Comparison of Low Yield Cigarettes in African Americans vs. Whites

NCT ID: NCT01058876

Last Updated: 2013-05-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

43 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-12-31

Study Completion Date

2013-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators' general hypothesis is that African-Americans (AAs) smoke more for positive reinforcement from nicotine with a "peak-seeking" pattern of smoking (smoking individual cigarettes more intensively with greater intake of nicotine and tobacco smoke toxins), while whites smoke more for negative reinforcement with a "trough-maintaining" pattern (avoiding withdrawal by maintaining more consistent nicotine levels throughout the day by means of a more regular smoking pattern). We, the investigators, believe that these patterns are linked to identifiable racial differences in nicotine pharmacology.

For this study we hypothesize that if AAs behave more like nicotine "peak-seeker" while whites behave more like nicotine "trough-maintainers", that AAs will respond to switching from regular to low nicotine yield commercial cigarettes by smoking each cigarette relatively more intensively with a relatively smaller increase in daily cigarette consumption (cigarettes per day or CPD) as compared to whites.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Several lines of evidence indicate that AAs are more highly addicted to cigarette smoking than are whites. AAs are more likely to smoke their first cigarette within 10 minutes of awakening, an indicator of the severity of the dependence. They are more likely to want to quit smoking and are more likely to try to quit (attempts lasting at least 24 hours, but are significantly less likely than whites to be successful abstainers at one year. The quit ratio (former smokers/ever smokers) was recently reported to be 37.3% in AAs compared to 51% for whites (2).

NICOTINE REGULATION IN AAS AND WHITES: In general smokers regulate (titrate) their smoking to take in about the same amount of nicotine from day to day. This behavior is well demonstrated in studies of smokers smoking commercial cigarettes of differing yields, showing that smokers take in similar amounts of nicotine from high- and low-yield cigarettes. NCI MONOGRAPH 13 summarized the data on nicotine and low yield cigarettes and concluded that low yield cigarettes presented the same health risks as high yield cigarettes (12). However, most or all of the research on nicotine titration appears to have been done primarily in white smokers.

We believe that nicotine titration patterns will differ in AAs compared to whites, based on the hypothesis that AAs smoke more for the positive reinforcing effects of individual cigarettes, while whites smoke more to maintain a consistent level of nicotine. We predict that the response to switching from regular to low yield cigarettes in AAs will differ in that they will try to take in more nicotine per cigarette by smoking more intensively, but will be less likely to try to regulate their total daily intake of nicotine compared to whites.

Melanin: A recent study (14) showed that levels of facultative melanin (includes both genetically and exposure influenced melanin) in the skin are significantly and positively related to cigarettes per day, the Fagerstrom score, and cotinine levels. By measuring melanin levels in our own study subjects, we will be able to determine if there is a relationship between melanin levels and nicotine pharmacokinetics.

This is a non-randomized, non-blinded, two treatment arm crossover study with an oral nicotine and cotinine pharmacokinetic study. Cigarettes will be supplied for both treatment arms and subjects will smoke ad libitum. During the first arm, the subject will smoke their "usual" cigarettes and also undergo an oral pharmacokinetics protocol. During the second arm, subjects will smoke a commercial cigarette with a machine-determined nicotine yield of approximately 50% of their "usual" brand.

Blood and urine samples will be collected throughout the study and analyzed by our usual methods.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cigarette Smoking

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Usual Cigarette

African American and White Smokers will smoke their usual cigarette and also undergo an oral pharmacokinetics protocol after administration of 3 mg deuteriumlabeled nicotine and 5 mg deuterium-labeled cotinine.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Deuterated nicotine and cotinine

Intervention Type DRUG

used as a marker for pharmacokinetic studies

Low-yield Cigarette

African American and White smokers will smoke a commercial cigarette with a machine-determined nicotine yield of approximately 50% of their "usual" brand.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Deuterated nicotine and cotinine

Intervention Type DRUG

used as a marker for pharmacokinetic studies

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Deuterated nicotine and cotinine

used as a marker for pharmacokinetic studies

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Sex: male or female (balanced numbers)
* Age: 18- 65
* Race/ethnicity: African-American or White (based on two parents who self- identify as AA or White, respectively)
* Smoking Status: Current daily smoker of at least 10 cigarettes per day; either menthol or non-menthol. Screening saliva cotinine level of \> 100 ng/ml.

Healthy by history and assessment of vital signs.

Exclusion Criteria

* Evidence of cardiac disease by history
* Recent or current history of asthma or severe allergic rhinitis
* Hypertension (blood pressure \[BP\] \>140/90 at screening after 5 min rest)
* Serious medical or psychiatric condition or other condition requiring regular medication use
* Lack of access to a refrigerator to store saliva specimens collected at home
* Morbid obesity (body mass index \[BMI\]\>35)
* Current illicit drug use by history and tox screen (however subjects using marijuana may be included if they are not daily users and will agree to abstain from the time of screening until the end of the study)
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
* Significant history of fainting, "bad veins", discomfort with blood draws
* Current or recent alcohol or drug abuse
* Inability to speak English/read forms or aversion to filling out forms
* Multiple or unexplained "no shows" for screening/study visits or other noncompliance with study procedures
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, San Francisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Neal L Benowitz, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Francisco

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco General Hospital

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NIDA DA002277

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

10-00158

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.