Optical Breath-hold Control System for Image-guided Procedures

NCT ID: NCT01062789

Last Updated: 2011-05-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-02-28

Study Completion Date

2011-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective or our study is to test the feasibility of a new optical-based breath-hold control (OBC) system for monitoring breath-hold levels and providing patient feedback during CT-guided biopsies of the lung and upper abdomen where respiratory motion is a problem.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

1. Specific Aim #1: To further test the feasibility of the new OBC system for guiding accurate and reproducible breath-hold levels that correlate with internal target position in human volunteers. Hypothesis: The OBC system is as good as or better than the currently used IBC system with regard to accuracy and reproducibility of a reference breath-hold level.
2. Specific Aim #2: To compare the use of 2 optical-based belts (wrapped around the chest and abdomen) versus 1 optical-based belt (wrapped around the chest or abdomen, depending on which region expands the most during respiration) with regard to accuracy and reproducibility of a pre-determined reference breath-hold level in a subset of patients (prone and/or obese). Hypothesis: The use of 2 optical-based belts allows increased accuracy and reproducibility of a pre-determined reference breath-hold level compared with the use of only one belt in this subset of patients.
3. Specific Aim #3: To test the clinical feasibility of the new OBC system in patients undergoing CT-guided biopsy of the lung or upper abdomen where respiratory motion is a problem. Hypothesis: The OBC system is as good as or better than the currently used IBC system with regard to the accuracy and reproducibility of the reference breath-hold and ease of use.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Respiration

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Use of an optical breath-hold control device

This is a feasibility study that will use this new device in place of a different bellows-based breath-hold control device for a series patients undergoing CT-guided lung biopsy. The new belt will be used in all patients in our study.

Group Type OTHER

Optical breath-hold control system (OBC)

Intervention Type DEVICE

The OBC system was designed to replace the IBC rubber bellows respiration sensor system that we are currently using for CT-guided lung biopsies. Unlike the IBC, the OBC is 1) unaffected by temperature changes, 2) has a linear sensitivity (for easier use and better accuracy), 3) has no pneumatic purge time when setting reference breath-hold level (reducing the chance of an inappropriate reference), 4) has no pneumatic cable that can occasionally interfere and get pinched during procedures, 5) is ambulatory (so patients can more easily familiarize themselves with the device before the procedure), 6) is capable of indicating proper fitting tension, 7) allows for easier binding (wireless pairing with other system components), and 8) is significantly less expensive (and possibly disposable).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Optical breath-hold control system (OBC)

The OBC system was designed to replace the IBC rubber bellows respiration sensor system that we are currently using for CT-guided lung biopsies. Unlike the IBC, the OBC is 1) unaffected by temperature changes, 2) has a linear sensitivity (for easier use and better accuracy), 3) has no pneumatic purge time when setting reference breath-hold level (reducing the chance of an inappropriate reference), 4) has no pneumatic cable that can occasionally interfere and get pinched during procedures, 5) is ambulatory (so patients can more easily familiarize themselves with the device before the procedure), 6) is capable of indicating proper fitting tension, 7) allows for easier binding (wireless pairing with other system components), and 8) is significantly less expensive (and possibly disposable).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients scheduled for a CT-guided lung or upper abdomen biopsy (including lesions in the liver, pancreas, stomach, kidneys, adrenals, spleen, or in the peritoneum at or above the level of the kidneys) on the SMH-CT-3M scanner when either Dr. Carlson or Dr. Bender are scheduled.
* Lesions will need to measure 3 cm or less in maximum dimension and cannot be affixed to the chest or abdominal wall.

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to cooperate with breath-holding (including cognitive impairment, poor pulmonary function that inhibits patients from being able to hold their breath for at least 10 seconds)
* Patients with bleeding diatheses (platelets \< 50,000, International Normalized Ratio \> 1.5, or activated partial thromboplastin time \> twice normal)
* Lesions that abut the pleura or abdominal wall for a distance greater than 3 cm (these lesions were assumed to be fixed in position and less likely to be affected by respiratory motion).
* Patients with implanted medical devices (pacemakers) (this exclusion is based on the Division of Engineering Safety Review-enclosed in application)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mayo Clinic

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stephanie K Carlson, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

09-004069

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.