Trial Outcomes & Findings for Genotropin Treatment in Short Prepubertal Children With Intra-Uterine Growth Retardation (NCT NCT01073605)
NCT ID: NCT01073605
Last Updated: 2010-11-18
Results Overview
Annual growth rate was expressed as height velocity (centimeter \[cm\]/year). This was derived by substracting annual growth rate at Baseline from 2-year value. (Annual growth rate was calculated each year and rescaled to 1 year if the interval between x and x-1 was not 365 days, as long as a subject remains in the study): ANGRYx = (Height Yx - Height Y{x-1}) / {(Date of Yx - Date of Y{x-1}) /365.25}
COMPLETED
PHASE3
208 participants
Baseline, 2 years
2010-11-18
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Genotonorm 0.7 (Continuous Treatment)
Subjects received 0.7 international unit (IU)/kilogram (kg)/week (0.03 milligram \[mg\]/kg/day) of Genotonorm growth hormone (GH) as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Continuous Treatment)
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Intermittent Treatment)
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as an intermittent treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
68
|
71
|
69
|
|
Overall Study
Received Treatment
|
68
|
70
|
68
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
6
|
4
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
62
|
67
|
61
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Genotonorm 0.7 (Continuous Treatment)
Subjects received 0.7 international unit (IU)/kilogram (kg)/week (0.03 milligram \[mg\]/kg/day) of Genotonorm growth hormone (GH) as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Continuous Treatment)
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Intermittent Treatment)
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as an intermittent treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Ongoing at Cutoff Date
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
4
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
25
|
21
|
29
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
31
|
39
|
22
|
|
Overall Study
Randomized But Not Treated
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Genotropin Treatment in Short Prepubertal Children With Intra-Uterine Growth Retardation
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Genotonorm 0.7 (Continuous Treatment)
n=68 Participants
Subjects received 0.7 IU/kg/week (0.03 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Continuous Treatment)
n=70 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Intermittent Treatment)
n=68 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as an intermittent treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Total
n=206 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
< 4 years
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
4 - 8 years
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
90 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
8 - 12 years
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
86 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>= 12 years
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
95 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
111 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 2 yearsPopulation: All subjects who received at least 1 study dose of Genotonorm were included in the Full Analysis Set (FAS). Number of Participants Analyzed = number of subjects with change in annual growth rate at 2 years.
Annual growth rate was expressed as height velocity (centimeter \[cm\]/year). This was derived by substracting annual growth rate at Baseline from 2-year value. (Annual growth rate was calculated each year and rescaled to 1 year if the interval between x and x-1 was not 365 days, as long as a subject remains in the study): ANGRYx = (Height Yx - Height Y{x-1}) / {(Date of Yx - Date of Y{x-1}) /365.25}
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Genotonorm 0.7 (Continuous Treatment)
n=47 Participants
Subjects received 0.7 IU/kg/week (0.03 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Continuous Treatment)
n=37 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Intermittent Treatment)
n=40 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as an intermittent treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Annual Growth Rate Measured at 2 Years Following Treatment With Genotonorm
|
3.07 cm/year
Standard Deviation 2.21
|
3.97 cm/year
Standard Deviation 1.72
|
2.84 cm/year
Standard Deviation 1.71
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 to 6 yearsPopulation: FAS. Number of Participants Analyzed = number of subjects with evaluable data at Baseline. n = number of subjects with evaluable data at each time point. Data beyond 6 years are not reported due to the low proportion of subjects followed up beyond 6 years.
Calculated using Sempe reference means and standard deviations for growth rate according to age and sex. Standardization was performed for chronological age.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Genotonorm 0.7 (Continuous Treatment)
n=50 Participants
Subjects received 0.7 IU/kg/week (0.03 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Continuous Treatment)
n=42 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Intermittent Treatment)
n=43 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as an intermittent treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Annual Growth Rate Standard Deviation Score (SDS)
Baseline (n=50, 42, 43)
|
-2.72 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.83
|
-2.58 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.39
|
-2.75 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.73
|
|
Annual Growth Rate Standard Deviation Score (SDS)
1 year (n=57, 55, 59)
|
2.14 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.52
|
3.97 SDS
Standard Deviation 2.26
|
1.71 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.51
|
|
Annual Growth Rate Standard Deviation Score (SDS)
2 years (n=53, 49, 56)
|
0.77 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.57
|
2.00 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.73
|
0.67 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
|
Annual Growth Rate Standard Deviation Score (SDS)
3 years (n=39, 34, 41)
|
0.36 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
1.35 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.78
|
0.31 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
|
Annual Growth Rate Standard Deviation Score (SDS)
4 years (n=21, 18, 27)
|
0.13 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.55
|
0.61 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
0.34 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
|
Annual Growth Rate Standard Deviation Score (SDS)
5 years (n=12, 10, 20)
|
0.18 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
0.09 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
-0.02 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.46
|
|
Annual Growth Rate Standard Deviation Score (SDS)
6 years (n=11, 7, 19)
|
0.90 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.92
|
0.59 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.61
|
0.05 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 to 3 yearsPopulation: FAS. Number of Participants Analyzed = number of subjects with evaluable data at 1 year. n = number of subjects with evaluable data at each time point.
