Optical Breath-hold Control System for Image-guided Procedures
NCT ID: NCT01062789
Last Updated: 2011-05-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
EARLY_PHASE1
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-02-28
2011-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Outcome Assessment in Patients Treated With Hyperbaric Oxygen Using OxyVu Tissue Oxygenation Monitoring System
NCT00768027
Breathing Cycle Biofeedback During Computed Tomography Procedures
NCT00059137
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Studies of Acute Hypoxic and Hyperoxic Breathing in Healthy Volunteers
NCT03106376
OM2 Motion Verification Study
NCT06415786
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in the Breath of Lung Transplant Rejection Patients Using Infrared Spectroscopy
NCT06309628
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2. Specific Aim #2: To compare the use of 2 optical-based belts (wrapped around the chest and abdomen) versus 1 optical-based belt (wrapped around the chest or abdomen, depending on which region expands the most during respiration) with regard to accuracy and reproducibility of a pre-determined reference breath-hold level in a subset of patients (prone and/or obese). Hypothesis: The use of 2 optical-based belts allows increased accuracy and reproducibility of a pre-determined reference breath-hold level compared with the use of only one belt in this subset of patients.
3. Specific Aim #3: To test the clinical feasibility of the new OBC system in patients undergoing CT-guided biopsy of the lung or upper abdomen where respiratory motion is a problem. Hypothesis: The OBC system is as good as or better than the currently used IBC system with regard to the accuracy and reproducibility of the reference breath-hold and ease of use.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Use of an optical breath-hold control device
This is a feasibility study that will use this new device in place of a different bellows-based breath-hold control device for a series patients undergoing CT-guided lung biopsy. The new belt will be used in all patients in our study.
Optical breath-hold control system (OBC)
The OBC system was designed to replace the IBC rubber bellows respiration sensor system that we are currently using for CT-guided lung biopsies. Unlike the IBC, the OBC is 1) unaffected by temperature changes, 2) has a linear sensitivity (for easier use and better accuracy), 3) has no pneumatic purge time when setting reference breath-hold level (reducing the chance of an inappropriate reference), 4) has no pneumatic cable that can occasionally interfere and get pinched during procedures, 5) is ambulatory (so patients can more easily familiarize themselves with the device before the procedure), 6) is capable of indicating proper fitting tension, 7) allows for easier binding (wireless pairing with other system components), and 8) is significantly less expensive (and possibly disposable).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Optical breath-hold control system (OBC)
The OBC system was designed to replace the IBC rubber bellows respiration sensor system that we are currently using for CT-guided lung biopsies. Unlike the IBC, the OBC is 1) unaffected by temperature changes, 2) has a linear sensitivity (for easier use and better accuracy), 3) has no pneumatic purge time when setting reference breath-hold level (reducing the chance of an inappropriate reference), 4) has no pneumatic cable that can occasionally interfere and get pinched during procedures, 5) is ambulatory (so patients can more easily familiarize themselves with the device before the procedure), 6) is capable of indicating proper fitting tension, 7) allows for easier binding (wireless pairing with other system components), and 8) is significantly less expensive (and possibly disposable).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Lesions will need to measure 3 cm or less in maximum dimension and cannot be affixed to the chest or abdominal wall.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with bleeding diatheses (platelets \< 50,000, International Normalized Ratio \> 1.5, or activated partial thromboplastin time \> twice normal)
* Lesions that abut the pleura or abdominal wall for a distance greater than 3 cm (these lesions were assumed to be fixed in position and less likely to be affected by respiratory motion).
* Patients with implanted medical devices (pacemakers) (this exclusion is based on the Division of Engineering Safety Review-enclosed in application)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mayo Clinic
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stephanie K Carlson, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mayo Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
09-004069
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.