Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study With Tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] Monotherapy or in Combination With Methotrexate in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (PICTURE) (NCT NCT01063062)
NCT ID: NCT01063062
Last Updated: 2017-08-21
Results Overview
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) \[28 joints\], swollen joint count (SJC) \[28 joints\], patient's global assessment of disease activity \[visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Low Disease Activity was defined as a DAS28 score of \< 3.2.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
107 participants
Baseline to Week 24 (Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24)
2017-08-21
Participant Flow
107 participants were enrolled from 11 centers in Egypt, 2 centers were prematurely terminated.
Patients in this 1 arm tocilizumab study were divided into 2 groups: tocilizumab monotherapy or tocilizumab plus methotrexate (patients taking disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs at Baseline who continued concomitant treatment with methotrexate as per standard of care at the investigator's discretion).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions).
|
Tocilizumab + MTX
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions). Participants taking concomitant methotrexate (MTX) at Baseline remained on a stable dose as per standard of care at the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
30
|
77
|
|
Overall Study
Received Study Drug
|
29
|
76
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
22
|
65
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
8
|
12
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions).
|
Tocilizumab + MTX
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions). Participants taking concomitant methotrexate (MTX) at Baseline remained on a stable dose as per standard of care at the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Patient withdrew consent
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
2
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
5
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Investigator's request
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Miscellaneous reason
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study With Tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] Monotherapy or in Combination With Methotrexate in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (PICTURE)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=30 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions).
|
Tocilizumab + MTX
n=77 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions). Participants taking concomitant methotrexate (MTX) at Baseline remained on a stable dose as per standard of care at the Investigator's discretion.
|
Total
n=107 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
37.78 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.47 • n=5 Participants
|
41.76 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.84 • n=7 Participants
|
40.64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.10 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
69 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
92 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24 (Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24)Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all participants who received study drug and had at least 1 follow-up variable. Last observation carried forward was applied for missing data.
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) \[28 joints\], swollen joint count (SJC) \[28 joints\], patient's global assessment of disease activity \[visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Low Disease Activity was defined as a DAS28 score of \< 3.2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=29 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions).
|
Tocilizumab + MTX
n=76 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions). Participants taking concomitant methotrexate (MTX) at Baseline remained on a stable dose as per standard of care at the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Low Disease Activity
Week 4
|
27.59 percentage of participants
|
18.42 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Low Disease Activity
Week 8
|
34.48 percentage of participants
|
40.79 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Low Disease Activity
Week 12
|
34.48 percentage of participants
|
38.16 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Low Disease Activity
Week 16
|
44.83 percentage of participants
|
47.37 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Low Disease Activity
Week 20
|
62.07 percentage of participants
|
57.89 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Low Disease Activity
Week 24
|
58.62 percentage of participants
|
59.21 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 WeeksPopulation: Intent-to-treat population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had data for at least one follow-up variable available. Last observation carried forward.
Time to DAS28 Low Disease Activity was defined as the time in days from the first infusion of study drug to the achievement of a DAS28 Score \<3.2 units. The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) \[28 joints\], swollen joint count (SJC) \[28 joints\], patient's global assessment of disease activity \[visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Low Disease Activity was defined as a DAS28 score of \< 3.2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=29 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions).
|
Tocilizumab + MTX
n=76 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions). Participants taking concomitant methotrexate (MTX) at Baseline remained on a stable dose as per standard of care at the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to DAS28 Low Disease Activity
|
107.2 days
Interval 84.57 to 129.78
|
100.2 days
Interval 87.49 to 112.93
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24Population: Intent-to-treat population included all participants who received study drug and had at least 1 follow-up variable. Last observation carried forward.
DAS28 Clinically Significant Improvement was defined as a DAS28 score reduction of at least 1.2 units from Baseline. The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) \[28 joints\], swollen joint count (SJC) \[28 joints\], patient's global assessment of disease activity \[visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=29 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions).
|
Tocilizumab + MTX
n=76 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions). Participants taking concomitant methotrexate (MTX) at Baseline remained on a stable dose as per standard of care at the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Clinically Significant Improvement
Week 4
|
62.07 percentage of participants
|
73.68 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Clinically Significant Improvement
Week 8
|
75.86 percentage of participants
|
86.84 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Clinically Significant Improvement
Week 12
|
75.86 percentage of participants
|
90.79 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Clinically Significant Improvement
Week 16
|
79.31 percentage of participants
|
92.11 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Clinically Significant Improvement
Week 20
|
82.76 percentage of participants
|
90.79 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Clinically Significant Improvement
Week 24
|
86.20 percentage of participants
|
96.10 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 WeeksPopulation: Intent-to-treat population included all participants who received study drug and had at least 1 follow-up variable. Last observation carried forward.
