Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of Intravenously Administered Tamiflu (Oseltamivir) in Patients Over 13 Years of Age With Influenza (NCT NCT01050257)
NCT ID: NCT01050257
Last Updated: 2013-11-01
Results Overview
Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs) as measured by the collection of AEs, vital signs, electrocardiograms and laboratory parameters. An AE was considered any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with the use of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Preexisting conditions that worsened during the study were reported as adverse events. A serious adverse event is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. On treatment = AEs that started between the day of first dose and within 2 days after the last dose. Off treatment = AEs that started more than 2 days after the last dose of study drug.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
118 participants
Up to 30 days
2013-11-01
Participant Flow
This study included a 5 day treatment period and an optional extension. Participants were considered to have completed treatment if they completed the 5-day course of treatment (IV and/or oral).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 75 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily to complete the 5 days of treatment. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 150 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily for 5 days. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir Open Label
Moderate/Severe renal impaired participants received open label oseltamivir IV or oseltamivir capsules at reduced doses for 5 days as per protocol. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug as per protocol.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
50
|
53
|
15
|
|
Overall Study
Received Treatment
|
49
|
50
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Population: Actual Dose Received
|
48
|
51
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
Intent-to-treat Infected Confirmed
|
30
|
32
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
Switched to Oral Treatment
|
28
|
31
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
39
|
40
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
11
|
13
|
7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 75 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily to complete the 5 days of treatment. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 150 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily for 5 days. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir Open Label
Moderate/Severe renal impaired participants received open label oseltamivir IV or oseltamivir capsules at reduced doses for 5 days as per protocol. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug as per protocol.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
4
|
4
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Admin/Other (did not switch to oral)
|
6
|
2
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
No reason specified
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Refused treatment/ Did not Cooperate
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Violation criteria
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Failure to return
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of Intravenously Administered Tamiflu (Oseltamivir) in Patients Over 13 Years of Age With Influenza
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg
n=50 Participants
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 75 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily to complete the 5 days of treatment. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg
n=53 Participants
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 150 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily for 5 days. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir Open Label
n=15 Participants
Moderate/Severe renal impaired participants received open label oseltamivir IV or oseltamivir capsules at reduced doses for 5 days as per protocol. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug as per protocol.
|
Total
n=118 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age Continuous
|
44.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.68 • n=5 Participants
|
44.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.09 • n=7 Participants
|
66.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.28 • n=5 Participants
|
47.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.93 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 30 daysPopulation: Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs) as measured by the collection of AEs, vital signs, electrocardiograms and laboratory parameters. An AE was considered any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with the use of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Preexisting conditions that worsened during the study were reported as adverse events. A serious adverse event is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. On treatment = AEs that started between the day of first dose and within 2 days after the last dose. Off treatment = AEs that started more than 2 days after the last dose of study drug.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg
n=48 Participants
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 75 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily to complete the 5 days of treatment. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg
n=51 Participants
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 150 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily for 5 days. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir Open Label
n=14 Participants
Moderate/Severe renal impaired participants received open label oseltamivir IV or oseltamivir capsules at reduced doses for 5 days as per protocol. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug as per protocol.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events(SAEs, AEs Leading to Withdrawal, and Death
AEs on treatment: IV dose
|
24 Partipants
|
27 Partipants
|
11 Partipants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events(SAEs, AEs Leading to Withdrawal, and Death
AEs on treatment: Oral dose
|
10 Partipants
|
9 Partipants
|
4 Partipants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events(SAEs, AEs Leading to Withdrawal, and Death
AEs off treatment
|
13 Partipants
|
13 Partipants
|
5 Partipants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events(SAEs, AEs Leading to Withdrawal, and Death
SAEs on treatment: IV dose
|
3 Partipants
|
4 Partipants
|
2 Partipants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events(SAEs, AEs Leading to Withdrawal, and Death
SAEs on treatment: Oral dose
|
2 Partipants
|
0 Partipants
|
2 Partipants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events(SAEs, AEs Leading to Withdrawal, and Death
SAEs off treatment
|
5 Partipants
|
1 Partipants
|
3 Partipants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events(SAEs, AEs Leading to Withdrawal, and Death
AEs leading to withdrawal on treatment: IV dosing
|
3 Partipants
|
3 Partipants
|
2 Partipants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events(SAEs, AEs Leading to Withdrawal, and Death
AEs leading to withdrawal on treatment: Oral dose
|
1 Partipants
|
1 Partipants
|
1 Partipants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events(SAEs, AEs Leading to Withdrawal, and Death
AEs leading to withdrawal off treatment
|
0 Partipants
|
0 Partipants
|
0 Partipants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events(SAEs, AEs Leading to Withdrawal, and Death
Death
|
1 Partipants
|
1 Partipants
|
3 Partipants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 3Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 4, 6, 11, 15 and 30Population: Intent-to-Treat Infected population included all treated participants who had confirmed influenza infection by culture or RT-PCR.
