A Randomised Trial With Irinotecan, Cetuximab and Everolimus (ICE)Compared to Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (CapOx) for Patients With Gemcitabin Resistant Pancreatic Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01042028

Last Updated: 2015-10-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

39 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is an open multicenter randomized phase I/II study. The main purpose with this study is to investigate dose and efficacy of a combination of Irinotecan, Cetuximab and Everolimus given biweekly to patients with local advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer AFTER progression from 1. line treatment with Gemcitabine.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreatic Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Phase II: Arm A

Regime A-ICE On progression or unacceptable toxicity patients can cross-over from regime A to regime B

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Everolimus, Cetuximab, Irinotecan

Intervention Type DRUG

Cetuximab 500 mg/m² iv biweekly Irinotecan 180 mg/m² iv biweekly Everolimus in daily MDT dosage

Arm B

Arm B: CapOx On progression or unacceptable toxicity patients can cross-over from regime B to regime A.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Capecitabine, Oxaliplatine

Intervention Type DRUG

Capecitabine 1250 mg/m² bid. Oxaliplatin 70 mg/m² biweekly

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Everolimus, Cetuximab, Irinotecan

Cetuximab 500 mg/m² iv biweekly Irinotecan 180 mg/m² iv biweekly Everolimus in daily MDT dosage

Intervention Type DRUG

Capecitabine, Oxaliplatine

Capecitabine 1250 mg/m² bid. Oxaliplatin 70 mg/m² biweekly

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

RAD001 Xeloda, Eloxatin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Written informed consent obtained prior to study entry?
2. Patient has histologically/cytologically proven, non-resectable or metastatic, adenocarcinoma of the pancreas?
3. Progressive disease during adjuvant chemotherapy (or within 6 month after) or progressive disease during or after first line chemotherapy?
4. Former treatment with chemotherapeutic agent containing gemcitabine?
5. Is the age of the patient ≥ 18 years?
6. Is the ECOG performance status 0-1?
7. Is the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 x 109/l?
8. Is the platelet count ≥ 75 x 109/l?
9. Is the total bilirubin ≤1.5 x UNL (upper normal limit)?
10. Patient has normal liver function? (If liver metastases are present, there is no upper limit for ALAT/SPGT/alk phosph)?
11. Creatinine clearance ≥ 30 ml/min
12. Is the patient capable of following the treatment and the plan of evaluation?

Exclusion Criteria

1. CTC Grade 3 hyperlipidaemia (\>10.34 mmol/l) in spite of treatment
2. Active former or concurrent history of malignant neoplasm, in the last 2 years?
3. Any condition or therapy which, by the investigators opinion, will expose the patient to a risk or will affect the purpose of the clinical trial?
4. Pregnant or breast feeding patient (fertile patients must use contraceptives)?
5. Infections or other serious medical conditions, which can obstruct the patient's possibility of receiving the treatment? (for instance serious heart, metabolic or lung disease)
6. Known hypersensitivity toward one or more of the parts in the treatment?
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Odense University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Aarhus University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Per Pfeiffer

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Per Pfeiffer

Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Per Pfeiffer, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Odense University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Oncology, Aarhus Hospital

Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark

Site Status

Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital

Odense, Odense, Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ICE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.