Comparison of Nonposterior- and Posterior-Stabilized Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT ID: NCT01075620
Last Updated: 2010-02-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
126 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2002-05-31
2010-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. whether the knee and function scores and the radiographic results of the knees with a PFC Sigma RP knee prosthesis would be better than those with an LCS RP prosthesis.
2. whether the patients with a PFC RP knee prosthesis would have a better range of knee motion than those with an LCS RP prosthesis.
3. whether patient satisfaction and preference would be better in the patients having a PFC Sigma RP knee prosthesis than those of patients having an LCS RP knee prosthesis
4. whether complication rate would be less in the knees with a PFC sigma RP knee prosthesis than in the knees with an LCS RP prosthesis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PFC sigma RP
Posterior stabilized rotating platform knee (press Fit Condylar Sigma rotating-platform, Depuy, Warsaw, Indiana)
PFC-Sigma RP
Posterior stabilizing rotating platform total knee components
LCS RP
non posterior stabilized Low Contact Stress Rotating-Platform; Depuy, Warsaw, Indiana
LPS RP
non-posterior stabilized rotating platform design
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PFC-Sigma RP
Posterior stabilizing rotating platform total knee components
LPS RP
non-posterior stabilized rotating platform design
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* patient with other Lower extremity disease which may affect functional outcome
* Neurologic disease effecting patients lower extremity
* Revision surgery
* Patient not medically cleared for bilateral surgery
30 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ewha Womans University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital Joint Replacement Center
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yoowang Choi, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2010-2-16
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id