Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Study to Assess Whether Treatment With Mycophenolate Sodium (MPS) Allows Higher Dose Optimization Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) Leading to a Dose Reduction of Tacrolimus. Maximiza Study.

NCT ID: NCT01056822

Last Updated: 2014-12-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

89 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-05-31

Study Completion Date

2013-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Study to Assess Whether Treatment With Mycophenolate sodium (MPS) Allows Higher Dose Optimization Versus Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) Leading to a Dose Reduction of Tacrolimus. Maximiza Study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prophilaxis of Acute Rejection in Patients Receiving a Renal Allograft

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Mycophenolate mofetil

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

1

Intervention Type DRUG

Continue with same dose of MMF as patient was taking before randomisation

2

Miycophenolate sodium

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

2

Intervention Type DRUG

Increase MPS by 180mg every 12h based on investigator's judgement up to a maximum of 720 mg of MPS every 12 hours

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

1

Continue with same dose of MMF as patient was taking before randomisation

Intervention Type DRUG

2

Increase MPS by 180mg every 12h based on investigator's judgement up to a maximum of 720 mg of MPS every 12 hours

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Renal transplant recipients ≥ 1 year and ≤ 5 years prior1 to inclusion in the study.
2. Patients who were receiving an immunosuppressive regimen including MMF ≤1000 mg/day and ≥ 250 mg/day 4 and Prograf®1 or Advagraf®6 (levels ≥7 ng/ml).
3. Patients who had been receiving the current maintenance immunosuppressive regimen with stable doses of MMF for at least the past 3 months.2
4. Patients included must have had Prograf® or Advagraf® levels ≥ 7ng/ml4 for at least one month prior to inclusion in the trial.2
5. Patients with low immunological risk, in the investigator's opinion.
6. Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate based on the MDRD formula of \> 30 ml/min x 1.73 m2.1
7. Patients over 18 years of age.1
8. Patients who were able to understand the study information and give written informed consent.
9. Patients who were able to meet all study requirements, including completing questionnaires and attending study visits.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with GI symptoms known or assumed not to be caused by mycophenolic acid (MPA) treatment (e.g. oral bisphosphonate-induced infectious diarrhoea).
2. Patients with chronic inflammatory bowel disease.
3. Diabetic patients.
4. Acute rejection \< 1 month prior to inclusion in the study.
5. Patients with leukopenia (\< 3500 cells/mm3) or thrombocytopenia (\< 100,000 cells/mm3).
6. Women of childbearing potential who were planning to become pregnant, were pregnant and/or breastfeeding, or who did not wish to use effective contraception \[hormonal contraceptives (implantation, patches, oral) and double-barrier methods (any double combination of: IUD, male or female condoms with spermicidal gel, diaphragm, contraceptive sponge, cervical cap)\].
7. Presence of psychiatric illness (such as schizophrenia, major depression) that, in the investigator's opinion, could interfere with study requirements.
8. Patients who were undergoing surgery for an acute condition or who were hospitalised.
9. Any other medical condition that, in the investigator's opinion based on blood counts or chart review, could interfere with completion of the study, including but not limited to visual problems or cognitive impairment.
10. Patients who were receiving or had received any investigational medicinal product during the 30 days prior to inclusion in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Novartis Investigative Site

Granada, Andalusia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Barakaldo, Basque Country, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Santander, Cantabria, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Valladolid, Castille and León, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Toledo, Castille-La Mancha, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

A Coruña, Galicia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Pamplona, Navarre, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Alicante, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2009-014562-26

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CERL080AES08

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id