Calculated corresponding to the gender and chronological age by substracting annual growth rate SDS at Baseline from annual growth rate SDS at each year.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Genotonorm 0.7 (Continuous Treatment)
n=49 Participants
Subjects received 0.7 IU/kg/week (0.03 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Continuous Treatment)
n=42 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Intermittent Treatment)
n=42 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as an intermittent treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Annual Growth Rate SDS
3 years (n=34, 25, 32)
|
3.31 SDS
Standard Deviation 2.06
|
3.80 SDS
Standard Deviation 2.20
|
3.17 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.86
|
|
Change From Baseline in Annual Growth Rate SDS
1 year (n=49, 42, 42)
|
4.81 SDS
Standard Deviation 2.27
|
6.56 SDS
Standard Deviation 2.55
|
4.37 SDS
Standard Deviation 2.16
|
|
Change From Baseline in Annual Growth Rate SDS
2 years (n=47, 37, 40)
|
3.51 SDS
Standard Deviation 2.50
|
4.53 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.89
|
3.37 SDS
Standard Deviation 2.33
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 to 6 years, final heightPopulation: FAS. Number of Participants Analyzed = number of subjects with evaluable data at Baseline. n = number of subjects with evaluable data at each time point. Data beyond 6 years are not reported due to the low proportion of subjects followed up beyond 6 years.
Performed by use of a wallmounted device (eg, Harpenden Stadiometer). Each subject was measured 3 times and the mean of these measurements was recorded as the present height. Final Height: Children are defined as reaching their final height when annual Growth Rate is less than 2 cm in the previous year and bone age is equal to or greater than 17 years in boys and equal to or greater than 15 years in girls.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Genotonorm 0.7 (Continuous Treatment)
n=58 Participants
Subjects received 0.7 IU/kg/week (0.03 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Continuous Treatment)
n=56 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Intermittent Treatment)
n=60 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as an intermittent treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Height (cm)
Baseline (n=58, 56, 60)
|
105.22 cm
Standard Deviation 15.04
|
107.06 cm
Standard Deviation 12.29
|
106.44 cm
Standard Deviation 12.04
|
|
Height (cm)
1 year (n=57, 55, 59)
|
113.38 cm
Standard Deviation 15.09
|
116.31 cm
Standard Deviation 12.24
|
113.71 cm
Standard Deviation 12.01
|
|
Height (cm)
2 years (n=53, 49, 56)
|
119.67 cm
Standard Deviation 15.18
|
124.11 cm
Standard Deviation 13.02
|
120.64 cm
Standard Deviation 12.34
|
|
Height (cm)
3 years (n=39, 34, 41)
|
123.92 cm
Standard Deviation 15.08
|
131.75 cm
Standard Deviation 13.76
|
125.39 cm
Standard Deviation 12.52
|
|
Height (cm)
4 years (n=21, 18, 27)
|
124.67 cm
Standard Deviation 13.14
|
132.30 cm
Standard Deviation 13.23
|
127.59 cm
Standard Deviation 11.51
|
|
Height (cm)
5 years (n=12, 10, 21)
|
126.73 cm
Standard Deviation 10.01
|
131.01 cm
Standard Deviation 9.26
|
129.98 cm
Standard Deviation 9.93
|
|
Height (cm)
6 years (n=11, 7, 20)
|
133.29 cm
Standard Deviation 10.46
|
138.84 cm
Standard Deviation 8.69
|
135.45 cm
Standard Deviation 10.10
|
|
Height (cm)
Final height (n=17, 12, 22)
|
146.86 cm
Standard Deviation 11.26
|
151.98 cm
Standard Deviation 6.52
|
149.13 cm
Standard Deviation 9.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 to 6 years, final heightPopulation: FAS. Number of Participants Analyzed = number of subjects with evaluable data at Baseline. n = number of subjects with evaluable data at Baseline and each time point. Data beyond 6 years are not reported due to the low proportion of subjects followed up beyond 6 years.