Nasal and throat swabs were collected on Days 1, 4, 6, 11, 15, and 30 and were sent to a central laboratory for analysis. The presence of viral shedding was determined by a positive culture \[log10 median tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) \> 0.5) or detection by RT-PCR (log 10 copies/mL).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg
n=30 Participants
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 75 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily to complete the 5 days of treatment. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg
n=32 Participants
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 150 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily for 5 days. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir Open Label
n=10 Participants
Moderate/Severe renal impaired participants received open label oseltamivir IV or oseltamivir capsules at reduced doses for 5 days as per protocol. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug as per protocol.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Viral Shedding by Culture or RT-PCR
Day 1 (n=29, 30, 10)
|
90 Percentage of participants
|
97 Percentage of participants
|
90 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Viral Shedding by Culture or RT-PCR
Day 4 (n=28, 28, 10)
|
64 Percentage of participants
|
75 Percentage of participants
|
60 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Viral Shedding by Culture or RT-PCR
Day 6 (n=22, 28, 8)
|
41 Percentage of participants
|
36 Percentage of participants
|
63 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Viral Shedding by Culture or RT-PCR
Day 11 (n=22, 26, 8)
|
9 Percentage of participants
|
15 Percentage of participants
|
13 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Viral Shedding by Culture or RT-PCR
Day 15 (n=17, 24, 7)
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
8 Percentage of participants
|
14 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Viral Shedding by Culture or RT-PCR
Day 30 (n=22, 28, 6)
|
5 Percentage of participants
|
4 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 4, 6, 11, 15, 30Population: Intent-to-Treat Infected population included all treated participants who had confirmed influenza infection by culture or RT-PCR.
Nasal and throat swabs were collected on Days 1, 4, 6, 11, 15, and 30 and were sent to a central laboratory for analysis. The presence of viral shedding was determined by a positive culture=log10 median tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) \> 0.5.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg
n=30 Participants
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 75 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily to complete the 5 days of treatment. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg
n=32 Participants
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 150 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily for 5 days. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir Open Label
n=10 Participants
Moderate/Severe renal impaired participants received open label oseltamivir IV or oseltamivir capsules at reduced doses for 5 days as per protocol. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug as per protocol.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Viral Shedding by Culture
Day 1 (n=29, 30, 10)
|
76 Percentage of participants
|
80 Percentage of participants
|
90 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Viral Shedding by Culture
Day 4 (n=28, 28, 10)
|
14 Percentage of participants
|
29 Percentage of participants
|
30 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Viral Shedding by Culture
Day 6 (n=22, 28, 8)
|
5 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Viral Shedding by Culture
Day 11 (n=22, 26, 8)
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
4 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Viral Shedding by Culture
Day 15 (n=17, 24, 7)
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
4 Percentage of participants
|
14 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Viral Shedding by Culture
Day 30 (n=22, 28, 6)
|
5 Percentage of participants
|
4 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 4, 6, 11, 15 and 30Population: Intent-to-Treat Infected population included all treated participants who had confirmed influenza infection by culture or RT-PCR.
Nasal and throat swabs were collected on Days 1, 4, 6, 11, 15, and 30 and were sent to a central laboratory for analysis. The presence of viral shedding was determined by detection by RT-PCR (log 10 copies/mL).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg
n=30 Participants
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 75 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily to complete the 5 days of treatment. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg
n=32 Participants
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 150 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily for 5 days. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir Open Label
n=10 Participants
Moderate/Severe renal impaired participants received open label oseltamivir IV or oseltamivir capsules at reduced doses for 5 days as per protocol. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug as per protocol.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Viral Shedding by Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)
Day 15 (n=17, 24, 7)
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
4 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Viral Shedding by Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)
Day 1 (n=29, 30, 10)
|
86 Percentage of participants
|
93 Percentage of participants
|
90 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Viral Shedding by Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)
Day 4 (n=28, 28, 10)
|
64 Percentage of participants
|
71 Percentage of participants
|
60 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Viral Shedding by Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)
Day 6 (n=22, 28, 8)
|
41 Percentage of participants
|
36 Percentage of participants
|
63 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Viral Shedding by Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)
Day 11 (n=22, 26, 8)
|
9 Percentage of participants
|
12 Percentage of participants
|
13 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Viral Shedding by Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)
Day 30 (n=22, 28, 6)
|
5 Percentage of participants
|
4 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 4Population: Participants from the Intent-to-treat Influenza Infected population with data available for analysis. Only participants with positive influenza results are included.
Nasal and throat swabs collected at Baseline and Day 4 were sent to a laboratory for analysis. Viral influenza titer (amount of virus present) was determined by culture. A log 10 median tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) \> 0.5= Positive culture. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement (less virus present).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg
n=4 Participants
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 75 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily to complete the 5 days of treatment. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg
n=8 Participants
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 150 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily for 5 days. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir Open Label
n=3 Participants
Moderate/Severe renal impaired participants received open label oseltamivir IV or oseltamivir capsules at reduced doses for 5 days as per protocol. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug as per protocol.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Influenza Titer by Culture at Day 4
|
-1.38 log10 TCID50
Standard Deviation 1.920
|
-2.19 log10 TCID50
Standard Deviation 1.186
|
-3.00 log10 TCID50
Standard Deviation 0.750
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 4Population: Participants from the Intent-to-Treat Infected population with data available for analysis. Only participants with positive influenza results are included.
Nasal and throat swabs were collected at Baseline and Day 4 and were sent to a central laboratory for analysis. Influenza Viral titers (amount of virus present) were determined by RT-PCR for Flu A and Flu B and were reported in log 10 copies/milliliter (mL). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement (less virus present).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg
n=30 Participants
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 75 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily to complete the 5 days of treatment. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg
n=32 Participants
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 150 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily for 5 days. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir Open Label
n=10 Participants
Moderate/Severe renal impaired participants received open label oseltamivir IV or oseltamivir capsules at reduced doses for 5 days as per protocol. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug as per protocol.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Influenza Titer by Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) at Day 4
Flu A (n=14, 14, 5)
|
-1.04 log 10 copies/mL
Standard Deviation 1.412
|
-1.30 log 10 copies/mL
Standard Deviation 0.883
|
-1.53 log 10 copies/mL
Standard Deviation 0.930
|
|
Change From Baseline in Influenza Titer by Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) at Day 4
Flu B (n=3, 5, 1)
|
-0.70 log 10 copies/mL
Standard Deviation 1.459
|
-1.51 log 10 copies/mL
Standard Deviation 0.262
|
-2.27 log 10 copies/mL
Standard Deviation NA
Unable to calculate standard deviation, data available for only 1 patient.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Hours 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and 108Population: Intent-to-Treat Infected population included all treated participants who had confirmed influenza infection by culture or RT-PCR.
Fever was defined as a temperature of ≥ 37.8 C (degrees Celcius).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg
n=30 Participants
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 75 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily to complete the 5 days of treatment. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg
n=32 Participants
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 150 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily for 5 days. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir Open Label
n=10 Participants
Moderate/Severe renal impaired participants received open label oseltamivir IV or oseltamivir capsules at reduced doses for 5 days as per protocol. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug as per protocol.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Fever During the Study
Baseline
|
23 Percentage of participants
|
19 Percentage of participants
|
20 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Fever During the Study
Hour 12
|
7 Percentage of participants
|
9 Percentage of participants
|
10 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Fever During the Study
Hour 24
|
7 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Fever During the Study
Hour 36
|
3 Percentage of participants
|
3 Percentage of participants
|
20 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Fever During the Study
Hour 48
|
3 Percentage of participants
|
6 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Fever During the Study
Hour 60
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
6 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Fever During the Study
Hour 72
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
3 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Fever During the Study
Hour 96
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
3 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Fever During the Study
Hour 108
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Fever During the Study
Hour 84
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Up to 30 DaysPopulation: Participants from the Intent-to-Treat Infected population, all treated participants with confirmed influenza infection by culture or RT-PCR, who had a fever at Baseline.
Fever was defined as a temperature of ≥ 37.8 C (degrees Celsius). Resolution of fever was a temperature ≤ 37.2 for at least 21.5 hours.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg
n=7 Participants
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 75 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily to complete the 5 days of treatment. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg
n=6 Participants
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 150 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily for 5 days. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir Open Label
n=2 Participants
Moderate/Severe renal impaired participants received open label oseltamivir IV or oseltamivir capsules at reduced doses for 5 days as per protocol. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug as per protocol.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Resolution of Fever for Participants Who Had a Fever at Baseline
|
11.8 Hours
Interval 7.8 to 43.5
|
18.6 Hours
Interval 8.4 to 66.8
|
47.7 Hours
Data available for only 1 patient (1 patient was censored).
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: Intent-to-Treat Infected population included all treated participants who had confirmed influenza infection by culture or RT-PCR.
Nasal and Throat swabs were collected on Days 1, 4, 6, 11, 15 and 30 and were sent to a central laboratory for testing. Viral resistance was determined by phenotypic and genotypic testing.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg
n=30 Participants
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 75 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily to complete the 5 days of treatment. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg
n=32 Participants
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 150 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily for 5 days. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir Open Label
n=10 Participants
Moderate/Severe renal impaired participants received open label oseltamivir IV or oseltamivir capsules at reduced doses for 5 days as per protocol. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug as per protocol.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Viral Resistance
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 11, 15, 30Population: Intent-to-Treat population included all treated participants.
Influenza (flu) symptoms were nasal congestion, sore throat, cough, aches and pains, fatigue, headache or chills.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg
n=49 Participants
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 75 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily to complete the 5 days of treatment. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg
n=50 Participants
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 150 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily for 5 days. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir Open Label
n=14 Participants
Moderate/Severe renal impaired participants received open label oseltamivir IV or oseltamivir capsules at reduced doses for 5 days as per protocol. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug as per protocol.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Influenza Symptoms
Day 1
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
93 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Influenza Symptoms
Day 11
|
63 Percentage of participants
|
64 Percentage of participants
|
79 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Influenza Symptoms
Day 15
|
51 Percentage of participants
|
44 Percentage of participants
|
64 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Influenza Symptoms
Day 30
|
33 Percentage of participants
|
26 Percentage of participants
|
64 Percentage of participants
|
Adverse Events
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg
Oseltamivir Open Label
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg
n=48 participants at risk
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 75 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily to complete the 5 days of treatment. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg
n=51 participants at risk
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 150 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily for 5 days. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir Open Label
n=14 participants at risk
Moderate/Severe renal impaired participants received open label oseltamivir IV or oseltamivir capsules at reduced doses for 5 days as per protocol. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug as per protocol.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
|
2.1%
1/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
2.1%
1/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
2.1%
1/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
2.1%
1/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
2.1%
1/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Parainfluenzae virus infection
|
2.1%
1/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
2.1%
1/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion threatened
|
2.1%
1/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus bradycardia
|
4.2%
2/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lung infection pseudomonal
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory distress
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg
n=48 participants at risk
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 100 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 75 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily to complete the 5 days of treatment. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg
n=51 participants at risk
Oseltamivir (TAMIFLU®) 200 mg intravenous (IV) infused over 2 hours, two times a day (every 12 hours) for 5 days. At the discretion of the investigator after 3 days of treatment (6 doses), participants could either continue IV treatment or switch to 150 mg oral oseltamivir twice daily for 5 days. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug (IV or oral) for up to 5 days.
|
Oseltamivir Open Label
n=14 participants at risk
Moderate/Severe renal impaired participants received open label oseltamivir IV or oseltamivir capsules at reduced doses for 5 days as per protocol. If necessary, after completing the 5 days of treatment, participants could receive additional treatment with study drug as per protocol.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
12.5%
6/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
6.2%
3/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.8%
4/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
4.2%
2/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
5.9%
3/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
8.3%
4/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
2.1%
1/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.8%
4/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
14.3%
2/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
2.1%
1/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
8.3%
4/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Agitation
|
2.1%
1/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Delirium
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
General disorders
Infusion site pain
|
6.2%
3/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.8%
4/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
6.2%
3/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
14.3%
2/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
6.2%
3/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
14.3%
2/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcaemia
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
14.3%
2/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular extrasystoles
|
2.1%
1/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
2.1%
1/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
14.3%
2/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Liver disorder
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
2.0%
1/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumomediastinum
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinitis allergic
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
|
Investigations
Blood magnesium decreased
|
0.00%
0/48
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
0.00%
0/51
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety population included all participants who received treatment and had at least one post-treatment safety assessment. One patient in the 100 mg group actually received 200 mg and is included in the 200 mg group for safety.
|
Additional Information
Medical Communications
Hoffman-LaRoche
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER