A Safety and Efficacy Study of Ustekinumab in Patients With Plaque Psoriasis Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate

NCT ID: NCT01059773

Last Updated: 2014-11-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

490 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-10-31

Study Completion Date

2011-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This purpose of this study is to assess the safety of ustekinumab in psoriasis patients who receive ustekinumab following an inadequate response to methotrexate therapy. The study will provide information for doctors on how to manage the transfer from methotrexate to the biologic agent ustekinumab. The study is designed to compare two methods of transferring patients from methotrexate to ustekinumab. The two methods being compared are discontinuation of methotrexate with immediate initiation of ustekinumab versus initiation of ustekinumab with overlap and gradual dose reduction of methotrexate over 4 weeks.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Only limited data exist to guide physicians on transitioning patients onto biologic agents once conventional systemic agents have been found to be inadequate. Most Phase III regulatory studies for biologics, including ustekinumab, required washout periods of between one and three months between previous therapies and the start of study agent. Although advantageous from a methodological perspective, this approach does not appear to mirror real-world clinical practice, in which clinicians and patients are unwilling to go without treatment for extended periods. As a result, physicians appear to employ several arbitrary strategies when transitioning their patients. Two commonly used approaches are: Initiation of biologic therapy with immediate cessation of previous conventional systemic therapy or Initiation of biologic therapy with overlap and gradual reduction of previous conventional systemic therapy. Some physicians opt for the first strategy to minimise the risk of drug-drug interactions. Others opt for the second strategy to minimise the risk of symptomatic worsening between cessation of previous treatment and the onset of action of biologic agents. This study aims to compare safety, efficacy and quality of life outcomes associated with these two strategies, with follow-up for 52 weeks. The primary objective of this exploratory trial is to evaluate the comparative safety through week 12 of two treatment transition strategies in patients with inadequate response to methotrexate: discontinuation of methotrexate with immediate initiation of ustekinumab versus initiation of ustekinumab with overlap and gradual dose reduction of methotrexate over 4 weeks. Secondary objectives of the study include evaluating the safety, efficacy, and quality of life through Week 52. The focus of the trial is on estimation rather than on hypothesis testing and, therefore, no formal hypothesis testing is planned. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients experiencing one or more treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) through Week 12 within each treatment transition arm. All proportions will be accompanied by an estimated 95% confidence interval. This is a phase IIIB/IV multicentre, open label, two-arm, randomised study, lasting 56 weeks (including a screening period). The primary endpoint is assessed after 12 weeks of treatment (Week 12). All treated patients will be followed for safety and efficacy through Week 52. Patients will be stratified according to their body weight to ensure a similar distribution of patients \>100 kg between the two treatment arms. Approximately 4 weeks prior to study start, all patients who provide consent for participation will be screened according to the requirements of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients who meet all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will enter the study. During the Screening Phase, patients will continue their current treatment schedule and dose for methotrexate, with folic acid if prescribed. At Week 0, prior to the first dose of ustekinumab, patients will be randomised 1:1 to one of the two treatment arms described below. Patients will be stratified according to their baseline body weight (=\<100 kg or \>100 kg) to ensure a similar distribution of patients \>100 kg between the two treatment arms. Patients eligible for the study will be men and women aged 18 years or older with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who have a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) \>=10, who have failed or are intolerant to methotrexate therapy. Patients entering the study must be receiving methotrexate at a dose of 10-25 mg/week, and should have been receiving methotrexate for at least 8 weeks prior to screening. Approximately 576 patients will be included in the study from approximately 100 sites in 20 countries. In both treatment arms, Patients weighing ≤ 100 kg will receive ustekinumab 45 mg at Weeks 0, 4 and 16. Patients who achieve a PASI 75 response at Week 28 and 40 will continue receiving ustekinumab 45 mg at Week 28 and 40. Patients who fail to achieve PASI 75 response at Week 28 will receive ustekinumab 90 mg at Week 28 and 40. Patients who achieve a PASI 75 response at Week 28, but fail to achieve PASI 75 response at Week 40 will receive ustekinumab 90 mg at Week 40. Patients \> 100 kg will receive ustekinumab 90 mg at Weeks 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40, regardless of achievement of PASI 75 response. Consideration will be given to discontinuing treatment in these patients if they show no response at Week 28. At Week 0, all eligible patients will be randomised to one of the following treatment regimens. The methotrexate dose reduction regime will depend on the dose of methotrexate at screening. All patients will stop methotrexate regardless of the final dose after 4 overlapping weeks (Weeks 0, 1, 2 and 3). The last dose of methotrexate will be given within the 7 day period before the second dose of ustekinumab. Safety evaluations will include physical examination, body weight and waist circumference, pregnancy testing, vital signs, clinical laboratory testing with full blood analysis and biochemistry, skin assessment for suspicious malignant lesions, Tuberculosis (TB) assessment, adverse events review and collection. Efficacy evaluations, including Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI), Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), will be carried out. Evaluations to assess changes in quality of life, including the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Hospital Anxiety Depression Score (HADS), EuroQol-5 dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D) and Patient Benefit Index (PBI), will be carried out.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Psoriasis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Immediate Methotrexate Cessation

Patients will receive ustekinumab by SC injection at Weeks 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40. The last dose of methotrexate will be taken anytime in the week prior to baseline (week 0).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ustekinumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients weighting ≤ 100 kg will receive ustekinumab 45 mg at Weeks 0, 4 and 16. Patients who achieve a PASI 75 response at Week 28 and 40 will continue receiving ustekinumab 45 mg at Week 28 and 40. Patients who fail to achieve PASI 75 response at Week 28 will receive ustekinumab 90 mg at Week 28 and 40. Patients who achieve a PASI 75 response at Week 28, but fail to achieve PASI 75 response at Week 40 will receive ustekinumab 90 mg at Week 40. Patients \> 100 kg will receive ustekinumab 90 mg at Weeks 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40, regardless of achievement of PASI 75 response. Consideration will be given to discontinuing treatment in these patients if they show no response at Week 28.

