Trial Outcomes & Findings for Ovarian Cancer Vaccine for Patients in Remission (NCT NCT01068509)
NCT ID: NCT01068509
Last Updated: 2017-05-11
Results Overview
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to the date of documented disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred earlier. Disease progression occurred when a patient met either the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) cancer-antigen (CA)-125 definition or the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) radiological definition of progressive disease. The GCIG CA-125 definition of disease progression was defined as a CA-125 level ≥ 2 × the upper limit of normal documented on 2 occasions at least 1 week apart. The radiological RECIST criteria of disease progression was defined as the appearance of new lesions or an overall increase ≥ 20% or at least 5 mm in existing tumors.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
63 participants
Baseline to 48 weeks after the last visit or dose of Cvac (up to 104 weeks)
2017-05-11
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Non-randomized Cvac
Participants received 6-8 intradermal injections of Cvac at 4 sites along both upper arms and both thighs. The 6-8 injections contained \~ 60 × 10\^6 dendritic cells. Following evaluation after the first dose, participants received additional injections as described for the randomized Cvac group below.
|
Randomized Cvac
Participants received 6-8 intradermal injections of Cvac at 4 sites along both upper arms and both thighs every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (7 doses at Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32), and then every 8 weeks for 24 weeks (3 doses at Weeks 40, 48, and 56). The 6-8 injections contained \~ 60 × 10\^6 dendritic cells.
|
Observational Standard of Care
Participants in this group did not receive any treatment during the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
7
|
29
|
27
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
1
|
7
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
22
|
21
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Non-randomized Cvac
Participants received 6-8 intradermal injections of Cvac at 4 sites along both upper arms and both thighs. The 6-8 injections contained \~ 60 × 10\^6 dendritic cells. Following evaluation after the first dose, participants received additional injections as described for the randomized Cvac group below.
|
Randomized Cvac
Participants received 6-8 intradermal injections of Cvac at 4 sites along both upper arms and both thighs every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (7 doses at Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32), and then every 8 weeks for 24 weeks (3 doses at Weeks 40, 48, and 56). The 6-8 injections contained \~ 60 × 10\^6 dendritic cells.
|
Observational Standard of Care
Participants in this group did not receive any treatment during the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Disease Progression
|
5
|
20
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrew Consent
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Reason Not Specified
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Ovarian Cancer Vaccine for Patients in Remission
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Non-randomized Cvac
n=7 Participants
Participants received 6-8 intradermal injections of Cvac at 4 sites along both upper arms and both thighs. The 6-8 injections contained \~ 60 × 10\^6 dendritic cells. Following evaluation after the first dose, participants received additional injections as described for the randomized Cvac group below.
|
Randomized Cvac
n=29 Participants
Participants received 6-8 intradermal injections of Cvac at 4 sites along both upper arms and both thighs every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (7 doses at Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32), and then every 8 weeks for 24 weeks (3 doses at Weeks 40, 48, and 56). The 6-8 injections contained \~ 60 × 10\^6 dendritic cells.
|
Observational Standard of Care
n=27 Participants
Participants in this group did not receive any treatment during the study.
|
Total
n=63 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
52.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 • n=5 Participants
|
56.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5 • n=7 Participants
|
56.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=5 Participants
|
56.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
63 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 48 weeks after the last visit or dose of Cvac (up to 104 weeks)Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants. Efficacy data were not collected on the initial cohort of 7 non-randomized participants.
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to the date of documented disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred earlier. Disease progression occurred when a patient met either the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) cancer-antigen (CA)-125 definition or the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) radiological definition of progressive disease. The GCIG CA-125 definition of disease progression was defined as a CA-125 level ≥ 2 × the upper limit of normal documented on 2 occasions at least 1 week apart. The radiological RECIST criteria of disease progression was defined as the appearance of new lesions or an overall increase ≥ 20% or at least 5 mm in existing tumors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Randomized Cvac
n=29 Participants
Participants received 6-8 intradermal injections of Cvac at 4 sites along both upper arms and both thighs every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (7 doses at Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32), and then every 8 weeks for 24 weeks (3 doses at Weeks 40, 48, and 56). The 6-8 injections contained \~ 60 × 10\^6 dendritic cells.
|
Observational Standard of Care
n=27 Participants
Participants in this group did not receive any treatment during the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Progression-free Survival
|
12.89 Months
Interval 7.26 to 22.77
|
8.64 Months
Interval 4.66 to 18.33
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years 10 months)Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants. Efficacy data were not collected on the initial cohort of 7 non-randomized participants.
Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Randomized Cvac
n=29 Participants
Participants received 6-8 intradermal injections of Cvac at 4 sites along both upper arms and both thighs every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (7 doses at Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32), and then every 8 weeks for 24 weeks (3 doses at Weeks 40, 48, and 56). The 6-8 injections contained \~ 60 × 10\^6 dendritic cells.
|
Observational Standard of Care
n=27 Participants
Participants in this group did not receive any treatment during the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival
|
NA Months
The median (95% Confidence Interval) could not be calculated due to too few deaths.
|
NA Months
The median (95% Confidence Interval) could not be calculated due to too few deaths.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 104Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants. Efficacy data were not collected on the initial cohort of 7 non-randomized participants.
Mucin 1 antibodies were assessed in serum samples using a quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Detection was achieved with electrochemiluminescence.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Randomized Cvac
n=29 Participants
Participants received 6-8 intradermal injections of Cvac at 4 sites along both upper arms and both thighs every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (7 doses at Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32), and then every 8 weeks for 24 weeks (3 doses at Weeks 40, 48, and 56). The 6-8 injections contained \~ 60 × 10\^6 dendritic cells.
|
Observational Standard of Care
n=27 Participants
Participants in this group did not receive any treatment during the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Mucin 1 Antibody Levels at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 104 (n's=10, 10)
|
-203.0 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 4413.4
|
-1956.7 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 5711.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Mucin 1 Antibody Levels at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 20 (n's=21, 13)
|
957.2 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 9127.3
|
-2854.8 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 9411.8
|
|
Change From Baseline in Mucin 1 Antibody Levels at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 56 (n's=8, 6)
|
-1113.9 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 12033.3
|
-19063.1 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 41323.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 104Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants. Efficacy data were not collected on the initial cohort of 7 non-randomized participants.
Intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) for IL2, IL4, IL17, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and interferon gamma (IFNg) was done in both CD4+ and CD8+ cells from serum samples collected at Weeks, 20, 56, and 104. Intracellular cytokine staining data were acquired with 8-color flow cytometry on a BD LSR II flow cytometer and a high-throughput screening microplate reader.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Randomized Cvac
n=29 Participants
Participants received 6-8 intradermal injections of Cvac at 4 sites along both upper arms and both thighs every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (7 doses at Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32), and then every 8 weeks for 24 weeks (3 doses at Weeks 40, 48, and 56). The 6-8 injections contained \~ 60 × 10\^6 dendritic cells.
|
Observational Standard of Care
n=27 Participants
Participants in this group did not receive any treatment during the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 56: IFNg in CD4+ cells (n's=2, 2)
|
-1.2676 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.4039
|
-1.2676 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.4039
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 56: IL2 in CD8+ cells (n's=2, 2)
|
-0.9438 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.0057
|
-0.9438 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.0057
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 56: IL4 in CD8+ cells (n's=2, 2)
|
0.0622 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.0950
|
-0.0622 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.0950
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 56: IL17 in CD8+ cells (n's=2, 2)
|
-0.0396 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.0136
|
-0.0396 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.0136
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 56: TNF in CD8+ cells (n's=2, 2)
|
-5.8027 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 3.2811
|
-5.8027 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 3.2811
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 56: IFNg in CD8+ cells (n's=2, 2)
|
-5.9300 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 3.7024
|
-5.9300 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 3.7024
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 104: IL2 in CD4+ cells (n's=3, 1)
|
-2.3179 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 1.8772
|
-1.4545 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation NA
The standard deviation could not be calculated as there was only 1 participant.
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 20: IL2 in CD4+ cells (n's=21, 14)
|
-1.4022 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.9730
|
-1.1842 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 1.0945
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 20: IL4 in CD4+ cells (n's=21, 14)
|
-0.0702 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.3781
|
-0.1651 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.2876
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 20: IL17 in CD4+ cells (n's=21, 14)
|
-1.0544 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 1.1481
|
-0.3960 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.4052
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 20: TNF in CD4+ cells (n's=21, 14)
|
-2.7106 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 2.1428
|
-1.8939 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 1.7481
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 20: IFNg in CD4+ cells (n's=21, 14)
|
-1.3576 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 1.5922
|
-1.0243 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 1.2047
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 20: IL2 in CD8+ cells (n's=21, 14)
|
-0.3724 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.3808
|
-0.4562 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.5527
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 20: IL4 in CD8+ cells (n's=21, 14)
|
-0.1495 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.1218
|
-0.5607 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 1.4552
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 20: IL17 in CD8+ cells (n's=21, 14)
|
-0.8268 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 1.6737
|
-0.1232 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.1367
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 20: TNF in CD8+ cells (n's=21, 14)
|
-2.0802 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 2.0004
|
-1.9156 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 2.1254
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 20: IFNg in CD8+ cells (n's=21, 14)
|
-2.8385 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 2.5259
|
-2.3178 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 2.1022
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 56: IL2 in CD4+ cells (n's=2, 2)
|
-1.6798 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 2.1394
|
-1.6798 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 2.1394
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 56: IL4 in CD4+ cells (n's=2, 2)
|
-0.3824 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.1417
|
-0.3824 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.1417
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 56: IL17 in CD4+ cells (n's=2, 2)
|
-0.9413 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.6249
|
-0.9413 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.6249
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 56: TNF in CD4+ cells (n's=2, 2)
|
-5.9500 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 3.3064
|
-5.9500 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 3.3064
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 104: IL4 in CD4+ cells (n's=3, 1)
|
-0.3328 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.1972
|
-0.2912 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation NA
The standard deviation could not be calculated as there was only 1 participant.
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 104: IL17 in CD4+ cells (n's=3, 1)
|
-1.1783 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.5970
|
-1.0044 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation NA
The standard deviation could not be calculated as there was only 1 participant.
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 104: TNF in CD4+ cells (n's=3, 1)
|
-6.4140 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 2.3691
|
-2.9642 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation NA
The standard deviation could not be calculated as there was only 1 participant.
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 104: IFNg in CD4+ cells (n's=3, 1)
|
-1.3833 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.3474
|
-1.5452 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation NA
The standard deviation could not be calculated as there was only 1 participant.
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 104: IL2 in CD8+ cells (n's=3, 1)
|
-1.1586 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.3643
|
-0.1277 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation NA
The standard deviation could not be calculated as there was only 1 participant.
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 104: IL4 in CD8+ cells (n's=3, 1)
|
-0.1241 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.0688
|
-0.1282 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation NA
The standard deviation could not be calculated as there was only 1 participant.
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 104: IL17 in CD8+ cells (n's=3, 1)
|
-0.2485 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 0.3395
|
-0.4682 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation NA
The standard deviation could not be calculated as there was only 1 participant.
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 104: TNF in CD8+ cells (n's=3, 1)
|
-5.1697 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 2.6055
|
-1.6795 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation NA
The standard deviation could not be calculated as there was only 1 participant.
|
|
Change From Baseline in ICS of IL2, IL4, IL17, TNF, and IFNg in CD4+ and CD8+ Cells at Weeks 20, 56, and 104
Week 104: IFNg in CD8+ cells (n's=3, 1)
|
-5.1340 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation 3.0755
|
-2.3506 Arbitrary units
Standard Deviation NA
The standard deviation could not be calculated as there was only 1 participant.
|
Adverse Events
Non-randomized Cvac
Randomized Cvac
Observational Standard of Care
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Non-randomized Cvac
n=7 participants at risk
Participants received 6-8 intradermal injections of Cvac at 4 sites along both upper arms and both thighs. The 6-8 injections contained \~ 60 × 10\^6 dendritic cells. Following evaluation after the first dose, participants received additional injections as described for the randomized Cvac group below.
