Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study of Milnacipran in Patients With Inadequate Response to Duloxetine for the Treatment of Fibromyalgia (NCT NCT01077375)

NCT ID: NCT01077375

Last Updated: 2012-01-26

Results Overview

The PGIC is a patient-reported measure of improvement in pain sensation and quality of life scored on a scale from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). To meet the criteria for a responder in this study, patients must report a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the PGIC.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE4

Target enrollment

107 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Assessed at Visit 4 (Week 9) and Visit 5 (Week 13) or early termination. Presented results generated via LOCF approach.

Results posted on

2012-01-26

Participant Flow

Recruitment occurred over an 8 month period from February 2010 to September 2010 at 25 study centers in the United States. Last patient last visit occurred on December 22nd, 2010.

All participants were given an open-label treatment of duloxetine 60 mg once daily for a two week period before randomization. Patients randomized to placebo received 1 week of duloxetine 30 mg to effect a duloxetine down-taper. Patients randomized to milnacipran received 1 week of placebo capsules to maintain the blind.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Placebo
Randomized Population: placebo treatment assignment, dose-matched placebo tablets, twice a day, oral administration.
Milnacipran
Randomized Population: milnacipran treatment assignment, 100 to 200 mg/day, twice a day in divided doses, oral administration.
Overall Study
STARTED
21
86
Overall Study
COMPLETED
11
51
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
10
35

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Placebo
Randomized Population: placebo treatment assignment, dose-matched placebo tablets, twice a day, oral administration.
Milnacipran
Randomized Population: milnacipran treatment assignment, 100 to 200 mg/day, twice a day in divided doses, oral administration.
Overall Study
Adverse Event
2
15
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
6
8
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
0
6
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
2
5
Overall Study
Other Reason
0
1

Baseline Characteristics

Study of Milnacipran in Patients With Inadequate Response to Duloxetine for the Treatment of Fibromyalgia

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Double-blind Safety Population: Placebo treatment assignment, dose-matched placebo tablets, twice a day, oral administration.
Milnacipran
n=85 Participants
Double-blind Safety Population: milnacipran treatment assignment, 100 to 200 md/day, twice a day in divided doses, oral administration. One patient randomized to the milnacipran treatment group did not take at least one dose of double-blind study drug and was therefore not included in the Double-blind Safety Population.
Total
n=106 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age Continuous
48.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 • n=5 Participants
48.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5 • n=7 Participants
48.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 • n=5 Participants
Age, Customized
18 to 59
17 participants
n=5 Participants
77 participants
n=7 Participants
94 participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Customized
60 to 70
4 participants
n=5 Participants
8 participants
n=7 Participants
12 participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
79 Participants
n=7 Participants
98 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
21 participants
n=5 Participants
85 participants
n=7 Participants
106 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Assessed at Visit 4 (Week 9) and Visit 5 (Week 13) or early termination. Presented results generated via LOCF approach.

Population: ITT Population: patients in the Double-blind Safety Population with ≥ 1 PGIC post-baseline assessment. Double-blind Safety Population includes 6 patients who were not included in ITT population. Presented results generated via LOCF approach. No statistical comparisons between groups are presented; study was exploratory, not hypothesis-testing.

The PGIC is a patient-reported measure of improvement in pain sensation and quality of life scored on a scale from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). To meet the criteria for a responder in this study, patients must report a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the PGIC.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population, placebo treatment assignment, dose-matched placebo tablets, twice a day, oral administration.
Milnacipran
n=79 Participants
Intent-to-treat Population, milnacipran treatment assignment, 100 to 200 mg/day, twice a day, oral administration. Flexible dosing from 50 mg/day to 200 mg/day was allowed except at a) the initial dosage after randomization had to be 100 mg/day, b) the dose range during week 1 of the randomized double-blind treatment period was 50 to 100 mg/day, and c) patients had to be on at least 100 mg/day at Visit 3 (Week 5).
Responder Status Based on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at Visit 5 (Week 13)
5 participants
26 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Change from Baseline (Week 3) to Visit 5 (Week 13)

Population: ITT Population: patients in the Double-blind Safety Population with ≥ 1 PGIC post-baseline assessment. Double-blind Safety Population includes 6 patients who were not included in ITT population. Presented results generated via LOCF approach. No statistical comparisons between groups are presented; study was exploratory, not hypothesis-testing.

