Cost-Effectiveness of Web-Based Follow Ups

NCT ID: NCT01079572

Last Updated: 2013-02-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

260 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-02-28

Study Completion Date

2011-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Complications following total joint arthroplasty are rare, and the majority of follow-up visits are routine. The technology now exists to conduct annual follow-up assessments without having to physically see the patient.

This study will investigate the cost-effectiveness of web-based follow-up assessments compared to standard in-clinic follow-ups. We will also assess patient satisfaction, preference, and the validity of the web-based follow up assessments. Patients coming up to their 1 year follow-up or greater will be randomized to either the web-based group or the usual care group.

Web-based patients will complete all questionnaires using an online database system, and have their x-ray taken at their local radiology facility. The surgeon will review radiographs online. If there are any concerns with the x-ray or responses to questionnaires, arrangements will be made for the patient to be seen at the clinic. Patients in the Usual Care group will come into the clinic for their follow-up assessment and have their x-ray taken at University Hospital as usual.

Online assessment could significantly decrease wait times in orthopaedic clinics, as well as increase availability for OR time and new consultations. This approach could also potentially reduce patient burden by decreasing travel distances, financial burden and time requirements.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis in the Knee Joint Osteoarthritis in the Hip Joint

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

web-based

The patient will undergo xrays at the closest PACs enabled imaging centre and will login and answer questions online. The surgeon will review the images and patient responses and determine whether the patient needs to be seen more urgently or a per routine.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

web-based

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients who are at least 2 years following knee or hip replacement will complete a questionnaire online and routine x-rays at a PACS enabled imaging center. The patient's surgeon will receive an email from the database summarizing the patient's responses to key questions and will review the x-rays. The surgeon will determine whether the patient needs to be seen in-person.

in-person

Patients will attend their follow-up appointments in-person as per usual

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

in-person

Intervention Type OTHER

Follow-up appointments will be completed in-person as per usual

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

in-person

Follow-up appointments will be completed in-person as per usual

Intervention Type OTHER

web-based

Patients who are at least 2 years following knee or hip replacement will complete a questionnaire online and routine x-rays at a PACS enabled imaging center. The patient's surgeon will receive an email from the database summarizing the patient's responses to key questions and will review the x-rays. The surgeon will determine whether the patient needs to be seen in-person.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients who have had a primary total hip or total knee arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria

* patients with osteolysis, or previous complications from their joint replacement
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Western Ontario, Canada

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dianne Bryant

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

London Health Sciences Centre - University Hospital

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Marsh J, Hoch JS, Bryant D, MacDonald SJ, Naudie D, McCalden R, Howard J, Bourne R, McAuley J. Economic evaluation of web-based compared with in-person follow-up after total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Nov 19;96(22):1910-6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01558.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25410510 (View on PubMed)

Marsh JD, Bryant DM, MacDonald SJ, Naudie DD, McCalden RW, Howard JL, Bourne RB, McAuley JP. Feasibility, effectiveness and costs associated with a web-based follow-up assessment following total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep;29(9):1723-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Apr 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24881023 (View on PubMed)

Marsh J, Bryant D, MacDonald SJ, Naudie D, Remtulla A, McCalden R, Howard J, Bourne R, McAuley J. Are patients satisfied with a web-based followup after total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1972-81. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3514-0. Epub 2014 Feb 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24562873 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PSI-2010-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.