A Study to Compare Taspoglutide and Insulin Glargine in Insulin-Naïve Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled on Metformin and Sulfonylurea Combination Therapy

NCT ID: NCT01051011

Last Updated: 2016-11-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

370 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-31

Study Completion Date

2010-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized, open-label, parallel arm study will compare the safety, tolerability and effect on glycemic control of taspoglutide versus insulin glargine in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on merformin and sulfonylurea combination therapy. Patients will be randomized to receive either taspoglutide 10mg subcutaneously (sc) weekly, or taspoglutide 10mg sc weekly for 4 weeks followed by 20mg sc weekly, or insulin glargine at an initial dose of 10 international units sc daily. Metformin treatment will be continued in all patients throughout the study, whereas sulfonylurea will be discontinued before starting study treatment. Anticipated time on study treatment is 24 weeks, with an option to continue the assigned treatment for another 28 weeks. Target sample size is 500-600 patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus Type 2

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

as prescribed

taspoglutide

Intervention Type DRUG

10mg sc weekly, 24 (-52) weeks

2

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

as prescribed

taspoglutide

Intervention Type DRUG

10mg sc weekly the 1st 4 weeks followed by 20mg sc weekly, 24 (-52) weeks

3

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

insulin glargine

Intervention Type DRUG

initial dose 10 international units (IU) sc daily, titrated according to the mean FPG, 24 (-52) weeks

metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

as prescribed

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

insulin glargine

initial dose 10 international units (IU) sc daily, titrated according to the mean FPG, 24 (-52) weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

metformin

as prescribed

Intervention Type DRUG

taspoglutide

10mg sc weekly, 24 (-52) weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

taspoglutide

10mg sc weekly the 1st 4 weeks followed by 20mg sc weekly, 24 (-52) weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* adult patients, 18-75 years of age
* type 2 diabetes mellitus, treated with stable dose of metformin and sulfonylurea for \>/= 12 weeks prior to screening
* HbA1c 7-10% at screening
* body weight stable (+/-5%) for \>/= 12 weeks prior to screening
* fasting C-peptide \>/=1ng/ml
* treatment-naïve for insulin

Exclusion Criteria

* diagnosis or history of type 1 diabetes mellitus or secondary forms of diabetes
* acute metabolic diabetic complications or evidence of clinically significant diabetic complications
* clinically symptomatic gastrointestinal disease
* history of chronic pancreatitis or acute idiopathic pancreatitis
* \>3 episodes of severe hypoglycemia within 6 months prior to screening
* miocardial infarcion, unstable angina pectoris, coronary artery bypass surgery, post-transplantation cardiomyopathy or stroke within 6 months prior to screening
* any treatment with exenatide, exendin analogues, GLP-1 or its analogues
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hoffmann-La Roche

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hoffmann-La Roche

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Beijng, , China

Site Status

Chengdu, , China

Site Status

Chongqing, , China

Site Status

Guangzhou, , China

Site Status

Hangzhou, , China

Site Status

Hefei, , China

Site Status

Nanjing, , China

Site Status

Nanjing, , China

Site Status

Nanning, , China

Site Status

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Shijiazhuang, , China

Site Status

Tianjin, , China

Site Status

Tianjin (天津), , China

Site Status

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

George Town, , Malaysia

Site Status

Johor Bahru, , Malaysia

Site Status

Kelantan, , Malaysia

Site Status

Kuala Lumpur, , Malaysia

Site Status

Kuala Lumpur, , Malaysia

Site Status

Kuala Selangor, , Malaysia

Site Status

Putrajaya, , Malaysia

Site Status

Cebu, , Philippines

Site Status

Iloilo City, , Philippines

Site Status

Manila, , Philippines

Site Status

Manila, , Philippines

Site Status

Manila, , Philippines

Site Status

Pasig, , Philippines

Site Status

Busan, , South Korea

Site Status

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Gyeonggi-do, , South Korea

Site Status

Gyeonggi-do, , South Korea

Site Status

Gyeonggi-do, , South Korea

Site Status

Incheon, , South Korea

Site Status

Kangwon-do, , South Korea

Site Status

Kyounggi-do, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Chia-Yi City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Tainan City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taoyuan, , Taiwan

Site Status

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Chiang Mai, , Thailand

Site Status

Nakhonratchasima, , Thailand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China Hong Kong Malaysia Philippines South Korea Taiwan Thailand

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ZC22565

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id