Differences in Morbidity Between a Necessity Endotracheal Suctioning Protocol Versus a Routine Endotracheal Suctioning
NCT ID: NCT01069185
Last Updated: 2017-09-11
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
92 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-02-28
2010-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Tracheal Suctioning With or Without Expiratory Pause Maneuver in Children
NCT05805475
Defining the 'Sniffing Position" in Infants and Toddlers - A Pilot Study
NCT04410289
Effectiveness of the Routine Use of Extubation Protocol on the Incidence of Occurrence of Failures Number of Extubation in Pediatric Resuscitation
NCT03129815
Effect of Closed Tracheal Aspiration Associated With Expiratory Pause in Pediatrics Randomized, Crossover Clinical Study
NCT05418530
Chest Pressure for Intubated Peds Patients
NCT02615834
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Necessity endotracheal suctioning
Endotracheal suctioning depends on clinical manifestations
Necessity endotracheal suctioning
Endotracheal suctioning depends on clinical manifestations
Routine endotracheal suctioning
Endotracheal suctioning every two hours
Routine endotracheal suctioning
Endotracheal suctioning every two hours
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Necessity endotracheal suctioning
Endotracheal suctioning depends on clinical manifestations
Routine endotracheal suctioning
Endotracheal suctioning every two hours
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
1 Month
14 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gloria Lema
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gloria L Lema, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe
Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lema-Zuluaga GL, Fernandez-Laverde M, Correa-Varela AM, Zuleta-Tobon JJ. As-needed endotracheal suctioning protocol vs a routine endotracheal suctioning in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A randomized controlled trial. Colomb Med (Cali). 2018 Jun 30;49(2):148-153. doi: 10.25100/cm.v49i2.2273.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
5100-66779
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.