Time to DAS28 Clinically Significant Improvement was the Time in days from the first infusion of study drug to the achievement of a DAS28 score reduction of at least 1.2 units. The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) \[28 joints\], swollen joint count (SJC) \[28 joints\], patient's global assessment of disease activity \[visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Low Disease Activity was defined as a DAS28 score of \< 3.2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=29 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions).
|
Tocilizumab + MTX
n=76 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions). Participants taking concomitant methotrexate (MTX) at Baseline remained on a stable dose as per standard of care at the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to DAS28 Clinically Significant Improvement
|
59.9 days
Interval 40.2 to 79.53
|
41.6 days
Interval 34.51 to 48.76
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24Population: Intent-to-treat population included all participants who received study drug and had at least 1 follow-up variable. Last observation carried forward.
DAS28 Remission was defined as a DAS28 score \< 2.6 units. The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) \[28 joints\], swollen joint count (SJC) \[28 joints\], patient's global assessment of disease activity \[visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=29 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions).
|
Tocilizumab + MTX
n=76 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions). Participants taking concomitant methotrexate (MTX) at Baseline remained on a stable dose as per standard of care at the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission
Week 4
|
17.24 percentage of participants
|
9.21 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission
Week 8
|
31.03 percentage of participants
|
23.68 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission
Week 12
|
31.03 percentage of participants
|
27.63 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission
Week 16
|
34.48 percentage of participants
|
34.21 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission
Week 20
|
41.38 percentage of participants
|
40.79 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission
Week 24
|
48.28 percentage of participants
|
40.79 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 WeeksPopulation: Intent-to-treat population included all participants who received study drug and had at least 1 follow-up variable. Last observation carried forward.
Time to DAS28 Remission was the Time in days from the first infusion of study drug to the achievement of a DAS28 score \< 2.6 units. The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) \[28 joints\], swollen joint count (SJC) \[28 joints\], patient's global assessment of disease activity \[visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=29 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions).
|
Tocilizumab + MTX
n=76 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions). Participants taking concomitant methotrexate (MTX) at Baseline remained on a stable dose as per standard of care at the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to DAS28 Remission
|
115.9 days
Interval 94.24 to 137.49
|
120.5 days
Interval 108.38 to 132.57
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24Population: Participants from the intent-to-treat population, all participants who received study drug and had at least 1 follow-up variable, with data available at the given time-point. Last observation carried forward.
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) \[28 joints\], swollen joint count (SJC) \[28 joints\], patient's global assessment of disease activity \[visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Low Disease Activity was defined as a DAS28 score of \< 3.2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=25 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions).
|
Tocilizumab + MTX
n=75 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions). Participants taking concomitant methotrexate (MTX) at Baseline remained on a stable dose as per standard of care at the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)
Week 8
|
3.72 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.71
|
3.68 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.60
|
|
Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)
Week 12
|
3.37 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.62
|
3.54 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.45
|
|
Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)
Week 16
|
3.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.54
|
3.21 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.43
|
|
Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)
Week 24
|
2.51 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.50
|
3.06 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.51
|
|
Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)
Week 20
|
2.86 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.50
|
3.11 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.44
|
|
Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)
Week 4 (n=24,75)
|
4.17 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.45
|
4.48 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.47
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24Population: Participants from the intent-to-treat population, all participants who received study drug and had data for at least one follow-up variable, with data available for the given timepoint.
Blood was collected for C-Reactive Protein (CRP), a test for inflammation, at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 and was analyzed at a central laboratory. The serum concentration of CRP was measured in milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=25 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions).
|
Tocilizumab + MTX
n=75 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions). Participants taking concomitant methotrexate (MTX) at Baseline remained on a stable dose as per standard of care at the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|---|
|
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Week 4
|
13.04 mg/L
Standard Deviation 24.90
|
12.28 mg/L
Standard Deviation 28.37
|
|
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Week 8 (n=25,74)
|
14.74 mg/L
Standard Deviation 35.74
|
6.24 mg/L
Standard Deviation 13.39
|
|
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Week 12
|
9.35 mg/L
Standard Deviation 17.29
|
6.89 mg/L
Standard Deviation 15.84
|
|
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Week 16
|
4.38 mg/L
Standard Deviation 9.98
|
3.87 mg/L
Standard Deviation 11.01
|
|
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Week 20
|
7.92 mg/L
Standard Deviation 15.07
|
4.20 mg/L
Standard Deviation 12.11
|
|
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Week 24
|
6.99 mg/L
Standard Deviation 13.64
|
3.82 mg/L
Standard Deviation 13.39
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24Population: Participants from the intent-to-treat population, all participants who received study drug and had at least 1 follow-up variable, with data available at the given time point. Last observation carried forward.
