Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Determine the Safety and Effectiveness of RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients With Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (NCT NCT01059318)
NCT ID: NCT01059318
Last Updated: 2020-11-19
Results Overview
Blood samples (1 mL) for determination of VEGF-D were collected from a forearm vein (direct venipuncture or from an indwelling cannula) and 2 aliquots of serum were collected. VEGF-D levels were determined from only 1 of the 2 serum aliquots, with the second acting as a back-up. A serum VEGF-D \>800 pg/mL level supports a diagnosis of Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM)
COMPLETED
PHASE2
24 participants
Baseline, 26 weeks
2020-11-19
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Everolimus
All patients received a starting dose of everolimus 2.5mg/day for 4 weeks, followed by a dose of 5 mg/day for 4 weeks and finally a dose of 10mg/day for 18 weeks. The 26 week treatment period was followed by an optional extension period wherein patients continued therapy until the last patient had completed 26-weeks of treatment. The longest period a patient participated in the study was 62 weeks.
Everolimus : Everolimus was formulated as tablets in strengths of 2.5mg, 5mg and 10mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Core Study (26 Week)
STARTED
|
24
|
|
Core Study (26 Week)
Everolimus 2.5 mg for 4 Weeks
|
24
|
|
Core Study (26 Week)
Everolimus 5 mg for 4 Weeks
|
24
|
|
Core Study (26 Week)
Everolimus 10 mg for 18 Weeks
|
24
|
|
Core Study (26 Week)
Pharmacokinetics (PK) Analysis Set
|
16
|
|
Core Study (26 Week)
COMPLETED
|
20
|
|
Core Study (26 Week)
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
|
Extension (36 Week)
STARTED
|
20
|
|
Extension (36 Week)
COMPLETED
|
17
|
|
Extension (36 Week)
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Everolimus
All patients received a starting dose of everolimus 2.5mg/day for 4 weeks, followed by a dose of 5 mg/day for 4 weeks and finally a dose of 10mg/day for 18 weeks. The 26 week treatment period was followed by an optional extension period wherein patients continued therapy until the last patient had completed 26-weeks of treatment. The longest period a patient participated in the study was 62 weeks.
Everolimus : Everolimus was formulated as tablets in strengths of 2.5mg, 5mg and 10mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Core Study (26 Week)
Adverse Event
|
3
|
|
Core Study (26 Week)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
|
Extension (36 Week)
Adverse Event
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Determine the Safety and Effectiveness of RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients With Lymphangioleiomyomatosis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Everolimus
n=24 Participants
All patients received a starting dose of everolimus 2.5mg/day for 4 weeks, followed by a dose of 5 mg/day for 4 weeks and finally a dose of 10mg/day for 18 weeks.
The 26 week treatment period was followed by an optional extension period wherein patients continued therapy until the last patient had completed 26-weeks of treatment. The longest period a patient participated in the study was 62 weeks.
Everolimus : Everolimus was formulated as tablets in strengths of 2.5mg, 5mg and 10mg.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeksPopulation: Pharmacodynamic analysis included patients who received study drug without any major protocol violation. Same patients in different dose groups were included in this analysis with available data.
Blood samples (1 mL) for determination of VEGF-D were collected from a forearm vein (direct venipuncture or from an indwelling cannula) and 2 aliquots of serum were collected. VEGF-D levels were determined from only 1 of the 2 serum aliquots, with the second acting as a back-up. A serum VEGF-D \>800 pg/mL level supports a diagnosis of Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Everolimus 2.5 mg/Day
n=21 Participants
All patients received a starting dose of everolimus 2.5mg/day for first 4 weeks.
|
Everolimus 5 mg/Day
n=22 Participants
Patients from 2.5 mg/day up-titrated after 4 weeks and followed by a dose of 5 mg/day for another 4 weeks.
|
Everolimus 10 mg/Day
n=22 Participants
Patients who had received 2.5 mg/day for first 4 weeks, up titrated to 5 mg/day and continued for another 4 weeks, again up-titrated to 10 mg/day for 18 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-D (VEGF-D) Concentrations
|
-464.3 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 745.23
|
-1113.2 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1468.9
|
-1771.7 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 2091.6
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: pre-dose and at 2 hour post dose at week 26Population: Pharmacokinetics analysis set. Patients with measurable data at particular time points were included in this analysis.
