Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy and Safety of Linagliptin in Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (NCT NCT01084005)

NCT ID: NCT01084005

Last Updated: 2014-01-29

Results Overview

HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 24 HbA1c percent minus the baseline HbA1c percent. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and prior use of insulin.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

241 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline and week 24

Results posted on

2014-01-29

Participant Flow

A total of 241 patients were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive treatment with linagliptin 5mg (n=162) or placebo (n=79). All randomised patients were treated.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Placebo
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo
Linagliptin 5 mg
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5mg
Overall Study
STARTED
79
162
Overall Study
COMPLETED
74
146
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
5
16

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Placebo
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo
Linagliptin 5 mg
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5mg
Overall Study
Adverse Event
1
8
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
3
7
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
1
1

Baseline Characteristics

Efficacy and Safety of Linagliptin in Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Placebo
n=79 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo
Linagliptin 5 mg
n=162 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5mg
Total
n=241 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
74.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2 • n=5 Participants
74.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4 • n=7 Participants
74.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
46 Participants
n=7 Participants
76 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
49 Participants
n=5 Participants
116 Participants
n=7 Participants
165 Participants
n=5 Participants
Body mass index (BMI) continuous
29.80 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.54 • n=5 Participants
29.60 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.74 • n=7 Participants
29.67 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.67 • n=5 Participants
Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1 (HbA1c)
7.70 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.70 • n=5 Participants
7.82 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.78 • n=7 Participants
7.78 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.76 • n=5 Participants
Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
144.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.6 • n=5 Participants
152.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.7 • n=7 Participants
149.9 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.2 • n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and week 24

Population: FAS consisting of all randomised patients who were treated with at least one dose of study drug, had a baseline, and at least 1 on-treatment HbA1c measurement. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used as the imputation rule.

HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 24 HbA1c percent minus the baseline HbA1c percent. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and prior use of insulin.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=78 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo
Linagliptin 5 mg
n=160 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5mg
HbA1c Change From Baseline to Week 24
0.04 Percent
Standard Error 0.07
-0.61 Percent
Standard Error 0.06

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and week 6

Population: FAS (LOCF)

HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 6 HbA1c percent minus the baseline HbA1c percent. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and prior use of insulin.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=78 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo
Linagliptin 5 mg
n=160 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5mg
HbA1c Change From Baseline to Week 6
-0.07 Percent
Standard Error 0.05
-0.42 Percent
Standard Error 0.03

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and week 12

Population: FAS (LOCF)

HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 12 HbA1c percent minus the baseline HbA1c percent. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and prior use of insulin.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=78 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo
Linagliptin 5 mg
n=160 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5mg
HbA1c Change From Baseline to Week 12
-0.03 Percent
Standard Error 0.06
-0.60 Percent
Standard Error 0.05

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and week 18

Population: FAS (LOCF)

HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 18 HbA1c percent minus the baseline HbA1c percent. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and prior use of insulin.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=78 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo
Linagliptin 5 mg
n=160 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5mg
HbA1c Change From Baseline to Week 18
0.04 Percent
Standard Error 0.07
-0.58 Percent
Standard Error 0.05

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and week 24

Population: FAS (LOCF)

This change from baseline reflects the Week 24 FPG minus the baseline FPG. Means are treatment-adjusted for baseline HbA1c, baseline FPG and prior use of insulin.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=78 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo
Linagliptin 5 mg
n=156 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5mg
FPG Change From Baseline to Week 24
10.1 mg/dL
Standard Error 4.3
-10.6 mg/dL
Standard Error 3.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and week 6

Population: FAS Observed cases (OC)

This change from baseline reflects the Week 6 FPG minus the baseline FPG. Means are treatment-adjusted for baseline HbA1c, baseline FPG and prior use of insulin, week repeated within patient and week by treatment interaction.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=77 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo
Linagliptin 5 mg
n=153 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5mg
FPG Change From Baseline to Week 6
4.6 mg/dL
Standard Error 2.7
-14.1 mg/dL
Standard Error 2.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and week 12

Population: FAS (OC)

This change from baseline reflects the Week 12 FPG minus the baseline FPG. Means are treatment-adjusted for baseline HbA1c, baseline FPG and prior use of insulin, week repeated within patient and week by treatment interaction.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=75 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo
Linagliptin 5 mg
n=148 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5mg
FPG Change From Baseline to Week 12
6.8 mg/dL
Standard Error 2.9
-14.7 mg/dL
Standard Error 2.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and week 18

Population: FAS (OC)

This change from baseline reflects the Week 18 FPG minus the baseline FPG. Means are treatment-adjusted for baseline HbA1c, baseline FPG and prior use of insulin, week repeated within patient and week by treatment interaction.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=68 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo
Linagliptin 5 mg
n=145 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5mg
FPG Change From Baseline to Week 18
9.6 mg/dL
Standard Error 3.6
-12.0 mg/dL
Standard Error 2.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and week 24

Population: FAS with baseline HbA1c \>=7% and non-completers considered as failure imputation (NCF)

The percentage of patients with an HbA1c value below 7% at week 24 was calculated for each treatment arm. If a patient did not have an HbA1c value at week 24 they were considered a failure, so HbA1c above 7%. Only patients with baseline HbA1c \>= 7%

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=72 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo
Linagliptin 5 mg
n=149 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5mg
Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7.0% at Week 24
8.3 percentage of patients
38.9 percentage of patients

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and week 24

Population: FAS (NCF)

The percentage of patients with an HbA1c value below 7% at week 24 were calculated for each treatment arm. If a patient did not have an HbA1c value at week 24 they were considered a failure, so HbA1c above 7%.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=78 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo
Linagliptin 5 mg
n=160 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5mg
Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7.0% at Week 24
11.5 percentage of patients
41.9 percentage of patients

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and week 24

Population: FAS (NCF)

The percentage of patients with an HbA1c reduction of ≥0.5% at week 24 from baseline was calculated for each treatment arm. If a patient did not have an HbA1c value at week 24 they were considered a failure, so HbA1c reduction less than 0.5%

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=78 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo
Linagliptin 5 mg
n=160 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5mg
Percentage of Patients Who Have a HbA1c Lowering by at Least 0.5% at Week 24
12.8 percentage of patients
54.4 percentage of patients

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: week 24

Population: FAS (OC)

The use of rescue therapy was planned for patients failing to achieve preset criteria based on glucose levels during the randomised treatment period of the trial

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=78 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo
Linagliptin 5 mg
n=160 Participants
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5mg
Number of Patients With Rescue Therapy
11 Number of patients
7 Number of patients

Adverse Events

Placebo

Serious events: 5 serious events
Other events: 37 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Linagliptin 5 mg

Serious events: 14 serious events
Other events: 70 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Placebo
n=79 participants at risk
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo
Linagliptin 5 mg
n=162 participants at risk
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5mg
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
0.00%
0/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
0.62%
1/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
Cardiac disorders
Atrioventricular block complete
0.00%
0/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
0.62%
1/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
0.00%
0/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
0.62%
1/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
0.00%
0/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
0.62%
1/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal haemorrhage
0.00%
0/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
0.62%
1/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
1.3%
1/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
0.00%
0/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
0.00%
0/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
1.9%
3/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
Infections and infestations
Vestibular neuronitis
0.00%
0/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
0.62%
1/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
0.00%
0/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
1.2%
2/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb traumatic amputation
0.00%
0/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
0.62%
1/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lower limb fracture
0.00%
0/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
0.62%
1/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thoracic vertebral fracture
0.00%
0/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
0.62%
1/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
0.00%
0/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
0.62%
1/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung adenocarcinoma
1.3%
1/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
0.00%
0/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant melanoma
1.3%
1/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
0.00%
0/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer
1.3%
1/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
0.00%
0/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
0.00%
0/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
0.62%
1/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
0.00%
0/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
0.62%
1/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary bladder polyp
1.3%
1/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
0.00%
0/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Placebo
n=79 participants at risk
Patients randomized to receive treatment with matching placebo
Linagliptin 5 mg
n=162 participants at risk
Patients randomized to receive treatment with Linagliptin 5mg
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
2.5%
2/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
5.6%
9/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
8.9%
7/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
10.5%
17/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
6.3%
5/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
3.7%
6/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
6.3%
5/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
4.3%
7/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
10.1%
8/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
5.6%
9/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
16.5%
13/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
22.8%
37/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
5.1%
4/79 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up
3.7%
6/162 • 24 weeks + 7 days of follow-up

Additional Information

Boehringer Ingelheim Call Center

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals

Phone: 1-800-243-0127

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Any publication of the result of this trial must be consistent with the Boehringer Ingelheim publication policy. The rights of the investigator and of the sponsor with regard to publication of the results of this trial are described in the investigator contract.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER