Trial Outcomes & Findings for The Effect of Irrisept for Irrigation of Skin and Soft Tissue Infections (Irrisept USF Study) (NCT NCT01076049)
NCT ID: NCT01076049
Last Updated: 2021-08-23
Results Overview
The primary endpoint was overall wound progression and signs of infection 48 hours post-treatment. This was measured via a blinded investigator's discretion and recorded as 'improved', 'no change', 'progression of signs or symptoms of infection', or 'immediate treatment required' if an infection had progressed to a certain extent.
TERMINATED
NA
114 participants
48 hours
2021-08-23
Participant Flow
From January 2010 to December 2011, patients with skin and soft tissue infections were recruited from the Tampa General Hospital, University of South Florida emergency department.
A total of 114 subjects consented to the study. Of these, 107 subjects were randomized as six (6) failed screening and one (1) subject had no randomization information available, but still completed the study. In total, 98 subjects completed the study. Of those 98 subjects, 52 subjects were enrolled in the Irrisept arm and 45 subjects were enrolled in the SoC control arm. There are records of an additional subject completing the study, but no randomization information was available.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Standard of Care (SoC)
The type of irrigation solution and method used as SoC was determined by the participating emergency department physician. The SoC method was used at the initial and 48-hour follow-up visit.
|
Irrisept Delivery System
Irrisept was recorded in the source document and used during the initial treatment and 48-hour follow-up visits.
Irrisept is a manual, self-contained irrigation device capable of producing 7-8 psi of pressure for effective wound cleansing and irrigation. Irrisept contents include the Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) solution, a 450 mL bottle, and Irriprobe applicator or an abscess irrigation tip. The bottle design allows users to control the pressure of the solution through manual bottle compression.
|
Randomization Unknown
The randomization group (SoC or Irrisept) is unknown for 1 subject.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
52
|
55
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
45
|
52
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
7
|
3
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
The Effect of Irrisept for Irrigation of Skin and Soft Tissue Infections (Irrisept USF Study)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Standard of Care (SoC)
n=45 Participants
For subjects randomized to the control group, the preferred irrigation solution was chosen by the site's emergency department physician(s).
Standard of Care (SoC): The preferred irrigation solution and method was chosen by the site's emergency department physician(s) and could vary between subjects. The type of SoC was recorded in the source document and the same solution and irrigation method were used during the initial treatment and 48-hour follow-up visits.
|
Irrisept Device System
n=52 Participants
For subjects randomized to the investigational group, Irrisept was used.
Irrisept Delivery System: Irrisept is a manual, self-contained irrigation device capable of producing 7-8 psi of pressure for effective wound cleansing and irrigation. Irrisept contents include the Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) solution, a 450 mL bottle, and Irriprobe applicator or an abscess irrigation tip. The bottle design allows users to control the pressure of the solution through manual bottle compression.
Irrisept was recorded in the source document and used during the initial treatment and 48-hour follow-up visits.
|
Randomization Unknown
n=1 Participants
|
Total
n=98 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown Race/Ethnicity
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
45 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
98 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Subject Accounting
|
45 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
98 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender · Female
|
25 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender · Male
|
19 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender · Unknown Gender
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race (Black)
|
15 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race (White)
|
23 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity (Hispanic)
|
6 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 48 hoursThe primary endpoint was overall wound progression and signs of infection 48 hours post-treatment. This was measured via a blinded investigator's discretion and recorded as 'improved', 'no change', 'progression of signs or symptoms of infection', or 'immediate treatment required' if an infection had progressed to a certain extent.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard of Care (SoC)
n=45 Participants
For subjects randomized to the control group, the preferred irrigation solution was chosen by the site's emergency department physician(s).
Standard of Care (SoC): The preferred irrigation solution and method was chosen by the site's emergency department physician(s) and could vary between subjects. The type of SoC was recorded in the source document and the same solution and irrigation method were used during the initial treatment and 48-hour follow-up visits.
|
Irrisept Device System
n=52 Participants
For subjects randomized to the investigational group, Irrisept was used.