Venous blood samples (2 mL) for pharmacokinetic evaluation were collected pre dose and 2 hours post dose at preselected visits.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Everolimus 2.5 mg/Day
n=16 Participants
All patients received a starting dose of everolimus 2.5mg/day for first 4 weeks.
|
Everolimus 5 mg/Day
n=16 Participants
Patients from 2.5 mg/day up-titrated after 4 weeks and followed by a dose of 5 mg/day for another 4 weeks.
|
Everolimus 10 mg/Day
n=16 Participants
Patients who had received 2.5 mg/day for first 4 weeks, up titrated to 5 mg/day and continued for another 4 weeks, again up-titrated to 10 mg/day for 18 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Trough (C0,ss) and Peak (C2,ss) Drug Concentration at Steady State
Trough (C0, ss)
|
3.1 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1.33
|
5.8 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 3.02
|
11.0 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 3.45
|
|
Mean Trough (C0,ss) and Peak (C2,ss) Drug Concentration at Steady State
Peak (C2, ss)
|
12.1 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 3.56
|
22.6 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 7.22
|
45.7 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 12.52
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeksPopulation: Pharmacodynamic analysis set for everolimus reporting arm. Patients with both baseline and 26 weeks assessment were included in this analysis.
All spirometry evaluation followed recommendations of the Standardization of Lung Function Testing. All spirometry maneuvers were performed in sitting position whilst wearing nose clips. At least three acceptable maneuvers were performed for each time point, and results met within-test and between-test criteria for acceptability. The highest value was obtained of FVC from any of the three maneuvers that met acceptability criteria. Change from baseline in FVC was compared between everolimus and historical placebo data from multicenter trial of sirolimus in LAM. (MILES NCT00414648) due to absence of placebo group in this current study on a rare lung disease. These two studies had different study designs, so the change from baseline to 6 months (26 weeks) in MILES study was estimated from the publicly reported rate of change per month to provide a meaningful comparison. This historical control be can be viewed on the Novartis Clinical Trial Results website.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Everolimus 2.5 mg/Day
n=23 Participants
All patients received a starting dose of everolimus 2.5mg/day for first 4 weeks.
|
Everolimus 5 mg/Day
Patients from 2.5 mg/day up-titrated after 4 weeks and followed by a dose of 5 mg/day for another 4 weeks.
|
Everolimus 10 mg/Day
Patients who had received 2.5 mg/day for first 4 weeks, up titrated to 5 mg/day and continued for another 4 weeks, again up-titrated to 10 mg/day for 18 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
|
10 mL
Interval -111.0 to 132.0
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeksPopulation: Pharmacodynamic analysis set for everolimus reporting arm. Patients with both baseline and 26 weeks assessment were included in this analysis.
All spirometry evaluation followed the recommendations of the Standardization of Lung Function Testing. All spirometry maneuvers were performed in the sitting position whilst wearing nose clips. At least three acceptable maneuvers were performed for each time point, and the results met within-test and between-test criteria for acceptability. The highest value was obtained of FEV1 from any of the three maneuvers that met acceptability criteria. Change from baseline in FEV1 was compared between everolimus and historical placebo data from the MILES study (NCT00414648) due to the absence of a placebo group in this current study on a rare lung disease. These two studies had different study designs, so the change from baseline to 6 months (26 weeks) in MILES study was estimated from the publicly reported rate of change per month in order to provide a meaningful comparison. This historical control can be viewed on the Novartis Clinical Trial Results website.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Everolimus 2.5 mg/Day
n=23 Participants
All patients received a starting dose of everolimus 2.5mg/day for first 4 weeks.
|
Everolimus 5 mg/Day
Patients from 2.5 mg/day up-titrated after 4 weeks and followed by a dose of 5 mg/day for another 4 weeks.
|
Everolimus 10 mg/Day
Patients who had received 2.5 mg/day for first 4 weeks, up titrated to 5 mg/day and continued for another 4 weeks, again up-titrated to 10 mg/day for 18 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
|
114 mL
Interval 11.0 to 217.0
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeksPopulation: Pharmacodynamic analysis set. Patients with both baseline and 26 weeks assessment were included in the analysis.
Extended pulmonary function testing such as Total Lung Capacity (TLC), Thoracic Gas Volume (TGV), Residual Volume (RV) were measured using a body plethysmograph
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Everolimus 2.5 mg/Day
n=22 Participants
All patients received a starting dose of everolimus 2.5mg/day for first 4 weeks.
|
Everolimus 5 mg/Day
Patients from 2.5 mg/day up-titrated after 4 weeks and followed by a dose of 5 mg/day for another 4 weeks.
|
Everolimus 10 mg/Day
Patients who had received 2.5 mg/day for first 4 weeks, up titrated to 5 mg/day and continued for another 4 weeks, again up-titrated to 10 mg/day for 18 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Extended Pulmonary Function Testing
TLC
|
0.199 Liters (L)
Standard Deviation 0.8645
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Extended Pulmonary Function Testing
TGV
|
0.267 Liters (L)
Standard Deviation 1.0368
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Extended Pulmonary Function Testing
RV
|
0.169 Liters (L)
Standard Deviation 0.9055
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeksPopulation: Pharmacodynamic analysis set. Patients with both baseline and 26 weeks assessment were included in the analysis.
Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (DLCO) one of the extended pulmonary function testing which was also measured using a body plethysmograph.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Everolimus 2.5 mg/Day
n=22 Participants
All patients received a starting dose of everolimus 2.5mg/day for first 4 weeks.
|
Everolimus 5 mg/Day
Patients from 2.5 mg/day up-titrated after 4 weeks and followed by a dose of 5 mg/day for another 4 weeks.
|
Everolimus 10 mg/Day
Patients who had received 2.5 mg/day for first 4 weeks, up titrated to 5 mg/day and continued for another 4 weeks, again up-titrated to 10 mg/day for 18 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (DLCO)
|
-0.782 ml/min/mmHg
Standard Deviation 1.5351
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeksPopulation: Pharmacodynamic analysis set. Patients with both baseline and 26 weeks assessment were included in the analysis.
A standardized 6-minute walk test (6MWT) was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the American Thoracic Society 2002. The test was done about the same time of day to avoid diurnal variation in an environment that had an adequate temperature to avoid additional burden to the patient due to heat or cold air. The distance walked in six minutes (6MWD) was recorded.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Everolimus 2.5 mg/Day
n=23 Participants
All patients received a starting dose of everolimus 2.5mg/day for first 4 weeks.
|
Everolimus 5 mg/Day
Patients from 2.5 mg/day up-titrated after 4 weeks and followed by a dose of 5 mg/day for another 4 weeks.
|
Everolimus 10 mg/Day
Patients who had received 2.5 mg/day for first 4 weeks, up titrated to 5 mg/day and continued for another 4 weeks, again up-titrated to 10 mg/day for 18 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 6-minute Walk Test Score to Measure Exercise Capacity
|
46.9 meters (m)
Standard Deviation 115.30
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeksPopulation: Pharmacodynamic analysis set. Patients with both baseline and 26 weeks assessment were included in the analysis.
Oxygen saturation means the amount of oxygen in blood stream. Oxygen saturation was measured by using a Pulse Oximeter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Everolimus 2.5 mg/Day
n=23 Participants
All patients received a starting dose of everolimus 2.5mg/day for first 4 weeks.
|
Everolimus 5 mg/Day
Patients from 2.5 mg/day up-titrated after 4 weeks and followed by a dose of 5 mg/day for another 4 weeks.
|
Everolimus 10 mg/Day
Patients who had received 2.5 mg/day for first 4 weeks, up titrated to 5 mg/day and continued for another 4 weeks, again up-titrated to 10 mg/day for 18 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Oxygen Saturation
|
0.8 percentage of oxygen
Standard Deviation 2.13
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Everolimus
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Everolimus
n=24 participants at risk
All patients received a starting dose of everolimus 2.5mg/day for 4 weeks, followed by a dose of 5 mg/day for 4 weeks and finally a dose of 10mg/day for 18 weeks. The 26 week treatment period was followed by an optional extension period wherein patients continued therapy until the last patient had completed 26-weeks of treatment. The longest period a patient participated in the study was 62 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
4.2%
1/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericarditis
|
4.2%
1/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
4.2%
1/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
4.2%
1/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
4.2%
1/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
4.2%
1/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumocystis jiroveci infection
|
4.2%
1/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
4.2%
1/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
4.2%
1/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
4.2%
1/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Everolimus
n=24 participants at risk
All patients received a starting dose of everolimus 2.5mg/day for 4 weeks, followed by a dose of 5 mg/day for 4 weeks and finally a dose of 10mg/day for 18 weeks. The 26 week treatment period was followed by an optional extension period wherein patients continued therapy until the last patient had completed 26-weeks of treatment. The longest period a patient participated in the study was 62 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Aphthous stomatitis
|
20.8%
5/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
29.2%
7/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
|
12.5%
3/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth ulceration
|
45.8%
11/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
29.2%
7/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
29.2%
7/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
16.7%
4/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
29.2%
7/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
20.8%
5/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
25.0%
6/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ear infection
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Furuncle
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
16.7%
4/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
12.5%
3/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Vulvovaginal mycotic infection
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post-traumatic pain
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
12.5%
3/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercholesterolaemia
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
16.7%
4/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Flank pain
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
12.5%
3/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
37.5%
9/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
12.5%
3/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Dysmenorrhoea
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Menorrhagia
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Menometorrhagia
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Pelvic pain
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
29.2%
7/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
16.7%
4/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
29.2%
7/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper-airway cough syndrome
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
|
20.8%
5/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
12.5%
3/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
12.5%
3/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
8.3%
2/24
Safety set includes all the patients who had received at least one dose of study drug.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (i.e., data from all sites) in the clinical trial or disclosure of trial results in their entirety.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER