Bacterial Pneumonia Score (BPS) Guided Antibiotic Use in Children With Community Acquired Pneumonia

NCT ID: NCT01041209

Last Updated: 2016-12-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-03-31

Study Completion Date

2012-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to test if BPS (Bacterial Pneumonia Score) guided antibiotic use in children with non severe community acquired pneumonia (CAP) will reduce antibiotic use as compared to standard care practice (current guidelines for CAP).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Pneumonia is a leading cause of mortality in children. Despite more than 50% of pneumonias are due to viruses, because it is difficult to rule out bacterial etiology, initial management of pneumonia in children usually includes antibiotics, often unnecessary. In 2006 was designed and validated a clinical prediction rule (BPS: Bacterial Pneumonia Score) which accurately identifies hospitalized children's risk of bacterial pneumonia. However, BPS efficacy on guiding therapeutic decision in children with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) has not been yet assessed.

Aim: The aim of this study is to test if BPS guided antibiotic use in children with non severe community acquired pneumonia will reduce antibiotic use as compared to standard care practice (current guidelines for CAP) Design: This is a randomized, controlled, blinded trial, to assess antibiotics use regarding two methods for initial management of children aged 3-60 months with non severe community acquired pneumonia. Children will be randomly allocate to be managed according to BPS or currently enforced guidelines. Use of antibiotics (%) and clinical outcome of both groups will be compared.

Setting: Tertiary children hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Patients: Consecutive children aged 3-60 months assisted for non severe community acquired pneumonia as outpatients. Patients with wheezing, severe pneumonia, pulmonary or cardiovascular chronic disease, or antibiotic use or hospitalization in the previous two weeks will be excluded.

Endpoints:

Primary: Use of antibiotics in each group (proportion) Secondary: Treatment failure (proportion) in each group Endpoints will be assessed at baseline and after 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 days by a blinded investigator.

Intervention: Patients with CAP will be randomized (1:1) to BPS versus enforced guidelines. In the BPS group antibiotics will be indicated in patients with a BPS ≥ 4 points, while in the control group antibiotics will be indicated according to current guidelines.

Variables and measurement: Antibiotic use will be defined as initial use of any antibiotic, immediately after diagnosis. Treatment failure will be defined as persistence of fever after 2 days, or tachypnea or diminishing in respiratory rate less than 5 bpm. after 2 days, or signs of severe pneumonia or requiring or changing antibiotics at any time.

Study hypothesis: BPS antibiotic use guidance will reduce at least 20% antibiotic use, as compared to standard care practice.

Analyses: These will be done based on an intention-to-treat and a per-protocol principle. With an assumed 20% less use of antibiotics in the intervention group, a maximum of 5% losses to follow-up, a confidence of 5% and power of 90%, the total sample size is 60. This will allow detecting a difference in clinical outcome of 28%. Proportion will be compared by Chi square test.

Interim monitoring: Regular review of serious adverse events, quality and integrity of the study by an independent data safety and monitoring board. Safety interim analysis after 50% of the patients recruited.

Significance: Due to the high prevalence of CAP in children, this study will offer the potential for a substantial reduction in health costs and antibiotics resistance.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pneumonia

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Pneumonia Children

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

BPS

BPS guidance

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

In this study a strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use in children with community acquired pneumonia implementation will be compared with enforced guideline.

Guideline

Enforced guidelines

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Enforced Guidelines

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

In this study a strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use in children with community acquired pneumonia implementation will be compared with enforced guideline.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use

In this study a strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use in children with community acquired pneumonia implementation will be compared with enforced guideline.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Enforced Guidelines

In this study a strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use in children with community acquired pneumonia implementation will be compared with enforced guideline.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children aged 3-60 months assisted as outpatients for non severe community acquired pneumonia.

Exclusion Criteria

* Wheezing
* Severe pneumonia
* Pulmonary or cardiovascular chronic disease
* Antibiotic use in the previous two weeks
* Hospitalization for any reason in the previous two weeks
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fernando A Torres, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires F.D., Argentina

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Argentina

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Moreno L, Krishnan JA, Duran P, Ferrero F. Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule to distinguish bacterial from viral pneumonia in children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006 Apr;41(4):331-7. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20364.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16493666 (View on PubMed)

Ferrero F, Torres F, Noguerol E, Gonzalez N, Lonegro L, Chiolo MJ, Ossorio MF, Benguigui Y. [Evaluation of two standardized methods for chest radiographs interpretation in children with pneumonia]. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2008 Dec;106(6):510-4. doi: 10.1590/S0325-00752008000600007. Spanish.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19107303 (View on PubMed)

Torres FA, Pasarelli I, Cutri A, Ossorio MF, Ferrero F. Impact assessment of a decision rule for using antibiotics in pneumonia: a randomized trial. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014 Jul;49(7):701-6. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22849. Epub 2013 Aug 23.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24039234 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HGNPE-186

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id