Blood was collected for Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), a test to assess inflammation, at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and was analyzed at a central laboratory. ESR was measured in millimeters/hour (mm/hr).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=25 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions).
|
Tocilizumab + MTX
n=27 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions). Participants taking concomitant methotrexate (MTX) at Baseline remained on a stable dose as per standard of care at the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
Week 16
|
15.80 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 23.65
|
13.88 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 18.02
|
|
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
Week 4 (n=24,27)
|
21.08 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 22.27
|
20.37 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 25.66
|
|
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
Week 8
|
17.18 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 21.54
|
13.79 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 18.52
|
|
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
Week 12
|
14.12 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 15.10
|
16.41 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 22.25
|
|
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
Week 20
|
16.32 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 25.44
|
14.28 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 20.42
|
|
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
Week 24
|
16.32 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 22.43
|
16.40 mm/hr
Standard Deviation 22.26
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 WeeksPopulation: Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
An AE was considered any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with the use of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Preexisting conditions that worsened during the study and laboratory or clinical tests that resulted in a change in treatment or discontinuation from study drug were reported as adverse events. A SAE was any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=29 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions).
|
Tocilizumab + MTX
n=76 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions). Participants taking concomitant methotrexate (MTX) at Baseline remained on a stable dose as per standard of care at the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
AEs
|
29 participants
|
76 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
SAEs
|
5 participants
|
12 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 WeeksPopulation: Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
The number of participants who stopped using the study drug because of an AE or a SAE. An AE was considered any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with the use of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Preexisting conditions that worsened during the study and laboratory or clinical tests that resulted in a change in treatment or discontinuation from study drug were reported as adverse events. A SAE was any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=29 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions).
|
Tocilizumab + MTX
n=76 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions). Participants taking concomitant methotrexate (MTX) at Baseline remained on a stable dose as per standard of care at the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With AE and SAE Related Discontinuation
Discontinuation due to AE
|
8 participants
|
7 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With AE and SAE Related Discontinuation
Discontinuation due to SAE
|
5 participants
|
6 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 WeeksPopulation: Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
A serious infection was an infection that qualified as a Serious Adverse Event (SAE). A SAE was any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=29 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions).
|
Tocilizumab + MTX
n=76 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions). Participants taking concomitant methotrexate (MTX) at Baseline remained on a stable dose as per standard of care at the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Infections
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: Participants from the safety population, all participants who received study drug and had at least 1 post-dose safety assessment, with data available for analysis.
Blood was collected for aspartate aminotransferase (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase) \[AST/SGOT\] and alanine aminotransferase (serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase) \[ALT/SGPT\], liver function tests, and were analyzed at a central laboratory. The number of participants with High AST (SGOT) or ALT (SGPT) levels at Week 24 is reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=29 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions).
|
Tocilizumab + MTX
n=76 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions). Participants taking concomitant methotrexate (MTX) at Baseline remained on a stable dose as per standard of care at the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT)
ALT (SGPT)
|
3 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT)
AST (SGOT)
|
3 participants
|
8 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 0 (Baseline), 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24Population: Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
Blood samples were collected for Total Cholesterol and were sent to a central laboratory for analysis. According to Adult Treatment Profile III (ATPIII) guidelines the Total Cholesterol level in milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) was categorized as: Desirable ( \< 200), Borderline High (200- 239) or High (≥ 240). The number of participants categorized Borderline High or High at each time-point is reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=29 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions).
|
Tocilizumab + MTX
n=76 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions). Participants taking concomitant methotrexate (MTX) at Baseline remained on a stable dose as per standard of care at the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated Total Cholesterol According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 0
|
10 participants
|
25 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated Total Cholesterol According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 4
|
16 participants
|
41 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated Total Cholesterol According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 8
|
10 participants
|
34 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated Total Cholesterol According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 12
|
9 participants
|
30 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated Total Cholesterol According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 16
|
10 participants
|
36 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated Total Cholesterol According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 20
|
7 participants
|
35 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated Total Cholesterol According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 24
|
9 participants
|
30 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 0 (Baseline), 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24Population: Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
Blood samples were collected for High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol and were sent to a central laboratory for analysis. According to Adult Treatment Profile III (ATPIII) guidelines the HDL Total Cholesterol level in milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) was categorized as: Low (\< 40) or High (≥ 60). The number of participants with category High at each time-point is reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=29 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions).