Calculated by substracting height at Baseline from height at each year. Final Height: Children are defined as reaching their final height when annual Growth Rate is less than 2 cm in the previous year and bone age is equal to or greater than 17 years in boys and equal to or greater than 15 years in girls.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Genotonorm 0.7 (Continuous Treatment)
n=58 Participants
Subjects received 0.7 IU/kg/week (0.03 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Continuous Treatment)
n=56 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Intermittent Treatment)
n=60 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as an intermittent treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Height (cm)
1 year (n=57, 55, 59)
|
8.21 cm
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
9.21 cm
Standard Deviation 1.45
|
7.33 cm
Standard Deviation 1.32
|
|
Change From Baseline in Height (cm)
2 years (n=53, 49, 56)
|
14.77 cm
Standard Deviation 2.45
|
17.01 cm
Standard Deviation 2.21
|
13.92 cm
Standard Deviation 2.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Height (cm)
3 years (n=39, 34, 41)
|
20.62 cm
Standard Deviation 3.00
|
24.49 cm
Standard Deviation 3.04
|
20.14 cm
Standard Deviation 2.78
|
|
Change From Baseline in Height (cm)
4 years (n=21, 18, 27)
|
26.36 cm
Standard Deviation 4.37
|
30.77 cm
Standard Deviation 3.43
|
25.83 cm
Standard Deviation 3.26
|
|
Change From Baseline in Height (cm)
5 years (n=12, 10, 21)
|
32.23 cm
Standard Deviation 5.92
|
35.70 cm
Standard Deviation 4.27
|
32.16 cm
Standard Deviation 3.81
|
|
Change From Baseline in Height (cm)
6 years (n=11, 7, 20)
|
38.20 cm
Standard Deviation 6.66
|
44.03 cm
Standard Deviation 3.09
|
38.01 cm
Standard Deviation 4.82
|
|
Change From Baseline in Height (cm)
Final height (n=17, 12, 22)
|
45.39 cm
Standard Deviation 13.08
|
45.30 cm
Standard Deviation 13.72
|
40.93 cm
Standard Deviation 9.22
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 to 6 years, final heightPopulation: FAS. Number of Participants Analyzed = number of subjects with evaluable data at Baseline. n = number of subjects with evaluable data at each time point. Data beyond 6 years are not reported due to the low proportion of subjects followed up beyond 6 years.
Calculated using Sempe reference means and standard deviations for height. Final Height: Children are defined as reaching their final height when annual Growth Rate is less than 2 cm in the previous year and bone age is equal to or greater than 17 years in boys and equal to or greater than 15 years in girls.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Genotonorm 0.7 (Continuous Treatment)
n=58 Participants
Subjects received 0.7 IU/kg/week (0.03 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Continuous Treatment)
n=56 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Intermittent Treatment)
n=60 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as an intermittent treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Height (SDS)
Baseline (n=58, 56, 60)
|
-3.16 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.52
|
-3.07 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.46
|
-3.21 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.65
|
|
Height (SDS)
1 year (n=57, 55, 59)
|
-2.49 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.54
|
-2.17 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
-2.68 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.69
|
|
Height (SDS)
2 years (n=53, 49, 56)
|
-2.21 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
-1.68 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.52
|
-2.38 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
|
Height (SDS)
3 years (n=39, 34, 41)
|
-2.17 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
-1.38 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.57
|
-2.24 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
|
Height (SDS)
4 years (n=21, 18, 27)
|
-2.16 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
-1.16 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.73
|
-2.09 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
|
Height (SDS)
5 years (n=12, 10, 21)
|
-1.95 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
-1.15 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
-1.96 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
|
Height (SDS)
6 years (n=11, 7, 19)
|
-1.80 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.28
|
-0.67 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
-1.93 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
|
Height (SDS)
Final height (n=14, 9, 18)
|
-2.06 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
-1.97 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
-2.29 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.35
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 to 6 years, final heightPopulation: FAS. Number of Participants Analyzed = number of subjects with evaluable data at Baseline. n = number of subjects with evaluable data at Baseline and each time point. Data beyond 6 years are not reported due to the low proportion of subjects followed up beyond 6 years.