|
Randomized Cvac
n=26 participants at risk
Participants received 6-8 intradermal injections of Cvac at 4 sites along both upper arms and both thighs every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (7 doses at Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32), and then every 8 weeks for 24 weeks (3 doses at Weeks 40, 48, and 56). The 6-8 injections contained \~ 60 × 10\^6 dendritic cells.
|
Observational Standard of Care
n=24 participants at risk
Participants in this group did not receive any treatment during the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
7.7%
2/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
3.8%
1/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
General disorders
Disease progression
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
3.8%
1/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
3.8%
1/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Ovarian epithelial cancer metastatic
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
3.8%
1/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Non-randomized Cvac
n=7 participants at risk
Participants received 6-8 intradermal injections of Cvac at 4 sites along both upper arms and both thighs. The 6-8 injections contained \~ 60 × 10\^6 dendritic cells. Following evaluation after the first dose, participants received additional injections as described for the randomized Cvac group below.
|
Randomized Cvac
n=26 participants at risk
Participants received 6-8 intradermal injections of Cvac at 4 sites along both upper arms and both thighs every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (7 doses at Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32), and then every 8 weeks for 24 weeks (3 doses at Weeks 40, 48, and 56). The 6-8 injections contained \~ 60 × 10\^6 dendritic cells.
|
Observational Standard of Care
n=24 participants at risk
Participants in this group did not receive any treatment during the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
38.5%
10/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
29.2%
7/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
26.9%
7/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
20.8%
5/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
26.9%
7/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
25.0%
6/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
15.4%
4/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
29.2%
7/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
28.6%
2/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
15.4%
4/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
16.7%
4/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
42.9%
3/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
7.7%
2/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
16.7%
4/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
19.2%
5/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
16.7%
4/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
19.2%
5/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
12.5%
3/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
3.8%
1/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
20.8%
5/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
19.2%
5/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
11.5%
3/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
12.5%
3/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hot flush
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
11.5%
3/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain lower
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
7.7%
2/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
3.8%
1/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
16.7%
4/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Injection site erythema
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
15.4%
4/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
7.7%
2/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
7.7%
2/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
7.7%
2/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Injection site pain
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
11.5%
3/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
3.8%
1/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
12.5%
3/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
3.8%
1/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
12.5%
3/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
15.4%
4/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
3.8%
1/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
12.5%
3/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
7.7%
2/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
4.2%
1/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
7.7%
2/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
11.5%
3/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
12.5%
3/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Injection site reaction
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
11.5%
3/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
General disorders
Lethargy
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
7.7%
2/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
4.2%
1/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathy
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
3.8%
1/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
4.2%
1/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
3.8%
1/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
4.2%
1/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
7.7%
2/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
11.5%
3/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
11.5%
3/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
7.7%
2/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
4.2%
1/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod bite
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
4.2%
1/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Investigations
Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
7.7%
2/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
7.7%
2/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
4.2%
1/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Influenza
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
3.8%
1/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
7.7%
2/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Metabolic disorder
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
3.8%
1/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
7.7%
2/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal discomfort
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
7.7%
2/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Proctalgia
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
4.2%
1/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Renal cyst
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
3.8%
1/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Soft tissue mass
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vulvovaginal candidiasis
|
0.00%
0/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
7.7%
2/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Immune system disorders
Asthma
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon adenoma
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Dermal cyst
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Food poisoning
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Hallucination
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperlipidaemia
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Localised intraabdominal fluid collection
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Micturition urgency
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pelvic fluid collection
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Right atrial dilatation
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rosacea
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal discharge
|
14.3%
1/7
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/26
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
0.00%
0/24
Safety population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of Cvac or were assigned to the observational standard of care group and were assessed at Week 20 (7 participants in the initial cohort, 26 of 29 participants randomized to Cvac, and 24 of 27 participants randomized to observational standard of care).
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee For study centers in Australia, no publication of the study results may be made until publication of the results of the study from all centers or until 2 years after study completion, whichever is sooner. For study centers in the USA, no submission for publication or public disclosure of the results by will be made until the results from all centers have been received and analyzed by the sponsor, or the multi-center study has been terminated or abandoned at all centers.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER