Effect of Surgeon Volume on Outcome of Pancreaticoduodenectomy
NCT ID: NCT01059097
Last Updated: 2010-01-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
610 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2001-08-31
2010-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Summary Background Data: The impact of surgeon volume on PD outcome is still controversial. So far, data available are from retrospective multi-institutional reviews, considering in-hospital mortality as the only outcome variable.
Methods: Prospectively collected data on 610 patients who underwent PD from August 2001 to August 2009 were analyzed. Cut-off value to categorize high and low-volume surgeons (HVS and LVS, respectively) was 18 PD/year. Primary endpoint was operative mortality (death within 30-day post-discharge). Secondary endpoints were morbidity, pancreatic fistula (PF) and length of stay. Demographic, clinical, and surgical variables were recorded.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
High volume surgeons
high volume surgeons performed at least 18 PD/year.
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Low volume surgeons
low volume surgeons performed less than 18 PD/year.
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
San Raffaele University
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marco Braga, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
San Raffaele University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
San Raffaele Scientific Institute
Milan, MI, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Balzano G, Zerbi A, Braga M, Rocchetti S, Beneduce AA, Di Carlo V. Fast-track recovery programme after pancreatico- duodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying. Br J Surg. 2008 Nov;95(11):1387-93. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6324.
Balzano G, Zerbi A, Capretti G, Rocchetti S, Capitanio V, Di Carlo V. Effect of hospital volume on outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy in Italy. Br J Surg. 2008 Mar;95(3):357-62. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5982.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PANCREAS2010
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id