Calculated by substracting height SDS at Baseline from height SDS at each year. Final Height: Children are defined as reaching their final height when annual Growth Rate is less than 2 cm in the previous year and bone age is equal to or greater than 17 years in boys and equal to or greater than 15 years in girls.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Genotonorm 0.7 (Continuous Treatment)
n=58 Participants
Subjects received 0.7 IU/kg/week (0.03 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Continuous Treatment)
n=56 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Intermittent Treatment)
n=60 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as an intermittent treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Height (SDS)
1 year (n=57, 55, 59)
|
0.67 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.28
|
0.88 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.30
|
0.53 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.28
|
|
Change From Baseline in Height (SDS)
2 years (n=53, 49, 56)
|
0.94 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.45
|
1.40 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
0.84 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.37
|
|
Change From Baseline in Height (SDS)
3 years (n=39, 34, 41)
|
1.06 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.54
|
1.70 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.54
|
0.99 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.51
|
|
Change From Baseline in Height (SDS)
4 years (n=21, 18, 27)
|
1.20 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
1.98 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.69
|
1.21 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Height (SDS)
5 years (n=12, 10, 21)
|
1.37 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
2.03 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
1.46 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.69
|
|
Change From Baseline in Height (SDS)
6 years (n=11, 7, 19)
|
1.54 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
2.60 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
1.54 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
|
Change From Baseline in Height (SDS)
Final height (n=14, 9, 18)
|
1.00 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.53
|
0.97 SDS
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
0.86 SDS
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 to 6 yearsPopulation: FAS. Number of Participants Analyzed = number of subjects with evaluable data at Baseline. n = number of subjects with evaluable data at each time point. Data beyond 6 years are not reported due to the low proportion of subjects followed up beyond 6 years.
BMI was calculated by weight divided by height squared.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Genotonorm 0.7 (Continuous Treatment)
n=58 Participants
Subjects received 0.7 IU/kg/week (0.03 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Continuous Treatment)
n=56 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Intermittent Treatment)
n=60 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as an intermittent treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Baseline (n=58, 56, 60)
|
14.74 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.48
|
15.14 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.76
|
14.59 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.51
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
1 year (n=56, 55, 59)
|
14.82 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.52
|
15.44 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.94
|
14.87 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.76
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
2 years (n=53, 49, 56)
|
15.33 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.78
|
15.92 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 2.15
|
15.29 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 2.00
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
3 years (n=39, 34, 41)
|
15.59 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 2.02
|
16.65 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 2.92
|
15.58 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 2.11
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
4 years (n=21, 18, 27)
|
15.32 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.56
|
17.03 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 3.70
|
15.80 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 2.37
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
5 years (n=12, 10, 21)
|
15.80 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.57
|
16.25 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.70
|
16.69 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 3.92
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
6 years (n=11, 7, 20)
|
16.21 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.46
|
16.34 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.80
|
17.28 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 4.21
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 to 6 yearsPopulation: FAS. Number of Participants Analyzed = number of subjects with evaluable data at Baseline. n = number of subjects with evaluable data at each time point. Data beyond 6 years are not reported due to the low proportion of subjects followed up beyond 6 years.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Genotonorm 0.7 (Continuous Treatment)
n=58 Participants
Subjects received 0.7 IU/kg/week (0.03 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Continuous Treatment)
n=56 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Intermittent Treatment)
n=60 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as an intermittent treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Weight
Baseline (n=58, 56, 60)
|
16.77 kg
Standard Deviation 5.43
|
17.70 kg
Standard Deviation 5.12
|
16.79 kg
Standard Deviation 4.35
|
|
Weight
1 year (n=56, 55, 59)
|
19.71 kg
Standard Deviation 6.28
|
21.29 kg
Standard Deviation 6.04
|
19.56 kg
Standard Deviation 5.17
|
|
Weight
2 years (n=53, 49, 56)
|
22.66 kg
Standard Deviation 7.62
|
25.08 kg
Standard Deviation 7.43
|
22.64 kg
Standard Deviation 6.05
|
|
Weight
3 years (n=39, 34, 41)
|
24.77 kg
Standard Deviation 8.80
|
29.61 kg
Standard Deviation 9.62
|
24.98 kg
Standard Deviation 7.05
|
|
Weight
4 years (n=21, 18, 27)
|
24.30 kg
Standard Deviation 7.01
|
30.56 kg
Standard Deviation 10.42
|
26.28 kg
Standard Deviation 7.94
|
|
Weight
5 years (n=12, 10, 21)
|
25.74 kg
Standard Deviation 6.22
|
28.07 kg
Standard Deviation 5.22
|
28.52 kg
Standard Deviation 8.96
|
|
Weight
6 years (n=11, 7, 21)
|
29.13 kg
Standard Deviation 6.42
|
31.94 kg
Standard Deviation 7.28
|
32.30 kg
Standard Deviation 10.32
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 to 3 yearsPopulation: Safety population = all subjects who received at least 1 study dose of GH. Number of Participants Analyzed = number of subjects with evaluable data at Baseline. n = number of subjects with evaluable data at Baseline and each time point.
Bone age was determined by the Greulich-Pyle method. Calculated by substracting bone age at Baseline from bone age at each year
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Genotonorm 0.7 (Continuous Treatment)
n=61 Participants
Subjects received 0.7 IU/kg/week (0.03 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Continuous Treatment)
n=62 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Intermittent Treatment)
n=61 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as an intermittent treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Bone Age
1 year (n=53, 60, 56)
|
1.17 Years
Standard Deviation 0.51
|
1.27 Years
Standard Deviation 0.72
|
1.25 Years
Standard Deviation 0.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bone Age
2 years (n=52, 51, 49)
|
2.40 Years
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
2.50 Years
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
2.58 Years
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bone Age
3 years (n=41, 39, 35)
|
3.53 Years
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
4.06 Years
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
3.67 Years
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 to 3 yearsPopulation: Safety population = all subjects who received at least 1 study dose of GH. Number of Participants Analyzed = number of subjects with evaluable data at 1 year. n = number of subjects with evaluable data at each time point.
Bone age was determined by the Greulich-Pyle method. Chronological Age (years) was calculated as: (Date minus Date of Birth) divided by 365.25. Chronological Age used was the age at the date that the corresponding Bone Age X-ray was performed. Ratio was calculated by change from Baseline in bone age divided by change from Baseline in chronological age.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Genotonorm 0.7 (Continuous Treatment)
n=53 Participants
Subjects received 0.7 IU/kg/week (0.03 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Continuous Treatment)
n=60 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Intermittent Treatment)
n=56 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as an intermittent treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Bone Age/Change From Baseline in Chronological Age Ratio
1 year (n=53, 60, 56)
|
0.96 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.41
|
1.07 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.62
|
1.06 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.45
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bone Age/Change From Baseline in Chronological Age Ratio
2 years (n=51, 51, 49)
|
1.06 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.41
|
1.14 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.18 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.44
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bone Age/Change From Baseline in Chronological Age Ratio
3 years (n=35, 37, 35)
|
1.09 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
1.26 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.32
|
1.14 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.29
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Onset of pubertyPopulation: Safety population. Number of participants analyzed = number of subjects who started puberty by the end of the study.
Chronological age (years) at first study visit with onset of puberty = (Date of study visit minus Date of Birth) divided by 365.25.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Genotonorm 0.7 (Continuous Treatment)
n=30 Participants
Subjects received 0.7 IU/kg/week (0.03 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Continuous Treatment)
n=35 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Intermittent Treatment)
n=45 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as an intermittent treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Chronological Age at Onset of Puberty
|
11.88 Years
Standard Deviation 2.22
|
11.12 Years
Standard Deviation 1.74
|
11.58 Years
Standard Deviation 1.42
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 to 6 yearsPopulation: Safety population. Number of Participants Analyzed = number of subjects with evaluable data at Baseline. Data beyond 6 years are not reported due to the low proportion of subjects followed up beyond 6 years. Started = started puberty; Not Started = not started puberty yet as per Tanner scale.