The VAS assessment ranges from a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population, placebo treatment assignment, dose-matched placebo tablets, twice a day, oral administration.
Milnacipran
n=79 Participants
Intent-to-treat Population, milnacipran treatment assignment, 100 to 200 mg/day, twice a day, oral administration. Flexible dosing from 50 mg/day to 200 mg/day was allowed except at a) the initial dosage after randomization had to be 100 mg/day, b) the dose range during week 1 of the randomized double-blind treatment period was 50 to 100 mg/day, and c) patients had to be on at least 100 mg/day at Visit 3 (Week 5).
Change From Baseline to Visit 5 (Week 13) in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 1-week Pain Recall Score
-1.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.5
-12.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.3

Adverse Events

Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 16 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Milnacipran

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 63 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Placebo
n=21 participants at risk
Double-blind Safety Population: placebo treatment assignment, dose-matched placebo tablets, twice a day, oral administration.
Milnacipran
n=85 participants at risk
Double-blind Safety Population: milnacipran treatment assignment, 100 to 200 mg/day, twice a day, oral administration. One patient randomized to the milnacipran treatment group did not take at least one dose of double-blind study drug and was therefore not included in the Double-blind Safety Population. Flexible dosing from 50 mg/day to 200 mg/day was allowed except at a) the initial dosage after randomization had to be 100 mg/day, b) the dose range during week 1 of the randomized double-blind treatment period was 50 to 100 mg/day, and c) patients had to be on at least 100 mg/day at Visit 3 (Week 5).
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
1.2%
1/85 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal ideation
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
1.2%
1/85 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Placebo
n=21 participants at risk
Double-blind Safety Population: placebo treatment assignment, dose-matched placebo tablets, twice a day, oral administration.
Milnacipran
n=85 participants at risk
Double-blind Safety Population: milnacipran treatment assignment, 100 to 200 mg/day, twice a day, oral administration. One patient randomized to the milnacipran treatment group did not take at least one dose of double-blind study drug and was therefore not included in the Double-blind Safety Population. Flexible dosing from 50 mg/day to 200 mg/day was allowed except at a) the initial dosage after randomization had to be 100 mg/day, b) the dose range during week 1 of the randomized double-blind treatment period was 50 to 100 mg/day, and c) patients had to be on at least 100 mg/day at Visit 3 (Week 5).
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
28.6%
6/21 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
21.2%
18/85 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
15.3%
13/85 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
9.5%
2/21 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
11.8%
10/85 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
9.5%
2/21 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
10.6%
9/85 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
Vascular disorders
Hot flush
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
8.2%
7/85 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
General disorders
Irritability
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
7.1%
6/85 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
7.1%
6/85 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
5.9%
5/85 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
5.9%
5/85 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
5.9%
5/85 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
14.3%
3/21 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
4.7%
4/85 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
General disorders
Fatigue
9.5%
2/21 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
3.5%
3/85 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
9.5%
2/21 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
1.2%
1/85 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
Nervous system disorders
Paresthesia
9.5%
2/21 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
1.2%
1/85 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
9.5%
2/21 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.
0.00%
0/85 • Adverse event data was collected over a nearly 10 month period from March 4th, 2010 through December 22, 2010.

Additional Information

Allan Spera, Director, Clinical Development

Forest Research Institute

Phone: (201) 427-8399

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee All data generated in this study will be the property of Forest Research Institute, Inc. An integrated clinical and statistical report will be prepared at the completion of the study. Publication of the results by the Investigator will be subject to mutual agreement between the Investigator and Forest Research Institute, Inc.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER