Study of AR-12286 Versus Latanoprost in Patients With Elevated Intraocular Pressure
NCT ID: NCT01060579
Last Updated: 2014-05-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
217 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-02-28
2010-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of AR-13324 to Latanoprost in Patients With Elevated Intraocular Pressure
NCT01731002
AR-12286 in Combination With Latanoprost
NCT01302249
Study of AR-13324 in Patients With Elevated Intraocular Pressure
NCT01528787
24-hour Efficacy of AR-12286
NCT01330979
AR-12286 Fixed Dose Combination to Lower Elevated Intraocular Pressure
NCT01474135
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
AR-12286 0.5% ophthalmic solution
AR-12286 0.5% ophthalmic solution
q.d. PM
AR-12286 0.25% Ophthalmic Solution
AR-12286 0.25% Ophthalmic solution
q.d. PM
Latanoprost 0.005% ophthalmic solution
Latanoprost ophthalmic solution
q.d. PM
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
AR-12286 0.5% ophthalmic solution
q.d. PM
AR-12286 0.25% Ophthalmic solution
q.d. PM
Latanoprost ophthalmic solution
q.d. PM
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Diagnosis of open angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) and currently being treated with ocular hypotensive medication.
3. Unmedicated (post-washout) IOP ≥ 22 mm Hg at 2 eligibility visits (07:00-09:00 hr), 2-7 days apart.
4. Corrected visual acuity in each eye +1.0 logMAR or better by ETDRS in each eye (equivalent to 20/200).
5. Has used a commercially available IOP-lowering medication in one or both eyes for at least 30 days over the 90 days prior to the screening visit.
6. Able and willing to give signed informed consent and follow study instructions.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Glaucoma: pseudoexfoliation or pigment dispersion component, history of angle closure. Note: Previous laser peripheral iridotomy is acceptable.
2. Intraocular pressure \> 36 mm Hg
3. Known hypersensitivity to any component of the formulation (benzalkonium chloride, etc.), or to topical anesthetics.
4. Previous glaucoma intraocular surgery or glaucoma laser procedures in study eye(s).
5. Refractive surgery in study eye(s) (e.g., radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, etc.).
6. Ocular trauma within the past six months, or ocular surgery or laser treatment within the past three months.
7. History or evidence of ocular infection, inflammation, clinically significant blepharitis or conjunctivitis at baseline (Visit 1), or of herpes simplex keratitis
8. Contact lens wear within 30 minutes of instillation of study medication.
9. Ocular medication of any kind within 30 days of Visit 1, with the exception of a) ocular hypotensive medications (which must be washed out according to the provided schedule), b) lid scrubs (which may be used prior to, but not after Visit 1) or c) lubricating drops for dry eye (which may be used throughout the study).
10. Clinically significant ocular disease (e.g. corneal edema, uveitis, severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca) which might interfere with the study, including glaucomatous damage so severe that washout of ocular hypotensive medications for one month is not judged safe (i.e., cup-disc ratio \> 0.8).
11. Central corneal thickness greater than 600 μ.
12. Any abnormality preventing reliable applanation tonometry of either eye.
Systemic:
1. Clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory tests at screening.
2. Clinically significant systemic disease (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, myasthenia gravis, hepatic, renal, endocrine or cardiovascular disorders) which might interfere with the study.
3. Participation in any investigational study within the past 30 days.
4. Changes of systemic medication that could have a substantial effect on IOP within 30 days prior to screening, or anticipated during the study.
5. Due to status of preclinical safety program, women of childbearing potential who are pregnant, nursing, planning a pregnancy, or not using a medically acceptable form of birth control. An adult woman is considered to be of childbearing potential unless she is one year post-menopausal or three months post-surgical sterilization. All females of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test result at the screening examination and must not intend to become pregnant during the study.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aerie Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Thomas van Haarlem, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
United Medical Research Institute
Inglewood, California, United States
North Bay Eye Associates
Petaluma, California, United States
Centre For Health Care
Poway, California, United States
East Florida Eye Institute
Stuart, Florida, United States
Marvin Greenberg, MD
Tamarac, Florida, United States
Coastal Research Associates, LLC
Roswell, Georgia, United States
Bradley Kwapiszeski, MD
Shawnee Mission, Kansas, United States
Taustine Eye Center
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Comprehensive Eye Care
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Mount Sinai School Of Medicine
New York, New York, United States
Rochester Ophthalmology Group
Rochester, New York, United States
Glaucoma Consultants of the Capital Region
Slingerlands, New York, United States
Charlotte Eye Ear Nose and Throat
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
The Eye Institute
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Black Hills Regional Eye Institute
Rapid City, South Dakota, United States
Univ Eye Surgeons, Maryville Ctr.
Maryville, Tennessee, United States
Texan Eye
Austin, Texas, United States
Medical Center Ophth. Associates
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AR-12286-CS202
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.