The defined criteria for reaching puberty were: boy=if right or left testes volume ≥4 ml; girl=if breast development ≥2. Tanner Adolescent Pubertal Staging Questionnaire documents the stage of development of secondary sexual characteristics rated in 5 stages: stage 1 (no development) to 5 (adult-like development in quantity and size). Onset of puberty was defined as the visit where the data recorded first met the above criteria for starting puberty.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Genotonorm 0.7 (Continuous Treatment)
n=68 Participants
Subjects received 0.7 IU/kg/week (0.03 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Continuous Treatment)
n=70 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Intermittent Treatment)
n=68 Participants
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as an intermittent treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
Baseline (Female, Not Started)
|
25 participants
|
31 participants
|
39 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
Baseline (Male, Not Started)
|
43 participants
|
39 participants
|
29 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
1 year (Female, Not Started)
|
24 participants
|
27 participants
|
37 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
1 year (Female, Started)
|
1 participants
|
3 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
1 year (Male, Not Started)
|
36 participants
|
35 participants
|
27 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
1 year (Male, Started)
|
4 participants
|
3 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
2 years (Female, Not Started)
|
20 participants
|
20 participants
|
31 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
2 years (Female, Started)
|
3 participants
|
7 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
2 years (Male, Not Started)
|
31 participants
|
28 participants
|
20 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
2 years (Male, Started)
|
9 participants
|
7 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
3 years (Female, Not Started)
|
16 participants
|
10 participants
|
16 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
3 years (Female, Started)
|
3 participants
|
9 participants
|
11 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
3 years (Male, Not Started)
|
19 participants
|
15 participants
|
9 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
3 years (Male, Started)
|
6 participants
|
7 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
4 years (Female, Not Started)
|
10 participants
|
7 participants
|
10 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
4 years (Female, Started)
|
2 participants
|
5 participants
|
7 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
4 years (Male, Not Started)
|
10 participants
|
5 participants
|
7 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
4 years (Male, Started)
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
5 years (Female, Not Started)
|
5 participants
|
4 participants
|
5 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
5 years (Female, Started)
|
2 participants
|
3 participants
|
10 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
5 years (Male, Not Started)
|
6 participants
|
6 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
5 years (Male, Started)
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
6 years (Female, Not Started)
|
3 participants
|
3 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
6 years (Female, Started)
|
3 participants
|
2 participants
|
12 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
6 years (Male, Not Started)
|
5 participants
|
4 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Reaching Puberty
6 years (Male, Started)
|
3 participants
|
1 participants
|
4 participants
|
Adverse Events
Genotonorm 0.7 (Continuous Treatment)
Genotonorm 1.4 (Continuous Treatment)
Genotonorm 1.4 (Intermittent Treatment)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Genotonorm 0.7 (Continuous Treatment)
n=68 participants at risk
Subjects received 0.7 international unit (IU)/kilogram (kg)/week (0.03 milligram \[mg\]/kg/day) of Genotonorm growth hormone (GH) as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Continuous Treatment)
n=70 participants at risk
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Intermittent Treatment)
n=68 participants at risk
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as an intermittent treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Tonsillectomy
|
0.00%
0/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.7%
4/70
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.4%
3/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Genotonorm 0.7 (Continuous Treatment)
n=68 participants at risk
Subjects received 0.7 international unit (IU)/kilogram (kg)/week (0.03 milligram \[mg\]/kg/day) of Genotonorm growth hormone (GH) as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Continuous Treatment)
n=70 participants at risk
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as a continuous treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
Genotonorm 1.4 (Intermittent Treatment)
n=68 participants at risk
Subjects received 1.4 IU/kg/week (0.06 mg/kg/day) of the growth hormone Genotonorm as an intermittent treatment. Treatment was allowed to be taken until final height of the subject had been reached.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
5.9%
4/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
3/70
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.9%
4/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
7.4%
5/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/70
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.9%
4/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
5.9%
4/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
3/70
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.4%
3/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
19.1%
13/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
12.9%
9/70
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
25.0%
17/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ear infection
|
22.1%
15/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
21.4%
15/70
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
13.2%
9/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Fungal infection
|
5.9%
4/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/70
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
5.9%
4/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
11.4%
8/70
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.2%
11/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
8.8%
6/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
12.9%
9/70
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.3%
7/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
23.5%
16/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
22.9%
16/70
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.2%
11/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
2.9%
2/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
8.6%
6/70
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.3%
7/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
5.9%
4/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/70
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
8.8%
6/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tracheitis
|
4.4%
3/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
7.1%
5/70
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
27.9%
19/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
27.1%
19/70
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
17.6%
12/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Varicella
|
11.8%
8/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
8.6%
6/70
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
1/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Scoliosis
|
2.9%
2/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.7%
4/70
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
|
0.00%
0/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.7%
4/70
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
2.9%
2/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
7.1%
5/70
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.4%
3/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
7.4%
5/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
3/70
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.4%
3/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
1.5%
1/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
3/70
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
7.4%
5/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
5.9%
4/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/70
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
1/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
5.9%
4/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/70
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
1/68
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER