Randomized Study With Midazolam for Sedation in Flexible Bronchoscopy
NCT ID: NCT01038882
Last Updated: 2009-12-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
238 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-10-31
2009-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Furthermore, there is nowadays little information with a highly obvious level about the relationship between sedation and the patient´s satisfaction with the FB.
Midazolam is one of the most commonly used sedatives at the beginning for its rapid onset property and brief duration of action with sedatives, anxiolytics and amnesia properties.
The principal aim of our study is to analyse if the use of a local anaesthetic with midazolam whilst performing an FB improves the quality of examination in terms of tolerance for the patient. It would also be of interest to know if there is an improvement in the acceptance of a second or further FB and if this improves the satisfaction of the Bronchoscopist as far as the examination performed is concerned.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A randomized, prospective study has been carried out; double blind and controlled with placebo to be treated with midazolam. This included 152 patients, randomized into two groups: Group A - 79(51.9%) patients which received midazolam before the FB, and Group B - (49.1%) patients which received placebo. The patients were given a questionaire of 13 questions about different aspects of perception of the procedure after the respiratory endoscopy and another was given to the Bronchoscopist.
RESULTS:
Both groups started off with a similar assessment of fear and nervousness before the FB. Nevertheless, Group A gave a much higher score than Group B referring to variables related to symptoms and feeling. The patients´ cooperation was assessed by the Bronchoscopist in a similar way in both groups, although the length of the procedure and difficulty was higher in the group treated with placebo (Group B).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Midazolam
The patients of this arma receives midazolam before the flexible bronchoscopy to maintain conscious sedation
Midazolam
Sedation started by injecting a 4 ml drug bolus with midazolam (0.07-0.1 mg/kg dose). Supplemental doses of midazolam (2 mg) were administrated at an interval of \>2 min to maintain conscious sedation
Physiological serum
Physiological serum
We started by injecting a 4 ml drug bolus and we ad supplemental doses (2 ml) to maintain the conscious sedation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Midazolam
Sedation started by injecting a 4 ml drug bolus with midazolam (0.07-0.1 mg/kg dose). Supplemental doses of midazolam (2 mg) were administrated at an interval of \>2 min to maintain conscious sedation
Physiological serum
We started by injecting a 4 ml drug bolus and we ad supplemental doses (2 ml) to maintain the conscious sedation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) class of risk I to III
Exclusion Criteria
* Psychological disorders
* Hypersensitivity to benzodiazepine
* Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (FEV1 \< 50% predicted value, requirement for oxygen therapy
* Unstable haemodynamic status (defined as a heart rate \< 60 or \> 120 and/or a systolic blood pressure \< 100 or \> 180 mmHG)
* Sings of systemic or pulmonary infection
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Universitario La Fe
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
GENERALIDAD VALENCIANA. AGENCIA VALENCIANA DE SALUD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
ENRIQUE CASES-VIEDMA, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
AGENCIA VALENCIANA DE SALUD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Universaitario La Fe
Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
González R, De-La-Rosa-Ramírez, Maldonado-Hernández A, Domínguez-Cherit G. Should patients undergoing a bronchoscopy be sedated? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003; 47: 411-5. Pérez Negrin LM, Batista Martín JJ, Acosta Fernández O, Trujillo Castilla JL, Gonzalvo Hernández F. Subjetive tolerance to flexible bronchoscopy. Journal of Bronchology 2001; 8: 166-9. Ruiz López FJ, Valdivia Salas MM, Latour Pérez J, Ros Lucas LA, Fernández Suarez B, Sánchez Gascón F, Lorenzo Cruz M. Flexible bronchoscopy with only topical anesthesia. J Bronchol 2006; 13: 54-7. Stolz D, Prashant NC, Leuppi J, Pflimlin E, Tamm M. Nebulized lidocaine for flexible bronchoscopy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Chest 2005; 128: 1756-60. Honeybourne D, Babb J, Bowie P, Brewin A, Fraise A, Garrard C, Harvey J, Lewis R, Neumann C, Wathen CG, Williams T. British Thoracic Society guidelines on diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy. Thorax 2001; 56:(suppl I) i1-i21. Houghton CM, Raghuram A, Sullivan PJ, O´Driscoll R. Pre-medication for bronchoscopy: a randomised double blind trial comparing alfetanil with midazolam. Respir Med 2004; 98: 1102-7. Clark G, Licker M, Younossian AB, Soccal PM, Frey JG, Rochat T, Diaper J, Bridevaux PO, Tschopp JM. Titrated sedation with propofol or midazolam for flexible bronchoscopy: a randomised trial. Eur Respir J. 2009; 34: 1277-83. Stolz D, Kurer G, Meyer A, Chhajed PN, Pflimlin E, Strobel W, Tamm M. Propofol versus combined sedation in flexible bronchoscopy: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Eur Respir J. 2009; 34: 1024-30. Stolz D, Chhajed PN, Leuppi JD, Brutsche M, Pflimlin E, Tamm M. Cough suppression during flexible bronchoscopy using combined sedation with midazolam an hydrocodone: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial. Thorax 2004; 59: 773-6. Chhajed PN, Wallner J, Stolz D, Baty F, Strobel W, Brutsche MH, Tamm M. Sedative drug requirements during flexible bronchoscopy. Respiration 2005; 72: 617-21.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HLaFe 324/08
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id