Pilot Study of Raltegravir Switch to Resolve Tenofovir Induced Proteinuria

NCT ID: NCT01044771

Last Updated: 2015-05-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-31

Study Completion Date

2011-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study is designed to evaluate the proportion of patients with tenofovir induced proteinuria that will resolve their proteinuria when the tenofovir containing nucleoside/nucleotide backbone is switched to a raltegravir backbone. Common HIV treatment regimens contain nucleoside/nucleotide combinations that may have long-term side effects including nephrotoxicity. Switching these backbones out for an integrase inhibitor based regimen has not been systematically evaluated.

Hypothesis: Proteinuria developing during treatment with tenofovir improves or resolves when tenofovir is switched out with raltegravir. Switching to a nuc- sparing regimen, containing raltegravir and a boosted protease inhibitor in patients without preexisting protease inhibitor mutations is safe and does not lead to virologic failure

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

As described in the brief summary, this is a pilot study to evaluate for improvements in proteinuria when switched off from Tenofovir

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV Infections Proteinuria

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

change from tenofovir to raltegravir

Single arm study:

Tenofovir containing nucleoside backbone changed over to raltegravir in all patients

Group Type OTHER

change from tenofovir to raltegravir

Intervention Type DRUG

Change of the tenofovir based nucleoside part of the HIV regimen to raltegravir, 400mg BID

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

change from tenofovir to raltegravir

Change of the tenofovir based nucleoside part of the HIV regimen to raltegravir, 400mg BID

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Isentress

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Documented HIV infection
* Ability to comply to protocol requirements
* On stable HAART for minimum of 12 weeks
* Evidence of TDF induced proteinuria
* No evidence of prior Protease inhibitor failure
* Treatment-naïve to integrase inhibitors
* VL\<200 x 12 weeks (minimum of 2 viral load measurements)

Exclusion Criteria

* Active Hepatitis B infection
* Proteinuria predating tenofovir use
* PRAMs on historic GT or PT
* Life expectancy less than 6 months
* Subjects with any ongoing AIDS defining illness
* Any condition which could compromise the safety of study subject
* Grade 3 or 4 lab abnormalities (excl. grade 3 bilirubin elevations)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Metropolis Medical

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fritz Bredeek, MD, PhD

President

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fritz Bredeek, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Metropolis Medical

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RALPIR

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.