|
Tocilizumab + MTX
n=75 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions). Participants taking concomitant methotrexate (MTX) at Baseline remained on a stable dose as per standard of care at the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated HDL Cholesterol According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 0
|
4 participants
|
20 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated HDL Cholesterol According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 4
|
10 participants
|
34 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated HDL Cholesterol According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 8
|
2 participants
|
26 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated HDL Cholesterol According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 12
|
6 participants
|
22 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated HDL Cholesterol According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 16
|
5 participants
|
19 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated HDL Cholesterol According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 20
|
2 participants
|
20 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated HDL Cholesterol According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 24
|
5 participants
|
20 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 0 (Baseline), 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24Population: Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
Blood samples were collected for Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol and were sent to a central laboratory for analysis. According to Adult Treatment Profile III (ATPIII) guidelines the LDL Cholesterol level in milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) was categorized as: Optimal (\< 100), Near Optimal/Above Optimal (100- 129), Borderline High (130- 159), High (160-189) or Very High (≥ 190). The number of participants categorized Borderline High, High or Very High at each time-point is reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=29 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions).
|
Tocilizumab + MTX
n=76 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions). Participants taking concomitant methotrexate (MTX) at Baseline remained on a stable dose as per standard of care at the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated LDL Cholesterol According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 0
|
9 participants
|
24 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated LDL Cholesterol According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 4
|
11 participants
|
35 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated LDL Cholesterol According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 8
|
7 participants
|
21 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated LDL Cholesterol According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 12
|
8 participants
|
27 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated LDL Cholesterol According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 16
|
9 participants
|
31 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated LDL Cholesterol According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 20
|
7 participants
|
33 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated LDL Cholesterol According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 24
|
8 participants
|
29 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 0 (Baseline), 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24Population: Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
Blood samples were collected for Triglyceride and were sent to a central laboratory for analysis. According to Adult Treatment Profile III (ATPIII) guidelines the Triglyceride level in milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) was categorized as: Normal (\< 150), Borderline High (150- 199), High (200- 499) or Very High (≥ 500). The number of participants categorized Borderline High, High or Very High at each time-point is reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tocilizumab
n=29 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions).
|
Tocilizumab + MTX
n=76 Participants
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions). Participants taking concomitant methotrexate (MTX) at Baseline remained on a stable dose as per standard of care at the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated Triglyceride According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 0
|
4 participants
|
7 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated Triglyceride According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 4
|
6 participants
|
15 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated Triglyceride According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 8
|
4 participants
|
12 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated Triglyceride According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 12
|
5 participants
|
15 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated Triglyceride According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 16
|
6 participants
|
15 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated Triglyceride According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 20
|
8 participants
|
16 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Elevated Triglyceride According to ATPIII Guidelines
Week 24
|
6 participants
|
16 participants
|
Adverse Events
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
Tocilizumab + MTX
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=29 participants at risk
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions).
|
Tocilizumab + MTX
n=76 participants at risk
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions). Participants taking concomitant methotrexate (MTX) at Baseline remained on a stable dose as per standard of care at the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Dysfunctional uterine bleeding
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
1.3%
1/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viremia
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
1.3%
1/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
3.4%
1/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
1.3%
1/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
1.3%
1/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
1.3%
1/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
2.6%
2/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gangrene
|
3.4%
1/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
0.00%
0/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatitis fulminant
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
1.3%
1/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
1.3%
1/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
1.3%
1/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Disseminated intravascular coagulation
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
1.3%
1/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
1.3%
1/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Haematoma
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
1.3%
1/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thermal burn
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
1.3%
1/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pilonidal cyst
|
3.4%
1/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
0.00%
0/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
C-reactive protein increased
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
1.3%
1/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
1.3%
1/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
3.4%
1/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
1.3%
1/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint effusion
|
3.4%
1/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
0.00%
0/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rheumatoid arthritis
|
3.4%
1/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
0.00%
0/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
1.3%
1/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
1.3%
1/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Haemoptysis
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
1.3%
1/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Tocilizumab Monotherapy
n=29 participants at risk
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions).
|
Tocilizumab + MTX
n=76 participants at risk
Participants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions). Participants taking concomitant methotrexate (MTX) at Baseline remained on a stable dose as per standard of care at the Investigator's discretion.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
34.5%
10/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
31.6%
24/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anisocytosis
|
3.4%
1/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
6.6%
5/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hypochromic anaemia
|
13.8%
4/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
3.9%
3/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytosis
|
3.4%
1/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
11.8%
9/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
3.4%
1/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
5.3%
4/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
17.2%
5/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
22.4%
17/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
3.4%
1/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
5.3%
4/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
5.3%
4/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
3.4%
1/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
5.3%
4/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
5.3%
4/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
10.3%
3/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
2.6%
2/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gingivitis
|
6.9%
2/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
3.9%
3/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
6.9%
2/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
1.3%
1/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
General disorders
Generalised oedema
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
6.6%
5/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema
|
6.9%
2/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
6.6%
5/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
6.6%
5/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
13.8%
4/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
0.00%
0/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
5.3%
4/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
10.3%
3/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
6.6%
5/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
17.2%
5/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
22.4%
17/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
17.2%
5/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
25.0%
19/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Bilirubin conjugated increased
|
17.2%
5/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
13.2%
10/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Blood albumin increased
|
6.9%
2/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
6.6%
5/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase decreased
|
6.9%
2/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
7.9%
6/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
|
3.4%
1/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
5.3%
4/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
|
6.9%
2/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
9.2%
7/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin unconjugated increased
|
6.9%
2/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
3.9%
3/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Blood calcium decreased
|
41.4%
12/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
38.2%
29/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Blood chloride decreased
|
20.7%
6/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
17.1%
13/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Blood chloride increased
|
55.2%
16/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
72.4%
55/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Blood cholesterol
|
6.9%
2/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
3.9%
3/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Blood cholesterol increased
|
41.4%
12/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
55.3%
42/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine decreased
|
13.8%
4/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
6.6%
5/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
6.9%
2/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
3.9%
3/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Blood phosphorus increased
|
13.8%
4/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
11.8%
9/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Blood potassium decreased
|
10.3%
3/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
2.6%
2/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Blood potassium increased
|
6.9%
2/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
6.6%
5/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure decreased
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
5.3%
4/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure diastolic increased
|
10.3%
3/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
11.8%
9/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
|
3.4%
1/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
13.2%
10/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Blood sodium increased
|
37.9%
11/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
36.8%
28/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Blood triglycerides increased
|
31.0%
9/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
36.8%
28/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Blood urea increased
|
10.3%
3/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
11.8%
9/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Blood uric acid increased
|
13.8%
4/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
19.7%
15/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Haematocrit decreased
|
24.1%
7/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
30.3%
23/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
|
27.6%
8/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
19.7%
15/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Hepatic enzyme increased
|
24.1%
7/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
18.4%
14/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Low density lipoprotein
|
3.4%
1/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
5.3%
4/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Low density lipoprotein increased
|
62.1%
18/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
77.6%
59/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Mean cell haemoglobin concentration decreased
|
13.8%
4/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
2.6%
2/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Mean cell haemoglobin decreased
|
24.1%
7/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
9.2%
7/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Mean cell volume decreased
|
13.8%
4/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
6.6%
5/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
13.8%
4/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
9.2%
7/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
7.9%
6/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Red blood cell count decreased
|
17.2%
5/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
23.7%
18/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Red blood cell count increased
|
17.2%
5/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
11.8%
9/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Red cell distribution width increased
|
20.7%
6/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
21.1%
16/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
Very low density lipoprotein increased
|
10.3%
3/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
19.7%
15/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count decreased
|
10.3%
3/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
13.2%
10/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count increased
|
13.8%
4/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
11.8%
9/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperchloraemia
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
15.8%
12/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercholesterolaemia
|
24.1%
7/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
11.8%
9/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperlipidaemia
|
24.1%
7/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
19.7%
15/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypernatraemia
|
20.7%
6/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
18.4%
14/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperuricaemia
|
6.9%
2/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
5.3%
4/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcaemia
|
27.6%
8/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
21.1%
16/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
58.6%
17/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
27.6%
21/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthritis
|
6.9%
2/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
2.6%
2/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
6.9%
2/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
9.2%
7/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone pain
|
3.4%
1/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
5.3%
4/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint swelling
|
6.9%
2/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
2.6%
2/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
6.9%
2/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
0.00%
0/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal stiffness
|
6.9%
2/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
3.9%
3/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
10.3%
3/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
13.2%
10/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
5.3%
4/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal colic
|
10.3%
3/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
2.6%
2/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
6.9%
2/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
1.3%
1/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
3.4%
1/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
6.6%
5/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
13.8%
4/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
5.3%
4/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin lesion
|
0.00%
0/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
5.3%
4/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
6.9%
2/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
17.1%
13/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
6.9%
2/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
7.9%
6/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
6.9%
2/29
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
1.3%
1/76
Safety population included all participants who received study drug and had post-dose safety data available.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER