Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of Laquinimod in Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Active Lupus Arthritis (NCT NCT01085084)
NCT ID: NCT01085084
Last Updated: 2022-07-07
Results Overview
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported AE section'.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
82 participants
Baseline up to Week 16
2022-07-07
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received 2 capsules of placebo matched to laquinimod orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 0.5 mg
Participants received 1 capsule of laquinimod 0.5 milligrams (mg) and 1 capsule of placebo matched to laquinimod orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 1 mg
Participants received 2 capsules of laquinimod 0.5 mg orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
26
|
28
|
28
|
|
Overall Study
Received at Least 1 Dose of Study Drug
|
26
|
28
|
28
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Analysis Set
|
25
|
29
|
28
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
19
|
23
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
7
|
5
|
9
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received 2 capsules of placebo matched to laquinimod orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 0.5 mg
Participants received 1 capsule of laquinimod 0.5 milligrams (mg) and 1 capsule of placebo matched to laquinimod orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 1 mg
Participants received 2 capsules of laquinimod 0.5 mg orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
4
|
3
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Treatment Failure
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of Laquinimod in Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Active Lupus Arthritis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=26 Participants
Participants received 2 capsules of placebo matched to laquinimod orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 0.5 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants received 1 capsule of laquinimod 0.5 mg and 1 capsule of placebo matched to laquinimod orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 1 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants received 2 capsules of laquinimod 0.5 mg orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
Total
n=82 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
48.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5 • n=5 Participants
|
46.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.0 • n=7 Participants
|
46.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4 • n=5 Participants
|
47.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
75 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 16Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported AE section'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=25 Participants
Participants received 2 capsules of placebo matched to laquinimod orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 0.5 mg
n=29 Participants
Participants received 1 capsule of laquinimod 0.5 mg and 1 capsule of placebo matched to laquinimod orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 1 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants received 2 capsules of laquinimod 0.5 mg orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
|
21 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis set included all participants who were randomly assigned to a treatment, regardless of which treatment they actually received, excluding observations after treatment failure. Here 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
The number of swollen joints was used to assess lupus arthritis activity. Joint swelling was defined as soft tissue swelling that was detectable along the joint margins. 66 joints were examined for swelling. These joints include the temporomandibular (n = 2), sternoclavicular (n =2), acromioclavicular (n = 2), shoulder (n = 2), elbow (n = 2), wrist (n = 2), metacarpophalageal (n= 10), interphalangeal of thumb (n = 2), distal interphalangeal (n = 8), proximal interphalangeal (n =8), knee (n = 2), ankle mortise (n = 2), ankle tarsus (n = 2), metatarsophalangeal (n = 10), interphalangeal of great toe (n = 2), and proximal/distal interphalangeal of the toes (n = 8).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=26 Participants
Participants received 2 capsules of placebo matched to laquinimod orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 0.5 mg
n=27 Participants
Participants received 1 capsule of laquinimod 0.5 mg and 1 capsule of placebo matched to laquinimod orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 1 mg
n=26 Participants
Participants received 2 capsules of laquinimod 0.5 mg orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Week 12
|
-36.9 percent change
Standard Deviation 78.1
|
-36.7 percent change
Standard Deviation 47.0
|
-40.5 percent change
Standard Deviation 55.6
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: The mITT analysis set included all participants who were randomly assigned to a treatment, regardless of which treatment they actually received, excluding observations after treatment failure. Here 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
The number of tender joints was used to assess lupus arthritis activity. Joint tenderness was defined as the presence or absence of tenderness and/or pain in a joint at rest with pressure or on passive movement of the joint and joint manipulation. 68 joints were examined for tenderness. These joints include the temporomandibular (n = 2), sternoclavicular (n =2), acromioclavicular (n = 2), shoulder (n = 2), elbow (n = 2), wrist (n = 2), metacarpophalageal (n= 10), interphalangeal of thumb (n = 2), distal interphalangeal (n = 8), proximal interphalangeal (n =8), hip (n = 2), knee (n = 2), ankle mortise (n = 2), ankle tarsus (n = 2), metatarsophalangeal (n = 10), interphalangeal of great toe (n = 2), and proximal/distal interphalangeal of the toes (n = 8).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=26 Participants
Participants received 2 capsules of placebo matched to laquinimod orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 0.5 mg
n=27 Participants
Participants received 1 capsule of laquinimod 0.5 mg and 1 capsule of placebo matched to laquinimod orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 1 mg
n=26 Participants
Participants received 2 capsules of laquinimod 0.5 mg orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count at Week 12
|
-8.5 percent change
Standard Deviation 81.3
|
-31.4 percent change
Standard Deviation 53.1
|
-42.0 percent change
Standard Deviation 37.8
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
Laquinimod 0.5 mg
Laquinimod 1 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=25 participants at risk
Participants received 2 capsules of placebo matched to laquinimod orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 0.5 mg
n=29 participants at risk
Participants received 1 capsule of laquinimod 0.5 mg and 1 capsule of placebo matched to laquinimod orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 1 mg
n=28 participants at risk
Participants received 2 capsules of laquinimod 0.5 mg orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.00%
0/25 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
0.00%
0/25 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia Mycoplasmal
|
0.00%
0/25 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis
|
0.00%
0/25 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/25 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal Ideation
|
0.00%
0/25 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleurisy
|
0.00%
0/25 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=25 participants at risk
Participants received 2 capsules of placebo matched to laquinimod orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 0.5 mg
n=29 participants at risk
Participants received 1 capsule of laquinimod 0.5 mg and 1 capsule of placebo matched to laquinimod orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 1 mg
n=28 participants at risk
Participants received 2 capsules of laquinimod 0.5 mg orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
12.0%
3/25 • Number of events 3 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Distension
|
0.00%
0/25 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 4 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain
|
8.0%
2/25 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Tenderness
|
0.00%
0/25 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/25 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
13.8%
4/29 • Number of events 4 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
14.3%
4/28 • Number of events 5 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry Mouth
|
0.00%
0/25 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
12.0%
3/25 • Number of events 3 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
17.2%
5/29 • Number of events 7 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
21.4%
6/28 • Number of events 6 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/25 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 4 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
8.0%
2/25 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
10.7%
3/28 • Number of events 4 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/25 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Seasonal Allergy
|
0.00%
0/25 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Escherichia Urinary Tract Infection
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
8.0%
2/25 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth Infection
|
8.0%
2/25 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
13.8%
4/29 • Number of events 5 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 3 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary Tract Infection
|
16.0%
4/25 • Number of events 7 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle Strain
|
0.00%
0/25 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased Appetite
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
10.7%
3/28 • Number of events 3 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/25 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
17.2%
5/29 • Number of events 5 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back Pain
|
0.00%
0/25 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
10.7%
3/28 • Number of events 4 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal Chest Pain
|
0.00%
0/25 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
|
8.0%
2/25 • Number of events 3 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
8.0%
2/25 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
13.8%
4/29 • Number of events 5 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
10.7%
3/28 • Number of events 5 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
0.00%
0/25 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
8.0%
2/25 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/25 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
10.3%
3/29 • Number of events 3 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/25 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal Pain
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
10.3%
3/29 • Number of events 3 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
0.00%
0/25 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Baseline up to Week 16
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In this set, treatment was assigned based upon the treatment actually received regardless of the assigned treatment.
|
Additional Information
Director, Clinical Research
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Sponsor has the right 60 days before submission for publication to review/provide comments. If the Sponsor's review shows that potentially patentable subject matter would be disclosed, publication or public disclosure shall be delayed for up to 90 additional days in order for the Sponsor, or Sponsor's designees, to file the necessary patent applications. In multicenter trials, each PI will postpone single center publications until after disclosure or publication of multicenter data.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER