Trial Outcomes & Findings for Post-Market Randomized Trial: Endoscopically- Guided Ablation vs. Radiofrequency Ablation (NCT NCT01057394)

NCT ID: NCT01057394

Last Updated: 2016-08-01

Results Overview

Number of initially isolated pulmonary veins that remain isolated at a 3 month remapping. The unit of measure is treated pulmonary veins (PVs).

Recruitment status

TERMINATED

Study phase

PHASE4

Target enrollment

21 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

3 Months

Results posted on

2016-08-01

Participant Flow

The Sponsor stopped the study for business reasons before any participants were enrolled in the RF arm.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Radiofrequency Ablation
Endoscopically Guided Ablation: Visually Guided Ablation using the EAS-AC Radiofrequency Ablation
Visually Guided Ablation
Endoscopically Guided Ablation: Visually Guided Ablation using the EAS-AC Radiofrequency Ablation
Overall Study
STARTED
0
21
Overall Study
COMPLETED
0
19
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
2

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Radiofrequency Ablation
Endoscopically Guided Ablation: Visually Guided Ablation using the EAS-AC Radiofrequency Ablation
Visually Guided Ablation
Endoscopically Guided Ablation: Visually Guided Ablation using the EAS-AC Radiofrequency Ablation
Overall Study
Not eligible
0
2

Baseline Characteristics

Post-Market Randomized Trial: Endoscopically- Guided Ablation vs. Radiofrequency Ablation

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Visually Guided Ablation
n=21 Participants
Endoscopically Guided Ablation: Visually Guided Ablation using the EAS-AC Radiofrequency Ablation
Age, Continuous
59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
16 participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
5 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 Months

Population: Of the 21 enrolled participants, 19 were treated participants and 17 of the 19 came back for the 3 month PV remapping and were thus evaluable for effectiveness. This resulted in 46/59 (78%) pulmonary veins being assessed for chronic isolation.

Number of initially isolated pulmonary veins that remain isolated at a 3 month remapping. The unit of measure is treated pulmonary veins (PVs).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Number of Chronically Isolated Pulmonary Veins
n=17 Participants
Rate of Permanent Pulmonary Vein Isolation of EAS-AC Compared to EAM Guided Radiofrequency Ablation
46 isolated pulmonary veins

Adverse Events

Visually Guided Ablation

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Visually Guided Ablation
n=19 participants at risk
Endoscopically Guided Ablation: Visually Guided Ablation using the EAS-AC Radiofrequency Ablation
Cardiac disorders
Pericardial effusion
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Up to 3 months after treatment
Vascular disorders
Groin bleed
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Up to 3 months after treatment

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Burke Barrett, VP, Regulatory & Clinical Affairs

CardioFocus, Inc.

Phone: 508 658-7200

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place