Gradual Reduction of Methotrexate

Patients will receive ustekinumab by SC injection at Weeks 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40. Patients will gradually reduce the dose of methotrexate over the 4 week period after week 0.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ustekinumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients weighting ≤ 100 kg will receive ustekinumab 45 mg at Weeks 0, 4 and 16. Patients who achieve a PASI 75 response at Week 28 and 40 will continue receiving ustekinumab 45 mg at Week 28 and 40. Patients who fail to achieve PASI 75 response at Week 28 will receive ustekinumab 90 mg at Week 28 and 40. Patients who achieve a PASI 75 response at Week 28, but fail to achieve PASI 75 response at Week 40 will receive ustekinumab 90 mg at Week 40. Patients \> 100 kg will receive ustekinumab 90 mg at Weeks 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40, regardless of achievement of PASI 75 response. Consideration will be given to discontinuing treatment in these patients if they show no response at Week 28.

Methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

Gradual reduction of methotrexate therapy over the 4 week period after Week 0. The methotrexate dose reduction regime will depend on the dose of methotrexate at screening. All patients will stop methotrexate regardless of the final dose after 4 overlapping weeks. The last dose of methotrexate will be given within the 7 day period before the second dose of ustekinumab.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ustekinumab

Patients weighting ≤ 100 kg will receive ustekinumab 45 mg at Weeks 0, 4 and 16. Patients who achieve a PASI 75 response at Week 28 and 40 will continue receiving ustekinumab 45 mg at Week 28 and 40. Patients who fail to achieve PASI 75 response at Week 28 will receive ustekinumab 90 mg at Week 28 and 40. Patients who achieve a PASI 75 response at Week 28, but fail to achieve PASI 75 response at Week 40 will receive ustekinumab 90 mg at Week 40. Patients \> 100 kg will receive ustekinumab 90 mg at Weeks 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40, regardless of achievement of PASI 75 response. Consideration will be given to discontinuing treatment in these patients if they show no response at Week 28.

Intervention Type DRUG

Methotrexate

Gradual reduction of methotrexate therapy over the 4 week period after Week 0. The methotrexate dose reduction regime will depend on the dose of methotrexate at screening. All patients will stop methotrexate regardless of the final dose after 4 overlapping weeks. The last dose of methotrexate will be given within the 7 day period before the second dose of ustekinumab.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients should have diagnosis of plaque-type psoriasis for at least 6 months prior to first administration of study agent (patients with concurrent psoriatic arthritis may be enrolled)
* Moderate-to-severe psoriasis scored as PASI \>= 10 at screening and at the time of first administration of ustekinumab
* Should currently receive (and have been receiving for at least 8 weeks directly prior to screening) systemic therapy with methotrexate at a dose of at least 10 mg/week but not exceeding 25 mg/week, with an inadequate response to this treatment (due to either efficacy or tolerability) and, in the judgment of the treating physician and patient, a treatment change is needed
* Women should take adequate birth control measures throughout the study and must agree to continue to use such birth control measures and not to become pregnant or plan to become pregnant for at least 15 weeks after the last dose of ustekinumab and for at least 6 months after the last dose of methotrexate
* Men must be using adequate birth control measures whilst receiving methotrexate and for 6 months after the last dose of methotrexate

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients should not have non-plaque forms of psoriasis (eg, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
* Should currently (and within 12 months) not receive ciclosporin, fumarates, PUVA, etanercept, efalizumab, infliximab, adalimumab or alefacept or other biologic or systemic therapy (and other therapy as indicated in the protocol)
* Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning pregnancy (both men and women) while enrolled in the study
* Have previously failed treatment with any therapeutic agent directly targeted at reducing IL-12 or IL-23, including, but not limited to, ustekinumab and ABT-874
* Active or latent Tuberculosis or other chronic or recurrent infectious disease
* Known history of lymphoproliferative disease
* Known malignancy or history of malignancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Janssen-Cilag International NV

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Janssen-Cilag International NV Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Janssen-Cilag International NV

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Roskilde, , Denmark

Site Status

Tampere, , Finland

Site Status

Turku, , Finland

Site Status

Chambray-lès-Tours, , France

Site Status

Creil, , France

Site Status

Jarez, , France

Site Status

Lille, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Nantes Cedex 01 N/A, , France

Site Status

Nice, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Erlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Göttingen, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Landau, , Germany

Site Status

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Mahlow, , Germany

Site Status

Marburg, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Tÿbingen, , Germany

Site Status

Witten, , Germany

Site Status

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Petah Tikva, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Stavanger, , Norway

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Alicante, , Spain

Site Status

Badalona, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Córdoba, , Spain

Site Status

La Coruÿa N/A, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Malmo, , Sweden

Site Status

Solna, , Sweden

Site Status

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Aberdeen, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Cardiff, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Craigavon, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Salford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria Belgium Bulgaria Denmark Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Israel Lithuania Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Slovakia Spain Sweden United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CR016639

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CNTO1275PSO4004

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR016639

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id