Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
260 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-02-28
2011-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study will investigate the cost-effectiveness of web-based follow-up assessments compared to standard in-clinic follow-ups. We will also assess patient satisfaction, preference, and the validity of the web-based follow up assessments. Patients coming up to their 1 year follow-up or greater will be randomized to either the web-based group or the usual care group.
Web-based patients will complete all questionnaires using an online database system, and have their x-ray taken at their local radiology facility. The surgeon will review radiographs online. If there are any concerns with the x-ray or responses to questionnaires, arrangements will be made for the patient to be seen at the clinic. Patients in the Usual Care group will come into the clinic for their follow-up assessment and have their x-ray taken at University Hospital as usual.
Online assessment could significantly decrease wait times in orthopaedic clinics, as well as increase availability for OR time and new consultations. This approach could also potentially reduce patient burden by decreasing travel distances, financial burden and time requirements.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Feasibility Study: Effect of Patient Decision Aids for Total Joint Replacement on Surgical Referrals
NCT00743951
Effects of Tele- or In-person Prehabilitation in Candidates Awaiting Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02636751
Questionnaire and Radiography for Prosthesis Follow-up
NCT03745976
New Tool of Subjective and Objective Functional Evaluation and the Quality of Life After Arthroplastic Surgery of the Hip and the Knee Assisted or Not by Computer and Mini-invasive Arthroplasty
NCT00894218
Testing Implementation of Total Joint Replacement Rehabilitation Quality Indicator Toolkits
NCT06208553
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
web-based
The patient will undergo xrays at the closest PACs enabled imaging centre and will login and answer questions online. The surgeon will review the images and patient responses and determine whether the patient needs to be seen more urgently or a per routine.
web-based
Patients who are at least 2 years following knee or hip replacement will complete a questionnaire online and routine x-rays at a PACS enabled imaging center. The patient's surgeon will receive an email from the database summarizing the patient's responses to key questions and will review the x-rays. The surgeon will determine whether the patient needs to be seen in-person.
in-person
Patients will attend their follow-up appointments in-person as per usual
in-person
Follow-up appointments will be completed in-person as per usual
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
in-person
Follow-up appointments will be completed in-person as per usual
web-based
Patients who are at least 2 years following knee or hip replacement will complete a questionnaire online and routine x-rays at a PACS enabled imaging center. The patient's surgeon will receive an email from the database summarizing the patient's responses to key questions and will review the x-rays. The surgeon will determine whether the patient needs to be seen in-person.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation
OTHER
University of Western Ontario, Canada
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dianne Bryant
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
London Health Sciences Centre - University Hospital
London, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Marsh J, Hoch JS, Bryant D, MacDonald SJ, Naudie D, McCalden R, Howard J, Bourne R, McAuley J. Economic evaluation of web-based compared with in-person follow-up after total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Nov 19;96(22):1910-6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01558.
Marsh JD, Bryant DM, MacDonald SJ, Naudie DD, McCalden RW, Howard JL, Bourne RB, McAuley JP. Feasibility, effectiveness and costs associated with a web-based follow-up assessment following total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep;29(9):1723-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
Marsh J, Bryant D, MacDonald SJ, Naudie D, Remtulla A, McCalden R, Howard J, Bourne R, McAuley J. Are patients satisfied with a web-based followup after total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1972-81. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3514-0. Epub 2014 Feb 22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PSI-2010-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.