Effects of Spontaneous Breathing Activity on Atelectasis Formation During General Anaesthesia
NCT ID: NCT01073917
Last Updated: 2010-10-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-03-31
2010-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Several measures to prevent or treat atelectasis in ventilated patients have been investigated, such as PEEP (Brismar, Hedenstierna et al. 1985; Tokics, Hedenstierna et al. 1987; Neumann, Rothen et al. 1999), recruitment maneuvers (Neumann, Rothen et al. 1999) and spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation (Putensen, Rasanen et al. 1994; Putensen, Mutz et al. 1999). The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is ideally suited for spontaneous breathing during general anaesthesia because of its low resistance. A large survey found that more than half of the routine cases with an LMA are performed under spontaneous ventilation (Verghese and Brimacombe 1996), while positive pressure ventilation is equally acceptable. With regard to the prevention of atelectasis, spontaneous ventilation could be advantageous.
Most works on atelectasis formation during general anaesthesia used CT. Although CT is a gold standard for quantification of lung aeration, it can only provide data on single time points and is not suitable for measurements during routine cases. In recent years, the electrical impedance tomography (EIT) has evolved into a versatile tool, which allows detailed insights into ventilation and perfusion conditions of the lung (Bodenstein, David et al. 2009). EIT allows continuous assessment of lung aeration, is non-invasive and can easily be used as a research and monitoring tool during routine cases.
We hypothesize that compared with positive pressure ventilation (PPV), pressure support ventilation (PSV) during general anaesthesia reduces the extent of redistribution as detected by EIT during and after the procedure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Spontaneous Breathing
Patients will be breathing spontaneously during anesthesia
Spontaneous Breathing
Pressure controlled ventilation
Patients in the PPV group will be ventilated by pressure control (tidal volume 8-10 ml/kg, frequency 10-14, I:E 1:1, no PEEP, target CO2 4.5 kPa).
Pressure Controlled Ventilation
Pressure Support Ventilation
The patients in the PSV group will breathing spontaneously on the ventilator with assistance by inspiratory support pressure. The support pressure will be adjusted to achieve a tidal volume of 8-10 ml/kg.
Pressure Support Ventilation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Spontaneous Breathing
Pressure Controlled Ventilation
Pressure Support Ventilation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Pulmonary diseases (e.g. Asthma, COPD),
* Implanted pacemaker or AICD,
* Inability to communicate or understand the risks of the study,
* Contraindications for an LMA (e.g. obesity, reflux),
* Deformities of the thorax,
* Failure to place an LMA.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Technische Universität Dresden
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dpt. of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital, TU Dresden, Germany
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Carl-Gustav-Carus
Dresden, Saxony, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Dresden, Germany
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EK375122009
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id