure post-randomization; Due to surgical scheduling variability this can be anytime from 1 to 2 days following randomization to a week or two
2016-10-28
Participant Flow
General surgery residents were recruited from the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota from January to September 2010.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Simulation Curriculum
General surgery residents will undergo a simulation-based educational curriculum on totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair.
|
Current Practice
General surgery residents will undergo training according to current practice.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
26
|
24
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
26
|
24
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Mastery Learning Inguinal Hernia Repair
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Simulation Curriculum
n=26 Participants
General surgery residents will undergo a simulation-based educational curriculum on totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair.
|
Current Practice
n=24 Participants
General surgery residents will undergo training according to current practice.
|
Total
n=50 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
30 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2 • n=5 Participants
|
30 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3 • n=7 Participants
|
30 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
26 participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 participants
n=7 Participants
|
50 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: at first TEP procedure post-randomization; Due to surgical scheduling variability this can be anytime from 1 to 2 days following randomization to a week or twoOperative time was recorded with a standard stopwatch, began at the start of the operative case and ended when procedure was terminated. We realized that the operative time for poorly performing trainees could be faster than the time for more skilled trainees because the supervising surgeon would perform a greater proportion of the procedure. We calculated participation-corrected time as raw total time + the time of staff involvement: time\_corrected = time\_raw + (1-participation) x time\_raw.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Simulation Curriculum
n=26 Participants
General surgery residents will undergo a simulation-based educational curriculum on totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair.
|
Current Practice
n=24 Participants
General surgery residents will undergo training according to current practice.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participation-Corrected Operative Time
|
34.4 minutes
Standard Deviation 8.4
|
47.5 minutes
Standard Deviation 13.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at first TEP procedure post-randomization; due to surgical scheduling variability this can be anytime from 1 to 2 days following randomization to a week or twoThe trained observer and the staff supervising surgeon graded operative performance independently using a global rating scale, Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) immediately after each case, (1 rating per case if bilateral repair). The GOALS tool has been shown to be a valid and reliable tool to measure generic laparoscopic skills in the simulated environment and in the operating room, with good agreement between live and video-review ratings. The scores range from 6 to 30, a higher score indicates greater operative performance.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Simulation Curriculum
n=26 Participants
General surgery residents will undergo a simulation-based educational curriculum on totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair.
|
Current Practice
n=24 Participants
General surgery residents will undergo training according to current practice.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Operative Performance
|
21.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
18.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at first TEP procedure post-randomization, subjects were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 1 nightUrinary retention is the inability to empty the bladder. This is an educational study for surgeons. The participants in the study are surgeons, and the participant flow, baseline characteristics and first two outcome measures are for the surgeons. During the part of the study reported for the third outcome measure, the first surgical procedure (TEP) after randomization, each surgeon had one subject. Therefore, this outcome measure is for the hernia patients or subjects.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Simulation Curriculum
n=26 Participants
General surgery residents will undergo a simulation-based educational curriculum on totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair.
|
Current Practice
n=24 Participants
General surgery residents will undergo training according to current practice.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Hernia Repair Subjects With Post-Operative Urinary Retention
|
0 Subjects
|
9 Subjects
|
Adverse Events
Current Practice
Simulation Curriculum
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Current Practice
n=24 participants at risk
General surgery residents will undergo training according to current practice.
|
Simulation Curriculum
n=26 participants at risk
General surgery residents will undergo a simulation-based educational curriculum on totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Peritoneal tear
|
37.5%
9/24 • Number of events 9 • Adverse events were collected on all patients during the hernia operation and postoperative until release from the hospital for first hernia repair postrandomization.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected on all patients during the hernia operation and postoperative until release from the hospital for first hernia repair postrandomization.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Epigastric vessel injury
|
16.7%
4/24 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected on all patients during the hernia operation and postoperative until release from the hospital for first hernia repair postrandomization.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected on all patients during the hernia operation and postoperative until release from the hospital for first hernia repair postrandomization.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary Retention
|
37.5%
9/24 • Number of events 9 • Adverse events were collected on all patients during the hernia operation and postoperative until release from the hospital for first hernia repair postrandomization.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Adverse events were collected on all patients during the hernia operation and postoperative until release from the hospital for first hernia repair postrandomization.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hematoma
|
8.3%
2/24 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected on all patients during the hernia operation and postoperative until release from the hospital for first hernia repair postrandomization.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected on all patients during the hernia operation and postoperative until release from the hospital for first hernia repair postrandomization.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Superficial skin infection
|
8.3%
2/24 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected on all patients during the hernia operation and postoperative until release from the hospital for first hernia repair postrandomization.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Adverse events were collected on all patients during the hernia operation and postoperative until release from the hospital for first hernia repair postrandomization.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place