Irrisept Delivery System: Irrisept is a manual, self-contained irrigation device capable of producing 7-8 psi of pressure for effective wound cleansing and irrigation. Irrisept contents include the Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) solution, a 450 mL bottle, and Irriprobe applicator or an abscess irrigation tip. The bottle design allows users to control the pressure of the solution through manual bottle compression.
Irrisept was recorded in the source document and used during the initial treatment and 48-hour follow-up visits.
|
Randomization Unknown
n=1 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Wound State at 48-Hour Follow-up Visit
Improved Wound State at 48-Hour Follow-up
|
40 Participants
|
47 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Wound State at 48-Hour Follow-up Visit
No Change Wound State at 48-Hour Follow-up
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Wound State at 48-Hour Follow-up Visit
Progression Wound State at 48-Hour Follow-up
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Wound State at 48-Hour Follow-up Visit
Immediate Treatment Required Wound State at 48-Hour Follow-up
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 48 hoursPopulation: There were 45 SoC \& 52 Irrisept subjects that completed the trial. Of these, 20 SoC \& 16 Irrisept subjects showed clinical signs of infection worsening; 25 SoC \& 36 Irrisept subjects did not show infection worsening signs. Worsening signs include changes in length, width, erythema, area, induration tenderness, warmth, pain, cellulitis and other. The total number of worsening signs for SoC subjects was 32. The total number of worsening signs for Irrisept subjects was 28.
The study tracked any instance of a subject's conditions worsening compared to their baseline measurements. This included a worsening in the size (length and width) and clinical signs (erythema, area, induration, tenderness, warm, pain, cellulitis and other) of the infection. While the protocol states the overall prevalence of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) colonization is the secondary objective, this information was not collected by the site. Therefore, worsening of clinical outcomes is considered the secondary objective.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard of Care (SoC)
n=32 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
For subjects randomized to the control group, the preferred irrigation solution was chosen by the site's emergency department physician(s).
Standard of Care (SoC): The preferred irrigation solution and method was chosen by the site's emergency department physician(s) and could vary between subjects. The type of SoC was recorded in the source document and the same solution and irrigation method were used during the initial treatment and 48-hour follow-up visits.
|
Irrisept Device System
n=28 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
For subjects randomized to the investigational group, Irrisept was used.
Irrisept Delivery System: Irrisept is a manual, self-contained irrigation device capable of producing 7-8 psi of pressure for effective wound cleansing and irrigation. Irrisept contents include the Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) solution, a 450 mL bottle, and Irriprobe applicator or an abscess irrigation tip. The bottle design allows users to control the pressure of the solution through manual bottle compression.
Irrisept was recorded in the source document and used during the initial treatment and 48-hour follow-up visits.
|
Randomization Unknown
n=1 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Performance of Irrisept to the Current SoC
Increased Length (cm)
|
5 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
9 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
0 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
|
Clinical Performance of Irrisept to the Current SoC
Increased Width (cm)
|
3 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
5 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
1 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
|
Clinical Performance of Irrisept to the Current SoC
Erythema
|
4 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
0 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
0 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
|
Clinical Performance of Irrisept to the Current SoC
Area (cm2)
|
1 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
3 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
0 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
|
Clinical Performance of Irrisept to the Current SoC
Induration
|
6 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
2 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
0 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
|
Clinical Performance of Irrisept to the Current SoC
Tenderness
|
2 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
2 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
0 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
|
Clinical Performance of Irrisept to the Current SoC
Warmth
|
6 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
3 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
0 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
|
Clinical Performance of Irrisept to the Current SoC
Pain
|
3 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
3 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
0 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
|
Clinical Performance of Irrisept to the Current SoC
Cellulitis
|
0 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
0 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
0 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
|
Clinical Performance of Irrisept to the Current SoC
Other
|
2 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
1 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
0 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
|
Clinical Performance of Irrisept to the Current SoC
No Signs of Infection Worsening
|
25 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
36 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
0 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
POST_HOC outcome
Timeframe: 48 HoursPopulation: Causality assessment categories for each worsening sign were related, possibly related, unlikely related, or unrelated. 45 SoC and 52 Irrisept subjects completed the trial. Of these, 20 SoC \& 16 Irrisept subjects showed clinical signs of worsening; causality assessments were made for each worsening sign (ex: length, erythema, etc.). There were 32 and 28 total worsening signs for SoC \& Irrisept subjects, respectively.
Causality for each worsening event was determined by using the following categories: 'related', 'possibly related', 'unlikely related', or 'unrelated'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard of Care (SoC)
n=32 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
For subjects randomized to the control group, the preferred irrigation solution was chosen by the site's emergency department physician(s).
Standard of Care (SoC): The preferred irrigation solution and method was chosen by the site's emergency department physician(s) and could vary between subjects. The type of SoC was recorded in the source document and the same solution and irrigation method were used during the initial treatment and 48-hour follow-up visits.
|
Irrisept Device System
n=28 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
For subjects randomized to the investigational group, Irrisept was used.
Irrisept Delivery System: Irrisept is a manual, self-contained irrigation device capable of producing 7-8 psi of pressure for effective wound cleansing and irrigation. Irrisept contents include the Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) solution, a 450 mL bottle, and Irriprobe applicator or an abscess irrigation tip. The bottle design allows users to control the pressure of the solution through manual bottle compression.
Irrisept was recorded in the source document and used during the initial treatment and 48-hour follow-up visits.
|
Randomization Unknown
n=1 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Worsening Events Causality
Related Worsening Event
|
0 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
0 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
0 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
|
Worsening Events Causality
Possibly Related Worsening Event
|
0 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
0 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
0 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
|
Worsening Events Causality
Unlikely Related Worsening Event
|
28 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
26 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
0 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
|
Worsening Events Causality
Unrelated Worsening Event
|
4 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
2 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
1 Total Number of Worsening Outcomes
|
Adverse Events
Standard of Care (SoC)
Irrisept Delivery System
Randomization Unknown
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Standard of Care (SoC)
n=45 participants at risk
The type of irrigation solution and method used as SoC was determined by the participating emergency department physician. The SoC method was used at the initial and 48-hour follow-up visit.
|
Irrisept Delivery System
n=52 participants at risk
Irrisept was recorded in the source document and used during the initial treatment and 48-hour follow-up visits.
Irrisept is a manual, self-contained irrigation device capable of producing 7-8 psi of pressure for effective wound cleansing and irrigation. Irrisept contents include the Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) solution, a 450 mL bottle, and Irriprobe applicator or an abscess irrigation tip. The bottle design allows users to control the pressure of the solution through manual bottle compression.
|
Randomization Unknown
n=1 participants at risk
There are records of an additional subject completing the study, but no randomization information was available.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Increased Length
|
11.1%
5/45 • Number of events 5 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
17.3%
9/52 • Number of events 9 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
0.00%
0/1 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Increased Width
|
6.7%
3/45 • Number of events 3 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
9.6%
5/52 • Number of events 5 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
100.0%
1/1 • Number of events 1 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Erythema
|
8.9%
4/45 • Number of events 4 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
0.00%
0/52 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
0.00%
0/1 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Area
|
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
5.8%
3/52 • Number of events 3 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
0.00%
0/1 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Induration
|
13.3%
6/45 • Number of events 6 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
3.8%
2/52 • Number of events 2 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
0.00%
0/1 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tenderness
|
4.4%
2/45 • Number of events 2 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
3.8%
2/52 • Number of events 2 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
0.00%
0/1 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Warmth
|
13.3%
6/45 • Number of events 6 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
5.8%
3/52 • Number of events 3 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
0.00%
0/1 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pain
|
6.7%
3/45 • Number of events 3 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
5.8%
3/52 • Number of events 3 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
0.00%
0/1 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/45 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
0.00%
0/52 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
0.00%
0/1 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Other
|
4.4%
2/45 • Number of events 2 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
0.00%
0/1 • The timeframe used for reporting adverse events was from the time of informed consent until subject termination or completion (approximately 48 hours after the initial visit).
Any change in the subjects' wound infection (i.e. any worsening of the secondary objective clinical outcomes) were considered adverse events. Causality assessments were provided. All-cause mortality and serious adverse events were not monitored nor assessed.
|
Additional Information
Chevy Brown, Clinical Trials Manager
Irrimax Corporation
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place